Patrick J Soule Music

They Don't See The Lines Yet Some lines are drawn long before anyone realizes they exist. A short visual from my song They Dont See The Lines Yet. Full song on SoundCloud. Patrick J Soule #NewMusic #IndieMusic #Songwriter #OriginalMusic #SoundCloud #PatrickJSoule #AmericanaMusic #StorySong

That is a very rare find these days is what that is. It was originally used to pluck individual nostril hairs, some times pinching more than one. Because of the pain induced by accidentally plucking multiple nose hairs, the FDA and FTC, in a joint operation, forced a recall of the product. People inhaled deeply with that news.

What the Heck is it? Hmm 😒 🤔?¿

@FreckledLiberty True. Lady on the left, no delay because of make-up, no "can't do it, my mascara will run", no stained white shirts of your's when you hug. Lady on the right, not so much.

men, is this true? 🧐

@lady_valor_07 4, 5, 8.

Which 3 are you picking?

IF... this is true, taking on an international organization, linked to organized crime world wide, of, usually amicable men, bikers who will brook no umbrage from anyone, including antifa. They can find virtually anyone, will tear your antifa mask off and force you to give up your "friends". Do, yeah, antifa, do that.

this should be fun to watch... and you say?

@sappholives83 Bring back "Insane Asylums". WOW. There is no helping some people.

This peaked me more than any other single incident. The man pictured, “Gabrielle” Darone, spent 9 months simulating a pregnancy, including feigned morning sickness and the wearing of a fake belly, with the intention of play-acting the loss of the imaginary baby. He also joined a support group for grieving mothers who had lost children, seeking validation and “support” for his planned “stillbirth.” He even went so far as to rent a machine that simulated contractions, and bought a plastic “baby” which he inserted into his rectum and then “gave birth to.” Afterwards, he took two weeks off from work to “grieve.” Women who objected to his presence in the group - women who had actually lost children - were kicked out so that this man could feel supported in his game of ‘let’s pretend.’ Their very real grief was considered less important than this man’s sexual fantasies. To top it all off, he did all of this in the house he still shared with his unconsenting soon-to-be-ex-wife and their minor children. He even roped his 7 year old into taking “maternity pictures.” Mr. Darone also convinced his doctors to provide him with drugs to induce lactation. He asked the members of an online breastfeeding group he’d joined if any of them would be willing to let him “breastfeed” - that is, sexually assault - their babies, and attempted to donate the chemical-laced sludge he pumped out of his moobs to “other mothers.” These men have proven over and over again that there is no aspect of women’s pain that they will not twist into a prop for their sickening deviancy, from rape to oppression to sexual objectification. Even the loss of a child in the womb is fair game to them: a perverted, selfish, hyper-sexualized game of make-believe that must always take priority over the real pain and real needs of real women.

The Anchormen Show EP 115 - Stop Paying Your Taxes? w/ Peymon Mottahedeh x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

Well, the government consistently can not produce the law requiring the paying of an income tax, for those who are not federal employees. The get people on civil matters, or get convictions regardless of not being able to produce the law and definitions that explain the law. Something about prosecutorial misconduct and judiciary collusion.

@RealJamesWoods Wanna bet? ;)

Honey Trap Swalwell fell for the oldest espionage trick with a Chinese spy, and now wants to be your governor. Even Democrats aren’t that stupid.

@justice_Tyr22 @ClaudesBBQ I am suspicious of the "publication date". So is Grok, who says it's a hoax.

Commies gonna commie @ClaudesBBQ

@GuntherEagleman Useless breather.

Meet Ketanji Brown Jackson, the dumbest Supreme Court judge in history. A DEI appointee.

@Rainmaker1973 We've already determined that the particles currently being injected into our skies, to allegedly induce cooling, is harmful to humans and our food supply. You want to inject something else? SO2 did you say? Oh, I'm sure that'll never harm people or crops, right? Right? Right?

Existing aircraft like the Boeing 777 could be used to help cool the planet. A new modeling study from University College London suggests that stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) — a form of solar geoengineering — could be carried out using modified commercial jets, such as the Boeing 777F freighter, without needing to build expensive, specialized high-altitude aircraft. The technique mimics the cooling effect of large volcanic eruptions by releasing sulfur dioxide into the upper atmosphere. Once released, it forms tiny reflective particles (aerosols) that scatter sunlight back into space, reducing the amount of heat reaching Earth’s surface. Traditionally, SAI was thought to require flights above 65,000 feet (20 km) in the tropics. However, researchers found that injecting particles at a lower altitude of about 43,000 feet (13 km) over the polar regions (around 60°N and 60°S) could still achieve meaningful cooling. This altitude is within reach of existing wide-body jets like the Boeing 777 after modifications. According to the simulations, releasing approximately 12 million metric tons (about 13 million US tons) of sulfur dioxide per year — primarily during spring and summer in each hemisphere — could lower global temperatures by roughly 0.6°C (about 1.1°F), similar to the temporary cooling caused by the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption. ["Geoengineering technique could cool planet using existing aircraft." UCL]

@DavefromEpping @lippyent "That's funny right there."

@lippyent this.... 😊

Hmm 😒 🤔?¿

@lippyent Pineapple, fresh ground black pepper, and salt to taste.

The Framers may have a disagreement with your analysis. Let's see what SCOTUS says, shall we? If SCOTUS comes back with a finding that happens to align with the current progressive agenda, progressives will be ecstatic. However, should SCOTUS come back with a finding that is repugnant to progressives, you will never hear the end of the feigned outrage, missing and moaning. Progressives will probably institute violence in our cities, paid for by other progressive rich people. I'm just sayin'.

Go with me for a second on the birthright citizenship scenario — simple version. You’re saying citizenship should depend on whether someone is here “legally.” Okay. Who defines “legal”? Congress. And Congress can change that definition anytime. Now fast forward 25–30 years. A different political wave takes over, not your side. Let’s say a very aggressive left-wing government. They decide certain groups are a “problem” or “historically harmful” or “overrepresented.” So they pass a law redefining “legal presence.” Not by geography. Not by birth. By criteria like: — ideology — ancestry — demographic quotas — “equity” frameworks Sounds crazy but we’ve literally done versions of this before, go see the Chinese Exclusion Act. Now under YOUR framework: Only people who meet this new definition of “legal” are considered fully “subject to jurisdiction.” Everyone else are not legal therefore not covered so their kids don’t get citizenship. So you now have: A child born in the U.S. Grew up here Never left Knows no other country But not a citizen… because Congress changed a definition of what legal means. Nothing about the child changed. Only politics did. That’s the entire problem with your argument. You’re turning citizenship from a constitutional guarantee into a policy lever. And policy levers get pulled. The 14th Amendment was written specifically to stop that, to make citizenship automatic at birth so it couldn’t be manipulated by whoever happens to be in power. Because once you let Congress define “who counts,” you’re not protecting citizenship anymore even for yourself.

Deutschland plant, das Braunkohle-Tagebau Hambach um 2030 zu fluten und über 1,1 Milliarden Tonnen förderbare heimische Braunkohle unter einem 360 Meter tiefen Freizeitsee aus Rheinwasser dauerhaft zu versenken. Vorteile: • Landschaftsrenaturierung: Der erschöpfte Tagebau wird zu einem großen See (lang geplante Rekultivierung). • Klimaschutz: Vermeidung hoher CO₂-Emissionen durch Braunkohle, den schmutzigsten fossilen Brennstoff. • Erneuerbare decken bereits ~56–58 % des Stroms (Wind von Enercon/Nordex/Vestas; Solar größtenteils aus China). Windanlagen gleichen ihren gesamten CO₂-Fußabdruck (Herstellung, Transport, Installation, Wartung) in ca. 6 Monaten aus; Solar in 1–2 Jahren. Nachteile: • Verzicht auf günstige, zuverlässige heimische Grundlast – bei Großhandelspreisen von ~89 €/MWh im Jahr 2025 (+14 % zum Vorjahr). • Stärkere Abhängigkeit von wetterabhängigen Erneuerbaren plus importiertem Gas (Norwegen/US-LNG), ohne neue Kernkraft und mit Netz- und Versorgungsproblemen. • Kurzfristige Belastung für Energiepreise und Unabhängigkeit. Die Entscheidung opfert kurzfristige Versorgungssicherheit und günstige Preise für langfristige Dekarbonisierung und Renaturierung. Politiker debattieren bereits Verzögerungen beim Kohleausstieg im Westen bis 2030. Lohnt sich das? #Hambach #Energiewende #GermanyEnergy

Germany plans to flood the Hambach open-pit lignite mine around 2030, permanently burying over 1.1 billion tonnes of producible domestic coal under a 360 m deep recreational lake fed by Rhine water. Pros: • Restores the exhausted pit into a large lake (long-planned reclamation). • Reduces high-CO₂ emissions from lignite, the dirtiest fossil fuel. • Renewables already cover ~56–58% of electricity (wind from Enercon/Nordex/Vestas; solar mostly from China). Wind offsets its full lifecycle carbon footprint in ~6 months; solar in 1–2 years. Cons: • Forgoes cheap, reliable domestic baseload energy while wholesale prices averaged ~€89/MWh in 2025 (up ~14% y-o-y). • Increases dependence on variable renewables + imported gas (Norway/US LNG), with no new nuclear and grid/security challenges. • Short-term hits to affordability and energy self-sufficiency. This decision trades immediate security and lower costs for long-term decarbonization and restoration. Policymakers are debating delays to the 2030 western coal exit. Worth it? #Hambach #Energiewende #GermanyEnergy

Germany plans to flood the Hambach open-pit lignite mine around 2030, permanently burying over 1.1 billion tonnes of producible domestic coal under a 360 m deep recreational lake fed by Rhine water. Pros: • Restores the exhausted pit into a large lake (long-planned reclamation). • Reduces high-CO₂ emissions from lignite, the dirtiest fossil fuel. • Renewables already cover ~56–58% of electricity (wind from Enercon/Nordex/Vestas; solar mostly from China). Wind offsets its full lifecycle carbon footprint in ~6 months; solar in 1–2 years. Cons: • Forgoes cheap, reliable domestic baseload energy while wholesale prices averaged ~€89/MWh in 2025 (up ~14% y-o-y). • Increases dependence on variable renewables + imported gas (Norway/US LNG), with no new nuclear and grid/security challenges. • Short-term hits to affordability and energy self-sufficiency. This decision trades immediate security and lower costs for long-term decarbonization and restoration. Policymakers are debating delays to the 2030 western coal exit. Worth it? #Hambach #Energiewende #GermanyEnergy

Germany's largest open-pit mine sits on more than 1 billion tonnes of extractable lignite. But starting in 2030, Rhine water will flood the pit, creating a 360-metre-deep lake. It's not a coincidence that the state's environmental ministry where the mine is located (Nordrhein-Westfalen) is led by the Green party. The same political class that dynamited functioning nuclear cooling towers is now drowning a billion tonnes of domestic fuel under a recreational lake. Once the pit fills, the coal beneath becomes permanently inaccessible. No future government can reverse a 360-metre column of water. The decision to flood Hambach is the deliberate, irreversible destruction of a strategic reserve, executed by politicians who price energy security at zero.

@BarackObama ANY... candidate endorsed by Mr. Obama, a fraud, is not a candidate you want for America's betterment.

Wisconsin Supreme Court justices have a profound responsibility: protecting the rights of the people and delivering on the promise of equal justice under the law. Judge Chris Taylor is the only candidate running for Wisconsin’s Supreme Court with a proven record of delivering on that promise. I hope Wisconsin voters join me in supporting her candidacy for Wisconsin’s highest court. Election Day is April 7th — make your plan to vote now. myvote.wi.gov/en-us/

@Matt_Pinner 18/20

I got 6 points,YOU?

@lippyent We used them as paper weights in the 60's and 70's. They are insulators for telephone poles running electrical lines. It was a crime to shoot them off the pole.

What the Heck is it? Hmm 😒 🤔?¿