Plotinuz

@Iromg I assume you know the terms filter bubble and containment. In 4 months Restore have overcome both and gotten 7% of the votes, come in as third in an election that was all about labour crowning a challenger to the current prime minister. If momentum keeps building….

Droning on, when will he realise only 6% are listening. Plank

@perkg Vi gjorde det. GenX gjorde det. Vet du om mange i Norge?

Tenker at alle disse som hyler og skriker over at noen barnehage barn går å vifter litt med noen fargerike flagg og spiser is heller kan ta ett oppgjør med de konservative kristne som skremmer livskiten ut av sine egne barn!

2-6% av menn of 1-2% kvinner er født homofile. Som del av gen x var jeg med på å tvinge frem at de skulle få lov til å leve sine liv i fred. Lev og la leve. Hva skjer? Bevegelsen blir kuppet av mentalt lidende mennesker og a ekshibisjonistiske ekstremister. Og får den bibelhyttende kragepresten med ild i blikket til å se ut som rasjonalitetens yppersteprest. Grunnleggeren av Pride ble jaget fra sin egen demonstrasjon. Marxistene tok over i en uhellig allianse med Islam. Og de går rundt og sier: «Ikke tro på dine lyvende øyne, og bekreft min lidelse som universets sannhet». Og hvis vi sier «du kan tro hva du vil, men du kan ikke tvinge meg til å bekrefte det du tror på», så er vi ondskapen selv. Vil vi beskytte barn, er vi ondskapen selv. Sier vi: Lev og la leve, er vi ondskapen selv. Nå sier vi nok. Og det er ingenting dere kan gjøre med det. Fordi dere er totalt 5%. Og av de 5% er majoriteten der også på vei ut. Sayanora. Det var en generasjonell feil å åpne skapet og slippe de ut.

Anti-Pride ekstremistene skaper splittelse i skolen

Its called a filter bubble. Look it up or ask your AI to explain it. To create momentum you need to overcome your filter bubble that “contains” you. To create change you need to pierce the filter bubble of others at scale. What this means is that Restore have a massive momentum. Think about it. A 4 month old party managed to get 7% of the vote in an area that has been labour for a generation. Where staunch labor voters knowingly vote in a leadership challenger to the ruling prime minister. Maybe they feel that this is the last chance of a multigenerational labour loyalist to change course. And still Restore got 7%. Fascinating.

If we needed anymore evidence that much of what we see on X is fake, these are the Makerfield by election results: LABOUR: 24,937 REFORM: 15,696 RESTORE: 3,111 CONSERVATIVES: 997 GREEN: 308 Rupert Lowe has over 850,000 "followers" on X - one of the most of any British political figure, all his posts are highly botted with 10,000s of likes. His party barely scraped 3000 votes and have never come close to winning a seat. Not even Rupert's own seat was won as part of Restore. Faking engagement to convince people of popularity in the manner he does is election fraud. It is also incredibly likely all this is foreign funded, and undeclared - again, election fraud. So much of what you read on X about UK politics and the UK in general is funded propaganda intended to overthrow the people's elected representation, and replace it with representation that supports elites and grifters whose sole purpose is to serve their own means, and hurt working people. We must continue to fight against this misinformation if we love our country. 🇬🇧 The British people have once again rejected grift and division.

Og i norske medier er det bare stillhet. Og de lurer på hvorfor nordmenn har sluttet å se på nyheter? Hvor er nyhetene? Hvor er diskusjonen? Hvor er analysene som uhildet ser kun på faktaene slik vi kjenner de? Både styrker og svakheter? Hvor er selvransakelsen? Hvor er media?

@d20woodworking @Strangeland_Elf His girlfriend: dagbladet.no/sport/slik-ser…

@Strangeland_Elf He’s for the boys.

For some reason the last few days my for you feed has been full of girls simping over this guy.

Real ones already know: Japanese is the superior language for anime. Don’t argue, just say 'Yes sir.' Now watch this clip and testify 👀🔥 #animeedits #japan #worldcup26

Incredible view of Norwegian fans at Gillette Stadium doing the Viking row during their match their match

The establishment is structurally incapable of addressing the Rape Gangs because to do so would delegitimize their own rule. Every ruling class on Earth constructs some kind of narrative for why it has the legitimacy to rule. In the Post-War West the fundamental premise that justifies effectively every Western government is some local variation of standing as a bulwark against Fascism, which is conflated with a more generic national sentiment or the idea that a nation exists to advance the interests of its people in particular. That national particularism is treated as the first step towards a resurgence of the bellicosity of Nazism and so instead these states classify themselves as "multicultural" or "universalist." Some, like Canada, even go so far as to declare themselves a "post-national" state, which is to say that they see their political system as explicitly detached from the Canadian nation from which the system originally emerged. This comes with localized justifications for why that particular nation's state has to broaden its consideration beyond the people of that nation. In the USA it's "righting the wrongs of slavery." In the UK it's "righting the wrongs of empire." In Ireland it's "fuck you everyone else is doing it." (No one said it had to be coherent). But in all cases the effect is the same. Western states must explicitly elevate the considerations of people outside the nation for whom the state was originally constructed, otherwise the state is spiritually aligned to Nazism and is thus destined to unleash unspeakable horrors against the rest of the world. Which brings us to the Rape Gangs. The Rape Gangs are an unspeakable atrocity inflicted by the foreign imports upheld by the state as the people whose interests they must represent against the native European populace whose interests the state intrinsically treats as suspect. To therefore acknowledge both the racialized element of these crimes and the direction of victimization undermines the state's entire legitimacy to rule. Because the facts of this case demonstrate that universalist harmony under a neutral system has not panned out the way proponents of this regime imagined (which was the primary goal of their entire political project), and that in denying the White Europeans a state apparatus that explicitly exists to advance their interests those White Europeans are then subject to extreme and gratuitous crimes, demonstrating why there is an explicit need for such an institution to exist. The very kind of institution that they have treated as eternally suspect. And so to meaningfully address the realities of this case is simultaneously to acknowledge that their own political project has been a failure that did not materialize what it originally promised, at the same time that it acknowledges why there is an explicit need for the exact type of state construction they are existentially required to oppose. To address this case then is to acknowledge their own failure and illegitimacy. So they don't address it, they bury it and try to manipulate public perception through information control and media programming which will enable them to survive another day. Widespread knowledge of the Rape Gangs and demands they be meaningfully contended with are thus an existential threat to the current order because it is structurally dependent upon fictions that are dispelled by an honest assessment of what happened to these girls. And so expecting them to address it is a fool's errand. They will never be addressed without regime change, and regime change is both just and necessary precisely because this regime can never address this atrocity. Restore Britain is, in my opinion, the last possible chance for an "orderly" regime change in the UK. Anything else will be a continuation of the current regime and its structural incapability of dealing with this problem. And if orderly regime change is not allowed to occur, chaotic regime change accompanied with extraordinary violence is inevitable.

@Et_smartere_liv Ser ut som at det er mainstream politikk med voldsomt momentum.

@Plotinuz Nei.

Jeg tror dette er en god idé. Det finnes også en del motargumenter. Men her tror jeg fordelene veier opp for ulempene. Kanskje kan dette faktisk også løse ganske mye. Hva tenker du❓

“I’m Muslim and those Pakistani rape gangs were not Muslim. That is not my religion.” I’ve seen this response countless times today. Understand this: The only interpretation of Islam that matters is the one that has enabled the systematic rape of hundreds of thousands of White British girls. Your personal interpretation is irrelevant, as is mine. Below, I will outline the theological architecture behind these egregious crimes—and why Islam, in its classical and dominant readings, is fundamentally incompatible with Western society. الولاء والبراء Al-walā’ wa-l-barā’ (loyalty and disavowal): This is an Islamic principle rooted in Quranic verses and hadith. It calls for alliance with believers and disassociation from non-believers. Mainstream and especially Salafi/Wahhabi/Deobandi interpretations (common among some Pakistani communities) emphasize enmity or at least strict separation from kuffar (disbelievers). Reformist or Sufi readings soften it toward personal piety. It fosters "us vs. them" thinking that dehumanizes outsiders. دار الحرب Dār al-Ḥarb (House of War) vs. Dār al-Islām: Classical fiqh divides the world this way. In non-Muslim territory, rules for interaction differ; some historical and jihadist readings treat it as a zone where normal restraints are relaxed or jihad applies until Islamic dominance. Peaceful modern Muslims often reinterpret this as irrelevant to living in the West under secular law. Others (including some UK imams or online preachers) maintain harder lines. It provides theological framing for parallel societies or resentment. مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُكُمْ Mā malakat aymānukum (milk al-yamīn in shortened form) translates to “those whom the right hand possesses” (or “what your right hands possess”). It appears in roughly 15 verses and is the Quran’s most frequent way of referring to slaves or war captives (male and female) in 7th-century Arabian society. Interpreted in a certain way, it permits the rape of captives. Aisha’s age The most authentic hadith collections (Sahih Bukhari and Muslim) state Muhammad married Aisha at 6 and consummated at 9. This is the orthodox Sunni position held for most of Islamic history. It has been used to justify child marriage in various Muslim societies. Modern apologists sometimes argue cultural context, different age calculations, or that it was normative then. Traditionalists defend it as the Prophet's example. This precedent weakens absolute age-of-consent arguments within strict Islamic frameworks. Combine al-walā’ wa-l-barā’ with dār al-ḥarb and milk al-yamīn. Now combine all of those with the belief that Aisha was 9 at the time of consummation. What do you get? • Moral and religious justification for enmity toward non-Muslims as a category. • License to operate with far fewer restraints inside non-Islamic societies, treating local laws and norms as non-binding. • Permission to dehumanize and sexually exploit non-Muslim females—including minors—once they are classified as captives or property. • No effective doctrinal floor on the age of sexual access, because the Prophet’s example overrides later, external standards of consent or maturity. “I’m Muslim and that’s not how we interpret those texts.” Doesn’t matter. This is how hundreds of thousands of South Asians interpret the Quran. Do you understand now why this must be purged from Western society by any means? I don’t care if you’re a peaceful 145 IQ Muslim scholar, we don’t have time to figure out who’s who here. There are 3.8 million Muslims in the United Kingdom. Hundreds of thousands of White British girls were raped. The perpetrators are overwhelmingly Pakistani Muslim. To the degree that if they didn’t directly participate, they knew someone who did, and did nothing to stop it. Get them out. Every last one.

@HowieHedde @sjakhaaheim Fascinerende. Det å se noens verdensbilde bli knust og så klamre seg fast i glasskårene med blødende hender og jamre magiske besvergelser som «godt dokumentert før» eller «ikke vitenskapelig bevist av folk som tenker som meg». Hva er det neste? Stikke ut dine egne lyvende øyne?

@sjakhaaheim @Plotinuz Ja, det er jo godt dokumentert fra før.

1/ Hvis du mener at Europa er i ferd med å bli "erstattet", har du egentlig allerede avvist integrering som løsning. Da spiller det ingen rolle om folk jobber, snakker språket eller har statsborgerskap. Problemet er at de eksisterer.

She was a 14 years old girl. Who was seconds from rape. Who were then protected by a female gang member. Who then raped her. She then became a “thing” with her lesbian protector. In the rest of the books she did not go back to that with anyone. She was actually recipient to be claimed by the elf king. But then HE could not go through with it because he considered humans to be like chimpanzees and he was disgusted by it. This disappointed her greatly. The bi thing was a character choice option in the game and have nothing to do with the source material.

@Mo9Grey @noname1error @Plotinuz @JoshN_1999 And again, I'm talking about Ciri's character and why she clings to Mistle. It's not healthy, it's horrible. But Ciri does it because at this point, she thinks everyone she cares about and cares about her is DEAD. her bighest fear is being ALONE, abandoned. And so she...

@ArtsyGameMagi @Mo9Grey @noname1error @JoshN_1999 You are projecting. Hard.

@Mo9Grey @noname1error @Plotinuz @JoshN_1999 Can you give a source that Saposki said that? Because that's the forst I've heard that, and AGAIN, I just called what Mistle dod sexual assault. Let's get something across, i LOATHE Mistle, i loathe the Rats, i cheered when one of the few things the show got right was Bonhart..

@DagensDummeste Som "Diversity, Equity and Inclusion". Som betyr at lokalbefolkningen skal bli nedprioritert?

En fin illustrasjon på debatten: «Remigrasjon» virker ganske enkelt å være det som til en hver tid passer inn i diskusjonen. Når oppslutning og legitimitet skal sikres, reduserer man begrepet til ordinær returpolitikk og frivillige insentiver. Det er en form for strategisk tvetydighet. Ved å ufarliggjøre begrepet i offentligheten, slipper man å diskutere de høyst reelle etiske og juridiske utfordringene som følger med en ideologi som i sin kjerne krever en kategorisering av første- og annenrangs borgere.

@SamCKx Its infrastructure

The biggest lie being spread about age verification is that it’s some backdoor for the government to see everything you do online. That’s simply not how modern age verification works. I’ve worked with KYC, AML and age verification systems for years. In nearly all cases, the age check acts as a gatekeeper. It confirms you’re old enough to access a service, then keeps that information ring-fenced within a secure, encrypted system. The website gets a “yes” or “no” answer. It doesn’t suddenly hand the government a list of every site you visit or every video you watch. The entire point of modern verification technology is to prove eligibility while sharing as little personal information as possible. In many systems, even the verification provider itself has extremely limited access to user data. People are entitled to debate whether age verification laws are a good idea. But the claim that verifying your age for a website automatically creates a government surveillance database of your browsing history is misinformation from people who either don’t understand the technology or are deliberately trying to create outrage. Argue the policy if you want. Just argue the reality, not the conspiracy theories.

It’s not Ciri that is the problem. It is the DOWNGRADE to being a mere Witcher when her blood is the most potent magical force in that universe. She should be a full mage in addition to a sword maiden. Vilgefortz dominated Geralt in the books. That and the feminist drivel is why we “chuds” groan in disgust and rejection.

Quick reminder: Ciri is still the best protagonist choice for Witcher 4. If you're mad about it, you're not a witcher fan and you don't know The Witcher at all

@ArtsyGameMagi @JoshN_1999 You are projecting. You want what you say to be true. Even if Ciri is a fictional character and only the author can be the arbiter a similar situation in the real world (well. Not in the uk apparently) would be considered exploitation of vulnerable underage female and rape.

@Plotinuz @JoshN_1999 1. Stickholm syndrome isn't real, it's been disproven of being a thing. 2. Factually, when asked, women fear leaving more than staying. 3. I'm not glorifying Ciri's relationship with Mistle, I'm bringing up how Ciri is clinging to anyone, and how despite being a horrible.....

@manus_carlisle A great day. And it is important to keep the families together.

A dark moment that is likely to go down in EU history. Centrists ally with the far-right to establish detention centres for migrant families, to chants of "Send them Back". The Left replies "Shame on You".