Tristan (Politically Concerned)

10.7K posts

Tristan (Politically Concerned)

Tristan (Politically Concerned)

@PolitiConcerned

If you agree with my pinned tweet, follow me. I'll follow back!

YouTube: انضم Aralık 2021
1.1K يتبع844 المتابعون
تغريدة مثبتة
Tristan (Politically Concerned)
Tristan (Politically Concerned)@PolitiConcerned·
To foster engaging and productive conversations, please consider these guidelines: 1. Avoid personal attacks. While it's fine to disagree with my perspective, articulating why you think I'm mistaken or misguided will be far more constructive and push our discussion forward. 2. Answer questions directly. I strive to provide clear and direct answers, often adding nuance afterward. If I need to prompt you for a straightforward answer multiple times, it only complicates our dialogue without any real benefit. 3. Don’t misrepresent my points. If my views are unclear, I welcome you to ask for clarification. I often seek to understand your stance better as well; that's why directly answering questions is crucial for effective communication.
English
16
2
56
12.9K
Tristan (Politically Concerned) أُعيد تغريده
blvckcat🎀
blvckcat🎀@n1ghtkitten·
liberals will never have a “joe rogan” the fundamental thing liberals can’t do is satiate populist stupidity, which is the defining characteristic of a joe rogan the second any moderately leftwing figure shows a glimpse of alt media potential, they immediately see the enriching grift of leftwing populism and go that route very quickly liberals don’t need to find their joe rogan, we have to win without one
English
9
73
502
6K
Tristan (Politically Concerned) أُعيد تغريده
Ranthony
Ranthony@ChiefTeef8·
Literally all of these people lost except the one thats been in office since before he was born
Hasanabi productions (meme account)@HasanabiProd

@hutchinson Hasan has campaigned for and promoted over 20 different democrats since the beginning of 2026 U on the other hand said you’d vote Jeffrey Epstein if he ran as a democrat because you hold no principles.

English
6
38
399
11.1K
Tristan (Politically Concerned) أُعيد تغريده
Kraut
Kraut@The_Davos_Man·
Glad there is so much energy among liberals now to cast out the pro-Russian Stalinist sewer around the likes of Hasan Piker.
English
17
55
568
4.5K
WhickTV - Bane of Christian Nationalists
Why are these lefties trying to pretend to know what the Democratic voter wants? They don't vote, their candidates mostly lose except in super safe blue strongholds, and they tend to scare away people from voting or working with Democrats.
gato fumador@KweenInYellow

I just don't think there's a whole lot of appetite among Democratic voters to be nagged and wokescolded by a GOP lobbyist using quotes that she herself admits were taken out of context when they aren't simply 100% true. 🥴

English
37
26
344
11.9K
Tim Miller
Tim Miller@Timodc·
The long sermon on Hasan discourse starts around 16 minutes here’s a teaser youtube.com/live/GMluDgu55…
YouTube video
YouTube
Tim Miller@Timodc

@KeshaWorld91 not doing that. people can criticize him all they want. But at the expense of winning/focusing on Trump? Just trying to advocate for doing smart politics. Will discuss at length tonight on the stream if you still hate me head on out to warmer podcast pastures I will understand!

English
253
98
1K
577.9K
CID
CID@CIDsix6·
@WhickTv @Timodc Hasan is not going to destroy the Democrats chances of winning, this is hysterical conjecture but I understand why you do it, constantly whining about him is good for your channel, good for the algorithm, and it makes you feel like you're actually doing something productive.
English
1
0
50
511
Hutch
Hutch@hutchinson·
He thinks the Democratic Party is the 2nd most evil institution in the world and genuinely hates 99% of elected democrats. Refusing to go on his stream is not what “cancelling” means. He’s toxic. Why would any mainstream dem in a competitive seat be seen cozying up to him lol?
Jacobin@jacobin

Democrats said they wanted a podcast bro of their own. Now they’re trying to cancel @hasanthehun, their top contender. What they actually wanted was a branded content asset, not someone authentic with genuinely appealing politics: jacobin.com/2026/04/democr…

English
299
347
4.9K
210.6K
Tristan (Politically Concerned)
@WhickTv That's not to say I'm for changing it, that is to say I think it can be sold to American citizens in a way they will agree with.
English
0
0
1
26
Tristan (Politically Concerned)
@WhickTv Honestly, I think if the Trump administration actually tried to govern, they could pass an amendment on this that would be supported by most Americans.
English
1
0
3
115
kafka esquire
kafka esquire@Kafkaesquire·
@TheOmniLiberal If I, an idiot, can't understand it, that just means it's complicated. If you, a person with above room temperature, think it doesn't work, that just means you aren't able to recognize complexity.
English
1
0
11
455
Tristan (Politically Concerned)
Americans with US born parents might start with more wealth and education, but children of undocumented immigrants are showing significantly higher income growth. The data suggests these first generation Americans eventually earn more than their peers.
Tristan (Politically Concerned) tweet media
English
0
0
0
10
Hutch
Hutch@hutchinson·
Some thoughts. Take a walk with me: We really need to launch a massive, country-wide campaign of educating (reeducating?😬) voters about the importance and function of the Congress. It is not enough to have majorities if you want to pass bills. A party winning control of government does not mean that literally anything can be done. There are limits to power, and those limits are set by the constitution and the voters themselves by deciding which politicians will represent them in government. The parties are not monolithic. If you don’t have the votes to do a particular thing, that thing simply cannot be done. That doesn’t mean you should give up on said thing, but it may have to be a long term project if the votes aren’t there. It is way, way, wayyy too common that this or that commenter on social media assumes that winning the presidency and control of the Congress means you can do literally anything you want. We are seeing that limitation now with Trump. He has been harassing republicans to drop the filibuster since the first term. He wants them to do that now to pass the SAVE Act with a simple majority in the senate. They are saying no, but he doesn’t have the votes to pass it even if they did get rid of the filibuster. He cannot brute force them to do anything, even though he generally gets a lot of the stuff he asks for. Then again, so did Biden and Obama. Obama had a functional 60 vote majority in the Senate for ~90 days when the Senate was actually in session in his first term. This short window was due to Sen Franken taking months to be seated and Sen Kennedy dying. Obama did not run on something more sweeping like M4A but even if he had, the voters did not elect a Congress that would have passed such a bill. He did campaign on a public option but Sen Lieberman and a handful of other democrats (that the VOTERS elected) said absolutely not. The ACA was a Herculean task and it was frankly a miracle that it passed given how many times most thought it was dead and how contentious the negotiations were. It did draw inspiration from a model established by then Governor Romney of MA, but Romneycare was the result of *bipartisan* negotiations with a Democratic Party supermajority led legislature, and it was democrats who forced massive subsidies into that policy. So yes, the ACA’s general model was inspired by Romneycare, but it was democrats who forced massive subsidies into both Romneycare and the ACA. Republicans were broadly and definitely *not* in favor of these subsidies, so the idea that the ACA or even Romneycare were “Republican policies” is pretty ludicrous.
English
12
16
180
7K
Tristan (Politically Concerned) أُعيد تغريده
Jessiah
Jessiah@thepondering_·
Bonus incentive for people to go out and vote Democrat in November: If Alito and Thomas don't resign in time and there's a vacancy on the court with Democrats in the Senate majority, they can pull a McConnell and block any Trump SCOTUS nominee for his remaining 2 years 😍
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog

Clarence Thomas is a brilliant man and one of the greatest justices of all time. He also needs to retire immediately. He's 77 years old. If Democrats win the midterms and then the presidency, which they very likely could, there's a significant chance they will get to replace him with another Kentanji Brown Jackson. That would be a disaster for the country. We need to get young conservatives on the court right now. Alito, too. He's 76.

English
18
149
2.5K
104.3K
Nancy Mace
Nancy Mace@NancyMace·
I am the ONLY candidate with a plan to eliminate the state income tax. As the fastest growing state in the nation, it’s time South Carolina becomes the MOST affordable. South Carolina STRONG.
English
71
77
454
11.8K
Tristan (Politically Concerned) أُعيد تغريده
Ask Yourself
Ask Yourself@askyourself92·
I didn't actually watch the full convo, so perhaps I'm missing context but taking the clip at face value, this is 100000% the right norm to set. I say that while not liking many of @TheOmniLiberal's debate norms. If someone just wants to ramble and evade you should simply leave the convo and let them cry about it or tell them to wave when done rambling then mute them on your end and just refute their points/shoot the shit with your own audience till they're ready to stop being clowns then pick up at exactly where you left of and refuse to follow whatever new thread they established during the rambling dodgefest. There are other options but these are 2 I like.
English
0
20
828
70.7K
ThePersistence
ThePersistence@ScottPresler·
I’m almost there. In 4 more days, I’ll have gone 1 entire year w/o chocolate, bread, or pasta. Chicken, cottage cheese, Greek yogurt, avocados, blueberries, tomatoes, bell peppers, protein powder, & hearts of palm have completely transformed my life for the better.
English
3.3K
1.4K
30.6K
6.4M