Richard J Oparil

The importance of Congress by Justice Gorsuch.

@KurtSchlichter Schlichter enjoys supporting Epstein.

Oh, so a dead guy from France. People covered by a non-prosecution agreement. Two others. Great. Assume the SOL was lifted (the crimes must have occurred after 2001 or so). You now reach question #2: What's your evidence?

@KurtSchlichter You’re just a horrible human.

Because Massie is the guy running his mouth.

@politicalmath @KurtSchlichter Fuck you

It's important to remember that most highly educated elitist Democrats are, in their heart of hearts, extremely bad people

About 510,000 people died of AIDS in the U.S. between 1981 and 1996. In the late 1990s, a breakthrough “cocktail” of HIV meds became available. Since then, treatment options have become more abundant and easier to take, and in the United States, HIV-related mortality rates have plunged. But now there’s risk of a backslide. States across the country are considering cuts to a program that covers about a quarter of the roughly 1.2 million people in the U.S. living with HIV. Tens of thousands could soon lose access to medication. The most extreme example is in Florida. Early this month, the state government drastically reduced access to its AIDS Drug Assistance Program, a long-standing federal initiative operated and partly funded by states that provides free or subsidized HIV meds and care. Claiming a $120 million budget shortfall, Florida chopped the annual income-eligibility cutoff for ADAP from about $64,000 (in line with many other states) to about $21,000. Half of the 32,000 Floridians who depend on ADAP would lose coverage. ADAP programs work both to help save lives and to stop the epidemic’s spread: Medically suppressed HIV cannot be transmitted. A recent study calculated that if Congress were to eliminate the act that houses ADAP, new HIV infections across 31 major U.S. cities would rise nearly 50 percent by 2030. Tim Murphy reports on how cuts in ADAP “could see the first rise in HIV incidence in decades”: nymag.visitlink.me/vh9KRx

@KurtSchlichter I’d believe any one of them over Trump on the war.

Think of the amazing opportunity the regime media missed asking one of these clowns her opinion on the Iran War.

@RapidResponse47 @SLOTUS Blink twice if you need help.

.@SLOTUS launches "Storytime with the Second Lady" podcast to promote childhood literacy: "We will have someone come in—a 'special reader,' we're calling them—read a fun book, have a very short little conversation, and then invite children to pick up books on their own."❤️

Just as in Gaza, Israel has been targeting schools and universities in Iran. The US did NOT target or bomb universities in Afghanistan & Iraq. Bombing universities is the Israeli mode of warfare. Further evidence suggesting that Trump has given the wheel to Israel in this war

@RpsAgainstTrump Never happened

RFK JR: I was on the plane with Trump, He got a placemat, turned it over, took a Sharpie, and drew a perfect map of the Middle East. Then he put the troop strength of every country on every border on that map…He has this extraordinary depth of knowledge…

@jason_meister Fucking wrong

Imagine throwing a “No Kings” protest after your party refused to hold a primary, coronated Kamala without a single vote, sued to keep RFK Jr. off the ballot, and attempted to remove Trump from state ballots only after your illegal lawfare scheme failed. If there was a modern day monarchy in America there would only be one party you could point to. The Democrats.

@RapidResponse47 @ICEgov @RealTomHoman Obstruct ICE

.@RealTomHoman sets the record straight for Margaret Brennan: "The DEMOCRATS shut down DHS. They [voted to] shut down DHS because they simply won't fund DHS — because they want to change ICE policies so that ICE is less effective in the interior."

You mean what are *Republicans* doing for you today? They control both houses of Congress and the White House, so maybe be a little more accurate with your words?

This is about deference to billionaires, in case you can’t tell.

Trump starts the week with market manipulation and threats of war crimes

More deference to billionaires. To quote Adam Smith, the tendency to admire to the unworthy rich is the chief source of the corruption of our moral sentiments.

Cutting more Americans healthcare to fund an illegal war started by Trump without Congressional authorization. Absolutely monstrous.

@TheCapeLife32 @awfulannouncing I care

@awfulannouncing Keep politics out of sports Chuck. No one cares about your opinion!

"The way some of these other immigrants are getting treated in our country right now is a travesty and a disgrace... I think what’s going on in our country, what we’re doing to some of these amazing immigrants, is really unfortunate and it’s really sad." - Charles Barkley on CBS

@1979vikings @awfulannouncing US citizens kill more people than migrants.

@awfulannouncing The way some of ‘these other immigrants’ treated Laken Riley and Sheridan Gorman is a bigger travesty that none of the Mensa panel of losers on that panel (as well as their left wing cheering section in the media) will ever acknowledge

@Okie_Patriot46 @awfulannouncing A diverse, equitable and inclusive society should be our goal. Immigrants are a net positive for the economy. GDP drops with mass deportation.

There's also a difference between legal immigrants and illegal immigrants. If you're here legally, we welcome you with open arms, but if you're here illegally—flying your Mexican or Palestinian or whatever foreign flag and taking taxpayer dollars to fund your welfare while living off the backs of every other American taxpayer—then you gotta go. You're not welcome here, and we want them gone. DEI means deport every illegal. Don’t like it? Go to Congress and change it, but until then it’s the law. It’s the way the world goes.

@nevadanfor @awfulannouncing @MarchMadnessMBB @DHSgov @SecMullinDHS @ICEgov He represents the views of this old white guy.

Dear @MarchMadnessMBB absolutely NO ONE tuned in to hear Charles Barkley talk about his view on illegal immigrants and politics. Perhaps @DHSgov @SecMullinDHS @ICEgov should challenge “never ran for any political office” Chuck to a little debate. You can be sure of one thing, Charles Barkley does NOT represent the majority of the American people.