Mr. Solomon

A little Billy Joel, fingerpicked. Cat on the ottoman next to me but you can't really see her... She's Got A Way...

The vetbro crowd that had no problem calling out veterans like Dan Crenshaw, Tim Kennedy, and Mark Kelly (which I’m all about, mind you) sure gets mad when you call them out for siding with the Halal Right… All the sudden now it’s “crashing out” and “attacking veterans.” Got it. Don’t care. Don’t side with people that want to hurt the right to make us lose to communists and Islamists and maybe you won’t get called out.

They bury the Dad’s full quote at the end of the article. And they REALLY buried the lede. “Simmons recalled something his son had told him before volunteering for the mission that ended his life. “He said, ‘Dad, I can’t give you any details, but if civilians knew what we knew, a lot of the criticism [of the war] would cease,” he said. Simmons came away from Dover with a better impression of the war’s architects than he had when he arrived. Trump teared up and hugged him, evincing warmth and compassion at odds with the president’s public persona, Simmons said. He also credited Trump for looking him “straight in the eye.” “He extended his condolences father to father and conveyed how difficult it is to make decisions to put the children of other parents in peril,” Simmons said. As for Hegseth, “When I talked to him, I got the impression that he was torn because he seemed to be a very compassionate man, faced with difficult decisions as it pertains to war,” Simmons said. “I also let him know that Tyler was my only son. And you could see the emotion on his face. And I think those kinds of things you can’t fake,” he continued. “I was pleasantly surprised because the perception is they [Trump and Hegseth] don’t care, they’re going to do what they want to do,” he said. “I got to see a different side of them up close and personal.”

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Correct, the Zionists themselves secured their natural right to self-defense and self-preservation. As an American, I am "anti-anti-Zionist," not because I am a Zionist, but because I believe it's in our interest to support Israel over the people who want to see it destroyed. The "are you a Zionist" line is a red herring, used to confuse the issue or imbue it with a particular Christian-evangelical theological belief, which isn't necessary and, in my view, is not correct. Easier to say "Israel is a key geostrategic ally, we share a common civilizational framework, and, if religion is important to you, they are a better steward of the holy sites than Hamas would be."

It’s starting to look like this hunch was correct and that the IRGC, in a desperate attempt to set the region on fire and rally jihadists behind them, is trying to blow up the Dome of the Rock and Al-Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount. This cluster munition flew directly over Al-Aqsa and landed just 200 meters away. This shell would have destroyed the domes. This seems to be their plan. It is the only possibile reason they are repeatedly targeting the Old City of Jerusalem. There are no military targets there, and most of the population is Muslim.

Hey @Newsweek ! Why don't you do the responsible thing, unlike all the clout-chasing morons on X, delete this and issue an apology? Maybe then you would actually gain credibility and contribute in some small way to society. You could actuality turn this into a win. What do you say?

“Jesus Christ has no advantage over Genghis Khan," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said during a press conference. #Echobox=1774018565" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">newsweek.com/netanyahu-jesu…

Do you see why they closed the Church of the Holy Sepulchre now? This is a matter of a couple hundred yards, like the length of a couple football fields. Visitors could be killed. Please try to remember who lied to you about this to inflame you with your faith and dissociate.

Credit where it's due: Tucker is amazing at confidently delivering absolute lies. Here he is claiming that Churchill locked up members of the opposition party during WW2. When, in fact, Churchill led a National Government, i.e. one that INCLUDED leaders of the opposition parties in prominent roles. Labour leader Clement Atlee was appointed Churchill's Deputy and other leading Labour and Liberal politicians held major roles in the cabinet. The person Tucker is talking about is Oswald Mosley who was the leader of the British Union of Fascists and was not elected to anything. He wanted Britain to become a fascist country and work with Hitler. Despite this, contrary to Tucker's claims, he was not even detained for the full duration of the war and was released in 1943, two years before it ended. In most other countries he would have been hanged for treason without a second thought the day the war started. Britain's treatment of this tiny group of fascists, i.e. enemy sympathisers and collaborators, during WW2 is an example of extraordinary restraint and respect for the sanctity of human life and freedom that was not only unparalleled in the world at that time but arguably remains rare and hugely admirable even by the standards of today across most of the world. In short, Tucker is completely wrong and we can only conclude that the spreading of these malicious lies is motivated not only by his ignorance of history but also by the fact that he will say ANYTHING he deems necessary to suit his political agenda. His opposition to the current war in Iran, about which I myself have expressed some skepticism, does not justify this behaviour and is, in fact, undermined by it - no right- thinking person can take him seriously after this.

Everybody knows Franz Kafka, but almost no one knows his sister Ottla. She was gassed on arrival at Auschwitz on Oct 7, 1943 after volunteering to escort a group of orphans from the Terezin ghetto so they wouldn’t be afraid.

“War is bad” Ok I’m with you “This war primarily benefits another country at great expense to national treasury and is a danger in spinning out of control.” Yeah I can see that. “And that other country killed Charlie Kirk.” What… “And his wife trafficked children for Epstein.” Huh? “And Epstein worked for that country to black mail every world leader into doing its bidding using baby rape” Ok you’re all retarded. “You’re Jewish”

@proteinwisdom The whole #walkaway shtick has been dead for awhile now, anyway. Clearly all he had left was a monetizable social media account. Wouldn't be surprised if it's not even Straka posting anymore.

Kent was under investigation before he “resigned” and instantly appeared on Tucker Carlson’s show to play victim. I warned you about this fake fuck, as well. 👇 It’s time to remove every last phony “influencer” from our tent. This guy can “walk away” from whatever he wants. That doesn’t mean we need to take him in. Sometimes it’s just best to leave a stray a stray. This one has had his dick in everything; no telling what funk he’s carrying with him.

So last night I finally sat down and read the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. As you likely know, it is supposed to be meeting minutes of a secret cabal of evil, world-conquering and powerful Jews. But it is actually merely an infamous late 19th Century forgery created by the Tsarist authorities in Russia (and yes, they’ve been doing information warfare by villainizing Jews since back then). It’s been popular since then, and translated into every language. In the US, Henry Ford was obsessed with it, and suggested it to his employees. It’s long been one of the most popular books in Arabic, of course. In Germany, we know what they did with it. But reading through it last night, I was struck by two things, both related: (1) how much online discourse is merely just copypasta Protocols, down to memes like “Goyim are Cattle” and the limitless, cartoonish alleged bloodlust of Jews and Israelis. And (2) how obviously, ridiculously fake it is. Protocols is not even an IQ test—if you have any blood pumping to your brain, you should not be fooled by it. Even so, that millions of people have allowed their mental faculties to be put to one side like this is a vivid example of what a totalizing mind virus Jew-hatred is. *This is the cover of a 1934 American printing. And needless to say, “possession of these documents in Soviet Russia” was NOT punishable by “immediate death.” But these guys knew—long before the social media age—that you can just make shit up.

This is insane. I know the term "mask off moment" is probably overused these days, but really...wow.

@TheMiddleborne I haven't even tried watching Part 2 yet because of my Zendaya aversion and you're not helping.

Just every time the camera goes to Chani it completely breaks the scene. She’s insufferable in this.

After listening to Joe Kent talk about my area of expertise, I assess his knowledge of terrorism and geopolitics at about the level of a weirdo far right podcaster. I’m not trying to be a dick. It is what it is.

@WassonWatch Another Nazi in Pastor's clothing.

This is absolutely disgusting. Michael Spangler calls The Hiding Place, by Corrie Ten Boom, "One of the most subversive books around." If you cannot see how this statement is positively*dripping* with evil, then you have lost your moral compass, your sense of reason, or both. I have blocked @spanglermt and suggest you do the same.

Guys, this is so simple. How do you not obviously see we should absolutely tell Israel what to do while also detaching from Israel and ceasing to give Israel foreign aid? Which many in Israel are also for but if we stop funding Israel we can’t dictate to it as we’re detaching from it. Then if we detach from Israel they’ll just do what they want, but we have to be America First by focusing on ourselves and our own problems as we’re also making sure we control the Jews half a planet away who aren’t even real Jews. As if that all isn’t obvious enough, it’s quite clear Iran wasn’t a threat despite killing/kidnapping hundreds of Americans the last 47 years. And there’s absolutely no evidence Iran ever wanted a nuclear weapon except all the covert weapons programs going back to its war with Iraq in the 1980s, when Iraq bombed a nuclear reactor inside Iran. And of course it is not antisemitism to be anti-Zionist, you just don’t want 8 million Jews currently in Israel to have a home so you can focus on America. But if there’s no Israel, that would then make America the most Jewish nation on earth and nothing makes you want to shout “Christ is King” more than that apparently. Again, what kind of retard do you have to be not to be able to make sense of all this? But sadly many cannot see the truth, since they are controlled by Jews who at the same time cannot stop all the algorithms from all the technology they command from promoting skepticism and hatred of Jews and Israel. WAKE UP PEOPLE

The entirety of his interview was a series of Iranian government talking points, many of them outright, verifiable lies. The idea there was an anti- nuclear Fatwa was a lie that has been verified in several publications to have not existed. The Iranian government has never released it, and when challenged to produce its text or date, none was. But useful idiots in the Obama administration were so eager to sell their diplomatic surrender to Iran as victory that they became the main purveyors of this false information. Iranians simply sat back and let the west delude themselves on this, occasionally stoking the delusion with more vague statements. So Kent here in this one point alone about the fatwa shows himself a Obama-like useful stooge of Iran’s propaganda apparatus. But that is just one point of many in this interview which is so staged that it looks as if it could have been scripted by Iran’s disinformation services themselves.

She's going full Groyper - Jew-baiting sleeze b/c in chyron Fox News create graphic about US and Israel working together that included both flags. Your true colors have come out and they are very ugly.

Listen you human piece of garbage and anyone else here in the comments who wants to get this straight. Charlie died in September of 2025. This conflict started in February 2026. Joe said this conversation happened in June 2025. Operation Midnight Hammer happened in June 2025. So we can establish that Charlie was talking to Joe in the context of Operation Midnight Hammer, but Charlie said those exact same things on camera to the world at the time. This isn't new information at all. It was always public straight from Charlie. Then Trump executed Operation Midnight Hammer, and a nervous Charlie Kirk said he supported President Trump 100%, though he didn't want a "regime-change war." He later said the operation was a success. Charlie Kirk backed President Trump 100%, even though he voiced his concerns before Trump made his decisions, both in public and in private. He supported Trump when he made these decisions and stood strongly with him, for him, and with and for the United States of America, even when he was nervous about it. Charlie's words in June of 2025 cannot be construed in any way to be applicable to the circumstances that led Trump to make these decisions in early 2026. It isn't hard to guess how Charlie would have felt about this situation, though, since he already demonstrated it for us in June last year. 1) He would be publicly and privately nervous about getting into such a war and would strongly caution against regime-change as a goal and boots on the ground as a strategy; 2) He would have voiced these concerns both on camera and in private and maintained a pro-Trump and pro-America, while "America First," messaging about the looming conflict; 3) Once things started in late February/early March, he would have backed President Trump 100% like he did on 100% of the other things he backed President Trump on 100%, 100% of the time; 4) He would have stood by the operation and President Trump's decision-making, even while voicing his anxieties, concerns, and beliefs about wanting the war/conflict to wrap up quickly and avoid boots on the ground and a deliberate strategy of regime change; 5) He would have reassured Americans that President Trump has the best intelligence, the best instincts, and the best capabilities to redefine conflict in the 21st century and to guide us through this war, consistently. To suggest anything else is to fail to have known Charlie Kirk or even to have paid attention to what he actually said in the relevant situation Kent is bringing up, standing on the silence of Charlie's coffin to do so. To tie this to Charlie's murder is nothing short of reckless and heinous, and it is likely so reckless that it will possibly interfere with bringing Charlie's murderer to justice, given the idiotic and opportunistic things he said. You are all vultures and skanks, and your judgment will be ruthless.