Tayfun

One of the reasons was the spread of firearms such as muskets and cannons. The mounted sipahi soldiers, who fought with swords and maces, lost their importance in battles. Professional infantry units, especially the Janissaries and artillery corps, became more important. These soldiers demanded regular cash salaries. Since the timar sipahis continued using old methods and weapons, they became ineffective in wars.

Illuminating read - suggests that the Ottoman apparati created to centralize authority & mobilize soldier which had been so effective in the 14th & 15th centuries began to hollow it out in the 16th. The brutal crackdowns on Safavid subversion were particularly damaging.

@Rassol_Hassani KA (𒅗) Mouth, enterence, voice, to speak + ME (𒈨) Divine powers, divine decrees, essential forces, rites, or cosmic order = EME (𒅴) Tongue (the organ) and Language, speech, tongue (as in spoken language). Very clever.

العلامة السومرية AMA - 𒂼 وتعني (الأم) 𒂷 - البيت 𒀭 - الاله أو الالهة ( 𒂷 × 𒀭 = 𒂼 = الام)

KA (𒅗) Kapı, giriş, ağız, geçit. Bizdeki kap, kapı kapak ile bağı olabilir. ME (𒈨) Bizdeki "kut" kelimesinin tüm vasıflarını dolduruyor. Ayrıca aldığı eklerle kuttan türetilen kutsal, kutlu, kutsi...Özellikle Tanrıdan "kut almak" kültünü de karşılıyor. Me diye değil bu kelimenin kut diye okunması gerekiyor. Peki bu ikisi birleşince yani ağzın içine kut koyarsak ne olur. Asıl ilginç olana gelelim. 𒅗+𒈨= 𒅴 (EME) Dil, lisan, kelam.... Logogramları kullanışları çok zekice #Sumer #Sumerian #Kut #Kutalmış

Önek meselesi çarpıtma için söyleniyor. Bizim Türkçe iltisaklı/sondan eklemeli dil ama bizde de Sümerdeki gibi ön ek var. Mesela iki çekirdek kelime birleşince yeni kelime olur. Önyarı, başkan,subay...gibi, ya da eskiden ön türetme vardı. Rus demezlerdi Urus derlerdi yada recebe ireceb derlerdi. Ya da pekiştirme ön eki vardır. Mesela kırmızı dersin kıpkırmızı dersin, buda ön ektir. Yani Sümerce ön ekli bir dil değil ama bazen bu şekilde ön ek alır. Türkçede sondan eklemeli diye geçer ama SÜmerdeki gibi bizde ön ek alırız.

@Herodottr Bu da Türklerin ve Türkçenin tarihini MÖ 4500 e kadar götürür

Türkler 1071’de Anadolu’ya gelmedi. 1071 Eve Dönüş Dillerdeki Benzerlikler Sümerce: Dingir — Türkçe: Tengri Sümerce: Kap-kagak — Türkçe: Kap-kacak Sümerce: Men — Türkçe: Ben Sümerce: Sag — Türkçe: Sağ Sümerce: Uş — Türkçe: Us Sümerce: Dag — Türkçe: Dağ Sümerce: Aş — Türkçe: Aş

@Herodottr Kelime çok var. Ama kelimeden önemlisi gramer semantik tutuyor. Hatta bazı Türkçe kelimeleri de kasıtlı yanlış okuyorlar. Mesela bal diye okunması gereken kelimeyi lal diye okurlar. Ya da kut diye okunması gereken kelimeyi me diye okurlar. Bu şekilde diğer kelimeler de saklarlar.

That is exactly the problem. God being tortured is a worldly standard and a sign of weakness, but God not doing everything despite having infinite power is a divine standard. Don't worry, theological chaos has always been the favorite thing of Jewish groups. The Christian world is just unlucky in this regard. I think even Jesus having no biological father was a completely new beginning,God severed his ties with them entirely.

@TayfunZone @salahudeen33 You are applying worldly standards to God. You cannot know his intentions. You cannot deny his power to do so. You have decided that Jesus and the apostles are lying, based on what?

Muslim : Who Is God? Christian : Jesus Muslim : Is Jesus The Son Of Mary? Christian : Yes Muslim : Who Created Mary? Christian : God. Muslim : Who Is God? Christian: Jesus Muslim : Jesus Is The Begotten Son? Christian : Yes Muslim : Who Is His Father? Christian : God. Muslim : Who Is God? Christian : Jesus. Muslim : Jesus Is A Servant Of God? Christian : Yes Muslim : Jesus Died On The Cross? Christian : Yes Muslim : Who Resurrected Him? Christian : God. Muslim : Is Jesus A Messenger? Christian : Yes Muslim : Who Sent Him? Christian : God. Muslim : Who Is God? Christian : Jesus. Muslim: Did Jesus Worship While On Earth? Christian: Yes Muslim: Whom Did He Worship? Christian: God. Muslim : Who Is God? Christian : Jesus. Muslim : Did God Have A Beginning? Christian : No Muslim: Then Who Was Born On 25 Dec? Christian : Jesus. Muslim : Is Jesus God? Christian : Yes Muslim : Where's God? Christian : In Heaven. Muslim : How Many Gods Are There In Heaven? Christian : Only One God. Muslim : Where's Jesus? Christian : He Is Seated On The Right Hand Of His Father. Muslim : Then How Many Are They In Heaven? Christian : Only One God. Muslim : Then How Many Seats? Christian : One Muslim : Where's Jesus? Christian: Seated Next To God. Muslim : How Are They Seated On One Chair? This Proved That Jesus Is A Messenger Of Allah Not God. And Alhamdulillah We Also Believe In Jesus. We Respect Him As Prophet 💛😍 Only One God In The All World's Allah ♡ ❥©️©️©️

Sumerians described cats as "the ones who wrap around you" or "door-chatterers." In both Anatolia and Sumer, cats were seen as protectors against the evil eye. In Central Asia, they’d let a cat into a new tent first; wherever the cat chose to nap was believed to be the spot with the cleanest and most positive energy to place the bed. #AncientHistory #Cats

@dr_omeragic @AngelicaOung There aren't just Pashtuns and Tajiks in that region. Also, I'm talking about Rumi's own work and you're still dragging it out. You’re either a waste of time or a bugged bot.

@TayfunZone @AngelicaOung Rumi didn't say he's Turkic. Balkh isn't Turkic land. It's Tajik Persian and Pashtun land.

THE 12 MUQAM AND THE KILLER APP OF THE SILK ROAD We talked about Kashgar’s pluralistic roots, a Tang Dynasty melting pot of Buddhists, Nestorian Christians, Zoroastrianism…anything goes. So what happened? First, the Uyghurs turned up and quickly dominated around 800ad, mixing heavily with the existing Silk Road gene pool. Having spent generations in Mongolia as the Tang dynasty’s steppe « muscle », like they helped the Tang break the An Lushan rebellion, they learned a thing or two about administration. They were actually manichean for a while amazingly (vegetarian on the steppe must be tuff). But once they were turfed out of Mongolia into Xinjiang they became Buddhists (and sometimes Nestorian Christians) for 500 years. But ultimately, Islam was just better for organizing everybody. Sharia law made business easy. And the Sufi network that stretched up and down the Silk Road was the ultimate decentralized trust-based network that stayed up when empires go down: the ultimate killer app. Music and dance was a key part of connecting with Sufi spirituality, as are the network of shrines and spiritual teachers. Amanisa Khan, a 16th century queen, collected the music and dance of the people and arranged them into the 12 Muqam. This became the cannon of Uyghur music and was passed on by the oral tradition. The collapse of the Qing and the subsequent chaos was not great for the Sufi tradition that relied on the maintenance of the shrines. The tradition further atrophied in the early PRC years, though they were left alone. The PRC genuinely did Uyghur culture a huge favor in the 50s by sending a musicologist to document the 12 muqam, which was an oral tradition on the verge of dying out. Unfortunately in the 80s with reform and opening up, Wahhabism was introduced from Saudi Arabia. This austere desert form of fundamental Islam seems very incompatible with traditional Uyghur Sufi beliefs. Music and dance, including the 12 muqam, is now viewed as haraam by the radicals. For the first time, Uyghur weddings fell silent. Musicians were harassed. Unlike the moderate but delicate Sufi Islam, Wahhabism spread like a weed. After a few decades of Wahhabism, the terror attacks arrived. I think that’s what’s important for ppl to understand…the PRC’s enemy is not traditional Uyghur religion or culture but radical Islam that is not native to Xinjiang or Uyghur culture. Ironically the PRC is now trying to promote Uyghur folk traditions like crazy. But I don’t know if it’s going to work. First of all, Sufi traditions are super delicate. Once lineage of the masters are broken or shrines are no longer maintained it’s hard to reboot. Also, the version the PRC is trying to promote is very « bonsai » and almost de-islamicized. Certainly not transnational. You can put girls in atlas silk and make them twirl and get men to sing the 12 Muqam but you will not get the spirituality back. Pic is from a great show called « Rendezvous with Kashi — the 12 Muqam » I saw tonight.

@dr_omeragic @AngelicaOung Let Rumi give you the answer: "Even if I speak Persian, my origin is Turkic." Nor: Born in Balkh, a Turkic land in Khorasan, and later living in Konya ( Türkiye), Rumi openly declared his true roots. (Diwan-e Shams-e Tabrizi)

@TayfunZone @AngelicaOung Rumi was Persian, not Turkish.

Mevlana Rumi was Turkish, and Bektash Veli was Turkish too. They themselves even said they were Turkish. Just because Rumi wrote some works in a foreign language doesn't make him a foreigner. We speak English, but that doesn't make us English. I'm Turkish, not Rum or Armenian. People don't get to choose where they're born, but they can choose their character. Also, unnecessarily blaming other people is classic projection psychology. Whatever they're accusing others of is actually something they have in themselves. You can contribute to any environment with your character and knowledge, of course but only if you have real knowledge and can free yourself from the fanatical tribalism of the place you come from.

@TayfunZone @AngelicaOung Rumi and Haji Bektash Vali were Persians, not Turks. Stop trying to Turkify everything you Turkish ultranationalist. You probably are of either Greek or Armenian origin yourself.

In Islam, we know God through his own revelations. Just as God has His divine attributes, prophets also possess specific qualities. When God chose a prophet in ancient times, He bestowed this 'secret' or 'trust' (amanah) based on their virtues. For example, a prophet must never have had extra-marital relations, must never lie, and must not commit shameful crimes like theft. Since God does not act in a demeaning way, He naturally expects a moral and stable life from the prophets He chooses. This is why Prophet Lot did not have relations with his daughters, Prophet David did not commit adultery, and Prophet Solomon never worshiped other gods. Most importantly, contrary to what the Torah suggests, God did not wrestle with His servants, nor was He ever crucified or tortured. This is a matter of theological and logical consistency; a Creator would never subject His chosen leaders or His own essence to such indignity

@TayfunZone @salahudeen33 And how do you know the intention of God?

@Waheedofkabul @zajako_ its because of the migration routes. r1a originated in that region and spread to the world with subarians and their successors. the scythians and their eastern wing the huns are also part of this.

@zajako_ How does Kyrgyz and Afghanistan get such high numbers

Virtually *everyone* that has R1a today that you see on this map is descended from men that lived in the Corded Ware Culture in Northern Europe about 5,000 years ago

Beauty standards change all the time. Like back in the day curvy women were the ultimate symbols of fertility and everyone loved it. Thats why ancient goddess statues are so curvy. back then no one would even look at a size-zero runway model theyd probably think she was sick or something. honestly if victoria's secret models traveled back to ancient times people would be so spooked theyd probably just pack up and run away from the city. But for me a smiling woman is always the most beautiful. that positive energy is everything

In 2012 Florence Colgate won a UK-wide contest for Britain's most naturally beautiful face. ♥️ Asians & Americans (from my experience), think British women are attractive. But Europeans say we are not. What do you think of British women?

Çakal aslanı görünce korkarmış. Ama kuyruğu da dik tutarmış. Güvenlik mimarisi konusunda naz etmelerine gerek yok. İş dönüp dolaşıp Türkiye gelecek. Biz olmadan kuracakları ordu anca "i am barby girl" şarkısını söyler. Yalnız bizimkilerin çoğu bilmiyor ama başka hiç bir ulusta olmayan Türk düşmanlığı yunan global hesaplarda var. Herifler her şeye muhalif ve herşeyi çalmaya çalışıyor. Yoğurttan başlıyor, baklavaya, oradan yer isimlerine hayali bağlantı atayıp yunanlaştırmaya kadar gidiyor. Cidden problemli bir toplum.

Almanya'nın Ankara Büyükelçisi Sibylle Katharina Sorg'dan önemli açıklama: "Türkiye olmadan kıtamızda ciddi bir güvenlik mimarisi kurulamaz." Komşular büyükelçiyi resmen linç etmiş. Gerçekler acıdır komşular...

Carlson is a man of reality, and being realistic doesn't mean a departure from his conservative nationalist view. He has a difficult task because nothing is harder than waking people up. When forced to choose between confronting the truth and staying in the comfortable space of lies, societies prefer the lies

Keep in mind, this type of rhetoric is meant to stoke fear of Carlson amongst constituencies like the Christian evangelical base in the U.S. which has a strong symbiotic relationship with the current admin. But when you look at the reality, Carlson continues to promote core conservative positions from immigration, American nationalism, and culture war critiques. To argue that Carlson has shifted away from conservative nationalism is laughable. What this actually reveals is a growing anxiety within the always-Trump base about losing support among key constituencies like the Christian evangelicals, America First conservatives, and rural populist voters (groups that Carlson has influence over)

Religions aren't just about theology, they also involve moral values. People can agree on common moral grounds like the family unit and ethics to counteract things like hedonism and chaos. Of course I’m not counting religious extremists or New Age nonsense because those are serious problems for everyone. But regardless, morality-based approaches benefit everyone. After all, even Christianity came from the East and most theological names actually have Sumerian roots.

Christians and Muslims are divided by serious theology, but they are still closer to each other in moral vision than either is to a world ruled by materialism, hedonism, and spiritual emptiness. If nearly 60% of humanity cannot learn to live as neighbors, friends, and partners in peace, the alternative will be civilizational ruin.

Ability and action are two different things. You could beg, but you choose not to out of self-respect. Similarly, Islam teaches that God has power over everything but would never become human to suffer at the hands of His own creation. Such a thing is simply not worthy of His divine nature

@salahudeen33 In islam does God not have the ability to make himself take human form and come to earth?

Sweet dreams, but these fantasies find no ground in reality. Türkiye has turned around many games at the last second, even past the 90+5 mark. Just as things appear to be finishing, everything begins anew. With its population nearing 100 million and world dynamics currently in its favor, Türkiye remains unshakable

Bu etnonim olayında Töre, Töreli, olayına da bakılsa iyi olur. Bu kelime aynı zamanda Töreli yani geleneği ve kültürü olan anlamı var. Çünkü antik çağda Türklerin kullandığı isim Turdu. Büyük ihtimal yeni isim olarak Törü, Türü gibi isme geçtiler. Emin değilim ama antik çağda da Türklerin kendi içinde kavgaları var. Mesela şehirli Türkler ile konar göçer Türkler arasında kavgalar var. Belki şehirli Turlar konar göçer Turlardan kendilerini ayırmak için Törük, Türük ismine geçtiler.

TÜRK ADININ KÖKENİ İÇİN AŞAĞIDAKİ MAKALEYİ VERİYORUM Özet ve sonuç olarak, Türk ~ Türük adının başlangıçta (1) *türü- ‘yığmak, toplamak, biriktirmek, bir araya getirmek vb.’ (> EUyg., DS türü-) anlamındaki eylem kökünden türeyen ve (2) aslen ‘birleşik, birleşmiş, toplanmış; bağlaşık’ (= İng. ‘united / allied / confederated’) anlamına gelen bir sıfat olarak kullanıldığını (3) ve bu biçimin Ön Ana Türkçe döneminde Yukarı Mezopotamya bölgesinde bulunan çivi yazılı tabletlerdeki Turuki, Tiruki, Turukki, Turukku (M.Ö. 19-18. yy.) boy ve halk adıyla aynı olduğunu söyleyebiliriz. Türk adının değişkelerinin nasıl ve hangi hiyerarşik sırayla ortaya çıktığını ve bu değişkelerin birbirleriyle olan ilişkilerini ise aşağıdaki – bütün değişkeleri içermeyen – soyağacında görebiliriz. Bu soyağacı aynı zamanda yukarıdaki kökenbilgisi açıklamasının bir özeti ve sağlaması niteliğindedir. ⬇️