Daniel Hart Baker

We have made available some repositories of example markdown scripts, as well as a ‘cookbook’ of useful tips here: github.com/bakerdh/Reprod… Hopefully this will help others to develop the necessary skills 4/6

All of our contributing authors were extremely cooperative, and clearly saw the benefit of their work being reproducible. We think this is how all scientific results should be reported. However we recognise several barriers to wider adoption, chiefly expertise and time 3/6

The question now is what we should do next. We have a really nice pipeline for automatically building markdown files on Github. But the process of making papers reproducible is time consuming.

@mariannazvg @PhDVoice @AcademicEEG If you can, take along a cap and a tub of gel to pass around. Physical props help learning, and this is generally not possible with other neuroimaging methods. I tried doing a live demo once too, but that was a bit unpredictable!

I’m going to co-teach a seminar about EEG to 2nd year BA students of psychology. I have created the outline of the course but it’d be nice to hear any of your tips since it’s my first time teaching such course. Thank you & have a nice day! @PhDVoice @AcademicEEG

A bit more about this, in case anyone is interested. Such a cool technique. bakerdh.wordpress.com/2022/07/26/ach…

@tom_hartley @KatjaKornysheva Oh yeah, this does look neat, especially for clinical/developmental applications. The key is having a really robust objective measure, as that means any criterion-related issues should go away

Nice thread on the use of M/EEG frequency tagging in binocular rivalry!

@EgyptMcr I'm holding out for 22/02/2022!

Anyone else a bit giddy to type out today's date? Just me? OK then... #palindrome

Also available from @AmazonUK amazon.co.uk/Research-Metho…

Also available (currently with a 12% discount) from: @blackwellbooks blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/produ…

@j_greenwood There's a detection threshold condition in the paper below on 'power contours' (see Fig 4). Basically power does keep increasing as you add more trials, which I think justifies the classic small-N psychophysics study design. dx.doi.org/10.1037/met000…

Has anyone ever done this kind of analysis for psychophysics? Am sure it’d be the same.

@RoseboomWarrick I think it’s a category error. In true 2AFC the alternatives are different stimuli that you choose between. But in the yes/no paradigm there are two alternative responses. Very easy to confuse the two, and that’s before you get into paradoxes, such as…