DD

22.3K posts

DD banner
DD

DD

@devine_moser

#Patriot #Constitution #USA 🇺🇸🇺🇸#Trump 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 #God Bless America 🇺🇸

New England انضم Temmuz 2016
6.2K يتبع6.3K المتابعون
TR G - The Royal Grift
TR G - The Royal Grift@TheRoyalGrift·
This makes me sick. Kemi: "The Prime Minister (STARMER) sent a known security risk to Washington, to a position where he would see our most important ally TOP SECRET intelligence." The Kings visit is not going to repair this broken, beyond repair, relationship with the US.
English
15
43
312
5.8K
Jewely💎Blue⭐️⭐️⭐️
❌ 3rd MAJOR SCOTUS leak in 4 years… and guess who showed up 4 years ago: 🫏 KETANJI BROWN JACKSON 🫏 Why the news is tiptoeing around the obvious here is beyond me! Sworn in 2022 = leaks start flooding out. Dobbs. Immunity. Now the shadow docket memos. This DEI hire is the common denominator turning the highest court into a leaky sieve for the left For God’s sake, in her 2022 Supreme Court confirmation hearing she said SHE DIDN’T KNOW WHAT A WOMAN IS 🤦🏼‍♀️ Shouldn’t we have seen this coming⁉️
English
167
3.7K
10.5K
228.9K
Scott Lewis
Scott Lewis@WarriorSpeech28·
With everyone now realising Farage is a wet lettuce my tweet that @danwootton featured will age very well. Farage has probably accelerated my claim of 1 year. They are finished, @RestoreBritain_ will win the next general election.
English
37
135
939
19.7K
Scott Lewis
Scott Lewis@WarriorSpeech28·
Tell me how he is different to the Uniparty. I’ll wait. @Nigel_Farage doesn’t differ much from @Keir_Starmer he don’t mind free speech until it affects his agenda.
English
17
33
197
2.3K
Laura Loomer
Laura Loomer@LauraLoomer·
If you come for me you better be ready to throw down because I will fuck you up so hard.
English
6.8K
1.6K
19.4K
2.5M
⭐️The FJC⭐️
Question for all the Catholics out there, are you really buying what this snake oil salesman @Pontifex is selling?
⭐️The FJC⭐️ tweet media
English
33
12
31
680
⭐️The FJC⭐️
With all this support for Muslims who have sex with minors, it makes you wonder what Pope Leo @Pontifex was doing all alone with all those alter boys when he was a priest. 🤷‍♂️
English
5
4
22
354
Scott Jennings
Scott Jennings@ScottJenningsKY·
I'm convinced that President Trump could walk into Iran, sieze all of the terrorist regime's nuclear material and Democrats STILL wouldn't call it a win. Here's what a "win" in Iran looks like: These fanatics don't get a nuclear weapon. Period. Full stop.
English
1.7K
5.1K
42.9K
703.8K
Queen Esther
Queen Esther@XOQueenEsther·
There’s a certain irony in Meghan Markle positioning herself as the “most trolled person in the world” over the past decade. It’s a claim designed to evoke sympathy, to frame her as uniquely targeted, and to suggest that the overwhelming public reaction to her is rooted purely in cruelty or bias. But that narrative leaves out a crucial question that she consistently avoids addressing: why? Public figures across politics, entertainment, and royalty face scrutiny. It comes with visibility, influence, and the power to shape narratives. But sustained, global dislike on the scale she describes doesn’t simply appear out of nowhere, and it certainly doesn’t persist for years without cause. Reducing it all to “trolling” dismisses the very real criticisms people have raised about her behavior, inconsistencies, and repeated attempts to control public perception. More telling is the consistent refusal to engage in self-reflection. The pattern has been consistent: criticism is reframed as harassment, disagreement is labeled as hate, and accountability is sidestepped in favor of victimhood. It creates a loop where every negative reaction becomes proof of persecution rather than an opportunity for introspection. There is also a growing disconnect between the image she tries to project and how she is perceived. Carefully curated appearances, controlled interviews, and polished messaging can only go so far when they clash with what people observe over time. Audiences are not as easily managed as they once were. Patterns are noticed. Contradictions are remembered. At some point, the question shifts from “why are people reacting this way?” to “why is there such resistance to examining the role she herself plays in that reaction?” Because being widely criticized and being widely disliked are not the same as being unfairly targeted. One invites sympathy. The other invites scrutiny. If there is any path to changing that perception, it does not lie in repeating the claim of being the most trolled person in the world. It lies in something far less comfortable: taking an honest look in the mirror and asking whether the criticism is earned. Until that uncomfortable mirror-gazing happens, the narrative will remain what it feels like today: less a story of victimhood, and more one of deflection.
English
173
88
933
27.9K
IRISH PATRIOT
IRISH PATRIOT@irishpatriot91·
The Army has started towing away equipment! The Irish Forces are now taking sides with the tyrant Government! We all know who stands by who now 🇮🇪
English
1K
5.4K
23.1K
640.8K
Queen Esther
Queen Esther@XOQueenEsther·
Surprise, surprise: so Australian taxpayers are still being forced to cover security costs for Harry and Meghan Markle, two shameless fucking grifters, even as they brazenly insist this is a fully “privately funded” trip. After sneering at concerned Australians through smug spokesperson clapbacks about how “99.9% didn’t sign the petition,” they really expect people to believe the public is happy to foot the bill? The arrogance is off the charts. They scream “security risk” whenever it’s convenient, yet in the same breath they’re happily selling access to strangers for eye-watering sums. So which is it? Dangerous or profitable? And let’s get this straight, on what possible basis are Harry & Meghan Markle entitled to taxpayer-funded security? They are not working royals. This is not state business. This is a paid private hustle dressed up in royal leftovers. They’re making money off this, so they can pay for their own security. End of story. While people are struggling to get by, these two are swanning around at luxury events, quietly passing the real costs onto the public and pretending it’s all “private.” It’s not just hypocritical, it’s shameless entitlement. And the audacity to act offended when people call it out. As if taxpayers should just shut up, smile, and subsidize their lifestyle while being fed PR spin. Absolutely disgraceful.
English
68
139
999
23.2K
0HOUR1
0HOUR1@0hour1·
Angry fat white woman complaining about the President
English
159
302
2K
27.8K
DD
DD@devine_moser·
@MarshaBlackburn Are you really this obtuse? Call for removal of Thune you absolute joke!
English
0
0
3
23
Sen. Marsha Blackburn
Sen. Marsha Blackburn@MarshaBlackburn·
Retweet if you’re excited about the $6,000 bonus deduction for seniors in the Working Families Tax Cuts. I will continue working with President Trump to put more money in your pocket and deliver a golden age for the American economy.
English
1K
222
1.3K
48.5K
DD
DD@devine_moser·
@XOQueenEsther @BarkJack_ So true!! Diabolical, calculating & deliberate! A case study on what is a narcissist 🤦‍♀️
English
0
0
3
87
Queen Esther
Queen Esther@XOQueenEsther·
@BarkJack_ She knows exactly what she’s doing, trying to diminish and provoke at the same time. It’s petty, calculated and completely unnecessary.
English
5
2
168
2.9K
Queen Esther
Queen Esther@XOQueenEsther·
“I was in ripped jeans and I was barefoot” Meghan Markle really thought sharing her story about meeting Prince William and Catherine, Princess of wales for the first time would make her sound warm and relatable, when all it did was expose how socially tone-deaf she is, loudly advertising her ignorance of basic manners, etiquette, and cultural norms. Meeting your partner’s family for the first time in ripped jeans, barefoot, and immediately going in for hugs isn’t charm. It’s a complete lack of social awareness and basic respect. Any adult with basic self-awareness knows you don’t greet people of that stature, or even any first-time hosts in a formal setting, by showing up half-dressed and invading their personal space. You dress appropriately. You observe boundaries. You show basic courtesy and humility instead of centering yourself and your habits. Meghan treated a significant family introduction like a casual hangout, then acted surprised when the other side didn’t drop their dignity to match her informality. What she fails to grasp is exactly why William and Catherine are the same in private as they are in public. They’re not faking it. Their composure, formality and consistency aren’t an act they switch off behind closed doors. It’s who they are: grounded, disciplined and authentic in their roles and values. Meghan, by contrast, has built her entire post-royal brand on performance, reinvention, and selective storytelling. She expects everyone else to perform emotional availability on her terms, while complaining that genuine consistency feels “jarring.” What makes it worse is that she still tells the story as if she were the normal one and they were the problem. They were consistent, composed and respectful both in public and in private. That’s authenticity. They don’t switch personalities depending on the camera. She, on the other hand, treats personality like a costume change and then acts confused when people don’t immediately play along. She walked in expecting instant intimacy without earning it, then reframed their perfectly polite behaviour as some kind of flaw. This story doesn’t humanise her. It highlights exactly why people find Meghan Markle exhausting. It’s evidence of entitlement and cultural cluelessness. She walked into that meeting broadcasting ignorance of basic manners, then turned the discomfort she caused into a complaint about them. That’s not victimhood. It’s exposure. Every time she tries to “explain” herself, she only reveals how little she understands about respect, restraint and genuine character. William and Catherine don’t need to change who they are in private. Meghan clearly does.
English
387
209
3.1K
281.3K
DD
DD@devine_moser·
@wendyp4545 💯 responsible!!
English
0
0
0
9