تغريدة مثبتة
Jane Saunders
10.4K posts

Jane Saunders
@downunderjane
I always speak my truth
Eltham North, Victoria, Aus انضم Mart 2009
767 يتبع2K المتابعون

@SkyNewsAust Have people forgotten the insulation debacle that Peter Garrett pushed?
English

The Coalition has demanded Energy Minister Chris Bowen reassure Australians about the safety of his battery rollout, after a federal audit found a shocking number of solar battery installations were "substandard".
skynews.com.au/business/energ…
English

Only because he will re-introduce them. 👇🏻
Bill Gates has issued a stark warning about the growing anti-vaccine movement, emphasizing that declining vaccination rates could lead to the return of deadly diseases previously thought to be eradicated. Diseases like measles, polio, and whooping cough, once under control thanks to widespread immunization, are beginning to reappear in areas with low vaccine coverage.
The anti-vaccine movement spreads misinformation about vaccine safety, effectiveness, and necessity, causing some individuals to delay or refuse immunizations for themselves or their children. Public health experts warn that even small decreases in vaccination coverage can significantly increase the risk of outbreaks. Measles, for example, requires about 95% vaccination coverage to prevent community transmission.
Bill Gates stresses that vaccines are one of the most effective tools in modern medicine, saving millions of lives every year. Protecting communities from preventable diseases requires maintaining high vaccination rates, public education, and combating misinformation.
The resurgence of once-controlled illnesses highlights the real-world consequences of declining immunization. Communities are reminded that vaccines not only protect individuals but also vulnerable populations who cannot be vaccinated, such as infants and immunocompromised individuals.
Could refusing vaccines reverse decades of public health progress? Gates’ warning underscores the importance of continued vigilance, education, and vaccination to prevent the return of dangerous diseases.

English

Yes I do. I make my own capsules from the powder.
Research (mostly lab/animal studies, with some human trials) suggests benefits from its antioxidants, anti-inflammatory compounds, and nutrients:
• Rich in antioxidants — May help combat oxidative stress.
• Blood sugar and cholesterol support — Some evidence for helping manage glucose and lipids.
• Anti-inflammatory effects — Potentially useful for conditions involving inflammation.
• Nutrition boost — Valuable for addressing deficiencies (e.g., in developing regions); may support lactation in breastfeeding mothers.
• Other traditional uses — Wound healing, liver protection, antimicrobial properties, and more. 
English

@FSUofAustralia There are a lot of boosted people on this thread. No wonder our country is going to shit.
English
Jane Saunders أُعيد تغريده

@MrJohnson860 @AaronSiriSG Did you actually read any of what Aaron wrote?
English

@AaronSiriSG Seems convincing… nah.
I trust a lawyer a lot less than vaccine companies and far less than scientists & doctors.
English

The WHO's claim that vaccines saved 154 million lives in the past 50 years is corrupt "science" at its apex.
This claim comes from an advertising report by the WHO touting its own vaccination program. In a real paper, there would be a confidence interval for the claimed “154 million lives saved.” The reason there is no confidence interval is that this figure is fabricated guesswork, as explained—or I should say buried—on page 42 of the supplement to this paper, in a section titled “Uncertainty of estimates.” [1] There, it explains that it cannot put “bounds around the veracity of the estimates” and that any “bounds are arbitrary” and “should not be interpreted as a claim to where the edges of valid estimated possible [sic] lie.” Meaning, the confidence that any estimate in this paper is correct is zero and it could be just as true that vaccines resulted in a net death of 154 million lives in the last 50 years. That alone renders this study entirely unreliable, and claims made using this study corrupt.
But it gets worse. This claim also fails to account for studies with actual data about vaccines and mortality. For example, almost the entire 154 million lives the report claims were saved comes from two vaccines, the DTP vaccine and the measles vaccine.
As for the DTP vaccine, the body of science based on actual real-world data is clear: this vaccine kills more children than it saves. In fact, the seminal study found that children receiving DTP died at 10 times the rate as those who received no vaccines in the first six months of life. [2]. Ten times. That study is based on real data and has a confidence interval. The study found that DTP may have reduced deaths from the diseases it targeted (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) but children were dying from other diseases and issues that otherwise would not have been associated with vaccines, absent the study. Accounting for this real-world data would wipe away the entirety of the 154 million lives saved, if you calculated those lives lost from DTP use over the past 50 years.
As for the measles vaccine, this product can prevent transmission of measles, and so it can save some lives by preventing measles deaths. But that is not the entire story. First, this WHO advertising report estimates that 40% of the decline in measles mortality is due to measles vaccine. But this estimate defies reality. In the United States, measles mortality declined by over 98% before a measles vaccine was introduced in 1963 and declined by over 99% in the U.K. before a measles vaccine was introduced in 1968. [3]. As living conditions improve, the hard data reflects that measles mortality declines by close to 99%, not 60% as this WHO advertisement report used. Using the real data regarding reduction of measles mortality absent a vaccine when living conditions improve, and accounting for the DTP data discussed above, the benefit of vaccines over the last 50 years becomes inverted.
But it gets even worse. A 100,000-person study conducted by the nation of Japan over a period of over 20 years found that those who had measles and mumps died at a far lower rate from cardiovascular disease than those who never had measles and mumps. [4]. In fact, 20 years after the start of the study, around 14% of those who never had measles and mumps were dead of heart disease whereas only 7% of those who had measles and mumps were dead of heart disease. Heart disease is the number one killer of Americans. Not only does measles have a statistically significant reduction in deaths from heart disease, study after study shows having measles provides a statistically significant reduction in death from various cancers. [5].
Notably, these cardiovascular and cancer studies were based on real data, not estimates, provided confidence intervals, and were statistically significant. If you now add this data to the above about DTP and measles, you are far negative in terms of the benefits of vaccines. Consider that unlike other pathogens that have come and gone, these pathogens apparently conferred a survival advantage and hence may explain why they became less virulent over time and remained in circulation.
Bottom line, the WHO’s advertising report, masquerading as science, epitomizes the corruption of science regarding vaccines. Overstating the benefits of vaccines is just as dangerous as overstating their risks. Doing so deprives the policy makers, medical professionals, and the public of the ability to make rational, informed, decisions regarding these products.
The above is an abridged discussion of this topic. For an illuminating, detailed, and fully cited discussion showing that the claimed reduction in mortality from vaccines is a belief, not science, see Chapter 7 of Vaccines, Amen.
[1] #page=43" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">thelancet.com/cms/10.1016/S0…
[2] pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC53… see Chapter 7 of Vaccines, Amen for full discussion and additional citations.
[3] cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus…; webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20160111…; and see Chapter 7 of Vaccines, Amen for full discussion and additional citations.
[4] pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26122188/
[5] For example, the International Agency for Research on Cancer found that those who never had measles had a 66% increased rate of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and a 233% increased rate of Hodgkin lymphoma. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16406019/(See Table 2: in the Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) column, divide the odds ratio 1 (never had measles) with .6 (had measles) which results in a 66% increased risk, and in the Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (HL) column, divide the odds ratio 1 (never had measles) with .3 (had measles) which results in a 233% increased risk). These two cancers killed an estimated 21,170 Americans in 2022 (see seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html… seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html…). There are event studies that found remission of Hodgkin’s disease after having measles (see pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4574047/). Likewise, researchers at the Department of Health Care and Epidemiology at the University of British Columbia and the Department of Biology at the University of Victoria found that those who never had measles had a 50% increased rate of ovarian cancer, which killed an estimated 12,810 Americans in 2022 (see pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16490323/and seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html…). Other studies have reached similar conclusions that measles—as well as mumps, rubella, chickenpox, etc.—reduce the rate of various forms of other cancers, including a study from researchers at the University of Berne, Switzerland that specifically reviewed these fever-causing illnesses and found that the “study consistently revealed a lower cancer risk for patients with a history of FICD [febrile infectious childhood diseases]” (see pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9824838/). Studies have also found that children who have had measles have far less allergies and atopic diseases, such as asthma, and adults who had measles have a reduced risk of Parkinson’s Disease (see pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19255001/; pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16854347/and pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4061437/).
WHO African Region@WHOAFRO
It’s #WorldImmunizationWeek. Vaccines have saved more than 150 million lives over the past 50 years. That’s around 6 lives every minute, every day, for more than five decades. They protect against diseases such as: ✅cervical cancer ✅cholera ✅diphtheria ✅Ebola ✅hepatitis B ✅influenza ✅measles ✅mumps ✅pertussis ✅polio ✅rabies ✅rotavirus ✅rubella ✅tetanus ✅varicella ✅yellow fever For every generation, #VaccinesWork 💉 #AfricanVaccinationWeek
English

@theheraldsun I’ve never heard of him and I live in Melbourne.
English

Reporter Peter Ford has defended his move to Queensland after facing unexpected trolling, saying critics are “triggered” by his decision to leave crime-hit Melbourne. > bit.ly/4cOO926

English
Jane Saunders أُعيد تغريده

@AaronSiriSG Did Fascistbook remove your main page? I went to tag you in something and couldn’t find you.
English


POLL: Did you vote for the introduction of Welcome to Country?
How did it become all pervasive — creeping into all aspects of Aussie life from schools to workplaces, and even ANZAC?
Should it be cancelled until further notice?
DISCUSS👇🏻🇦🇺
#auspol #welcometocountry #wtc

English

@theheraldsun Pretty much the road system through Eltham going out towards Diamond Creek and Yarrambat needs to be resurfaced.
English

The Victorian Premier has announced the “biggest roads blitz in the state’s history” as part of a pre-election spending spree. See if your area is snaring repair funds. > bit.ly/4ub4Z2b

English

@ABridgen Andrew, this might be the new narrative that that hideous Klaus is talking about here.
English
Jane Saunders أُعيد تغريده

The Albanese government has launched a major vaccine campaign for COVID-19, flu and RSV as part of efforts to tackle growing “vaccine fatigue”.
skynews.com.au/australia-news…
English

Do you support getting rid of Welcome to Country until further notice?
#auspol #welcometocountry

English













