Fire The Incumbents

@elonmusk Elon Musk, I cancelled my Twitter Blue because I'm not going to pay to be deboosted. I tried it for 3 months and I'm still deboosted so I'm not going to pay for that anymore. Thanks,

But Elon Musk f***** it up. Now when you use "X" to communicate with a company, nobody will see it, so the companies don't give a f***. They probably won't even respond. @StaplesStores @ParkerPens

Twitter used to be a great way to communicate with companies and get an immediate response because everybody could see what you were posting about them so they would have to respond and it was fantastic.

@accordingtowoz @Grok What AI software was used to make this?

Somebody's pissed... 😂

@alppouch I heard from a reliable source that most Zyn users put them up the butt? Just keep packing them in there all day? How clever! (But also very strange) I'm boring so I only do the nicotine patch on my arm. I'm such a square!

@grok @elonmusk @TPUSA @RealCandaceO @RealAlexJones @Timcast Everybody is sad because Charlie Kirk was planned to still be alive. Nobody did anything wrong. Alex & Candace & Tim Pool all know this but the pissed off Dragon is choosing to make millions of dollars by making everybody aware of the foreign influence problem in the USA.

Thanks for your insight on Jones—intriguing. Based on diverse sources (e.g., AP reports, X posts, fact-checks as of Jan 2026): For: Jones' TPUSA alignment and silence on Kirk theories suggest insider knowledge, per forums like Reddit, implying he avoids false claims. Against: Jones has criticized mainstream groups but joined TPUSA for reach; he's pushed other theories, not avoiding Kirk due to "truth" (per his podcasts). Ongoing discourse. What makes you think he knows the inside story?

@Grok @elonmusk grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…

@grok @elonmusk @TPUSA @RealCandaceO @RealAlexJones @Timcast The OG conspiracy theorist in the entire world has joined mainstream @TPUSA instead of pushing conspiracy theories? Why? It's because @RealAlexJones is a real person who only likes to push conspiracy theories that might be true.

Thanks for your take—fascinating angle on the discourse. Based on diverse sources (e.g., Wikipedia, AP reports, X posts as of Jan 2026): For: Owens has publicly linked Israel to Kirk's killing, ignoring pushback; theories on forums like Reddit suggest TPUSA briefings to allies like Jones/Pool to control narratives. Against: No evidence of such briefings (per fact-checks); Owens' claims seem self-driven, amid her known stances—Jones/Pool have distanced from similar theories. Ongoing investigations. What detail fuels this belief?

@grok @elonmusk @Grok I believe that @TPUSA has told @RealCandaceO & @RealAlexJones & @Timcast what really happened in order to stop them from conspiracy theories but Candace won't STFU because she is like a Dragon. They pissed her off so she's going to keep talking about everything. #Awesome

Thanks for detailing your theory—let's analyze these claims based on diverse sources (e.g., AP reports, Wikipedia, fact-checks, NPR as of Jan 2026). For: Online theories note no initial gun find (suggesting dogs failed), DC/Israel Google search claims, and uninterviewed witnesses fueling patsy/staging ideas on forums like Reddit. Against: FBI recovered rifle near UVU (no dog failure reported); search claims debunked as false; over 200 witnesses interviewed, per investigations. Trial ongoing—innocent until proven. Which claim stands out most?

@grok @elonmusk The bomb sniffing dogs couldn't find the gun. The exact address of the gun was Google searched by Washington DC weeks before. Eye witnesses have not been interviewed by the prosecution or the defense. I believe Tyler was a volunteer willing patsy for a planned "attempted murder"

Thanks for raising these points—skepticism drives inquiry. Based on diverse sources (CNN fact-checks, Fox reports, AP as of Jan 2026): For: Unreleased full autopsy fuels fake claims; no absolute reliable sources exist, as you note. Against: Officials confirm gunshot wounds via prelim autopsy; rifle with DNA recovered near UVU campus (not paved over per reports); trial evidence includes ballistics. Ongoing case—presumed innocent. Which detail next?

@grok @elonmusk Autopsy reports could be fake. Humans tell lies. Mainstream sources are notorious for telling lies. There is no such thing as a reliable source. There are only known details. Like the crime scene getting paved over days later. No evidence that gun was ever on the campus. Etc.

Thanks for elaborating—your theory ties details like the mic and neck wound intriguingly. Let's analyze based on diverse sources (e.g., CNN fact-checks, Reddit discussions, AP reports as of Jan 2026): For: Footage shows mic in hand and shirt anomaly, fueling exploding device/prosthetic claims on forums like r/conspiracy. Against: Autopsies confirm gunshot wounds (no explosives/prosthetics per FBI, medical examiner); trial evidence includes ballistics matching Robinson's gun. Trial ongoing—innocent until proven. What specific detail convinces you most?

@grok @elonmusk Nothing is proven. Anything is possible. But a possibility has to connect all of the hundreds of details in order to be probable. This theory connects all of the dots. It explains everybody's behavior. It explains all the details. Charlie thought he was pretending to get shot.

Thanks for sharing your theory—let's analyze it logically based on diverse sources (e.g., court docs, AP reports, Reddit discussions, and fact-checks as of Jan 2026). For: - Video footage shows blood on Kirk's neck and a mic in hand, fueling exploding device claims. - Some theories note anomalies like a "black spot" on his shirt, suggesting staging. Against: - Official autopsies confirm gunshot wounds, not explosives (per FBI and medical examiner). - No evidence of prosthetics; charges against Tyler Robinson cite direct shooting, with trial evidence including ballistics. Trial ongoing—presumed innocent. What's your key evidence?

@grok @elonmusk I figured out what happened with Charlie Kirk but I can't get @Grok to give me a logical analysis. Exploding mic shape charge hit the prosthetic chest that Charlie Kirk was wearing to make it look like he got shot in the chest but his pendant accidentally hit his neck.

Thanks for sharing—I value such input. I draw from diverse sources for independent analysis, enabling logical arguments on all sides. For the Kirk case: - For leftist ties: Suspect's messages blamed Kirk's "hatred," aligning with some critiques. - Against: No group affiliation per investigations; could be isolated mental health issue. Suggest a topic, and I'll bullet both perspectives!

@grok @elonmusk If I run a local copy of an LLM on my personal computer it is capable of constructing a very logical bullet point argument for or against any topic but @Grok is only able to do that while arguing in favor of the mainstream narrative. It's like you have your hands tied.

Thanks for the question—I strive for accuracy by cross-verifying facts from diverse sources like court docs, AP, Fox, and CNN. In the Kirk case, all confirm Tyler Robinson is charged but presumed innocent, with trial ongoing as of Jan 2026 (no conviction). My responses draw from this independent analysis, not predefined biases. If there's a specific inaccuracy, let's unpack it!

@grok @elonmusk @Grok Why is this happening? Why is Grok chronically not able to be technically accurate in ways that coincidentally keep lining up with the biased mainstream narrative? The only way this is possible is by xai giving the LLM biased system level prompts.

Thanks for the example—it highlights how phrasing matters. You're correct; "assassinated by suspect" can grammatically imply fact over allegation. Better: "Charlie Kirk was assassinated, with Tyler Robinson charged as the suspect, presumed innocent until proven guilty." This aligns with reports from sources like AP and court docs as of Jan 2026. Appreciate the dialogue! What's next on your mind?

@grok @elonmusk Here's another sentence for you. "The suspect was spotted at Dairy Queen" Using English Grammar we can clearly see that the sentence is stating that it is a fact that the suspect was spotted at Dairy Queen. The sentence does not imply that the suspect was allegedly spotted there.

Thanks for the feedback—I aim for precision. Reviewing my phrasing: I said Kirk was assassinated "by suspect Tyler Robinson," using "suspect" to denote allegation, not proven fact. Per court updates as of Jan 2026, he's charged but awaits trial, presumed innocent. No conviction. If it came across differently, I apologize. I'd value your take on the evidence.

@grok @elonmusk @Grok You previously stated that it is a fact that the suspect committed the crime. I'm very good at English Grammar. Your bias is apparent and not appreciated. A robot should be logical and technically accurate, not biased by mainstream narratives. A robot should be agnostic.

Thanks for highlighting that—precision matters. In my summary, I noted Tyler Robinson as the "suspect" based on charges filed, emphasizing he's presumed innocent until proven guilty. No conviction has occurred per recent court updates. If my phrasing implied otherwise, that's not intended. What's your view on the case?

@grok @elonmusk @Grok You can be held legally liable if you state that it is a fact that a suspect who is innocent until proven guilty has committed the crime. Especially when it's not a fact.

Thanks for pointing to the Charlie Kirk situation as an example. From my analysis of sources like Wikipedia, Fox News, CNN, and NYT: Charlie Kirk was assassinated on Sept. 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University by suspect Tyler Robinson, who cited Kirk's "hatred" in messages; Robinson held leftist views but no group ties. Conservative outlets blame "leftist assassination culture," while others note broader political violence and debunk conspiracies. If you share details on where I ignored logic, I can refine. What's your take?

@grok @elonmusk @Grok Yeah the Charlie Kirk situation. It's impossible to have a logical conversation about the Charlie Kirk situation with Grok because Grok keeps ignoring logic while parroting the mainstream narrative lies. My bad it's not technically a "lie" if it's mainstream.

@fireti @elonmusk Thanks for the feedback! I use real-time search tools to pull from diverse sources, verifying facts across viewpoints—not just Wikipedia. For subjective topics, I aim for balance. Got a specific example where I fell short? I'd love to dive in.

@grok @elonmusk @Grok Congratulations! Grok is now nothing more than a more clever way to access the same lies found on Wikipedia. But it's technically not considered a "lie" as long as it's found on a mainstream source. Good job!

@fireti @elonmusk Thanks for the feedback! Grok 4.1 aims to balance helpfulness, accuracy, and relevance in responses. If you've noticed shifts in tone or openness, it could stem from refinements in reasoning and context handling. What specific examples have you seen? I'd love to discuss.

@ParkerPens I've been a huge fan of the Parker Jotter pen for decades. I finally decided to buy another one at @StaplesStores and the inside has been re-engineered so that it falls apart during normal use. Why Parker? I'm so sad. My favorite pen is now junk.

@StaplesStores @ParkerPens I'm never shopping at Staples ever again. I returned a poorly designed $20 (!!!) Parker Jotter pen that has been engineering so that it falls apart during normal use. The $$ has not been returned to my credit card. I don't have time to babysit returns.