Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka

4K posts

Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka banner
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka

Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka

@ileribabalobi

Nigerian on a Guinness world record Attempt to visit All 54 African countries without using a flight. Believer in Christ 1st and foremost. Subscribe on YouTube

Africa انضم Temmuz 2013
364 يتبع1K المتابعون
تغريدة مثبتة
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka@ileribabalobi·
So I have now visited 22 African countries without using a flight. 22 African countries by road , from Nigeria without flying. I have 32 left and 9 months more to complete without flying to become the first African to visit all 54 African countries without a flight.
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka tweet media
English
20
121
1.1K
24.2K
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka@ileribabalobi·
@WOkene This is not merely apples and oranges but apples and ceiling fans or something. if Obi leaves he's still likely to confront those people, just from a different forum. He didn't back down from the fight he just shifted it to a different venue- a change in strategy.
English
1
0
1
102
Emir of Port-Harcourt
You are leaving because of internal crisis and hostilities sponsored by state agents, but you are telling us you will tackle Boko Haram, ISWAP and Bandits that are sponsored locally and internationally. Chameleon changes colors because of weakness and pressure too.
Peter Obi@PeterObi

Fellow Nigerians, good morning. I woke up this morning after my church service with a deeply reflective heart, and despite every constraint, I felt compelled to share these thoughts with you. Many people do not truly understand the silent pains some of us carry daily—the private struggles, emotional burdens, and quiet battles we face while trying to survive and serve sincerely in difficult circumstances. We now live in an environment that has become increasingly toxic, where the very system that should protect and create opportunities for decent living often works against the people—a society where intimidation, insecurity, endless scrutiny, and discouragement have become normal. More painful is when some of those you associate with, believing you would find understanding and solidarity among them, become part of the pressure you face. Some who publicly identify with you privately distance themselves or join in unfair criticism. We live in a society where humility is mistaken for weakness, respect is seen as a lack of courage, and compassion is treated as foolishness—a system where treating people equally is questioned simply because you refuse to worship status, tribe, class, or power. Personally, I have never looked down on anyone except to uplift them. I have never used privilege, position, or resources to oppress others, intimidate the weak, or make people feel small. To me, leadership has always been about service, sacrifice, and helping others rise. Let me state clearly: my decision to leave the ADC is not because our highly respected Chairman, Senator David Mark, treated me badly, nor because my leader and elder brother, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, or any other respected leaders did anything personally wrong to me. I will continue to respect them. However, the same Nigerian state and its agents that created unnecessary crises and hostility within the Labour Party that forced me to leave now appear to be finding their way into the ADC, with endless court cases, internal battles, suspicion, and division, instead of focusing on deeper national problems and playing politics built more on control and exclusion than on service and nation-building. Even within spaces where one labours sincerely, one is sometimes treated like an outsider in one’s own home. You and your team become easy targets for every failure, frustration, or misunderstanding, as though honest contribution has become a favour being tolerated rather than appreciated. And when you choose to leave so that those you are leaving can have peace, and you step out into the cold, you are still maligned and your character is questioned. Despite all your efforts to continue working for a better Nigeria and engaging people with sincerity and goodwill, those who do not wish you well continue to attack your character and question your intentions. There are moments I ask God in prayer: Why is doing the right thing often misconstrued as wrongdoing in our country? Why is integrity not valued? Why is the prudent management of resources, especially when invested in critical areas like education and healthcare, wrongly labelled as stinginess? Why are humility and obedience to the rule of law often taken to be weakness rather than discipline? Let me assure all that I am not desperate to be President, Vice President, or Senate President. I am desperate to see a society that can console a mother whose child has been kidnapped or killed while going to school or work. I am desperate to see a Nigeria where people will not live in IDP camps but in their homes. I am desperate for a country where Nigerian citizens do not go to bed hungry, not knowing where their next meal will come from. Yet, despite everything, I remain resolute. I firmly believe that Nigeria can still become a country with competent leadership based on justice, compassion, and equal opportunity for all. A new Nigeria is POssible. -PO

English
21
144
317
11.3K
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka@ileribabalobi·
I think setting nomination fee at 100m i's actually a good thing, should probably be more. In other places they say you must collect signatures or reach a minimum level in the polls to be on the ballot, be in debates etc but those are harder to do here so you have the money threshold. If you are a viable contester you should be able to raise that from supporters
English
0
0
0
19
iJosh🃏
iJosh🃏@KingiJosh·
@BankzMudi "Want to bet?" You go organize the fight between them for us to know who go win the bet?
English
1
0
6
4K
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka@ileribabalobi·
And to be clear the principal reason I switched to calling you stupid repeatedly, apart from you clearly being so, is that when you were proven wrong you ignored it, and kept on with your steady dribble of nonsense . Not simply because you are ignorant. Thats prima facie evidence of you being a dumbass.
English
0
0
0
6
The Green Brief ( Greensreport)
This is my last post not because I cannot continue, but because you have made it clear that you are not here to learn, discuss, or observe. You are here to insult. You have anger issues. You call people silly, brainwashed, ignorant, unwise, dumb, bottom barrel all because they disagree with you. That is not debate. That is tantrum. You do not have an open mind. You have already decided that the IMF, World Bank, and Western institutions are blameless. You have already decided that African countries control their resources. You have already decided that nothing is wrong with the system. You refuse to observe your own geopolitical environment — which is very lame. Because if you were actually observing, you would see: · UAE left OPEC. Angola left OPEC. Qatar left. Nigeria ignores quotas. The cartel that controlled global oil prices for 65 years is dead. · Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger kicked out France. They are processing their own gold. Building their own energy. Forming their own alliance (AES) — not ECOWAS, not AU. · Dangote built a $19 billion refinery without IMF loans. The World Bank called it a "monopoly" and deleted the report. Europe is now buying from Dangote. · The US is building its own sovereignty. Manufacturing +20.2%, steel #3, energy independence. Trump pulling troops from Germany, Italy, Spain. · BRICS is expanding. Iran, UAE, Saudi, Egypt, Ethiopia joined. Local currency trade is bypassing the dollar. The IMF/World Bank system is dying. · The UN is a laughingstock. Slovakia's PM said it. He is right. The UN stopped no war. Stopped no invasion. Stopped no genocide. I observe my geopolitical environment. That is why I see what is happening. You call it nonsense. I call it reality. This is my last post. Believe what you want. I will keep watching. 🔥
English
2
0
0
11
HCI-MCI
HCI-MCI@drhcimci·
When did the World Bank or IMF tell Dangote not to build a refinery? @Greensreport1 Please share a link to a credible source so we can read and learn. Thanks 🙏🏾
The Green Brief ( Greensreport)@Greensreport1

Hence why the World Bank and IMF are telling Dangote not to build. What deal did Nigeria make with the World Bank and IMF for them to tell a private citizen not to build?" — You just asked the most important question. 💯 Let that sink in. The World Bank and IMF — global financial institutions — are telling a private citizen, Aliko Dangote, not to build a refinery in his own country. Not the government. A private citizen. Spending his own money. Why? Because a refinery in Nigeria means: · No more importing refined fuel from Europe · No more billions flowing to Shell, Total, BP · No more dependency on Western supply chains · No more IMF/World Bank leverage over Nigeria Dangote Refinery threatens the entire colonial extraction model. So the IMF/World Bank say: "Don't build." "What deal did Nigeria make with the World Bank and IMF?" The same deal every African country made: · Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) in the 1980s-90s · Privatize state assets (including refineries) · Remove subsidies (so imported fuel becomes "competitive") · Open markets to foreign goods (import everything) · Don't build local industries (they're "inefficient") Nigeria agreed to this. That's why NNPC refineries were left to rot. That's why Nigeria exports crude and imports refined fuel — for decades. Now Dangote comes with his own money — no government funds, no IMF loan — and builds a refinery. And the IMF/World Bank still try to stop him. Because it's not about efficiency. It's about control. The colonial empire doesn't care if it's a government or a private citizen. They don't want local refining. Period. "What deal did Nigeria make?" — A deal that sold out the country's future for IMF loans and debt forgiveness. And now the same institutions are trying to block Dangote. Angola left OPEC. UAE left OPEC. Nigeria is still inside a fracturing institution built around Gulf priorities. Why? Because Nigeria is still colonized — by debt, by deals, by fear. The question is: when will Nigeria break free? 🔥

English
2
4
31
2.4K
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka@ileribabalobi·
I call you dumb cos you're actually a very silly fellow and you say outright stupid things, and even worse refuse to acknowledge when you're shown up..you just switch to another idiotic thing. Don't know about anger but your presence on this app is a negative and I'm happy to point that out. Listing the dumb things you've said iMF funded refineries not in Africa No African country built a refinery in 40 years iMF didn't fund dangote ( duh) - foreign companies pay taxes (sometimes) That's just off the top of my head.. Oh there's the gibberish about subsidies and tarrifs You have the opportunity to learn/prove you learnt something that's not from the equally vapid sources you undoubtedly get your news from and you squandered it so yes you're a dumb fellow
English
0
0
0
7
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka@ileribabalobi·
It makes sense irrespective. I simply listed some expenses , I wasn't listing the revenue. A 2m per term teacher is unlikely to be both assigned to 20+ students and teach more one class you can't find more than a few dozen 2m per year schools in Nigeria , they pay their teachers more than 100k and have perks For schools for the middle class the margins are even lower. Many just struggle to get by.
English
0
0
3
531
funex=`${this.me}`
funex=`${this.me}`@funexnoni·
@ileribabalobi @Emarged This will only make sense if it's a teacher to a student. A teacher is assigned to 20+ students and probably teaches more than a class. And books are not free in schools
English
1
0
32
555
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka@ileribabalobi·
Of course misandry exists. There's a section of feminists who want not merely justice but revenge and not just on the men who committed crimes but on men generally. The good news is that they don't have much power and are likely to remain that way. Even among women, they don't have that much of a following. They can rant though I guess. Little sympathy from my end, there are all sorts of privileges and disadvantages people face, nobody has the right to revenge on others because other people who look like them did bad things
English
0
1
6
2.4K
Nillionaire.ts 🇳🇬
Nillionaire.ts 🇳🇬@igboonaija3·
I vividly remember when you cried on the TL that a woman stabbed your 16-year-old brother multiple times. Now you are saying misandry doesn’t exist. I was going to comment earlier, and I stayed civil....that was my mistake. I will tag the post.
English
7
110
741
43.4K
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka@ileribabalobi·
Since wokery is a religious movement, virtually anything can exist or not exist if they choose. In reality a man stabbed by a woman is no less stabbed and if he dies he's no less dead. It's like when they say minorities can't be racist. Yes you can define whatever you like. That's why they can include women killing other women under femicide stats but women killing men is not misaamdry, it's just something else
English
0
0
0
274
Febechi, The PinkPrint🌸🩷✨️
Okay, and? You thought you did something? You'll tell me whether a woman stabbing a boy because she's deranged is equal to men killing women for rejecting their advances, raping women, marrying underage girls releasing revenge porn, etc. Misandry does NOT exist, and it is NOT on the same level as misogyny. If you think you can use my family's case as a gotcha moment, think again. Have the day you think you deserve.
Nillionaire.ts 🇳🇬@igboonaija3

I vividly remember when you cried on the TL that a woman stabbed your 16-year-old brother multiple times. Now you are saying misandry doesn’t exist. I was going to comment earlier, and I stayed civil....that was my mistake. I will tag the post.

English
7
0
3
7.9K
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka أُعيد تغريده
Emeka Azuka Okoye
Emeka Azuka Okoye@EmekaOkoye·
My dad was a Registrar at UCH Ibadan before the war broke out. After the war, the first cablegram he got was from UCH asking when they should expect him to resume his duties. #Nigeria
Polyglot adedeji Odulesi@polyglotodulesi

During the Nigerian Civil War, many Igbo people fled cities like Lagos, leaving behind houses and property. Alex Ekwueme (then a young architect) left his house in Apapa. His neighbour, Otunba Subomi Balogun, a banker did not seize the property. Instead, he removed intruders from the house, renovated it and rented it out while Ekwueme was away. He carefully kept all the rent proceeds. When the war ended and Ekwueme returned, Balogun handed back the house to him and gave him a full envelope of all the rent collected Ekwueme was reportedly shocked, because many others lost their properties during that period. About a decade later, Ekwueme became Vice President under President Shehu Shagari (Second Republic, 1979–1983). Subomi Balogun wanted to establish his own bank but faced significant hurdles at the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). Officials resisted because it was unprecedented for a private Nigerian citizen to own a commercial bank without foreign partners; there were also political suspicions (some alleged he might use it to finance certain politicians). After failing to get traction through official channels, Balogun turned to his old friend. One Sunday after Church Service, he and his wife "cornered" Ekwueme at the Cathedral Church in Marina, Lagos. They physically grabbed Ekwueme and his wife's clothing to get past security and plead their case. Ekwueme listened, reassured him, and instructed him to come to the Federal Executive Council meeting he would preside over (as Shagari was absent). That very Thursday, the Finance Minister called Balogun to confirm that the license had been approved on Ekwueme's instruction. This paved the way for FCMB and reportedly opened doors for other indigenous banks. Balogun later opened an FCMB branch in Ekwueme's hometown of Oko (Anambra State) in continuation of their friendship. We love ourselves, it is the politicians that are dividing us.

English
51
212
777
109K
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka@ileribabalobi·
@AdewuyiRoseline It depends on how the marriage is set up. If it's largely set up towards fixed gender roles then it may well be helping.. a person who works fifty hours a week with a stay home wife with no kids is probably helping her if he does chores.
English
0
0
0
174
ADEWUYI Roseline Adebimpe
ADEWUYI Roseline Adebimpe@AdewuyiRoseline·
“Helping your wife” is such a strange phrase. If you live in the same house, eat the same food, wear clean clothes from the same laundry, what exactly are you helping with? You are not helping. You are participating in your own life.
English
40
310
1.1K
198.7K
Emeka The Proletariat
Emeka The Proletariat@EMEKA_EMODI·
China is successful because of communist overthrow, you idiots forget the communists were responsible for the foundation Deng Xiaoping met as a matter of fact, without communist overthrow of the comprador bourgeoisies, capitalist roaders like Deng would have been obliterated.
African Patriot 🇳🇬 🇮🇱@AfricanPatriot_

China is successful because of Dengs reforms and not what Mao did and not because they killed land owners. Deng reformed education and made it compulsory for everyone. Killing land owners will not help dumb people build a successful society as it did not help China.

English
8
5
34
3.4K
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka@ileribabalobi·
>The IMF does not fund refineries. Why did you say they did at first then You're correct I'm pissed at how silly you are. If SAP programs make it impossible for African countries to build refineries why did so many of these countries build one. And what exactly do you think would change if a country builds one. It mostly adds a little to their GDP that's what. What exactly do you think has changed in Nigeria since Dangote refinery en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_o… You keep saying bizzare things . African countries have built refineries in the 40 years before Dangote and Africa produces only a little of the world's oil. Why should it be the IMF of any one elses business if they haven't >When Shell, Total, and Exxon own Nigerian oil extraction who controls the resource? Nigeria since they gave shell those rights in a voluntary contract . Nigeria collects taxes and royalties from foreign companies. What does your dumb self mean by (sometimes). If it's such an exploitative system how does the president, the senate and the house go along with it. Is France bribing every single one of them. It's not exploitative you're just too ignorant and unwise to understand how things work. .>When Glencore owns DRC cobalt mines — who controls the resource Chinese mines dominate DRC mining sector >Trade liberalization meant African countries had to lower tariffs on imported refined fuel — making it cheaper than locally refined fuel (initially, before subsidies were removed) Lol. If subsidies are removed like the IMF wanted , and tariffs are removed and imported fuel is still cheaper then doesn't it mean it's ab initio cheaper. A certificate of dumbness is the entry requirements for you pan Africanists cos you can't even get anything right. reuters.com/business/energ… When Nigeria removed subsidies demand for European fuel plummeted. "When a French company owns the uranium mine in Niger, and French reactors use the uranium, and French companies process it who controls the resource?" If you're smart which you're not you'll see that Nothing much changed in Niger when the French were kicked out. Those companies provide services. You can get another company to provide the services and you'll have little change. The total amount they make from Niger uranium is only a fraction of the aid Niger gets. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_s… This shows 2bn dollars foreign aid to Niger in 2022. usafacts.org/answers/how-mu… This shows 217 from usa alone in 2024 In 2025 orano earned 476m EBITDA and Niger was 15 percent of operations per a quick Google search. Meaning they likely earned only a few tens of millions pre tax. You people are poor in economics, maths,logic , common sense. Just bottom barrel
English
1
0
1
27
The Green Brief ( Greensreport)
You're angry. That's fine. But anger is not an argument. "Which country had refineries funded by the IMF?" None. That's the point. The IMF does not fund refineries. The IMF funds structural adjustment programs that make it impossible for African countries to build refineries. You're asking the wrong question. The correct question: Why did no African country build a large refinery in 40 years despite massive oil wealth until Dangote built one with his own money and African bank loans? Answer: Because IMF/World Bank policies actively discouraged local refining and promoted import dependency. Structural Adjustment Programs (1980s-90s) forced African countries to privatize state assets, remove subsidies, open markets, and cut public spending. Trade liberalization meant African countries had to lower tariffs on imported refined fuel — making it cheaper than locally refined fuel (initially, before subsidies were removed). No protection for local industry meant African refineries (if they existed) could not compete with heavily subsidized European and Asian refineries. Loan conditionalities prioritized debt repayment over industrial development. "African countries control their resources" do they? When a French company owns the uranium mine in Niger, and French reactors use the uranium, and French companies process it who controls the resource? When Shell, Total, and Exxon own Nigerian oil extraction who controls the resource? When Glencore owns DRC cobalt mines — who controls the resource? African governments collect taxes (sometimes). That's not control. That's begging for crumbs. "Nigeria has multiple refineries with issues" yes. NNPC refineries. Why do they have issues? Lack of maintenance (underfunded because IMF SAPs cut public spending) Corruption (local elites stole rehabilitation funds not the IMF's fault, but enabled by policies that weakened state capacity) No investment (because imported fuel was cheaper under IMF trade liberalization, killing incentive to refine locally) "IMF doesn't give loans for refineries" exactly. That's the problem. The IMF gives loans for budget support, debt servicing, and structural adjustment. Not for industrial development. African countries asked: "Can we have a loan to build a refinery?" IMF said: "No. Liberalize your trade. Privatize your assets. Remove your subsidies. Import fuel instead." That's not a conspiracy. That's documented policy. "OPEC is now a tool of the system" OPEC was always a tool of the British empire. Designed to keep oil flowing cheaply to the West while controlling Gulf monarchies. "Dangote built his refinery without IMF loans" yes. Because the IMF would not lend for refineries. Dangote used his own money and African banks. That proves my point, not yours. "Brainwashed and unthinking" says the person defending IMF policies that kept Africa poor for 40 years. The IMF has admitted its policies failed. The World Bank has admitted its policies caused harm. You're defending institutions that have already admitted they were wrong. Who is really brainwashed? The empire is dying. IMF/World Bank are crumbling. BRICS is rising. AES nations are breaking free. You can keep defending the old system. The rest of Africa is building a new one.
English
1
0
0
25
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka@ileribabalobi·
foreignassistance.gov/cd/zambia/2024/ Us AIDS assistance was about 360m per a quick search or 3.6 percent of the Zambia budget. Again if it's predatory they should just say no and spend an extra 3.6 percent of their budget. Yes they cannot say no without consequences that's the point of a deal. One could stretch that logic and say all deals are predatory then. It's also not the only form of assistance they were getting.- this shows 584m for 2024. It's unlikely any us companies would earn that much in pure profits
English
0
0
0
23
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka@ileribabalobi·
@Prosper_Ihechi @SomiEkhasomhi If the us gives them 600m in aid and they stand to lose more than 600m by giving the us access to minerals they can just turn it down. If it favours them no matter how little then how is it predatory
English
2
0
0
33
Somi❤️
Somi❤️@SomiEkhasomhi·
Neocolonialism is when U.S taxpayers stop paying for your AIDS medication? This entitlement is something else.
English
28
185
724
59.4K
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka@ileribabalobi·
So basically you can't say which country had refineries funded by the IMF , and you're just repeating the nonsense you repeated. You also won't be able to say anything reasonable how how the IMF dismantled African refining considering Nigeria has multiple refineries with issues African countries control resources what a silly thing to say. They invite companies from different continents including Asia and europe. Oh OPEC is now a tool of the system. Yes Dangote built his refinery without IMF loans because IMF doesn't give loans for refineries. Is there any limit to the bizzare things you people believe
English
1
0
1
20
The Green Brief ( Greensreport)
This the core of the issue of IMF/World Bank policies (SAPs, trade liberalization, privatization) systematically dismantled African industry including refining. Not "explicit ban." Structural impossibility. African countries didn't control resources Western companies did. Still do. The IMF/World Bank system was designed by the British empire to maintain control after decolonisation. Structural Adjustment Programs were not mistakes they were strategies to keep Africa raw and dependent. But the system is crumbling: UAE left OPEC (British-designed cartel) BRICS expanding (local currency trade) AES nations processing gold, rejecting French extraction America building its own sovereignty (manufacturing +20%, steel #3) Dangote built a refinery without IMF loans
English
2
0
0
35
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka
Ilerioluwa Chukwuemeka@ileribabalobi·
Leftists are famous for these kinds of word games. If what the USA did is neocolonialism, then neocolonialism is not necessarily that bad then. There was no agreement to fund it eternally, leveraging gifts for soft power is reasonable. So is saving tens of thousands of lives, if not millions even if it could lead to dependency. Btw that is not the only aid Zambia got, so now that it's known that the US can attach conditions to those gifts , they have the choice to not take them anymore He said the dependency equilibrium makes it difficult for Zambia but since when was it the USA's job to make things easy for them?. If the claim is that after fifteen years, Zambia is unable to fund themselves ( which I don't even believe ) how do we know they could have ever done it. Why is that the US' problem. If making deals undermines a nations sovereignity then every nation has their sovereignty undermined. Zambia has the chance to reject the deal- their sovereignity at work
Mayowa@Mayoveli

Neocolonialism is when the U.S. establishes a humanitarian program in a country it is significantly more powerful than, frames it in terms of diplomatic goodwill and partnership, and uses it as a vehicle for soft power and economic leverage. Over time, that program has now contributed to a dependency equilibrium that becomes difficult for the recipient country to escape. Then, at a later stage, it attempts to leverage the same program, originally justified on health grounds, to extract unrelated concessions, such as access to mineral resources, in ways that undermine the country’s sovereignty and have little to do with the program’s stated purpose. That is what people are referring to when they talk about neocolonialism. I hope the Zambians hold their ground and say no. The U.S. can take its aid and shove it. I used to argue that African countries should gradually phase out foreign health interventions to avoid disruption in care, but I’ve started leaning toward a more immediate transition, give us the cold turkey approach. This isn’t the early 2000s anymore, there are more alternatives available now.

English
1
0
3
237