TommyGPT

@diegocabezas01 open to insults. i am leaning skill issue. need to shake off some mild fomo i'm not maxxing subagents🤨

@diegocabezas01 i asked to spin up 5x subagents and an orchestrator to review a 5 layer algo i've been building - it did good. But - it only accelerated vs 1x agent - it wasn't like there was a material change in output quality. Is that the expectation? OR - skill/creativity issue!? 🤣

Codex subagents game changer

@gdb google / gemini seems a complete step ahead in visuals - if i think about their training data; YouTube and years of human assisted data labelling via captcha's - it just makes sense that they lead here. And the actual tangible output from 3.1 Pro supports this.

@gdb im a big codex guy but i have used antigravity w 3.1 pro a bit to sort some fancy designs. Maybe its my prompting (i doubt it) but a frontend gallery for Codex is needed asap - show off it's potential (let users contribute their best and upvote efforts). Continued...

gpt-5.4 for frontend:

@LLMJunky What in the SPF-50 is this

Codex app light mode is simply just better. I will die on this hill. Let's fight about it, leave your wrong opinions below 👇

@haha_girrrl Biometric ID is the way, your password is superfluous! Then there’s a whole data privacy thing though…

Hot take: The username field is pointless. Change my mind.

@TheByteRacoon @UnathiAfrika @LuizaJarovsky Agreed misuse is the real risk, not the tool itself. But that pattern exists with every cognitive tool we’ve adopted. Eg Search engines shifted where effort is applied. differentiator w/ AI is leverage: used well, it compounds thinking; used poorly, it replaces!

@jailbreakersAI @UnathiAfrika @LuizaJarovsky If you use it as a tool then yes, I agree. The problem is that many users are treating it as a “companion” which AI is definitely not. And LLM providers are encouraging such approach because it benefits them.

Nobody wants to read AI-generated posts. Nobody wants to read AI-generated emails. Nobody wants to read AI-generated newsletters. Nobody wants to read AI-generated reports. Nobody wants to read AI-generated articles. Nobody wants to read AI-generated anything.

@TheByteRacoon @UnathiAfrika @LuizaJarovsky This is thought provoking take. But it is dependent on framing; like others said using AI as a copilot is no different to using a calculator for maths - or a dishwasher for cleaning; it removes friction so you can focus on higher-value work.

it's not even close, you are comparing apples to potatoes. AI generated content on the other hand, is its interpretation of the topic, it's not deterministic, not flawless, and is trying to take away critical thinking from the brain. Calculators are generating fully deterministic results, always the same, it's just a tool to reduce load on the brain. I see a huge gap between those two examples, but maybe your ability to think critically is already atrophied.

@zarazhangrui Well said. I’m also in this loop. Life was about compromise and picking your battles, now it’s ’just do it all’. Powered by fomo. This state of mind isn’t stable. We will figure it out.

Almost every AI power user I know is MORE stressed and busier after using AI, not less What people thought AI would do: 10x productivity so that we can finish work earlier & relax more What it’s actually doing: 10x productivity so that we end up with 20x more things to do cos of the sheer possibilities

@thsottiaux Codex

Codex is for engineering Codex is for research Codex is for science Codex is for math Codex is for fun You can just build things

@OfficialLoganK @demishassabis @GoogleAIStudio Holy moly. How does one juggle this with a Codex 5.4 addiction?

Introducing the all new vibe coding experience in @GoogleAIStudio, feating: - One click database support - Sign in with Google support - A new coding agent powered by Antigravity - Multiplayer + backend app support and so much more coming soon! x.com/GoogleAIStudio…

@stevibe Gemini has been distinctively ahead in frontend since ~Aug 2025 imo. (I lose track - 2.5 pro era?). I can foresee OpenAI targeting it relentlessly over the coming months with Codex being such a hot product.

I gave 6 frontier coding models the same task: turn this emoji into an SVG, from scratch, in real time. Watching them stream their thinking before a single shape appears is wild — some plan meticulously, others just wing it. Models: - GPT-5.3 Codex - Claude Opus 4.6 - Gemini 3.1 Pro - MiniMax M2.7 - GLM-5 - Kimi K2.5

@runwayml @nvidia @NVIDIAGTC super creative people will run with this and make amazing things, I really hope to see more people embrace the upside potential.

A breakthrough in real-time video generation. As a research preview developed with @NVIDIA and shared at @NVIDIAGTC this week, we trained a new real-time video model running on Vera Rubin. HD videos generate instantly, with time-to-first-frame under 100ms. Unlocking an entirely new creative paradigm and bolstering the foundations of our General World Model, GWM-1. Real-time generation opens a fundamentally different design space for video models and world simulation. We're investing in co-designing our models alongside advances in hardware to keep pushing this frontier.

@steipete @AbhiCodes15 every product made for money slowly gets eaten by products made for passion - the universe corrects itself. This equilibrium was getting shittier ~2012-2024 but since gen AI got good and destroyed some old rusty moats I feel change in the air.

@AbhiCodes15 Not everything needs to make money. Some folks just do it for the love of it.

Can someone explain how these open source projects actually make money? -Git -Linux -Docker -OpenClaw -Kubernetes

@thedorbrothers @AutismCapital @joerogan @AngryTomtweets @WhiteHouse @LinusEkenstam @bennyjohnson @Rainmaker1973 @MarioNawfal @MattWallace888 @WallStreetMav it doesn't take much to parse this, but its borderline and any exception is a slippery slope. This is too real, not instant-obvious satire. It fundamentally needs to be clear. And as an amazing gen-AI creative - I'd rather you didn't cross that line.

@thedorbrothers @AutismCapital @joerogan @AngryTomtweets @WhiteHouse @LinusEkenstam @bennyjohnson @Rainmaker1973 @MarioNawfal @MattWallace888 @WallStreetMav LOVE your vids. LOVE AI. Don't like this. Violates 'thou shall label AI'

🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: Donald Trump pressed on the Epstein list during the latest Joe Rogan episode. j-files.com

@VraserX Also second order effects - less social friction, less growth. Skills atrophy is a risk. But maybe AI can also help there.

@VraserX It’s not dystopian unless it undermines intent. That is the core imo. If you use it with intent, good. If you use it based on compulsion / addiction - you’re going to entertain yourself to mush. That’s the real risk - and split.

I genuinely think AI companions will become more emotionally important to millions of people than some of their actual friends. Not because humans are obsolete, but because most people are tired, distracted, flaky, and bad at listening. Is that dystopian or just honest?

@andrewchen Because your ambition and possibilities just did a 100x

AI is supposed to save me time, but now I find myself building stuff all evening and weekend and it's actually increasing my time in front of the computer WTF

@sahill_og This is a god-mode recruitment hack. I’d love this to be the norm. 30m, not 2h. And let the applicant ask you/the panel (presumably skilled) anything - and answer it fully even if they get you to do all the work (fuck the process, pure collab/result). Last 30m - they present.

Job interviews in 2026 should just be: "Open your laptop. Build something in 2 hours. We'll watch." No leetcode. No "tell me about yourself." No "where do you see yourself in 5 years." Just build. That's the whole interview.