
Our clients tend to trade when 1) it’s financially neutral or beneficial and 2) when operations will benefit (or be hurt by not trading)
- we measure financial neutrality between keeping the older aircraft or replacing with newer starts after year 5/6 of ownership (using Life Cycle Cost)
- financial neutrality considers not just OpEx and Mx but also replacement cost relative to market depreciation
- dispatch reliability is a somewhat deceiving metric, we’re starting to track dispatch availability: how many days out of a year could I dispatch my plane if I wanted to based on its age. This (intuitively) decreases significantly in aging aircraft.
- our benchmark survey of 140+ major corp flight departments show that the majority trade before the aircraft is 10 years old
So net/net - if it’s financially neutral to trade after year 6, why own aging aircraft with less availability, greater risk of unscheduled events, and increasing risk of market obsolescence (parts availability)?
English









