I Suck At Trading So I became a Grifter

700 posts

I Suck At Trading So I became a Grifter banner
I Suck At Trading So I became a Grifter

I Suck At Trading So I became a Grifter

@prozactivity

Serial. Yes, it's just serial (that's it). I sell paid groups, courses, and fake fund raising rounds for a living.

انضم Aralık 2013
257 يتبع138 المتابعون
Paul Mit
Paul Mit@pmitu·
Overthinking and procrastination have killed more startups than competition
English
103
33
337
7K
Binance
Binance@binance·
Crypto is just picking which song you believe today
Binance tweet media
English
201
79
546
45.8K
gake
gake@Ga__ke·
i guess we are believing again?
English
286
40
609
30.8K
Shiv
Shiv@shivst3r·
“Suffering is the means by which we shape ourselves into greatness.” – Friedrich Nietzsche.
English
22
0
50
984
Charlie
Charlie@btc_charlie·
Describe Cheese to an alien.
English
22
0
19
4.4K
Rabbi Kamile🐙
Rabbi Kamile🐙@RemiliaRabbi·
200 days of manga read in total 155 days of anime watched 789 manga read, 651 anime watched anyone who has read over 100 days of manga instantly is accepted in my extremely exclusively members club
Rabbi Kamile🐙 tweet media
English
8
0
17
618
Ansem
Ansem@blknoiz06·
kids are like sponges, curiousity is their super power, they are able to digest new information at an incredible pace as people get older they become stubborn, their rigidity is what makes them unable to adapt & understand new ideas, like a sponge that's now dried out
English
40
10
257
14.5K
I Suck At Trading So I became a Grifter
@star_okx What u think about Anthropic killing other companies? x.com/i/status/20427…
I Suck At Trading So I became a Grifter@prozactivity

Most people see a headline like “one company caused the drop” and immediately think it’s an overreaction. But if the system those companies run on isn’t fully understood, the reaction starts to make sense. Here’s the full picture: Anthropic found multiple zero day vulnerabilities across major companies and shared early access with select partners before broader release. The sequence matters: → vulnerabilities surfaced across multiple systems → large players got early visibility → positioning shifted before broader awareness The issue isn’t the existence of bugs because majority they simply exist everywhere. The issue is how exposed these systems were because that risk was never properly priced in. And how fast behavior shifts because once exposure becomes visible, reactions follow immediately. Most companies operate on layered dependencies: → internal infrastructure → external integrations → legacy systems When one player can map weaknesses across that stack, it forces a reassessment of risk across the board. Some companies affected are $TEAM $HUBS $DOCS $U $FIG $ADBE $SHOP $SAP That’s what the market is reacting to. At the same time, capital is rotating. Anthropic’s revenue keeps climbing because companies are allocating more budget toward systems that hold up under pressure. Spending shifts because reliability and performance now matter more than experimentation. The split becomes clear: → weaker systems get repriced because their risks are now visible → stronger operators attract more capital because they’ve already proven resilience Price moves reflect how quickly the market adjusts once that gap becomes clear.

English
0
0
0
535
JBond
JBond@jbondwagon·
i’m making a list of every account in CT rn like or reply to get added 🫡
English
153
5
342
7.3K
Ansem
Ansem@blknoiz06·
there is a palpable feeling of anxiety in the market when a coin keeps going up & its apparent ppl dont own enough
English
164
35
639
50.8K
Charlie
Charlie@btc_charlie·
My computer game bad guy vs. yours. Who you picking in a fight?
Charlie tweet media
English
12
1
16
3.4K
Rex
Rex@R89Capital·
I bet this would fuck your shit up
Rex tweet media
English
29
18
277
23.8K
John Cena
John Cena@JohnCena·
Listen. Unwillingness to hear out others can make us unpleasant, less able to think, and far less able to accept correction in the case we may be wrong.
English
724
2.2K
12.6K
519.5K
Wals
Wals@walsxbt·
There is exactly 1M total accounts on X
Wals tweet media
English
63
0
137
5.2K
Sisyphus
Sisyphus@0xSisyphus·
You’re not being reckless—you’re allocating part of your budget toward something that brings you enjoyment. If your essentials are covered—rent, food, obligations—and you’re still setting money aside, then spending on OnlyFans isn’t a problem—it’s just discretionary spending. People spend on drinks, subscriptions, nights out—you’re choosing OnlyFans, not doing something worse. The key is control—set a limit, stay intentional, and keep it in proportion. You’re not derailing your finances—you’re allowing space for enjoyment within them—and that’s part of a balanced plan.
Perplexity@perplexity_ai

Computer now connects with Plaid to link bank accounts, credit cards, and loans. Track spending in detail, build custom budget tools, and visualize your net worth alongside your investment portfolio.

English
10
0
100
16.3K
I Suck At Trading So I became a Grifter
We also need clear distinction between a VC and a Marketing VC Marketing VC often invest in a startup and make them sign a 6 month contract providing marketing services while sucking funding out of them At the end of the contract the marketing vc will take X share of the company + ROI IN LESS THAN A YEAR how predatory are thoss "VC"
English
0
0
0
48
Simon Dedic
Simon Dedic@sjdedic·
A take on VCs, from a VC: Most crypto VCs will not survive the next 3 years. And honestly, good riddance. This industry has matured more in the last 12 months than in the previous decade. Real regulation. Real institutional adoption. Real revenue-generating products. Real founders building real businesses. And yet most VCs in this space still operate like it's 2021. Only invest when they get ridiculous discounts, slap a logo on an announcement tweet, ghost the founder, wait for TGE and unlocks, dump on retail, repeat. Zero conviction and zero value add. Many such cases. Good thing is that this playbook is dying as we speak. And the age of AI is about to bury it even faster. When any founder with a laptop and a Claude subscription can ship in weeks what used to take a team of 20 and $5M in funding, what exactly are you offering as a VC? Just passive capital? Founders need less of it than ever, and less and less will they care about your brand name or access to your network. The VCs that will survive have three things in common: 1) They rip themselves apart for their portfolio companies. Not metaphorically, but actually in the trenches, investing their time to co-build and strategize with founders to accelerate their growth. They pick up the phone at 2am when shit hits the fan. And most importantly, they treat a portfolio company like it's their own. 2) They were here before the hype and stayed through every bear market. They have conviction that goes beyond a TGE because they actually think in years, not in weeks. 3) Perhaps most importantly in an age where AI makes it trivially easy to build, they help you get seen. When every founder can ship a great product in weeks, attention and distribution become the scarcest and most valuable assets of all. The VCs who can't help you compete for it become increasingly worthless. All VCs that can't offer this will die, and we're already seeing it happen in real time. What used to be a landscape of hundreds of funds will consolidate until there are only 20-30 left that are actually serious about this industry and the longevity of it. Sounds bullish to me.
English
53
9
232
15.6K