τяєν

@graveskies @John77394613 @DnP_BTC @theonevortex I’ve been holding Bitcoin far longer than you, been building with it longer than you’ve been here You said all that and you still don’t know how protocols work Best of luck shitcoiner, uncapped opreturn won’t help Bitcoin base layer scale 😆

All I read from you is fake retard maxi. Every judgment is a baseless assumption. You assume my motives to what fits your narrative. It's low information tribalism. You wouldn't have to make assumptions otherwise. I'm not interested in shitcoins or spam but I see something you can't so you label me in accordance with what fits your narrative and protects your ego. You probably claim to be a maxi but you talk like a nocoiner normie. I understand what has been built on top of Bitcoin both good and bad. And the good can't scale to 8 billion people. It only works if Bitcoin stays small. It's no different than bch. It can only work if it isn't successful in adoption. It can't fail if only a few use it. We all know that Bitcoin can't scale on its own. Lightning can scale more but not enough. It will likely require many different systems trying in different ways to find the most effective. You want to cut out the possibilities and only leave what we have which works now but not under the weight of 8 billion people using everyday. I guess you can just let it scale through banks and more fractional reserve bullshit. You need to study more.

It’s been interesting to see that everyone I trusted and fought alongside during the 2017 UASF is on the anti-110 side.

@graveskies @John77394613 @DnP_BTC @theonevortex Monetary functionality is being built with Bitcoin daily. This is how it should remain. Like OAuth should stick with schema bounded authentican, Bitcoin should stick with its monetary properties, else it competes with TC chains which have better technology You’re a shitcoiner

@graveskies @John77394613 @DnP_BTC @theonevortex By implying you want to support arb data on the chain, and in conjunction with your statement saying it will help people build, it’s easy to deduct that you are ignorant of what is already built You want contracts… on a non TC chain. You don’t know what you’re advocating for

@graveskies @John77394613 @DnP_BTC @theonevortex And if it wants to succeed, it cannot begin competing in the TC chain space else it’d lose pitifully You can already build on top of Bitcoin, the monetary protocol, by your statement it’s clear you’ve never tried

@graveskies @John77394613 @DnP_BTC @theonevortex You don’t know why existing protocols have been adopted to the scale they have today to imply a schema limited protocol should be expanded to support arb data A non Turing complete chain does not need to morph to support contracts, Bitcoin has been this way since inception

@graveskies @John77394613 @DnP_BTC @theonevortex Seems like you don’t understand the basics of protocols. Schema bounded protocols do the job they are intended to do, exploiting portions of the protocol to store arb data outside of the intended schema is a design flaw You should move towards IPFS if you want storage so bad

@trevdevv @John77394613 @DnP_BTC @theonevortex I agree. I'm glad you have come around.

@ToneVays @adam3us @Du_Bi_Bo @w_s_bitcoin @LeTenken @gcarbo @SteveSimple @PortlandHODL You’re a tool, you’re trying to turn Bitcoin into an arbitrage data storage You’re either a complete moron or paid for

We are not silent! 90% of Bitcoin OGs that I know are either anti bip110 or told me in DMs they are anti bip110, but don't wanna make it public cause of the lynch mob.... * Some OGs are publicly neutral, I would guess 75% of neutral are anti bip110. ** Any Bitcoin OG pro110 never understood how Bitcoin worked and was lucky to make it this far without shitcoining! - so far Bob Barnet is my only anomaly on this! And obviously Luke but he is just trying to be the pope of Bitcoin.

If bip110 succeeds, yet the same amount of spam simply moves to an alternative witness style inscription method, then I’ll admit I was wrong. But right now it seems bip110 corrects some unforeseen data incentive introductions of Segwit-Taproot and doesn’t introduce new ones.

@graveskies @John77394613 @DnP_BTC @theonevortex Bitcoin's protocol is valuable precisely because it does one thing exceptionally well: trustless, censorship-resistant, final settlement of value. That specialization is a feature, not a limitation. Inflating the utxo set quietly centralizes cost of running a node over time

@graveskies @John77394613 @DnP_BTC @theonevortex You are the one who doesn’t understand. Why aren’t you trying to store data in snmp? OAuth? NTP? BGP? Where’s your push to change these typed & schema bounded protocols to store data? Either you want a monetary protocol, or a storage protocol.

@inewcentz @theonevortex @HeSpeaksNStuff @TheGuySwann Such colorful words coming from a dunce posturing as if you know what you’re talking about

@theonevortex @HeSpeaksNStuff @TheGuySwann You are speaking logic to emotional low iq marxist fascist dweebs. 90% of what you say will go over their heads.

Curious what a larger pool of BT thinks of this. (Not that polls are very reliable of course) Ignoring all questions related to a fork and its risk, what is lost by these changes that actually has genuine, defensible, and clearly positive value?

@graveskies @DnP_BTC @theonevortex goal is to reduce the weeds, not let them flourish

@graveskies @DnP_BTC @theonevortex Storing non-monetary data in a monetary protocol is a design flaw

@HodlMagoo @inversebrah @BernieSanders It’s gonna happen, prep for 45k

I swear to God if this happens I’m going to vote for @BernieSanders

“You can’t kill an idea whose time has come.” — Alan B, The Way of Bitcoin (Bitcoin Maximalism)

@CloudflareDev You’re fucking shitting me

Introducing the new /crawl endpoint - one API call and an entire site crawled. No scripts. No browser management. Just the content in HTML, Markdown, or JSON.

@TTrevethan @eliherf1 @callebtc @knutsvanholm Then because you can steg arb data into the protocol, your solution is to open the floodgates and say F it, the monetary protocol is now an arb data protocol? Disingenuous, the goal should be to aim for the reduction and continuously refine the design not give up

@trevdevv @eliherf1 @callebtc @knutsvanholm There is no design that can prevent it and remain permissionless.

Any "bitcoiner" who wants Bitcoin to have more than one use case is just a pathetic shitcoiner scammer larping as a bitcoiner. Don't trust anything people like this say, all they want is to take your money.

@eliherf1 @callebtc @knutsvanholm Storing non-monetary data in a monetary protocol is a design flaw

@knutsvanholm How dare you use my permissionless block chain in a way I don’t give permission

@zwinchester5 @EpsteinFuryNet @ChaosAgent_42 It’s accurate, best to read em yourself instead of staying in denial

@EpsteinFuryNet @ChaosAgent_42 Propaganda site against Trump.

The news is slowing down on the Epstein Files reporting. But only because it has been made clear who's in them.

@wokeisterne @Matthew1544255 @dikballswanglow @Reality_Train @MetamateDaz …for no return or profit motive Do you not see how you clearly dont understand how money and markets actually work? Limited resources requires competition, which progresses & democratizes technologies Markets collapse when the money isn’t sound, like every fiat driven market

@wokeisterne @Matthew1544255 @dikballswanglow @Reality_Train @MetamateDaz Again, everyone liking your comment shows they fundamentally misunderstand markets & social dynamics You pitch a utopic premise; make what you’re good at if you can & you can have what you wish… …and will be coerced to work to support others

“No one owes you anything” YES THEY DO, AND I OWE THEM TOO I've had enough of this capitalist propaganda. We're human, we live within society, we should be taking care of each other.