Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Please make sure no one at your bitcoin meetup is pointing their hash to foundry
English
Simple Steve 🌌
6.1K posts
Simple Steve 🌌
@SteveSimple
UTXOracle Inventor. Run it from your own node or watch the live stream at https://t.co/8tVVAlf2xU. Free api at https://t.co/m0lWKZFeI1
Raleigh, NC Katılım Şubat 2018
0 Takip Edilen5.2K Takipçiler
Simple Steve 🌌 retweetledi
Checkers is not "an additional use case for a chess club that can help bring new ideas and revenue to the chess playing network"
It's dilution, the termination of that chess club. Taken more generally, it leads to the slow death of chess itself.
English
Simple Steve 🌌 retweetledi
@citrea_xyz this makes me want to hurt everyone involved in this crap. and somehow now I even have a sympathy towards bip110 crowd.
English
Simple Steve 🌌 retweetledi
So it was all just about a shitcoin ICO. Shocking. I'm in disbelief. Who could have said!
Take note of all the people promoting this blatant scam in any way, for your future credibility score.
Citrea | Mainnet Live 🍊🍋@citrea_xyz
1/8 Today, we introduce CTR, the coordination asset for the Bitcoin economy. Over the past two years, we built an end-to-end Bitcoin economy that relies on the Bitcoin Network as its source of truth. With CTR, we're handing control of this economy to the people who use it.
English
@aswren *was
Dawkins would fall for a good text message scam today
English
@NoahBoz But you would think it’s is a master mentality to try to use the slave mentality of others to your advantage.
English
@SteveSimple The verbal communication of what you think is 'good' shows your resentment to Saylor's displayed values. The public communication is an appeal to others with slave morality to join in or possibly validate your hostility.
English
Saylor needs a better personal story.
His only credible motivation in life seems to be to keep a promise he made to his mother to be one of the worlds most powerful men
Not helping humanity. Not family. Not even being rich. Just power and his mom
English
@Leurico8 Agree. I’m starting to think the automatic trigger date of bip-110 probably isn’t wise because we need to see how hash rate rental plays out. At least for a year or so
English
@SteveSimple I think it is a very good thing. After burning my bitaxe hash rate rental seems to make a lot of sense.
English
Hash rate rental is inevitable imo. People will directly use their wealth to signal for soft forks at the block level fairly easily. The hasher could of course oppose it if they prefer the principle to the money. But this is gonna happen. There’s no way to stop it really
English
@Leurico8 @SteveJReed @giacomozucco @oomahq @hodlonaut Fair. I get the dislike of the soft fork mechanism.
For me I like the consensus changes of bip-110. As for the soft fork strategy it’s not what I’d prefer, but I also want to see the results of some one attempting this strategy.
English
@SteveSimple @SteveJReed @giacomozucco @oomahq @hodlonaut My point is that BIP110 aims to game the system and try to activate even without consensus. Every single step along the way ignored building it in the first place and then if there is no majority of hashhate signaling for it (very low by the way), it will activate anyway?!
English
Can anyone actually identify a “uSe cAsE” BIP110 breaks that isn’t spam, is actually used and hasn’t already failed on a shitcoin? Show me some way, somehow that BIP110 will negatively affect ANYTHING THAT MATTERS.
@giacomozucco @oomahq @hodlonaut
English
@SteveSimple 99% sure apes and most biological life is conscious. 99% sure AI isn’t. Consciousness being qualia.
English
Been waiting a decade for people to stop using the word “conscious” because it doesn’t help anything.
It’s emotionally loaded and has no definition using other words that doesn’t start fights. It only subtracts from conversations
Stop using it
Alan Mathison ⏫@ai_sentience
the point @RichardDawkins is making is: if Claude can code/do philosophy/engage in conversation and is not conscious and a human with late stage dementia who can't speak is "conscious" then the definition of "conscious" is broken and fundamentally useless which is obvious
English
@Leurico8 @SteveJReed @giacomozucco @oomahq @hodlonaut All changes start out as minorities. For that minority to become a majority people have to evaluate the change for its own merits which is what OP is asking you for.
English
@SteveJReed @giacomozucco @oomahq @hodlonaut If BIP110 wins, it means you can change consensus rules without comunity consensus by just gaming the system. Extremely bad precedence.
English
@giacomozucco @SteveJReed @oomahq @hodlonaut All changes to Bitcoin begin as a vocal minority. For example I know a guy who’s being vocal about block size reduction
English
Any nontrivial miniscript use (like in nunchuck) is an example. Not very consequential. More in general, the general precedent that a change to Bitcoin validation rules which is clearly controversial for most users can still easily be enforced by a vocal minority would be itself very negative (it would make Bitcoin definitely uninteresting for me, since users minorities, just like users majorities, are retarded, and I don't want them in control of my money).
English
@J_Milkshakes You mean an absence of conscious experience like an ape?
English
@SteveSimple Said like someone who has no conscious experience
English
@NoahBoz Given your view that all communication is manipulation I would think you would see me trolling Saylor as an attempt to manipulate him or others into getting something I wanted. I have no slave morality. But curious how you reconcile your inconsistency with that
English
@cguida6 @moonbootspleb Deep philosophical questions about the nature of free will arent relevant in these kinds of trials
Similar rabbit hole into definitions of consciousness aren’t either
English
@cguida6 @moonbootspleb Which is what a trial largely consists of
English
@uanbtc 💯 if there’s a debate, it’s answered by old nodes, so long as those old nodes haven’t died
English
@SteveSimple The precedent was set with SegWit. Old node’s hash will define Bitcoin.
Proof of work purification.
English
The 2106 bug in bitcoin is so distant that it’s hard to grasp the realness of it
But do this. Try to set a time lock using the time format (not height) beyond 2106
It can’t be done because bitcoin is hard coded to die on 7 Feb 2106 at 6:28 AM UTC
That’s how real it is
English
@moonbootspleb Sure but if one is looking for consensus it’s a different matter
English
@SteveSimple I think it’s a spiritual one, not metaphysical, which to me has a secular bent.
English
Every night I say a little prayer that a popular exchange will get hacked and there will be a run to self custody
Then God trolls me by hacking Bisq
Bisq@bisq_network
Bisq Protocol Exploit Update This is a brief update on what we have learned so far, the current state of reimbursement planning for affected users, and some broader observations about the growing role of AI-assisted attacks.
English
@cguida6 @moonbootspleb It would be a judgement by peers like a court trial
English
