Post

Steve
Steve@Game_Dev_Steve·
SPVs charging 2% annual and 20% carry is insanely exploitive for a single equity fund that has no stock picking, no hedging, no active management, opaque accounting, no serious GP participation, etc. And often they're nested! Qualified purchasers/investors typically have no other option: gamble on a shady SPV or miss out. The obvious choice after due diligence is usually to pass, but it sucks, especially how hard the independent research is.
English
2
2
11
5.2K
Aashay Sanghvi
Aashay Sanghvi@aashaysanghvi_·
@bgurley If only there were another way to tap deep pockets of capital and allow for individuals to participate ...🧐
English
1
0
28
3.6K
@jason
@jason@Jason·
@bgurley The fees on these late stage ones are high right? And the sponsor puts up less than 1% of the capital?
English
6
1
13
7.6K
jason
jason@jasonth0·
@bgurley spvs are like the weird uncle at the ai funding party, everyone tolerates them but no one actually wants them around
English
2
1
5
1.7K
Noel Moldvai
Noel Moldvai@noelregrets·
@bgurley Why? It is merely a vehicle and if fairly priced (@AugmentMarkets has 0/0) with a trustworthy manager, it's really the only way to access outside of an IPO
English
0
0
1
636
The Shark
The Shark@TheShark0912·
@bgurley SPVs are a huge grift but most of the time it’s the only way to get into these AI names. It’s that or wait till OpenAI goes public in a few years when their growth rate converges to GDP
English
0
0
2
1.2K
Mentacles
Mentacles@FutureFetish007·
@bgurley America also lets politics define its priorities. Red SUV loving voters helped slow EV adoptions dramatically. Tortures the engineers in our society.
English
0
0
0
29
jdubbs
jdubbs@jweil130·
@bgurley Chamath back at it. New spac
English
0
0
0
479
Allen Knoll
Allen Knoll@GreenWaveSaves·
I looked that up. If I have 3,000,000 GreenWave* Cruisers can they be classified as SPV's (Single Purpose Vehicles) No seriously, I want SPV's as part of GreenWave*s 10 Silos. If your investing in something like a "B" Corp like GreenWave* we have to insist on SPV's directed at particular projects and sub-projects. The biggest problem may be that Anthropic may be just a 1 Trick Pony
English
0
0
0
413
John Michael Kane
John Michael Kane@thejmkane·
@bgurley Ok, so go democratize private financing instead of shutting everyone out.
English
0
0
2
309
PayPalled
PayPalled@PayPalled123·
@bgurley The large funds are the ones pushing this as it allows them to inflate valuations without scrutiny. Eg Founders Fund and 8VC investments in Anduril at a ridiculous $30B valuation came through their SPVs, not main funds. Ditto Lux's investment wet through an SPV.
English
0
0
2
312
Camina Drummer
Camina Drummer@CaminaDrummer4·
@bgurley SPVs exist because rent seeking parasites like you got corrupt laws to be passed. Any time you want to face the music for being a value destroying rent seeking parasite, you are more than welcome.
English
0
0
0
37
Paylaş