Post

Gary Marcus, MIT PhD and NYU Professor Emeritus
👇 This is an incredible admission by Jensen Huang. Effectively he is saying that AI, for all the hype (some from himself) wasn’t really useful until late 2025. Let that sink in. This means practically everything everyone said before was more or less bullshit. And it raises a question: *how useful* is it now, and how much it that utility worth? $10B a year? $50B? It can’t just be a little useful to justify the trillions in infrastructure. It has to maybe be the most lucrative technology that ever existed to justify those investments. So far it ain’t even close to that.
tae kim@firstadopter

Jensen: "this all happened in the last several months. AI in the last several months became useful. That’s the big idea" "GPU consumption is going through the roof. Even GPUs we sold four or five years ago now are rising in price faster than good wine." $NVDA

English
39
48
295
31.7K
Timothy B. Lee
Timothy B. Lee@binarybits·
@GaryMarcus Maybe they are making big investments now (and made big investments in the past couple of years) because they expect it to be useful in the future? Investments are forward-looking almost by definition.
English
2
0
9
1K
YT Commenter 2015
YT Commenter 2015@ytcommenter2015·
@binarybits @GaryMarcus Investments are also a form of gambling. In this case, they require probably the biggest returns ever in terms of raw monetary value.
English
0
0
0
18
Paylaş