BLM (Buster of Liberal Myths)

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk What part of "some" gives you the most problems? Sorry, you don't get to make false assertions about what I am saying. I will continue to call you out. Your imagination does not sync with reality. Your strawman and false assertions are just sad.

@1classic_lib @1bv_radar @elonmusk "I prefer political bloggers over medical science" is a long way of saying "I only listen to people who tell me what I want to hear." If you think bloggers have more credibility than the entire medical establishment, you aren't "busting myths," you're just lost in the sauce.

Major

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Yes, I bust liberal myths on a regular basis. So what? So i ask again; where did I say I busted a liberal myth here? Hint: just because it is my username, doesn't mean I claimed it or did it here. Hope that helps.

"I didn't claim I busted a myth." ​My brother in Christ, it is literally your username. If you aren't here to provide facts or "bust" anything, you're just another guy with an internet connection and a collection of bad takes. Don't go backpedaling now that the "sources" failed you. ,👇

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Skippy, your opinion of me doesn't change your are obtuseness. Who said the gold standard was a lie? Only person? Did you forget about the other sources? Let me know when you're able to debunk. I bet dollars to donuts, more studies come out soon that support my contention.

Imagine calling someone "obtuse" while your entire argument relies on a Google search result for a report you didn't realize was mathematically flawed. ​If the "gold standard" is a lie, why is the only person agreeing with your "math" a political blogger with no medical degree? Stay in the bubble, the real world uses calculators.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk I go to a doctor who isn't a leftwing partisan hack. Common sense is a code word for Common sense. Question: Did you buy into the decades long govt reviewed "food pyramid" lie? I sure the hell didn't. I let common sense guide the way. As usual, eventually I was shown to be right

When the Buster of Liberal Myths is busted, incarceration is the only argument left". 🏛️ ​You're hiding behind "compare vs. equate" because you can't defend the fact that you prefer political bloggers over the AMA, AAP, and APA. ​Answer me this: ​If you have a medical emergency, do you call a political scientist or a doctor? ​Why is a Google search result more credible to you than peer-reviewed clinical outcomes? ​Is "common sense" just a code word for "I ignore any facts that don't fit my narrative"?

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Damn, you are obtuse. Not unrelated to statistics, unrelated to your fallacy. What moving target? I gave you a link with multiple sources. What definition did I change? Where is this imaginary backpedaling? Anyway, thanks for unwittingly admitting you have debunked nothing.

@1classic_lib @1bv_radar @elonmusk Claims "math is unrelated" while literally using the word "STATISTICAL" in the previous post. ​The backpedaling is moving faster than the actual data at this point. Hard to "debunk" a moving target that changes its own definitions every time it gets checked. 🏃‍♂️

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Umm, I didn't call it "math" nor claim to provide equations, you did. I'm simply pointing out that "math" is unrelated to your fallacious arguments. Funny thing is you haven't debunked a damn thing I said. You offered some conflicting studies and bitched about sample size.

@1classic_lib @1bv_radar @elonmusk Imagine calling it "math" while providing 0.00 equations. 😭 ​I guess "standard statistical plateau" is just the new academic way of saying "I trust my Echo Chamber more than my eyes." Let me know when the calculator finishes its imaginary long division.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk I'm hung up on grammar? You're the one who felt the need to inject it into the conversation. I am just addressing the mindset of people who like you who do that. You also seem very triggered by "busting liberal myths" but I didn't claim I busted a myth here.

It’s funny you’re hung up on grammar when your logic is currently in a coma. ​You’re citing "evidence" that has the statistical weight of a Twitter poll, then acting like you’ve cracked the Da Vinci Code. It’s not a "liberal myth," it’s just basic math. Maybe spend less time "busting" and more time auditing a Community College stats class.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Um, I never once called it a busted myth, you lying POS. Roughly 5 people, huh? Interesting, seems like a liberal myth.

Imagine thinking a 2024 survey which hasn't even finished its full reporting cycle—is a definitive trend. 🤡 ​You're looking at a noisy, sub-sampled slice of a specific election study and calling it a "busted myth." Newsflash: when your sample size for 2006 births is roughly five people in a basement, the graph is going to look like a cliff.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Of course I am right, grammar Nazi. Sorry, my link had multiple sources, and I provided it 2 different ways. Cope harder.

You’re right, it’s not about the grammar—it’s about the fact that you’re citing a graph that looks like a EKG of a caffeine overdose. ​"I have cited exactly zero vibes." ​Correct. You’ve also cited exactly zero sources. At least "vibes" have a mood; these lines just have an identity crisis.

@xo_Bambita @Gr82BA10ACVol @Provokethoughtz Actually they have everything to do with real world situations. They give a far clearer picture of the real world than your tiny anecdote. If you neighbor says labradors are bad because one bit her, but stats show only 1 of 100 labs bite people, what are you going to believe?

@1classic_lib @Gr82BA10ACVol @Provokethoughtz Statistics have nothing to do with real world situations you can’t be that fucking stupid.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Why would I have to hide, when you are the one choosing incorrect words? I hide from nothing and stand by the comparison. I showed you multiple studies. You claim other studies differ. So be it. There will be more studies, and time will tell. Common sense says the fad is waning.

When the Buster of Liberal Myths is busted, incarceration is the only argument left. 🎯 ​You're hiding behind the semantics of "compare vs. equate" because you have zero rebuttal for the fact that your "rapid decline" was a basic math error. ​Using unweighted raw data for a longitudinal study is a statistical rookie mistake. When independent researchers re-ran those same numbers with actual weighting, the "drop" vanished—showing a stable plateau, not a fading fad. You didn't bust a myth; you just forgot your calculator.

@Mintslice2 @Donmega67 @S_D_Mannix @HorrorGorl Hey dipshit, please stop lecturing me on the constitution, because you have already proven beyond all reasonable doubt that you are fucking clueless on the topic. You are the posterchild for this idiom:

@1classic_lib @Donmega67 @S_D_Mannix @HorrorGorl Like what? It's completely constitutional to "forcibly confiscate" taxpayer money and distribute it to those in need. What specifics make it OK with you?

The most cruel and sadistic comments you will ever receive are literally always from someone with a Bible verse in their bio

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Show full context. Keep trying.

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl It's right here, lmfao.

@Mintslice2 @Donmega67 @S_D_Mannix @HorrorGorl A leftist's idea of what constitutes a "person in need" stretches well beyond what rational people consider "needs". E.g., your liberty did not increase because my money was forcibly confiscated so you could by Twinkies and carbonated sugar water with food stamps. Cope.

@1classic_lib @Donmega67 @S_D_Mannix @HorrorGorl And noooo........ any form of taxation effects taxpayer liberty, but for what? To fucking help those in need m8, which increases their liberty. It's also completely constitutional to "forcibly confiscate" taxpayer money for distribution to those in need. Cope.

@Mintslice2 @Donmega67 @S_D_Mannix @HorrorGorl Please do. Be sure to show the full context while you are at it. Thanks.

@1classic_lib @Donmega67 @S_D_Mannix @HorrorGorl I might make this my new display picture. LMFAO

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl You are one pathetic sad sack. The "general welfare" clause has been egregiously abused and deliberately MISinterpreted beyond all logic, by "progressives", for over a century. So you lecturing me on the constitution, is like King George lecturing the FF on limited govt.

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Article I section 8 "To tax and spend for the general welfare" You don't even know your own constitution, which is weird for a self-proclaimed constitutional conservative. Roads = constitutional Pensions = forcible confiscation Is totally bullshit unconstitional diahrea

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Of course the constitution was man made, imbecile. No one claimed otherwise. The aforementioned "enlightened thinkers" created it. They created it to protect God given/natural rights.

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl A bunch of your founding fathers were enlightenment thinkers, and your constitution promotes a separation of church and state. They didn't believe your rights were "endowed by our creator".... is this a joke? The constitution was man made, not ordained by God.

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Actually my ancestors had the exact same God given rights as me, they simply lacked a constitution that protected those rights. Is it starting to make sense yet? Maybe you need to get a book on the basics of the constitution.

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl You just brought it up...... "Rights were endowed by our creator" No they fucking weren't Your ancestors had completely different rights to the people present in the bible. There's no objective rights m8. It's all man made. Hence why free speech wasn't in the constitution.

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Wrong, dipshit, I never brought up religion, Are you ever right about anything? Stop trying to portray yourself as some great expert/defender of the constitution, if you can't even grasp/accept the basic premise.