CD Marshall

Energy‑budget diagrams aren’t validated by reading direction. They’re validated by physics: boundary conditions, conservation of energy, flux divergence, heterogeneous temperatures, and radiative‑transfer equations.

@afreedma Record heat requires a synoptic setup, air mass origin, subsidence, radiative conditions, soil‑moisture feedbacks, and boundary‑layer structure. High pressure is part of the picture, but not the cause.

New study finds the current heat wave in the West would be "virtually impossible" without human-caused climate pollution. We're on the verge of breaking an all-time March heat record for the US today/tmrw. cnn.com/2026/03/20/wea…

@Maga4liberty They lowered the standards to get them in. No women and few men made the cut for the Recon Rangers back in the 80s.

What do you think about females serving in the Special Forces???

@_ClimateCraze The next glaciation is just around the corner, geologically speaking, anyway. 🥶

Andrew still doesn't get it. We will continue (over the long term) to observe warming records as we continue to thaw out from the Little Ice Age. In about another 100 years or so, we will again enter another global cooling trend - unfortunately.

@The_Epic_Mike Then he'll love this: 😂 x.com/charliebcurran…

Just say you're gay and hate women.

@musta_ankka @PeterDClack ..."GHGs slow energy out → ΔU > 0." Is exactly backwards. Slowing an internal flux does not increase U. To increase U, you need: Q(external) >0. This is the 1st LOT: (ΔT > 0 ⇒ ΔU > 0). Only external energy can change U. Internal variability can redistribute energy, not DT>0.

@4RealClimate @PeterDClack Wrong premise. Earth isn’t a closed box. Solar energy in is fixed; GHGs slow energy out. Result: temporary imbalance -> planet gains internal energy (ΔU > 0) until T rises to match. That’s why your “only external energy” line misses the radiative transfer step entirely. Period.

Southern elephant seals flourished on the ice-free shores of Antarctica for several thousand years, when temperatures were much warmer than today. This recent discovery challenges the modern climate narrative of 'unprecedented' modern warming. It could only be possible if elephant seals had access to ice free beaches for breeding and molting. It also questions the notion that we are living in a far warmer world today. It must have been a lot warmer between 7,000 and 500 years ago for this to happen, overlapping the Holocene Climate Optimum. We are often told that Antarctic ice loss is unprecedented. But if we look at the biological record instead of just the last 40 years of satellite data, a much more complex story emerges. Recent research by Brenda Hall (University of Maine, 2023) and others has identified over 300 samples of southern elephant seal remains, such as skin, hair, and bones, along the Victoria Land Coast of the Ross Sea as far south as 78°S. This indicates a widespread, long-term presence rather than isolated visits. Elephant seals are not ice-dwellers like Weddell seals, and they require ice-free, pebble and sand beaches to breed and molt. Radiocarbon dating shows these colonies thrived in the Ross Sea for 6,000 years, from the mid-Holocene until only about 500 to 1,000 years ago. For these colonies to exist that far south for six millennia, the Ross Sea had to be significantly warmer and less ice-choked than today. The frozen state we currently consider normal is actually a relatively recent development, likely triggered by the cooling of the Little Ice Age (1300 to 1850). It also means the current sea-ice conditions in the Ross Sea are not necessarily the long-term baseline. Periods of greater warmth have occurred naturally in the recent geological past. The mummified remains at 78°S are silent testimony that natural cycles have historically pushed Antarctic ice much further back than today, long before the industrial era. Biology is recorded in the permafrost, waiting to be read. Image: Brenda Hall - Earth and Climate Sciences - University of Maine

@musta_ankka @PeterDClack ‘Solar energy in is fixed’ refers to TSI, not ASR. TSI is at TOA; ASR is the energy actually absorbed by the internal system. ASR can change even when TSI is constant. Internal radiative flux changes cannot increase U only changes in ASR can...

Make that 1101 Scientists 🥰💁🏼‍♀️🫶🏻!!!

@Electroversenet Mann wasn't appointed his position because of his veteran years of experience.

MIT Professor Emeritus of Meteorology Dr. Richard Lindzen has spent decades inside the heart of the climate establishment. He helped write IPCC reports and he says the science is nothing like the apocalyptic headlines. Quote: "Even the IPCC, if you read Working Group I, the actual science section, doesn't support these doomsday claims." Lindzen says the scary narratives pushed by politicians and media are built on distortion, not data. And even inside the IPCC, many scientists know it.

@mattvanswol This isn't organic. It's planned and that means funded.

🚨#BREAKING: Atlanta police have released a statement saying that they will ARREST THE PARENTS of teenagers found breaking the law ahead of multiple planned "teen takeovers" happening this weekend. During a previous teen takeover, 17 people, including a 13 year old, were arrested and 11 firearms were found, including a modified FULLY AUTOMATIC HANDGUN. We do not have to live like this...

@musta_ankka @PeterDClack Alarming to who? Not to anyone with a shred of understanding atmospheric physics. ΔT > 0 ⇒ ΔU > 0 (To increase global temp an increase in global internal energy is required). _Only external energy can increase U and internal fluxes never change U. Period.

@PeterDClack You utter clown. How many times must it be said to you that it is the **rate** of warming that is alarming. That is the thing that will create very severe problems for humanity.

It was part of the disgusting anti-science efforts to create a bogus 99% of scientists agree with a climate crisis!

@fredco1948 @KevGrant8 @PIK_Climate @rahmstorf

@4RealClimate @KevGrant8 @PIK_Climate @rahmstorf 🤡🖕

Only a small fraction of greenhouse gases is needed to create most of the greenhouse effect, because these gases absorb specific wavelengths of the heat the Earth emits, states PIK scientist @rahmstorf in new explainer on climate change myths👇Full video: youtube.com/watch?v=0mla1i…

@STARFORCEHH He's a Democrat. I trust him as much as I did Marjorie Taylor Green.

Be sincere Is Fetterman a solid guy? Yes or No and Why.. go...

@Disciple4Lif @OliLondonTV @LaurieoncRN Cops are terrorists in Iran and part of the regime.

@OliLondonTV @LaurieoncRN COP KILLERS

These young Iranian men put on a brave face as they were handed death sentences in Iran for protesting. They were convicted of ‘waging war against God.’ Yesterday they were all executed. 🕯️Saleh Mohammadi 🕯️Saeed Davoudi 🕯️Mehdi Ghasemi

@fredco1948 @KevGrant8 @PIK_Climate @rahmstorf I think this is more your speed. youtube.com/watch?v=uc6f_2…

@4RealClimate @KevGrant8 @PIK_Climate @rahmstorf 1st Law (Conservation of Energy): Increased greenhouse gases (GHGs) trap outgoing infrared radiation, reducing the energy escaping to space. The heat trapped is equal to the heat lost from the surface, satisfying the conservation of energy.

@fredco1948 @KevGrant8 @PIK_Climate @rahmstorf You keep repeating slogans, but you still haven’t disproved the physics. ΔT > 0 requires ΔU > 0, and only external energy can increase U. Show the mechanism by which internal fluxes increase total internal energy that disproves the 1st Law of Thermodynamics. You can't.

@4RealClimate @KevGrant8 @PIK_Climate @rahmstorf 1st Law (Conservation of Energy): Increased greenhouse gases (GHGs) trap outgoing infrared radiation, reducing the energy escaping to space. The heat trapped is equal to the heat lost from the surface, satisfying the conservation of energy.

@fredco1948 @KevGrant8 @PIK_Climate @rahmstorf

@KevGrant8 @4RealClimate @PIK_Climate @rahmstorf No insults, mate. Just accurate character descriptions off utter morons, unable to show any evidence for their BS. Gfy Kev

@fredco1948 @KevGrant8 @PIK_Climate @rahmstorf Not one of your links show how: >ΔU increases without external input >internal fluxes add energy >absorption/re‑emission increases total internal energy >“slowed cooling” increases U >“emission altitude” increases U They don't even attempt to, because they can’t. Now answer the?

@4RealClimate @KevGrant8 @PIK_Climate @rahmstorf 🤡🖕steve.cooleysekula.net/blog/2011/08/1…

@KevGrant8 @fredco1948 @PIK_Climate @rahmstorf I'm using an algorithm to identify if it is a bot account and report it. I have found 7 so far this year.

@4RealClimate @fredco1948 @PIK_Climate @rahmstorf You really are wasting your time with this numpty dude. It only knows what propaganda told it to say. Otherwise it doesn't have a fucking scooby do about facts, delta or anything else. It seems to think AGW denying (insert insult) is some sort of clever reply Save your breath

@fredco1948 @KevGrant8 @PIK_Climate @rahmstorf I asked whether you understand that ΔT > 0 requires ΔU > 0, and that only external energy can increase U. If you disagree, show the mechanism by which internal fluxes increase total internal energy that disproves the 1st Law of Thermodynamics.

@4RealClimate @KevGrant8 @PIK_Climate @rahmstorf 🤣🤣🤣 Why can't you show scientific evidence for your BS? Repeating the same BS over and over doesn't make it true, loser. climate.gov/news-features/…