Asyt Arc

Taste is the only moat for future computer engineering.

@Steve8708 Builder

Announcing Builder 2.0 We raised $67M to build collaborative coding for Claude and Codex - Start tasks from a local branch, Slack or Jira - Real-time collab between humans and agents - 100s of parallel agents code, test, review Reply "Builder" and I'll DM you 500 agent credits

@RapidEnglish4u Am

I wish I ___ taller. A) am B) were

@Englishtiip Damn

@Englishtiip B

He died ___ COVID-19. A) of B) from C) in D) with

@echanxec @eChan_XEC @e_koush

@kimmonismus True

Today is the biggest day for open source - and for Chinese companies.

npmjs.com/package/ecash-… ecash-quicksend was updated from 1.0.6 to 1.3.6 today—10 minor versions in a single day. A large number of tests, code improvements, and fault handling mechanisms.

You can learn anything in 2 weeks. You can't master it, obviously, but if you obsess over it, you can become better at it than most people ever will. You'd be surprised how fast your life can change when you understand this.

@emma_saintly @IraninSA Your IQ < 65. Confirmed

Calling American commanders “criminals” while asking if they have children? This is emotional manipulation. A US missile struck an IRGC base right beside the school in Minab, and outdated data caused a horrible error that killed many children. Is it Tragic? Yes, but Iran embeds its forces among civilians and then plays the victim when the consequences hit. The real outrage should be at those who started this conflict.

Remember these two criminals. Leigh R. Tate, the commander, and Jeffrey E. York, the executive officer of the USS Spruance, who ordered the launch of Tomahawk missiles three times, killing 168 innocent children at a school in Minab. Don’t they have children of their own?

@7lxo90 @fairiehaze Tbh every one who claims they don’t like cat can be easily converted once they have one

@Alitayin @fairiehaze Mama doesn't like cats

Anyone using claude code? Do u need a cheap api key?

@louszbd 💯

finally glm-5.1 at the very beginning we were teaching models how to write code, basically training a system that could imitate developers. back then AI lived inside the IDE as an intelligent assistant, but we were still the main driver. that was the copilot era of AI coding. then it started to become something more collaborative. we could express a vague intention (prompt), and the model translates that intention into structured software. in a way, that was the first time we taught machines to understand vibe. earlier this year, we entered the agentic engineering era. we stopped programming line by line. models began to form plans, maintain them, and operate inside a feedback loop. the model takes responsibility for planning. and now we are approaching a moment where AI can operate on the same time horizon as engineers. this is why we built glm-5.1. we want to unlock a new long-horizon paradigm. where it starts to tackle the kinds of problems that unfold over weeks: debugging, integration. an agent to remember context over long stretches, still stay aligned with the objective (and keep correcting itself along the way)

@xolosArmy @sedonatvcom @TobiasRuck Yes, that is why i trusted him

@sedonatvcom @Alitayin @TobiasRuck Tobias is a Legend

Please ask everyone to be cautious about cooperating with @TobiasRuck. He breached the contract in his cooperation with me in a dishonest way. For more details, DM

@7lxo90 @fairiehaze Get one

@fairiehaze I wish I had a cat but I don't💔

@sedonatvcom @TobiasRuck You can DM for details. if you don't, who care what your pick. you can pick yourself.

@Alitayin @TobiasRuck between you and @TobiasRuck I'll pick Tobias all day long.

@TobiasRuck x.com/Alitayin/statu…

@jasonbcox0 x.com/alitayin/statu…

@Alitayin You should take a deposit before beginning any work. And ideally get paid in full before handing over deliverables, even for the first stage.

Suppose someone collaborates with you to design their app under a $3,000 agreement divided into two stages: the draft stage (Stage 1) and the full stage (Stage 2). In the draft stage, you provide several design mockups to establish the concept and style — this stage helps to adjust the future direction of the work. Regardless of whether they are satisfied with Stage 1, they must pay $1,000. If they are satisfied after Stage 1, then the project proceeds to Stage 2 for the remaining $2,000, covering all design content. After reviewing your previous design portfolio, they agreed to this plan. You then spent about 3–4 weeks understanding the app’s interactions and one week creating the design, delivering 5 app screens. During this period, the client even expressed that he liked the design, but then said their partner didn’t, then They rejected the draft, decided not to continue the collaboration, and said they would only pay $100 out of politeness. When you requested the agreed $1,000, they accused you of making threats, claimed they could pay at most $400, and behaved rudely. Do you think that’s reasonable?

@rnsescanorzoro @TobiasRuck No

@Alitayin @TobiasRuck Hi Alita. Does this situation with Tobias Ruck have anything to do with any development on the eCash network?