Anthony

26 posts

Anthony

Anthony

@Anthony07585274

Beigetreten Temmuz 2021
180 Folgt55 Follower
Britt 🌺
Britt 🌺@B_Reel_Outdoors·
Say “hi” if I can DM you😚
Britt 🌺 tweet media
English
1.6K
274
7.9K
140.4K
Anthony
Anthony@Anthony07585274·
@MichaelSalla He’s always been in this for clicks and views has no bull shit detector at all.
English
0
0
2
111
Michael Salla
Michael Salla@MichaelSalla·
Eyewitness claims dead scientist leads antigravity research at secret Spaceport under Green Mountain, Alabama Amy Eskridge has been listed among the 11+ missing/dead scientists working on breakthrough technologies that could be linked with the UFO issue. What we know officially is that she was a pioneering anti-gravity technology expert & head of the Institute for Exotic Science in Huntsville, Alabama,. After revealing threats she was receiving for her efforts to promote antigravity research, and saying she would never take her life, she was allegedly found dead in June 2022 from a self-inflicted gunshot. On May 29, I received a text message from a source I have known for several years, who said he had twice met someone who claimed to be Amy Eskridge, who looked very much like her. The woman went on to share startling information about an underground base with a large spaceport at Green Mountain, Alabama, where Nordic ETs are training international military pilots. The facility is allegedly run by Eskridge, who wants to reveal to the world the existence of the facility along with information about four additional fundamental forces of nature that are essential to the understanding of antigravity, the operation of interstellar spacecraft, the existence of stargates, consciousness transfer, and orbs. In this Exopolitics Commentary, I analyze the various elements of my source's text message, along with discussion of three scenarios ranging from the information being genuine, part of an elaborate psychological operation, or wholly contrived by the source. Article version is available here: exopolitics.org/eyewitness-all…
English
61
146
548
24.3K
Anthony
Anthony@Anthony07585274·
@RedPandaKoala Don’t give Sean a platform.. he’s a scumbag
English
0
0
1
13
Red Panda Koala
Red Panda Koala@RedPandaKoala·
Sean Kirkpatrick says the new AARO Director Jon Kosloski’s is playing into "sensationalism" when he says some UFOs move in ways that are unexplainable “The new director of AARO, Dr. John Kasloski has said that ‘there are cases that with my physics and engineering and time in the intelligence community, I do not understand and I do not know anybody else who understands them either.’ That seems to sort of contradict quite a bit with your experience. He seems to be saying there is some stuff that doesn't make any sense.” “I've seen some of the things that he's referring to and I would just disagree. He's not the only physicist that's out there. There's a lot of people that know a lot of different things about everything from plasma physics to lightning to all kinds of other interesting electromagnetic types of phenology. I think that's playing a little bit up to the sensationalism of the department these days.”
English
24
13
68
13.9K
Michael Salla
Michael Salla@MichaelSalla·
Antigravity researcher Amy Eskridge did not die in 2022. Next week, I will publicly release details that Amy faked her death and is now in contact with a reliable source I have known for several years who has shared stunning info about her current antigravity research at a secret research facility. I will share more details in my webinar today. crowdcast.io/c/trump-pentag…
Michael Salla tweet media
English
899
1.4K
8K
788.2K
Anthony
Anthony@Anthony07585274·
@RedPandaKoala Dude this guy Sean if a sack of shit liar!! I mean anyone can watch the videos
English
0
0
1
355
Red Panda Koala
Red Panda Koala@RedPandaKoala·
Former AARO Director Sean Kirkpatrick says Jake Barber and Skywatcher produced no evidence of UFOs when investigated “Are you aware of Skywatcher, Jake Barber, and those guys that say they're able to summon a UFO and they've got a dog whistle?” “We've talked to them. I found absolutely nothing credible about it. They weren't able to produce any evidence. They weren't able to produce any pictures, documents, video, data, anything.”
English
76
18
164
34.6K
summer
summer@summerxiris·
Today’s selfie please enjoy
summer tweet media
English
223
75
2.6K
70.4K
Anthony
Anthony@Anthony07585274·
@InterstellarUAP So wtf actually happened here why did they stop? Does anyone know?
English
0
0
0
140
Interstellar
Interstellar@InterstellarUAP·
Skywatcher's Jake Barber: "We can summon UFO's 100% of the time in daylight" He told Ross Coulthart: "100% of the time when we run our operation with the dog whistle we get results in broad daylight." His Skywatcher team uses an electro mechanical signaling system that summons UAPs every single time. Even in full daylight. They've captured nine different shapes on video. A whistleblower claiming on demand, repeatable contact with the phenomenon. Is this the real deal? Or too extraordinary to be true?
English
277
175
1.4K
138.2K
Michael Salla
Michael Salla@MichaelSalla·
In her June 30, Star Nations News, Elena Danaan claims she was told by an ET Herald that. "The ancient space arks have not fallen into the wrong hands ...These space arks are protected by impenetrable shielding technology. None of these vessels have been hacked by low vibrational intentions because the technology prevents such intrusions." youtu.be/-4-_oFB8haQ?si… Her second-hand information contradicts the eyewitness testimony of JP, who in his most recent Update 47 revealed that a Pacific Ocean Space Ark had been accessed/taken over by a group of 30 black-clad Deep State operatives with evil intentions. JP explained what happened with his abduction in Japan and escape from the space ark here: exopolitics.org/deep-state-abd… Danaan's information is also inconsistent with what was revealed in the Transylvania Book series where similar ancient technologies had been compromised by Deep State/Freemason operatives after the protective frequency shields had been first deactivated by someone with the right frequency, Cezar Brad. More info here: exopolitics.org/ancient-hall-o… In conclusion, despite protective mechanisms put in place to prevent access to or takeover of ancient tech by those with the wrong frequencies/consciousness, the Deep State finds a way to gain access to such tech by abducting and manipulating those individuals with the right frequencies & consciousness. This is what happened with JP and a Nordic ET, both of whom refused to cooperate with the Deep State operatives who gained access but were unable to take full control of the Pacific Space Ark. I find JP's eyewitness account of what actually happened on the Pacific Space Ark more reliable than Danaan's 2nd hand info from an unknown galactic authority figure making proclamations that don't fit the facts of what's happening on Earth.
YouTube video
YouTube
English
70
42
395
18.6K
Anthony
Anthony@Anthony07585274·
@CoreyGoode I love how people finally woke up to this guys bull shit lol
English
0
0
1
21
Skye 💚
Skye 💚@tasteofskye·
free spicy video Sunday, say "YES" if you want one❤️
Skye 💚 tweet media
English
830
303
10.6K
341.3K
Michael Salla
Michael Salla@MichaelSalla·
“There Can Be Only One” Syndrome I find it ironic that Elena Danaan is now following in the footsteps of Corey Goode, who attacked other alleged SSP insiders using similar sources and information to his own as "counterintelligence agents". After I introduced Danaan to Goode in 2021 for her excellent work on the Stephen Chua case, she began discussing a communication/vision with Inner Earth beings including the "Anshar." Goode, who had first written and spoken about his meetings with the “Anshar” flipped out. He next publicly condemned her as a disinformation agent who was appropriating his info and putting out hopium to fool the masses and build a big following. Danaan was unknown at the time, and Goode was a fading "big star" who still had a significant following. Not dissimilar to the current situation with Danaan as the star today, wanting to defend her information from others who are putting out their own accounts of being part of a Galactic Envoy program. A program Danaan herself introduced, which told of starseed pairings, where one incarnated on Earth while their mate stayed behind as a Federation member to protect them. Now Danaan is doing the same as Goode to those who claim to be part of the Envoy program and believe they are working with the GFW. Danaan is calling these other alleged envoys "counterintelligence agents" and is trying to persuade her supporters not to listen to them and judge for themselves what is true through discernment. If the Envoy program exists, wouldn’t it be natural that other envoys on Earth would come forward to reveal themselves? Now, this is happening and Danaan is treating them exactly as Corey Goode did her. Danaan wrote, "Jor El is the Admiral high command officer in charge of the GFW battle station XLR6 SOL... since I announced that he was taking the position of Ardaana, suddenly, all sorts of counterintelligence agents decided it would be fun to pretend communicating with him to confuse the information and discredit my work." x.com/danaan_elena/s… What's next? Am I going to be accused of being a "counterinteligence agent" for giving other alleged galactic envoys a platform to share their information? It seems the iconic Highlander movie theme is playing out in the exopolitical community once again with the thunderous cry, “There can be only one!”
Elena Danaan Official@danaan_elena

Jor El is the Admiral high command officer in charge of the GFW battle station XLR6 SOL. He is married to a wonderful Pleiadian woman living with him on that mothership and whom I had the privilege to meet last year at a celebration party with the high command. Jor El and his spouse have a little boy. I mentioned Jor El in my book "we will never let you down", 2021, and since I announced that he was taking the position of Ardaana, suddenly, all sorts of counterintelligence agents decided it would be fun to pretend communicating with him to confuse the information and discredit my work. Just be aware of upcoming circus performances. That shall be entertaining lolll.

English
175
60
525
36K
Anthony
Anthony@Anthony07585274·
@TheUfoJoe I’ve lost all faith in Elizondo and Melon. It’s so clear now they are part of the slow drip disclosure team to try to shape the narrative like this phenomenon doesn’t have a deep history.
English
0
0
0
68
Joe Murgia
Joe Murgia@TheUfoJoe·
Head of AARO Admits He Couldn't Tell Us if Non-Human Intelligence is Discovered Elizondo on a Game-Changing UFO Video: "That probably shouldn't come out." (My take on the ABC News article on Kosloski, UFOs and transparency. My comments in ( ). There's A LOT here, including something "new" regarding @jamescfox, @ChrisKMellon and those alleged 4K videos.) H/T: @CuriousNHI UFO sleuths want fewer secrets in Trump-era investigations Pentagon official vows ‘aggressive’ data collection, swift resolution of cases After generations of stigma and secrecy around sightings of unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAPs), or what the public calls UFOs, investigators probing hundreds of unsolved cases say the second Trump administration could be a turning point for transparency. "We're trying to get as much of the raw evidence out as we can without putting our partners' equities at risk," said Jon Kosloski, director of the Pentagon's All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, the government-wide task force leading research into mysterious sightings. (We need AARO and Kosloski to do what was written in the UAPDA: "All Federal government records concerning unidentified anomalous phenomena should carry a presumption of immediate disclosure." If not, they need to present a clear and valid reason why it should remain classified. Remember, not all UFO talking heads are as supportive of full disclosure as we are... @LueElizondo: "There's one I really wish I could talk about. It was in 4K, ultra-high definition video. Anybody who sees that video.. And there's people in the Intel Community that have seen it, and they're just like, 'Okay. Yeah, that's a game changer.' I mean,. that (laughs)...there's no doubt what we're looking at, at that point. That is not ours. "That's what frustrates me because those videos are there. There are people that are aware of it, a lot of people. It's kind of a bad-kept secret at this point. The problem is: How that video was taken; Where it was taken; Under the circumstances...is very classified. So it probably won't see the light of day. "Honestly, looking at it, I can say, yeah, that probably shouldn't come out, as compelling as it is. Because, there's reasons to keep that type...those...there's a couple of videos - well, more than a couple - that really are sensitive because of the circumstances of the collection that we were doing." (First he says it's frustrating that those videos haven't come out and then he says they probably shouldn't come out. And BTW, other folks (Stratton, Davis, Mellon, Nell, Puthoff, etc.) - if they all had access to the same videos - may feel the same way. I don't know. In my experience in talking with some of these guys, working in defense their entire lives makes them view things from a certain perspective. So it's not just Lue. Look at what James Lacatski, rocket scientist and former head of AAWSAP for the DIA, said to @g_knapp and @JeremyCorbell on @WeaponizedPod in 2023... Corbell: "Why is this topic, that the United States government has a UFO in its possession and we've been reverse engineering it - you've done admitted it - why is it delicate?" Lacatski: "The details. I'm old school. I won't use the term adversary, competitor, as the way we describe [them]. We are surrounded, maybe not surrounded, but hopefully not so, by our enemies. And our enemies, you can be sure they're listening to this show right now. You can be sure that they were monitoring AAWSAP. You can be sure that perhaps they had employees - hopefully not in DIA, in the contractor part (laughs) - that were giving out information. I am con(vinced). I know that. So, the thing is, is we can't say anything more than what we've been approved to say." (Sounds just a little paranoid but I get it. However, when you're talking about something that may change how we view our species, you need to be more open, rather than less, to disclosure, IMO. And take some risks! Especially if the phenomenon is somehow manipulating humanity and society in ways that are not beneficial to us. We deserve to know that. Source for Lue video/quote: x.com/UAPJames/statu… Source and link to Lacatski/Kelleher interview: x.com/JeremyCorbell/… I still need to finish the Lacatski transcript from that show a few years ago. It's an important one so I'll make that a priority. As far as those 4K videos, I'd like to go back to what @ChrisKMellon, allegedly and actually, said about that. From April 2023 James Fox: [@ChrisKMellon] "just met with me in DC and he's now told me that there is satellite data. And the only reason why he talked about it is because @JohnRatcliffe mentioned it. "So [Mellon's] like, 'Well Ratcliffe mentioned it, so I'll mention the fact that Ratcliffe mentioned it. It's satellite data.' And I was like, 'Ohh, how good are the photographs?' I wanna know so bad. You know me. Like, Come on, I've been looking at this for 30 years. "[And Mellon] goes, 'James... 4K. Just think about as good as you can imagine...of craft.' And to know that? And I spoke to five other people that are part of the program or had the top-secret...the clearances, [the] access to this, and they all confirmed. And it's like, they're just on the other side of that curtain. Can somebody just get those out here, please (laughs)? Like, please!" Source: x.com/TheUfoJoe/stat… ~ In July of 2023, Fox posted this interview clip with Mellon... Fox: "And you've seen some pretty compelling photographic evidence." Mellon: "I've seen some very compelling evidence. Evidence that I very much wish was in the public domain. When I'm talking to these scientists at the @GalileoProject1, for example, and at the @ExploreSCU, I so wish that they were privy to this information, that the public was privy to the information." Fox: "What happened when you looked at those photographs? Come on, put me there. I wanna be you for a minute (laughs)." Mellon: "Well, it's like, 'Wow!!! You know? Like...I can't think of any way to explain this, other than, you know...I mean, this is not something in our inventory, I'm pretty sure." H/T: @UAPJedi Source: x.com/TheUfoJoe/stat… ~ At the Congressional UAP briefing in DC on May 1st of 2025, hosted by the @UAPDF, Fox dug a little deeper for clarity... Fox: "This high-resolution, 4K videos of UAP. Is this stuff that you know about or is this stuff that you've seen?" Mellon: "Well there's some stuff that I've seen and I've asked about. And I think there's one video I've seen that they're going to declassify. And I hope that happens. It wasn't 4...I [wish?] it was 4K. It was more like what you've seen, you know, was infrared-sensor, gun-camera, along the lines of what the NYT published (Tic Tac and Gimbal ~Joe) and the Washington Post, subsequently (Go Fast ~Joe). So it's that kind of video from that sensor system." Fox: "So we know it exists, it's there?" Mellon: "Oh yeah, yeah, yeah. And, by the way, we are at a point now where the AARO has received somewhere in the neighborhood of 1800 military reports. 1800, in the just the last few years. Some of those are iPhone videos, so I don't think there's a big sources-and-methods issue there (laughs). There's a variety of... Some are from, you know, stuff you get at Best Buy from sailors on the ship with a video camera on the deck. There's gotta be a number in that mix that could be revealed. And beyond that, as I said, I think there is a lot of high-caliber sensor data. The American people already paid for many of these sensors, they're out there, many of them, and they're collecting pertinent data." (Yeah, but has he seen 4K videos like Fox asked? 🤔 He didn't really answer that question. Anybody disagree? I'm still skeptical those videos are as good as advertised but all it will take is getting one declassified. ) ~~~Back to ABC News and Kosloski~~~ "The office has hired additional personnel and we're investing in automated security review software that can redact the sensitive information from videos," [Kosloski] said of an effort to release more currently classified material related to the probes. (Great!!! Use it on the videos that Lue was referring to and we can all see proof of anomalous phenomena! I won't hold my breath.) Congress established [AARO] in 2022 to "detect, identify and attribute" mysterious objects of interest in the air, outer space, and underwater, with special focus on mitigating potential threats to military operations and national security. More than 1800 cases have been reviewed by the Pentagon so far, with the vast majority ultimately resolved as likely balloons, drones, debris or animals based on a comprehensive review of available data. Kosloski says "several dozen" cases remain anomalous even after rigorous analysis of evidence. They continue to receive new reports of anomalies by military service members and the general public every month. "It's a potential problem, a national security problem, safety of flight issue," Kosloski told ABC News. "We seem to have the full support of the administration" in pursuing answers. (I wish Kosloski wouldn't play the I'm-gonna-be-as-boring-as-possible-game. How about this as an answer? Hypothetical Kosloski: "It may be a national security or safety issue. But we also have to leave the door open for something anomalous, and that could include a non-human intelligence. We just don't know." (Of course, according to James Fox, Kosloski told him he couldn't part his hair without getting approval from the Pentagon so we can't expect him to veer off of the boring path any time soon. And @devindwyer did bring up the possibility of NHI in the video interview, here: x.com/TheUfoJoe/stat… But why couldn't Kosloski bring up that possibility himself? I guess he doesn't have the approval to do that.) ~~~ABC News Article~~~ Trump vows greater transparency President Donald Trump has famously been a UFO skeptic. "It's never been my thing. I have to be honest," he told podcaster Joe Rogan in an October 2024 interview. "I have never been a believer." But the president, who has full access to all government secrets as commander in chief, has also hinted on several occasions that there may be more information than has previously been revealed about alleged extraterrestrial life and unusual technological capabilities. "I won't talk to you about what I know about it but it's very interesting," Trump told his son, Donald Trump Jr., in an online video during the 2020 campaign. "But Roswell's a very interesting place with a lot of people that would like to know what's going on." (That's when Trump confused Area 51 with Roswell. I don't think he really cares about the UFO topic. But if he does, and wants to show it, he can call for the immediate release of all UFO-related files just like he did with JFK. Or, he can make it known that he supports the UAPDA, use his influence, and do his best to make sure Congress approves it, untouched and un-gutted, in this year's NDAA.) ~~~ABC News Article~~~ Since taking office a second time, Trump has vowed "radical transparency" across government. Last month, he ordered the release of all remaining classified files related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy Jr. Some UFO enthusiasts across the political spectrum are pushing for a similar release of government files related to extraterrestrial mysteries. "When you have only certain information that's shared with the American people, that's when conspiracy theories happen. And it's, in my opinion, that conspiracy theories can be detrimental," said Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., in April as she opened the House Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets. (Historically, "UFO enthusiast" has been used as a pejorative term and I wouldn't use it to describe Luna. And as far as conspiracy theories? Some of them may be accurate.) ~~~ABC News Article~~~ Lawmakers from both parties have proposed legislation to force government agencies to disclose more information on UAPs, but Congress has yet to pass it. (That's where Trump can help out with the UAPDA) "The issue is when we mix secrecy with a stigma, and that we create such a stigma around a phenomenon that it becomes difficult, if not impossible, for agencies, for people to look at the issue seriously," said former Associate NASA Administrator Mike Gold, who served on the agency's UAP Independent Study Team. Gold, who is now part of the UAP Disclosure Fund, an independent group of scientific and national security experts, says Congress must fund more aggressive analysis of troves of existing government data. "If we study UAP, not only can we help with national security," Gold said, "but even if we don't discover something exotic, what's the worst case scenario? We discover an incredible new physical phenomenon?" Whistleblowers, advocates allege secret evidence long denied Critics of the Pentagon effort led by Kosloski say it has been hobbled by "staffing shortfalls," bogged down by "bureaucratic confusion," and mired in "excessive secrecy." In recent testimony before Congress, whistleblowers insist the government is still hiding evidence of non-human intelligence, which top officials have long denied. Kosloski has accelerated the release of intensive investigations, publishing unclassified resolution reports for some of the most high-profile cases, detailing the technical and intelligence analysis behind the conclusion. "Our hope is to be able to triage them, identify those that have the best scientific data, the nexus with national security interests and the true anomalies behind them, and focus our attention on those really anomalous cases," Kosloski said. (That's great but if Congress and AARO aren't getting access to the good stuff (as Mellon hammered home at the DC briefing on May 1st) we'll never make real progress.) Last year, the Pentagon completed a historic review of 80 years of records related to unidentified anomalous phenomena, concluding there is "no evidence that any U.S. government investigation, academic-sponsored research, or official review panel has confirmed that any sighting of a UAP represented extraterrestrial technology." "That stands true," said Kosloski. (IMO, Kosloski is either just another guy who will not rock the boat, or...AARO does not have all the access Sean Kirkpatrick (former head of AARO) claimed they had. And yes, it's annoying that they keep using the world, "extraterrestrial" when we don't know where it's from. It could be based here.) ~~~ABC News Article~~~ Government and private UAP investigators say it will take substantially more data to resolve the most persistent mysteries on file. (Until we get access to ALL the data, we'll never be able ro figure this out. Unless, some of the folks who have seen it start talking.) ~~~ABC News Article~~~ As for whether he can categorically rule out the existence of an intact spacecraft or part of a spacecraft in government possession, Kosloski said he has not been able to corroborate any claims but promised to push for public release of any likely findings of non-human intelligence. (Has Kosloski ever visited the locations of alleged programs said to house craft of non-human origin? Is anybody ever going to ask the head of AARO that question? How about asking him about what Lacastki said during that episode of "Weaponized"?) Knapp: "There's one particular UFO design that gets discussed in the book ("Initial Revelations" ~Joe), that you reveal. And if you blink, you'll miss it. But it's maybe the most controversial and important piece of information that this book conveys. You say something at the beginning of Chapter Nine about a craft of unknown origin that our government finally accessed the inside. Can you share with us what's in the book? And is there anything else you can add to that?" Lacatski: "Well, what's in the book is an exact statement of the event that occurred in the, let's say, in a congressional facility. There was more to it, considerably more to that discussion about what the situation was. We can't go into that because it's...and I mean Colm and I. Yes, we know about it, people are interested in it, I'm quite sure, but security has to trump everything else. A lot of things can be said. This book, as with 'Skinwalkers at the Pentagon' - I keep flashing the book (laughs) - basically, was reviewed by the Department of Defense for release, and approved the wording that's in it. The wording. If we vary that wording, we'd get back... This was a seven-month review, this was quick. DoD on "Skinwalkers at the Pentagon" took fourteen months to review that book. And I agreed with all of the changes on both of these books, except for one, I made the fatal mistake of complementing the help from a non-DoD organization, and it was, "Whoa, we can't do that!" we've gotta line that out. And so that was the only thing that was a straight line out. DoD helped us reword things by their security regulations. And so, you're getting as much as we can say. Jeremy, it looks like you..." Corbell: "Okay, hold on, hold on, hold on. So, for our audience that's listening, George has dropped an atom bomb because it was dropped in the book. So audiences just listening, I'm going to read you something. Beginning of chapter nine. 'At the conclusion of a 2011 meeting in the Capitol building, with a U.S. senator and an agency undersecretary, Lacatski, the only one of the book's authors present, posed a question.' But this is where it gets good. 'He stated,' meaning you Dr. Licatski, 'that the United States was in possession of a craft of unknown origin and had successfully gained access to its interior. This craft had a streamlined configuration suitable for aerodynamic flight, but no intakes, exhaust, wings or control surfaces. In fact, it appeared not to have an engine, fuel tanks or fuel.' Now there's a next part, which I'll read in a minute. But what this is, is you're officially allowed to tell us that the United States government has in its possession, a craft of unknown origin and you were able to access the inside. Is that correct?" Lacatski: "The wording that you read is correct. Ahh, you're going beyond the wording." Corbell: "No, I'm not, I'm not. I'm asking you, did that meeting happen, and is it true?" Lacatski: "Oh, of course. Yes. Yes." Corbell: "Okay, you're telling us... You told us, because you were allowed to tell us, that our government has a UFO in its possession and has been able to access the inside of it, right?" Lacatski: "Yes (lots of cross talk). I was allowed to tell you... Let me show the back of the book. This is where Jeremy was reading from." Corbell: "I know, know, but hold up! George, will you translate, George?" Knapp: "All right, let's try another tack. How do we know it's a craft and not a doorstop? We accessed it. It has no engine, it has no wings, no fuel. We don't know that it travels. Do we know it's a craft, or it's just a rock?" Lacatski: "George, you're going into the further discussion that occurred that day." Knapp: "All right." Lacatski: "We can't go there. But, let me tell you, we're going to try to cover that in the future, but it's delicate. It's... It makes the technology described in here (holding the new book) look primitive." (I'd love to see what Kosloski has to say about that. Back to the ABC News article and I'm going to go back one paragraph.) "As for whether he can categorically rule out the existence of an intact spacecraft or part of a spacecraft in government possession, Kosloski said he has not been able to corroborate any claims but promised to push for public release of any likely findings of non-human intelligence. "There's no precedent for that, obviously, but I think that we would take that up through the Secretary of Defense and allow him to make that decision." (In other words, if Kosloski DID come across an intact craft of unknown origin in one of these programs, he wouldn't be able to tell us. The buck would be passed to the Secretary of Defense and/or the POTUS. At least he's honest about it. Kirkpatrick used to give us conflicting answers on similar questions.)
GIF
Joe Murgia@TheUfoJoe

.@devindwyer: "Is it possible there's a secret program here that you just don't know about?" Jon Kosloski: "(laughs) Anything's possible." Full ABC News interview with Director of @DoD_AARO, Jon Kosloski. I think Dwyer did well. Making sure to include non-human intelligence in addition to ET gets him a gold star. Dwyer: "Can you say, categorically, that's there's no intact spacecraft or part of a spacecraft that the US government is holding?" Kosloski: "I have not been able to corroborate any of those claims." Dwyer: "Is it possible there's a secret program here that you just don't know about?" Jon Kosloski: "(laughs) Anything's possible." Seems like they cut off his answer. That happened at least one other time. Full transcript later. I don't like the laugh. Either... 1) Kosloski is lying. 2) AARO just doesn't have access to those programs or the full set of UAP data. 3) Those programs don't exist. I'm going with 2. My opinion.

English
16
35
186
28.8K
Faith 🌼
Faith 🌼@FaithTTV·
say hi for my special nudys
Faith 🌼 tweet media
English
751
184
9.3K
477.9K
US Rep. Mike Turner
US Rep. Mike Turner@RepMikeTurner·
When classified information is compromised, it undermines our national security and the safety of our allies. If an American leaked sensitive material, that would be criminal espionage. Today, I told @SumiSomaskanda on @BBCNews that those responsible should be held accountable.
English
27
10
25
3K
Hoops
Hoops@Hoopss·
$500k or a date with Angel Reese?
English
32.8K
1.1K
40.7K
18.2M
Hoops
Hoops@Hoopss·
$500,000 or a date with Megan Thee Stallion?
English
16.1K
673
20.5K
7.2M