BakeThePie
9.3K posts

BakeThePie
@BakeThePie
Pepperidge farm remembers Xbox gamers will believe anything their PR will say just as long as an influencer says it to him




@asha_shar @mattbooty @aarongreenberg This message is written on behalf of many German and European Xbox creators I’ve spoken with. Under the new Xbox leadership and the New Spirit, we are genuinely hopeful for real change. However, it is still extremely difficult for us to get game codes, early previews, event invites or just getting noticed. There is no direct contact to local Xbox teams — everything routes through third-party agencies. This creates endless back-and-forth: agencies refer us to the US Xbox team, the US team sends us back because we’re not American, and eventually the 3rd party agencies reject us with generic excuses that they “can’t help”. Many talented creators have already given up trying to get in contact with Team Xbox. This loop directly results in significantly less high-quality Xbox-focused content in one of Europe’s biggest markets. If Xbox truly wants to grow in Germany or Europe under this New Spirit, the local creator scene needs proper support: direct communication channels, fair access, and real investment in the region. We believe in the New Spirit and want to create great Xbox content with you. Please help us help Xbox succeed here. Sorry for the longer post — this is written in close consultation with many European creators. We’re all very aware that most of our channels aren’t as big as US-based ones yet, but that’s exactly the classic chicken-and-egg problem. Many of us also know Xbox would prefer content in local languages, but gaming connects people across Europe and the world — which is why so many European creators run their channels in English. Having a Europe based channel in English should not be a reason to prevent contact with the local Xbox team. — Boxenberger on behalf of many European creators 🙏































Phil Spencer didn’t sell us a vision of XBOX as a de facto third‑party publisher. He sold us a future where “great exclusive games… ship on platforms where Game Pass exists” - his words, not ours. Outside of contractual or legacy obligations, that was the expectation he set. You can’t market hardware on the strength of exclusives, then pivot to platform‑agnostic publishing, and act confused when the people who bought into the ecosystem feel misled. And before anyone tries to cite his 2018 comments about the future of the brand, those remarks were about Microsoft’s cloud ambitions, not a signal that they planned to release their games everywhere. He was talking about expanding access through streaming, not abandoning hardware, dissolving platform identity, or repositioning the division as a third‑party publisher. The subsequent One X, Scarlett, and Series X campaigns made it abundantly clear that hardware remained central to the strategy. Analysts, press, and even Bethesda leadership expected games to be exclusive, including The Elder Scrolls VI. The internal emails revealed during the 2023 FTC v. Microsoft trial revealed that Pete Hines expressed frustration that Bethesda was told to make its games exclusive to console and PC while Microsoft simultaneously reassured regulators that Call of Duty would remain multiplatform. This wasn’t invented by fans - it was documented inside Microsoft’s own communications. So if the company is now promoting every platform its games appear on, how does this benefit XBOX users specifically? Because when every major game goes everywhere, the hardware’s value proposition collapses. When the platform’s relevance in the hardware space dwindles, the people who actually bought the console are left with a weaker offering. When Microsoft treats the console as optional, media outlets follow suit and stop prioritising it in comparisons. When the install base shrinks and confidence erodes, third‑party publishers begin skipping the platform entirely. And at that point, it becomes reasonable to ask whether those of us who bought into the original vision are going to be compensated for a strategic reversal that leaves us at a disadvantage.









