Squatch🫈🆗

“Father Abraham” By Squatch Galatians 3:29 “And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to promise.” 1 John 2:22-23 “Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, he who denies the Father and the Son. No one who denies the Son has the Father. Whoever confesses the Son has the Father also.”

@GeraldMarkJames Calling someone’s attitude “gay” is the modern equivalent of “gird up your loins like a man” which is a perfectly biblical rebuke to a man that needs to man up.

@nypost I have the utmost trust in Google and see absolutely zero ways that this could POSSIBLY backfire!

Google planning to release millions of mosquitoes into California to help stop diseases trib.al/PxG3SpO

@LeadingReport Make it make sense!

Google planning to release millions of mosquitoes into California to help stop diseases, per NYP.

@KingSkanderbeg On the positive side, he might keep things moving so everyone can get to the lunch buffet.

When people say that obesity is a sin and is disqualifying for the ministry, this is the picture that immediately comes into my mind. But in the PCA, they elect him to be the Moderator of the GA instead.

Lazy Saturday feels.

@Bigus_Nicus This is beautiful and a function of AI I wholeheartedly approve of

“Unwholesome Speech” by Squatch. The words of Martin Luther concentrated in song form. Viewer discretion advised.

Seven thoughts about the Rio Grande Presbytery's suspension of @ZacharyGarris. 1. Pastors are in the word-speaking business. It's literally in our job description. We are called to speak what is true and correct error (2 Tim 4:1-5). Garris' job is to speak words to uphold the truth and correct error. 2. Garris was not convicted for being wrong. He was convicted for sarcasm. That's a standard the Old Testament prophets, the Apostle Paul, and Jesus Christ himself wouldn't meet. Sarcasm is a legitimate rhetorical tool in the pastor's toolkit. The Presbyters who voted to convict him obviously had a personal vendetta against Garris and used the courts to lawfare a good man. 3. The idol of decorum is a problem with modern evangelicalism. The PCA will tolerate gay affirming pastors like Greg Johnson (of Revoice infamy), but will not tolerate truth tellers like Garris whose only crime is hurting someone's feelings. 4. Decorum is an idol because it gives power to the weak bureaucrats of the institutional class. Strong men like Garris speak truth plainly and directly. Weak men weaponize subjective standards of decorum to punish any speech that offends them. No doubt, the Rio Grande presbyters who voted against Garris feel justified in their decision. They probably see themselves as righteous martyrs after the overwhelming backlash they've received since their ruling. But their standard is a highly subject rule of decorum, not the word of God. 5. The Rio Grande presbytery's attack on Garris is also an attack on every faithful pastor in the PCA (and beyond). Scripture tells us to not charge pastors with wrong without clear evidence of serious sin (1 Tim 5:19-20). This is not favoritism for pastors, but a recognition that every pastor is in a spiritual battle. 6. The Rio Grande presbytery's attack on Garris is also an attack on the sheep of his church. This decision harms the souls of God's people by wearying their shepherd and distracting him from the work he's called to do. The RGP is trying to deprive God's people of their shepherd. Their attack on Garris is the same as an attack on Garris' entire church. 7. Finally, the Rio Grande presbytery was doing the devil's bidding by attacking Garris. Their ruling would undermine the authority of the word of God in the church and sow seeds of doubt in the hearts of God's people. Calvin addressed this. Calvin said pastors need to be protected from frivolous charges like this as a "remedy against the malice of men" because "none are more liable to slanders and calumnies than godly teachers." He goes on to say, "this is the craftiness of Satan, to draw away the hearts of men from ministers, that instruction may gradually fall into contempt. Thus not only is wrong done to innocent persons, in having their reputation unjustly wounded, (which is exceedingly base in regard to those who hold so honourable a rank,) but the authority of the sacred doctrine of God is diminished" (Calvin's commentary on 1 Tim 5:19). The Rio Grande Presbytery's actions were shameful, and I pray the PCA's higher courts do the right thing by overturning RGP's ruling and vindicating Garris.

@TheJollyBrawler Is that where they draft up their charges?

Damn. Everything reminds me of the Rio Grande presbytery today.

@apologistlayman Instructions unclear.

Get you someone who looks at you like this

GM83. Happy Saturday!

“Daddy just got home from work. Ask him if he wants to hear the recorder solo I’ve been practicing all day.”

@samuel_costner “Dad looks tired. Tell him he should take us swimming.”

They sure do, kids. Let's go.

@AmerRef1517 I gib you good tidings of much happy

@Bigus_Nicus If not fren, y fren shaped?

Do not be afraid. Am fren.

This must be reversed.

@TaxSlaveDave @AliAmongFlowers But if it was a crusade…?

@AliAmongFlowers I wouldn't take a trip to Europe if it was free.

@Brian_Sauve @MefukiBLU Or just, “No, and I will not elaborate.”

Four examples of what I mean when I say that a leader must offend women to be effective today: "No, we will not enforce masking during worship, ma'am." "No, we will not open our borders to infinity third world immigration. No, not even if a child is crying on a video somewhere, ma'am." "No, we won't continue doing that bible study where the lady is doing expository preaching, even if it's just to women, ma'am." "No, we won't apologize for that joke you are pretending to be offended by, ma'am."

@TheJollyBrawler Facts.

@Bigus_Nicus The PCA would crumble if they were under Luther's scorn. And then they would gnash their teeth and excommunicate him.