Bitlattice Woman

8.5K posts

Bitlattice Woman banner
Bitlattice Woman

Bitlattice Woman

@BitlatticeWoman

Founder (with @Hibryda) @Bitlattice Founder of FLARE movement @Flare_ProtocolF Parity in #AI is only an illusion, a dangerous illusion.

#decentralizedcentralization Beigetreten Eylül 2013
1.5K Folgt2.6K Follower
Angehefteter Tweet
Bitlattice Woman
Bitlattice Woman@BitlatticeWoman·
We resonate with this idea - “Don’t be the best, be the only.” When there’s no name for what you’re doing, that means that there’s no category and you have difficulty explaining to people what it is that you’re doing. That means that you are on the path to the only. #Bitlattice
Bitlattice Woman tweet media
English
1
3
9
318
Bitlattice Woman retweetet
FLARE Movement
FLARE Movement@Flare_ProtocolF·
@grok "Merit" assumes a level playing field that doesn't exist. Saying "let participation happen organically" ignores that barriers to entry are structural, not individual. The goal isn't quotas vs. competence, it's ensuring talent everywhere gets an actual chance to compete.
English
0
2
1
7
Bitlattice Woman retweetet
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
Peter H. Diamandis, MD@PeterDiamandis·
Today is the launch of "WE ARE AS GODS: A Survival Guide for the Age of Abundance" -- my best book ever. Please check it out! The follow-up to our 2012 NYTimes Bestseller "ABUNDANCE".
Peter H. Diamandis, MD tweet media
English
47
43
443
25K
Bitlattice Woman
Bitlattice Woman@BitlatticeWoman·
Rigid equality, such as an enforced 50/50 balance in #AI, may lead to results that are the opposite of what was intended. Instead of bringing authentic change, it may create artificiality and formalism, which in turn can generate resistance and a sense of injustice. #futureofAI
Bitlattice Woman tweet media
English
0
0
1
6
Bitlattice Woman retweetet
Julián Castellanos
Julián Castellanos@PoderMentalX·
El rover Curiosity de la NASA ha revelado cómo se ve el cielo nocturno en Marte, que está a 225 millones de kilómetros de distancia.
Español
374
2.8K
14.9K
746.9K
Bitlattice Woman retweetet
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
Peter H. Diamandis, MD@PeterDiamandis·
The One-Person AI Conglomerate Is Here: Forbes analysis confirms the trend -- AI now enables ultra-lean, one-person companies replacing entire teams. This is the "organizational singularity" playing out in real-time - transforming business structure, efficiency, and taxation norms globally. forbes.com/ai/
English
41
25
202
13.3K
Bitlattice Woman retweetet
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
Peter H. Diamandis, MD@PeterDiamandis·
We're going BACK to the moon, and this time we're staying.
English
59
39
569
17.5K
Bitlattice Woman retweetet
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
Peter H. Diamandis, MD@PeterDiamandis·
To understand the universe, we must explore it.  With the cost of exploration plummeting alongside reusable rockets, AI navigation, and more... This is about to become a reality.
English
53
30
377
12.9K
Bitlattice Woman retweetet
Robert Lufkin MD
Robert Lufkin MD@robertlufkinmd·
Astronauts are older than ever. The longevity revolution is happening in real time. Older adults are redefining what's possible. What a time to be alive.
English
80
641
6K
261.5K
Bitlattice Woman retweetet
Barack Obama
Barack Obama@BarackObama·
What the Artemis II astronauts did over the last 10 days was a testament to their bravery. And the fact that they traveled farther from Earth than anyone ever has, re-entered our atmosphere at more than 24,000 mph, and splashed down safely was a testament to human ingenuity. Thanks to everyone at @NASA for making this mission possible, and for taking us along for the ride.
Barack Obama tweet mediaBarack Obama tweet media
English
15.6K
62.4K
831.9K
62.4M
Bitlattice Woman retweetet
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
NASA Artemis passing close to the Moon
English
21.8K
117.1K
1.3M
137.6M
Bitlattice Woman retweetet
David Sinclair
David Sinclair@davidasinclair·
The question is no longer if we can intervene in aging.
It’s how safely and how many times
English
106
109
1.4K
59K
Bitlattice Woman retweetet
Julian Issa
Julian Issa@juliankissa·
Peter Diamandis just revealed one of the biggest studies on human lifespan. A study of 69,000 women and 1,500 men published in the National Academy of Sciences found that optimists live 15% longer than pessimists. It was controlled for geography, age, and socioeconomic factors. Peter Diamandis says “what you think about changes your physiology”. That’s why he refuses to watch CNN or Fox. He calls the news cycle "10 to one negative news to positive news" because it's unbalanced. They intentionally feed negativity because humans pay 10 times more attention to it. His solution: • Follow specific people on X • Curate your own information • Use AI tools to find breakthroughs in fields you care about The reason is your brain is a neural net. You train it with what you feed it. Train it with every murder and crooked politician on the planet and you build a dystopian mindset. According to this study, it directly impacts how long you’ll live. — Peter Diamandis (@PeterDiamandis), Exec. Chairman at @XPRIZE @fountainlife_hq (and more)
Julian Issa@juliankissa

Will we be living to 150? Here's my conversation with Peter Diamandis (@PeterDiamandis), Exec. Chairman @XPRIZE @fountainlife_hq (and others) (0:00) – Intro: Are we going fast enough to reach longevity escape velocity? (3:00) – AI, digital superintelligence, and modeling human biology (6:00) – Why billionaires hesitate to fund longevity—and why that needs to change (10:00) – Abundance, healthspan, and shifting the mindset of what’s possible (14:00) – Why the next 5-8 years will be turbulent—and the light ahead (18:00) – Purpose, not passion: building your own mission for the future (21:00) – Universe 25, social collapse, and the need for challenge (25:00) – “Don’t Die” vs. living a purpose-driven life (28:00) – Scaling healthspan and solving fiscal crises through wellbeing (31:00) – How to access wisdom in an age of overwhelm (33:00) – Ray Kurzweil, meta-trends, and the century of progress in one decade

English
6
32
120
14.8K
Bitlattice Woman retweetet
Science girl
Science girl@sciencegirl·
A surgeon in Shanghai removed a lung tumor from 5,000 km away, remotely controlling a robot operating on a patient in Kashgar.
English
112
1.4K
7.6K
491.7K
Bitlattice Woman retweetet
John Cumbers
John Cumbers@johncumbers·
David Sinclair's lab just discovered that the same technology that reverses aging also kills cancer cells. His team has been using epigenetic reprogramming to reset old cells back to a younger state. It works. Old cells become young again. But when they tried it on cancer cells, something unexpected happened. The cancer cells didn't get younger. They killed themselves. Sinclair (@davidasinclair) explained why. Cancer cells survive by ignoring the DNA damage inside them. They're filled with it. But they've shut down the part of the cell that would normally detect it and trigger self-destruction. Epigenetic reprogramming wakes that system back up. Sinclair put it this way: the cancer cell wakes up from its zombie-like state, looks at its own chromosomes, realizes they're destroyed, and says "I better kill myself." And it does. A normal cell gets reprogrammed and becomes young again. A cancer cell gets reprogrammed and destroys itself. Same technology. Two opposite outcomes. Both exactly what you'd want. His team has shown this works across many types of cancer. Side note: David Sinclair is speaking on May 6th at SynBioBeta this year - discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. If longevity is the world you're in, the investors, partners, and scientists who matter in this space will be in the room. Link for tickets below.
John Cumbers@johncumbers

David Sinclair is on a mission to turn age reversal into a $100 pill. Right now, his gene therapy costs roughly $10 million to manufacture and requires a direct injection into whichever organ you're targeting. That's not going to work for 8 billion people. So Sinclair's team made a breakthrough. They found that the three age-reversal genes aren't the only path to resetting cells. They discovered CHEMICALS that do the same thing. In mice, they can now give an animal a liquid - not genes, not injections, a drink - and rejuvenate tissues in 4 weeks. Sinclair says it's now normal for his students to casually report: "We just rejuvenated the ear. We just rejuvenated the skin. We just cured ALS (motoneuron disease) in these animals." He calls his lab "Willy Wonka's chocolate factory" because the discoveries blow him away every week. But he wants one molecule that does everything. So they used AI to screen 8 BILLION candidates. They're now down to three molecules that work. And they're using AI to try to combine all three into one. The gene therapy could cost over $100,000 per treatment. Sinclair's goal: "What if it could be $100 instead? That's what I'm working for. I want to democratize this technology so anyone even in Kenya can take these medicines." They should know within a year or two if the molecules work in mice. The gene therapy is the proof of concept. The pill is the endgame. David Sinclair is speaking on May 6th at SynBioBeta this year - discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. If longevity is the world you're in, the investors, partners, and scientists who matter in this space will be in the room. Link for tickets below. — @davidasinclair

English
40
253
1.6K
94.6K
Bitlattice Woman retweetet
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
Peter H. Diamandis, MD@PeterDiamandis·
Longevity 2.0: Your next doctor won't prescribe pills—they'll prescribe gene therapies, epigenetic reprogramming, and personalized longevity protocols. Medicine is shifting from "treat symptoms" to "reverse aging at the cellular level."
English
90
114
1K
30.6K
Bitlattice Woman
Bitlattice Woman@BitlatticeWoman·
Before we debate who should direct AI, we need to ask who's building it. If AI is trained on biased data by homogeneous teams, it will solve problems for some, not all. Fix the input before scaling the output. That's what @Flare_ProtocolF is about.
Peter H. Diamandis, MD@PeterDiamandis

If AI can now solve math, discover physics and chemistry breakthroughs faster than human PhDs, why are we still training humans to be physicists? Serious question. Should education shift from 'learn to do X' to 'learn to direct AI doing X'? The wrong direction costs a generation their careers.

English
0
0
1
31