Covering Delta

2.5K posts

Covering Delta banner
Covering Delta

Covering Delta

@CoveringDelta

Beigetreten Mayıs 2009
2 Folgt37 Follower
Covering Delta retweetet
Demetri Kofinas
Demetri Kofinas@kofinas·
There have been people on this platform arguing for years that in order to re-build its manufacturing sector and increase exports, America would need to devalue. We may have a chance to test that really dumb hypothesis in the next few years.
English
2
1
30
2.7K
Covering Delta retweetet
Demetri Kofinas
Demetri Kofinas@kofinas·
It's amazing how much more visibility podcast platforms give you when you publish more often. I rarely publish more than one episode per week, but on weeks where I do, like this one, the show is rewarded with more listeners and greater exposure on the top charts. Furthermore, it's momentum driven, like pushing on a pendulum. The more you string together, the more visibility you get. Who does this benefit? Not paying subscribers. They can only absorb so much quality information. The beneficiaries are advertisers, for whom every incremental minute of exposure means more shots on goal and more subliminal priming. This creates an information environment that incentivizes lower quality content, because quality decreases as a function of quantity at scale.
English
9
2
67
4.2K
Covering Delta retweetet
Demetri Kofinas
Demetri Kofinas@kofinas·
I'm joined by @johnkonrad — one of the most influential voices in commercial shipping — who argues that Trump has a maritime strategy to exploit the ongoing disruption of commercial shipping with a political endgame that few in the media are discussing. hiddenforces.io/podcasts/why-t…
English
13
21
114
18.4K
Covering Delta retweetet
Demetri Kofinas
Demetri Kofinas@kofinas·
I've recorded a timely @HiddenForcesPod today with @johnkonrad where we discuss why Trump may not be in a rush to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and why he may be using this crisis as a forcing function to fundamentally re-order the global economy and the nature of American power.
Demetri Kofinas tweet media
English
10
10
73
9.5K
Covering Delta retweetet
Demetri Kofinas
Demetri Kofinas@kofinas·
We are living through a generational reordering of the global economy away from free trade and open capital markets toward one increasingly shaped by national interests, clandestine statecraft, and great power competition operating below the threshold of open military conflict.
English
11
22
85
5.5K
Covering Delta retweetet
Demetri Kofinas
Demetri Kofinas@kofinas·
This was one of many insightful anecdotes from @scmallaby’s book. His appearance on Hidden Forces publishes tomorrow morning at 3 AM EST.
Steve Jurvetson@FutureJurvetson

Subtext: how Zuck’s obsession with VR lost him AI leadership and “the greatest deal Google ever made.” “if Facebook didn’t buy DeepMind, they would end up in the arms of Google. Hassabis came out to the West Coast to have lunch with Larry Page, still the strongest suitor. Zuckerberg got wind of his visit and invited him to dinner. Arriving at Zuckerberg’s Palo Alto home, Hassabis administered a subtle test on him. The two men discussed the potential of AI, and Zuckerberg expressed appropriate excitement. But then, as the dinner continued, Hassabis brought up other hot technologies: virtual reality, augmented reality, 3-D printing. Zuckerberg sounded equally excited about all of them. ‘That told me what I needed to know,’ Hassabis said. ‘Facebook offered more money, but I wanted somebody who really understood why AI would be bigger than all these other things.’ After the dinner, Hassabis got back to Larry Page. ‘Let’s go further,’ he told him.” — book excerpt from today’s WSJ: wsj.com/tech/ai/deepmi… Zuck’s misplaced devotion to VR and the metaverse hurt the company much more than the $80 billion of wasted spend. It’s the reputational hit. @DemisHassabis divined it in his final test, and Zuck didn’t even know that he blew the opportunity. Eight years later, he renamed the company Meta, doubling down on what anyone with tech savvy knew was DOA. Then, in a 2025 attempt to play catchup, Zuck spent $14 billion on a data labelling company with a salesy leader and upended his AI team. Once again, anyone with tech savvy rolled their eyes on the acquisition and management changes, further evidence that the tech leadership at Meta was seriously lacking. TLDR; beware the metaverse. It is a dystopian vision at best, and luckily for humanity, headsets are still nowhere near readiness for mass adoption.

English
1
3
18
8.5K
Covering Delta retweetet
Demetri Kofinas
Demetri Kofinas@kofinas·
While I've reflected on how this may necessitate a new social contract, I haven't given any of this enough thought. Great power conflict will be the hardest to arrest and the incentives driving it run counter to those advocated by the AI safety community. It's all quite scary, and yet, I feel somewhat numb at this stage. I must say, I've grown mute on this topic after having been pretty clear-headed about it a decade ago when it was all theoretical. Maybe paralyzed is a better way of describing how I feel, like watching a beautiful asteroid hurtling across our atmosphere, mesmerized by the brilliance of its light and the bright streak of ionized gas it leaves in its wake.
English
1
1
9
261
Covering Delta retweetet
Demetri Kofinas
Demetri Kofinas@kofinas·
“Someone decided that deliberation was latency. Someone decided to build a system that produces 1,000 targeting decisions an hour and call them high-quality. Someone decided to start this war. Several hundred people are sitting on Capitol Hill, refusing to stop it. Calling it an “AI problem” gives those decisions, and those people, a place to hide.”
Van Jackson@RealVanJackson

This piece on Palantir death-tech and the kill chain is breathtakingly good theguardian.com/news/2026/mar/…

English
7
306
1.6K
95.1K
Covering Delta retweetet
Demetri Kofinas
Demetri Kofinas@kofinas·
I’m 30 min into this excellent discussion between @ttmygh and @ThematicMarkets. Marvin makes a compelling case for an out-of-consensus view on Trump’s policy that I’ve heard in one form or another from a few smart people I follow. I highly recommend listening to this episode.
Grant Williams@ttmygh

1/ The latest episode of The Grant Williams Podcast featuring my very special guest Marvin Barth (@ThematicMarkets) is now available to all subscribers at grant-williams.com

English
5
3
22
8.8K
Covering Delta retweetet
Demetri Kofinas
Demetri Kofinas@kofinas·
I'm joined by @TheEconomist's @glcarlstrom to discuss the mood across the Gulf since the US and Israeli began bombing Iran on February 28th, and what the conflict's trajectory reveals about the widening gap between tactical success and strategic victory. hiddenforces.io/podcasts/why-t…
English
7
7
24
6.8K
Covering Delta retweetet
Covering Delta retweetet
Demetri Kofinas
Demetri Kofinas@kofinas·
I'm joined by @Jacob__Siegel to discuss the rise of what he calls "The Information State", a new form of political regime that governs not through force or democratic consent, but by controlling the codes and protocols of the digital world. hiddenforces.io/podcasts/infor…
Demetri Kofinas tweet media
English
2
9
27
5.3K
Covering Delta retweetet
Demetri Kofinas
Demetri Kofinas@kofinas·
"There's a RAND strategy document from 1996 saying that the Internet is going to efface boundaries between   nations and break the distinctions between military and civilian activity. All of these things have happened. The failure was to not fortify the nation state against the effects of the technology and to not discipline the technology so that it didn't undermine our political systems. Why did this occur? Why is a global communications architecture incompatible with national citizenship or national sovereignty? Well, here's one obvious example: if you are participating in a public debate relevant to things going on in your life, which have to do with the particular political community that you belong to, and I can enter into that conversation uninvited from another country and manipulate it deliberately or distort it through my participation by impersonating a citizen without being one, it devalues the very meaning of that citizenship. Citizenship requires a boundary that is policed in order to be meaningful. When you wipe away that boundary, the category of citizen itself loses its value. I think this is what we've seen happen." Excerpt from my recent conversation with @Jacob__Siegel on @HiddenForcesPod. The episode drops tomorrow morning @ 3 AM EST.
Demetri Kofinas@kofinas

And the “best jacket art of the year award” goes to ⁦@Jacob__Siegel

English
4
11
62
10.9K
Covering Delta retweetet
Demetri Kofinas
Demetri Kofinas@kofinas·
We need to get ourselves out of this situation before it's too late. We have no business turning Iran into Syria even if that's what the Israelis want and that's where this is headed. The president has given Americans no clear definition of victory. This is an open-ended war and now there is talk of sending in ground troops. This risks turning a political defeat for the president into a strategic defeat for the country.
Ambassador Yechiel (Michael) Leiter@yechielleiter

The U.S. and Israel planned this operation together, we’re executing it together, and we will bring this terror regime to its knees - together. 🇺🇸🇮🇱 Watch my full interview with @DanaBashCNN 👇🏻

English
13
18
124
15.9K
Covering Delta retweetet
Demetri Kofinas
Demetri Kofinas@kofinas·
"Whoever fights with monsters should see to it that he does not become one himself. And when you stare for a long time into an abyss, the abyss stares back into you." — Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil
Demetri Kofinas tweet media
English
2
2
61
3.6K
Covering Delta retweetet
Demetri Kofinas
Demetri Kofinas@kofinas·
"At a BYD Co. car dealership in Manila’s financial district, demand for the Chinese company’s electric vehicles is so high that Matthew Dominique Poh said he’s seen a month’s worth of orders in just the past two weeks."
Demetri Kofinas tweet media
Demetri Kofinas@kofinas

Arguments that this is a move to choke China off from its oil imports ignore the possibility that any importing country watching this disaster unfold — and deciding it needs to electrify faster — would become MORE dependent on China's clean energy supply chains, not less.

English
3
6
28
11.4K
Covering Delta retweetet
Demetri Kofinas
Demetri Kofinas@kofinas·
This is excellent.
plur daddy@plur_daddy

Equity bears are at the brink of insanity given resilience in the indices, but odds of a breakdown are increasing now. Equities top slowly as passive flows and rotational dynamics can hold up indices for a long time. There are many structural forces rigged to push them higher, and thus it takes a lot to make them go down. Over the course of an equity bull market, buy-the-dip behavior continually gets reinforced, and the majority of capital will be controlled by adherents to this mantra. In theory, the longer prices remain coiled, the larger the move once they exit the range. This nuke in gold suggests there are liquidity issues brewing under the surface. It feels like a preview of what is going to happen to crowded trades. My theory is the Middle East is selling gold to shore up capital, as they have lost their revenue, and have many expenses around defence. They will also need to rebuild lost energy infra, and eventually, new pipelines to reroute around Hormuz. The buyback window is starting to close, and the sugar rush of higher-than-usual tax refunds is starting to fade. Retail has been a key marginal buyer of equities in these past weeks, and the fading of the tax refund tailwind is critical. The market is gradually coming to terms with the fact that this conflict may last for a long time. On a conventional level, the US and Israel have completely dominated Iran, but Iran has an asymmetric edge when it comes to controlling world oil prices through Hormuz. Trump can still end it, but the issue is that the US cannot simply leave, a ceasefire with Iran must be struck in order to guarantee that Hormuz is reopened. In order to strike a ceasefire, Iran wants to see a guarantee that the US and Israel won't attack them again (at a bare minimum), and it will be difficult for the US to get Israel to agree to that. Trump is used to being able to quickly maneuver according to his whims, as he did with tariffs, but the complex interlocking physical realities of war are different. Oil shocks often contribute to the end of bull markets, since they constrain consumer spending, hit manufacturing, and lower the ability of central banks to offer support. Indeed, the Fed came out slightly hawkish yesterday, and Powell also hinted that he may stay in his Governor seat post his role as Chair ending, which would constrain Trump's plans to unleash liquidity. We have a stronger dollar and long duration bond yields are going up over the world, which tightens liquidity. The Middle East is tight on money now and they were the marginal bidder in many assets. In particular, they were a key funder for AI capex through their investments in the frontier labs. They've been 40-50% of recent big rounds. Remember other deep pockets like Softbank are close to being tapped out. Any dollar that goes into these rounds will have to come out of something else, like liquid stocks (look at my pinned post for this broader thesis). And if we have any signs of risk to AI capex expectations, this will be a major shift that the market needs to contemplate. I've said this before, but puts are a difficult way to express bearish equity views because timing is so uncertain. Equities can hold on for a long time, because they are structurally rigged to go higher. Easier expressions are simply being in cash, or gradually shorting cash stocks over time, which helps avoid getting chopped. This is a very difficult market, stay safe out there.

English
4
5
49
22.3K
Covering Delta retweetet
Demetri Kofinas
Demetri Kofinas@kofinas·
I don't remember things playing out this way. In fact, I recall there being more debate within Israeli circles than within American ones about whether invading a Shia-majority country sharing a thousand-mile border with Iran was a good idea or not. This is not to say that Israel doesn't exert an extraordinary degree of influence over U.S. politics — of course it does. If it didn't, far fewer people would be afraid to speak out against it. But I was around in the lead-up to the Iraq War, and it was not the Israel Lobby that drove that policy. Hawkish Israeli considerations certainly formed part of the interest-group politics that pushed for it — as did prominent figures within the Bush administration and Congress, among them Paul Wolfowitz, Doug Feith, Richard Perle, Elliott Abrams, Scooter Libby, and Senator Joe Lieberman. But so did the interests of DynCorp, Halliburton, Lockheed Martin, Blackwater, ITT, Aegion, and other members of the military-industrial complex. So too did the broader cadre of Democrats who had been mugged by reality and the Nixonian-Reaganite champions of the unitary executive — Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, chief among them — who saw in this war not only a chance to reassert executive power but an opportunity to conclude unfinished business and settle old scores. What clearly unified ALL OF THEM was the pursuit of a more coercive and militarized form of American hegemony. This was not a "war on behalf of Israel." It was a long-dreamed-of opportunity to redeem what this group regarded as a squandered moment — one for which they believed the Clinton administration should have been held almost criminally liable. For these people, the end of the Cold War was more than a strategic victory. It was a historic opening to usher in the era of AMERICAN EMIPRE. The failure to acknowledge this reality and the attempt to simplify the causes underlying the policy that led to arguably the greatest single strategic defeat in American history is incredibly sad. It shows how easily the past can be rewritten and relearned by people who weren't there or never took the time to understand the war, why it happened, and what lessons it should have taught us about the limits of American power and the inexhaustibility of imperial hubris.
Policy Tensor@policytensor

I keep seeing the claim that Israel did not want Bush to attack Iraq, including by @michelleinbklyn in the @nytimes today and elsewhere. The claim is entirely fraudulent and easily debunked with even a cursory examination of the evidence. Every serious student of the catastrophe knows that Israel and the lobby were champions of the war. See the original paper by @MearsheimerJ and @stephenWalt that documents this at length. hks.harvard.edu/publications/i…

English
2
3
21
4.7K