
Hidden Forces
5.7K posts

Hidden Forces
@HiddenForcesPod
Get the edge with Hidden Forces, where podcast host @Kofinas teaches you how to think critically about the systems of power that structure our world.


New: Some Trump officials privately acknowledge that the president’s public commentary has been detrimental to talks, noting the sensitivity of the negotiations and the Iranians’ deep mistrust of the US. That was especially true on Friday, when the Pakistanis were in Tehran for talks with the Iranians. As the meeting played out, Trump took to Truth Social and spoke with several reporters, claiming Iran had agreed to a host of provisions that sources familiar with the talks said had not yet been finalized. He also asserted that Tehran had agreed to many of the most contentious US demands and declared an imminent end to the war. Behind the scenes w/ @Kevinliptakcnn cnn.com/2026/04/20/pol…


I'm joined by @ThematicMarkets to discuss the ongoing US-Israeli military campaign against Iran and its implications for the global economy, global security, and the future of American power. We open with ... 👇🏼 hiddenforces.io/podcasts/why-a…


LMAO whoever made this is a genius 😭🤣😂



This isn’t about our respective pain thresholds and human suffering. If it was, we would all be upset about the enormous suffering in South Sudan and the DRC. Of course, hardly anybody sheds a tear about those conflicts. My point is that circulating images of human suffering - whether of IDF airstrikes in Beirut or Druze kids killed by a Hezbollah rocket while playing soccer, is nothing but a bleat in the void, particularly if not accompanied by analysis of what is happening and why.







Subtext: how Zuck’s obsession with VR lost him AI leadership and “the greatest deal Google ever made.” “if Facebook didn’t buy DeepMind, they would end up in the arms of Google. Hassabis came out to the West Coast to have lunch with Larry Page, still the strongest suitor. Zuckerberg got wind of his visit and invited him to dinner. Arriving at Zuckerberg’s Palo Alto home, Hassabis administered a subtle test on him. The two men discussed the potential of AI, and Zuckerberg expressed appropriate excitement. But then, as the dinner continued, Hassabis brought up other hot technologies: virtual reality, augmented reality, 3-D printing. Zuckerberg sounded equally excited about all of them. ‘That told me what I needed to know,’ Hassabis said. ‘Facebook offered more money, but I wanted somebody who really understood why AI would be bigger than all these other things.’ After the dinner, Hassabis got back to Larry Page. ‘Let’s go further,’ he told him.” — book excerpt from today’s WSJ: wsj.com/tech/ai/deepmi… Zuck’s misplaced devotion to VR and the metaverse hurt the company much more than the $80 billion of wasted spend. It’s the reputational hit. @DemisHassabis divined it in his final test, and Zuck didn’t even know that he blew the opportunity. Eight years later, he renamed the company Meta, doubling down on what anyone with tech savvy knew was DOA. Then, in a 2025 attempt to play catchup, Zuck spent $14 billion on a data labelling company with a salesy leader and upended his AI team. Once again, anyone with tech savvy rolled their eyes on the acquisition and management changes, further evidence that the tech leadership at Meta was seriously lacking. TLDR; beware the metaverse. It is a dystopian vision at best, and luckily for humanity, headsets are still nowhere near readiness for mass adoption.





And the “best jacket art of the year award” goes to @Jacob__Siegel






Bruno and I examine the competing explanations for why the campaign was launched when it was, from the argument that Washington was drawn into the conflict by Israel, to the question of whether Trump's own instincts and political calculations were the decisive factor. We also discuss Washington and Tel Aviv's strategic visions for the post-conflict order, the fractures emerging within Trump's political base, and how early battlefield developments are already complicating the administration's attempts to construct a coherent narrative around the war. The conversation closes with a broader assessment of where this conflict fits within Bruno's framework of world-building and American decline — how the United States appears to be abandoning soft power in favor of unbridled military force, what that shift signals to capitals around the world, and why Beijing may be the most important audience of all for everything that is now unfolding.