Dan Latarche 🇪🇺 #FBPE

@SpiritOf_TheAge @NikeBookk @NotEvolution1 PS, does your cultish echo chamber have anything say about the process of fossilisation or would that just blow the illusion its trying to push here?!! 🤔

@SpiritOf_TheAge @NikeBookk @NotEvolution1 mechanism involved which your selective echo chamber explanation deliberately omits, which means youre ignoring observable evidence, which makes you a cultist by your own definition! 🤦‍♂️

Yet soft tissue in bones means they lived recently

@NikeBookk @SpiritOf_TheAge @NotEvolution1 I know but someone else might read his crap & think hes got a point!

@DLatarche @SpiritOf_TheAge @NotEvolution1 Don't bother friend he is clearly either a troll or just plain no brain person

@SpiritOf_TheAge @NotEvolution1 The only assumption here is that the very rare occurence of fossilised soft tissue proves they lived recently but it doesnt mean that at all!!

@SpiritOf_TheAge @NotEvolution1 In neither case will you find fossils & thats bc fossilisation takes vastly longer than 10,000yrs, the presence of fossils alone means theyre millions of years old, its only when the peat has been in situ for millions of years & turned to rock will you find a bog body fossil!

@SpiritOf_TheAge @NotEvolution1 observable reality, its simpmy not the case! While extremely rare circumstances can preserve soft tissue over millions of years which is why theres so little of it. Clearly its not me whose unable to follow observable evidence, thats you, so by your own admission, youre a cultist

@SpiritOf_TheAge @NotEvolution1 What evidence are you talking about exactly? The vast majority of fossils have no soft tissue whatsoever, thats a fact. So how does that show they lived recently? You cant explain it can you? soft tissue would be far more prevalent if they lived recently but thats not...

@KelTjorson @plain_see Exactly, with this map the Southern Cross isnt due south of australia, s africa & s america but in provable reality it always is. With this map youd have ppl looking in opposite directions but seeing the exact same constellation, so South cant be a 360° circle, its a single point

@plain_see Provable, as in people looking in opposite directions can’t be looking in the same direction.

This guy gets it… ✅👇👇

@plain_see @KelTjorson Well yes there are experiments that show thats true. You havent got any evidence that proves you right though do you?!! 🤦‍♂️

@KelTjorson Provable, as in bending spacetime and dark matter. 😂😂

@plain_see He gets the false narrative spun by con artists trying to undermine ppls confidence in knowledge & understanding while making a quick, cheap buck! For all his unfounded bluster, Ill bet he cant explain why the Southern Cross is always due south of Australia, S Africa & S America!

@DrFisura @NotEvolution1 Then kill a bunch of people out of spite!

@DrFisura @NotEvolution1 I mean never mind making the world, I wouldnt trust him to make a cup of tea!! hed probably set fire to the kitchen!! 🤣

“Modern science owes its being to christianity” Michael Ruse Atheist philosopher of science

@darwintojesus @Tobydeaux91 If you really want a fact, then unlike every scientific theory, religion hasnt provided a shred of supporting evidence for well over 2000yrs & the more we look, the more we find contradictory evidence. Fact is religion is not even a hypothesis, its a superstition!

@darwintojesus @Tobydeaux91 Thats exactly what you said, with science a "fact" isnt that a theory is 100% true, its that it has evidence to back it up, has passed every test so far place upon it & we have no evidence to the contrary. Your use of the word "fact" tries to disengenuously sidestep this point.

It's the best current guess and it's always open to being changed or totally abandoned as new data comes in. This is nothing like a fact, this is not knowledge... and if you all didn't worship science then people like me wouldn't have to explain this to you.

@darwintojesus It is knowledge, its based on evidence & yes can change, be abandonded or reinforced as more evidence becomes available. We then take that knowledge & build the modern world off the back of it. Religion however, isnt knowledge there is no evidence & hasnt been for a long time

@NotEvolution1 The logic states that creating a city is less likely than creating organic compounds which in turn makes biology more likely but we dont know the likelihood of that. It could be 1-1000, it could be 1-1x10^100 & maybe only possible bc of the sheer number of planets in the universe

@darwintojesus Only one answer to 1+1 so dont become a victim by listening to fake named internet grifters like this try to tell you that a magic guy created "1" anyway so he can make 1+1=43 with a flick of his magic fingers if he wanted!

True victims