Not Evolution

@4tis @SalvusL @JohnHan17112435 @ScienceQriosity @Psychobabble66 The same supernatural power that caused life to come into existence is the same power that created all life forms. Need for evolution = none

Christianity is true because of the resurrection

Has since bowed the knee and confessed Jesus is Lord to the glory of God the Father

The smartest people I know believe in God

Evolutionism’s great high priest

More proof atheists are satanists. Can't make this stuff up.

We determine our eternal destiny

No Atheist lives as if Atheism is true.

@herainhistory What ever dogs do, atheists do

"it's unatural" homosexuality is found in over 1,500 species, and homophobia is found in 1. nature isn't judging, why are you?

If there really is no God like atheists claim, then they have no care about the concept of morality. They care deeply about morality because they know God exists.

Why would anyone care about this

@Ernest1588761 evolve and inbreed and incest for millions of years until humans exist

@Skeletonkey5555 "First, there is no moral law: the universe is a nasty, heartless place where most things wouldn't mind killing you if you let them. No one is compelled to be nice; you or anyone could go on a murder spree, and all that is stopping you is your self-interest" -PZ Myers, atheist

You don’t need religion to have morals. If you can’t determine right from wrong, then you lack empathy, not religion.

Sinful humans always have a way of trying to make God the problem

@DivinelyDesined @NotEvolution1 # of scientists who have criticized the cell design and managed to create a better one from scratch: zero.

The bible also tells us about the end of time

Imagine seeing the greatest feat of engineering ever known in the history of the universe and having the audacity to call it "bad design."

Bulverism (C.S. Lewis term): Instead of showing why the belief is wrong, Dawkins assumes it must be wrong and then explains why people believe it (cultural conditioning). • It’s also a subtle Tu Quoque / “You too” smear: implying religious people are hypocrites or intellectually lazy for inheriting their faith. Strong rebuttal: “Yes, most people share their parents’ religion — just like they share their parents’ language, values, and worldview. That’s called culture and upbringing, not proof of falsehood. The real question is: Are the claims of that religion true? Attacking the transmission method instead of the content is a textbook genetic fallacy, Richard.” Dawkins’ line sounds clever and smug, but it’s logically empty. It’s rhetoric disguised as insight.