Doug Shaw
5.8K posts

Doug Shaw
@DougShaw
📈asset management, cricket🏏, 🚲 @putneycricket










Good news - Simon Walls @TheFCA says the post sale cost disclosure consultation (MiFiD) will be out in the summer - completed by the end of the year in time to be implemented at the same time as CCIs.@AICPRESS #aicconf


@OldLondonW14 FitzJames and FitzGeorge Avenues please


Amnesty International, Medecins Sans Frontieres, Save the Children, the UN, International Association of Genocide Scholars, B’Tselem, Physicians for Human Rights-Israel, Palestinian Human Rights Organizations Council, Islamic Relief - all say, it's a genocide.





A passage from the Phillipson profile is extremely misleading. She claims England's improvement in PISA scores isn't impressive because recent scores are not much higher than in 2009. She also claims that @michaelgove's reforms failed to close the attainment gap between rich and poor. Both are misleading. Here's some context she 'forgot' to add: - England's Maths Ranking: 27th (2009)➡️11th (2022) - England's Reading Ranking: 25th (2009)➡️13th (2022) - Scores fell during the pandemic everywhere, but England's scores fell by less. - Wales (under Labour) didn't implement Gove's reforms. Their scores are lower than England's and haven't improved. - In fact, the average Welsh pupil now performs at the same level as the most disadvantaged pupils in England. - Scotland is a similar story. They had better scores than England 20 years ago. England's are now higher in all three categories. (Scotland also withdrew from other international metrics.) - Phillipson claims our average scores might be up, but we've done little on equity/fairness. - The problem for her is that England's attainment gap between rich and poor is very low by international standards. - England's 86 point gap is below France's (113), Germany's (111), OECD average (93). The gap is marginally larger than Finland's (83), but our gap is stable while theirs is widening. I agree with the New Statesman article that Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson isn't a Marxist. But let's be clear, she is undermining successful reforms and abusing statistics in the process. Not a Marxist, not good either.
















