Flint Dibble 🍖🏺

29.5K posts

Flint Dibble 🍖🏺 banner
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺

Flint Dibble 🍖🏺

@FlintDibble

Archaeologist ⛏️ | YouTuber 🎬 | Anti-intellectualism is the real cancel culture | Winner of 2024 Ockham Award | he/him | it's my real name | Cancer Fighter

Beigetreten Mart 2014
1.8K Folgt43.6K Follower
Angehefteter Tweet
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺@FlintDibble·
Graham Hancock is a coward who won't debate me again. He's rejected two different offers to go face to face with me on major, international media outlets @Graham__Hancock can't defend the ideas he makes millions off of against evidence based critiques He lacks integrity 1/5
English
187
51
601
74K
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺@FlintDibble·
RT @jtlewis_arch: This is an excellent video. While I do not agree with Todd Surovell on the peopling of the Americas or that most Paleo-re…
English
0
1
0
240
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺 retweetet
NeoJoeBro
NeoJoeBro@Neojoe18·
@C_Kavanagh @Graham__Hancock @FlintDibble Getting his dick knocked into the dirt by Flint in that debate is the closest Graham has ever been to being an archeologist.
English
0
3
18
799
Graham Hancock
Graham Hancock@Graham__Hancock·
Attn @FlintDibble : (1) you have been boasting and preening for nearly two years that you "won" your debate on the JRE with me and that your self-proclaimed brilliant performance "tanked" my audience. Usually, it is the loser of a debate, not the winner, who asks for a second round. I must therefore assume that your petulant demands to go "face to face" with me again mean you’ve known all along that you failed yourself and embarrassed your profession very badly when you sat down with me for JRE 2136 and that everything you've said on the matter since then is simply the smelly gas of a deeply insecure man. (2) In your pinned post of March 10th 2026 you accuse me of cowardice and lack of integrity and claim that I "rejected two different offers to go face to face” with you "on major, international media outlets". From whence came the “two different offers” for me to go face to face with you in a second debate? When and where were these “offers” made? And in what way, where, did I reject these offers? (3) For the avoidance of future doubt let me be clear. I am content for JRE 2136, the debate that you claim you won, to stand as the permanent record of what passed between us and to continue to allow those who are still interested to make up their own minds on the matter. I see no point in sitting down with you again to accommodate your neediness.
Graham Hancock tweet media
English
264
134
2.5K
86.5K
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺 retweetet
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺@FlintDibble·
@Graham__Hancock receipts that 1) I never requested a rematch and 2) you're a coward scared of those more intelligent than you
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺 tweet mediaFlint Dibble 🍖🏺 tweet media
English
7
5
61
1.6K
Meadowsweet
Meadowsweet@a_meadowsweet·
You have. Stating that Hancock (and others) centers White Europeans as able creators while chalking up the accomplishments of other peoples to outside influences is calling him a racist. It is stating that Hancock is making a call on races, comparing the achievements of one race against the other and making a subjective call on which is the most capable (able creator) race. You can twist yourself round in knots with your semantics, but what you are doing below is in fact calling him racist. If I state that you are inhaling paper sticks full of ignited tobacco, I am stating that you are a smoker. I hate this hypocrisy. I won't discuss with you long Flint, because I feel you are fragile and it is difficult to remain kind to you when replying to your posts. I like to argue with people, but I do not like to feel like I'm being unkind.
Meadowsweet tweet media
English
1
0
0
20
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺@FlintDibble·
@a_meadowsweet @94_415 @adancingferret @Graham__Hancock Find the quote liar And not a quote about him using evidence created by racist colonists. Because my point is such evidence isn't evidence Not a point about other people, racists, using his work. Cause he's acknowledged they do Show me calling him a racist. Cause I haven't
English
1
0
1
20
Meadowsweet
Meadowsweet@a_meadowsweet·
@FlintDibble @94_415 @adancingferret @Graham__Hancock Can you show a different version of the article he displays in his video, the one you sent for publication on the same day as the debate? Because you are in fact calling him a racist in that article. Semantic excuses fool no one Flint.
English
1
0
0
19
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺@FlintDibble·
@a_meadowsweet @94_415 @adancingferret @Graham__Hancock Simple. He lied about me calling him a racist. I never did such a thing. He deceptively edited text of mine to make it look like I did, and he even got called out for it during the debate I cited the study that I misstated the shipwreck count on screen. It was a simple mistake
English
2
0
6
53
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺@FlintDibble·
Graham Hancock is a coward who won't debate me again. He's rejected two different offers to go face to face with me on major, international media outlets @Graham__Hancock can't defend the ideas he makes millions off of against evidence based critiques He lacks integrity 1/5
English
187
51
601
74K
Sir Nigel Gresley
Sir Nigel Gresley@JLBKL·
No, that is not entirely accurate. He says he is quite content for the first debate to stand as a testament to who won. He goes onto say, quite fairly, that the winner of bout rarely ask for a re match as the point has already been made. Where can I view the debate to see if his claim is justified?
English
1
0
1
70
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺@FlintDibble·
Graham Hancock admits here that he is too cowardly to debate me again I have never demanded another debate, but I have been approached by other parties, including Piers Morgan team, and I accepted such offers Graham however is too scared for a second conversation
Graham Hancock@Graham__Hancock

Attn @FlintDibble : (1) you have been boasting and preening for nearly two years that you "won" your debate on the JRE with me and that your self-proclaimed brilliant performance "tanked" my audience. Usually, it is the loser of a debate, not the winner, who asks for a second round. I must therefore assume that your petulant demands to go "face to face" with me again mean you’ve known all along that you failed yourself and embarrassed your profession very badly when you sat down with me for JRE 2136 and that everything you've said on the matter since then is simply the smelly gas of a deeply insecure man. (2) In your pinned post of March 10th 2026 you accuse me of cowardice and lack of integrity and claim that I "rejected two different offers to go face to face” with you "on major, international media outlets". From whence came the “two different offers” for me to go face to face with you in a second debate? When and where were these “offers” made? And in what way, where, did I reject these offers? (3) For the avoidance of future doubt let me be clear. I am content for JRE 2136, the debate that you claim you won, to stand as the permanent record of what passed between us and to continue to allow those who are still interested to make up their own minds on the matter. I see no point in sitting down with you again to accommodate your neediness.

English
15
8
134
4.7K
Space Chimp
Space Chimp@VocalSpaceChimp·
@FlintDibble How do you know he won’t debate you if you didn’t ask for debate? If you never asked for another debate your pinned tweet is pretty idiotic. If you did ask for another debate then you’re lying here. Which is it Flint?
English
2
0
2
67

Entdecken

@jtlewis_arch @C_Kavanagh @Graham__Hancock @cCoppertot @a_meadowsweet @94_415 @adancingferret @elonmusk