Future Ruins

5.8K posts

Future Ruins banner
Future Ruins

Future Ruins

@FutureRuins

Free speech enjoyer.

Beigetreten Nisan 2021
459 Folgt208 Follower
Info Battle Maiden
Info Battle Maiden@info_maiden·
Literally a few White kids in the 2026 UT-Dallas graduation walkout… The rest…All indian. Trump still thinks we need more foreign student visas, though. They’ll never leave.
English
370
1.8K
7.8K
115.6K
Future Ruins
Future Ruins@FutureRuins·
@One_Way_Home She's cute. I would feel bad for her if I ignored the fact that she deliberately put herself in this situation.
English
0
0
0
319
Dweller
Dweller@One_Way_Home·
Teacher reads comments her 8th graders said. They just keep getting better but her demeanor while reading them steals the show.
English
482
732
8.5K
802.6K
Future Ruins retweetet
αΩ - OPERATION FREE DALTON 'Chud the Builder'
Breaking news on Dalton's Case! Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly case update Affidavit of Complaint just made public. Andrew Branca (self-defense law attorney) breakdown: • No racial slur alleged. Zero. The state's affidavit contains not one word of Eatherly provoking Fox with a slur. That was the biggest threat to his self-defense claim. Gone. • Affidavit describes zero criminal conduct. Not one sentence states what Eatherly did that was unlawful. • "Verbal altercation" is not a crime. At most a misdemeanor that would apply equally to both men. Neither is charged with it. • "Bladed stance" is not a crime. Taking a defensive posture against an angry antagonist is legal. • "Reached for his firearm" is not a crime. Preparing to defend yourself is legal. • "A physical altercation ensued" is written in passive voice. The state does not allege Eatherly started it. By omission, the inference points to Fox as the initiator. • "Discharged his firearm, striking Fox multiple times" is not inherently unlawful. Thousands of lawful self-defense shootings fit this exact description annually. • Ricocheting rounds near bystanders is not a crime absent recklessness. The affidavit alleges no recklessness. Police miss roughly 70% of shots in lawful shootings. • Lawful self-defense shots are, as a matter of law, not reckless. • Affidavit does not contest any element of self-defense. Not Innocence, Imminence, Proportionality, Avoidance, or Reasonableness. Not a single one. • Charges: attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, employing a firearm during a dangerous felony. • Branca's verdict: "Hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance." Sees no realistic path to conviction beyond a reasonable doubt on these facts.
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow

WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY! TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached). This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you. FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE. NOT. ONE. WORD. That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest. But it gets even BETTER for Dalton. SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.) Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever. I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads: "... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse." This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course). "During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..." There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance." "... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket." Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket." "Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued." Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation." Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation. This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him. The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times." There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table. Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls." Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness. Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly. I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness. Not a single element. Not a word of it. If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action. Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever. At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint." If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits. HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H). lawofselfdefense.com/FREEBOOK @AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman

English
245
726
5.7K
441.9K
Future Ruins retweetet
The SCIF
The SCIF@TheSCIF·
An 11-year-old changed election results on a replica state website in under 10 minutes. 35 out of 39 kids were successfully able to hack replicas of the Secretary of State's websites from 6 swing states. Multiple types of election machines were easily hacked as well, showing that these machines are extremely vulnerable. Now imagine the best hackers in the world with an unlimited budget. Most of these machines don't even need to be hacked because there are backdoors already built into them. This should concern EVERY American.
The SCIF tweet media
English
173
5.5K
8.8K
117.9K
Future Ruins retweetet
Chris Martenson
Chris Martenson@chrismartenson·
Here's my hypothesis. What we just witnessed in KY with the Massie loss was a 'struggle session.' It was designed to send one message: "We're fully in control, you have no power, and you might as well not even waste the time to vote." It was an operation designed to inflict demoralization. Same as not being allowed to be on the beach alone during 'Covid.' That's it's complete nonsense **IS** the point. Same as publicly executing Charlie Kirk. Same energy, same intention, & the same people. The point is to demonstrate their power, with the target being your sense of agency and control. We no longer need to wonder why the Trump administration has zero interest in finding CK's actual killer. It's the same people. Who was that figure in white seen leaving the roof of the Sorenson building at UVU that fateful day? That nobody cares on Tyler's 'defense team' or with any investigative authority is meant to be both obvious to the thinking person, as well as demoralizing. That's the play; fracture and divide us. Demoralize people to the point of giving up before they can even begin to organize, let alone fight. It's a form of cognitive warfare, and it's been running non-stop since Covid first appeared in 2020. Why? Because someone hates America and its people and wishes to see us taken down. The Barbarians are inside the gates. That's what the Massie loss means to me.
English
1K
3.2K
13.4K
205.4K
Future Ruins retweetet
GenXGirl
GenXGirl@GenXGirl1994·
QUITE A YEAR FOR ISRAEL -Buy TikTok & censor -Buy CBS & censor -Buy CNN & censor -Buy Influencers -Charlie Kirk gets killed -TPUSA becomes more Israel -Geo-Fence churches -1000 pastors become Israel Ambassadors -Replace MTG with Pro-Israel -Replace Massie with Pro-Israel
GenXGirl tweet media
English
628
10.1K
29.4K
408.9K
Future Ruins retweetet
Carolina ❤️‍🔥
Carolina ❤️‍🔥@realCarola2Hope·
I’m going to state the obvious: voting doesn’t matter. When a foreign country pours $32 million to unseat someone who doesn’t bend the knee and succeeds, it’s because we are an occupied nation. Real change won’t come from the ballot box.
English
494
5.7K
29.6K
248.7K
Future Ruins retweetet
Dr. Simon
Dr. Simon@goddek·
I think it’s fair to say that the U.S. is no longer a constitutional republic but an oligarchy serving foreign-lobby interests over its own citizens.
English
483
8.5K
45.3K
329.3K
Future Ruins retweetet
Lauren Witzke
Lauren Witzke@LaurenWitzkeDE·
Kentucky Fox News Boomers just voted for a mandatory Military draft, endless pro-LGBTQ policies, a wrecked economy, and forever wars for Israel. The rest of America? We just learned who truly controls our country and her elections.. and it’s not the voters. A tragic day for America.
English
266
929
5.1K
74K
Future Ruins retweetet
Mike Netter
Mike Netter@nettermike·
A former California social services worker just walked us through exactly how illegal aliens cash out the welfare system while American citizens get denied the same benefits. This is a disgrace and demonstrates how DNC politicians are lying about illegal aliens receiving benefits. Democrats hate Americans and always put illegal aliens ahead of their own constituents. It’s pathetic.
English
71
935
1.6K
17K
Future Ruins retweetet
bumbadum
bumbadum@bumbadum14·
"You, yes you young zoomer. You must save every penny for 10 years for a down payment on your home." "Oh hello Rakesh, here is your 1% downpayment FHA loaned backed by the federal government" FUCK YOU.
bumbadum tweet media
Selenite (The Rock Lady) ✝️@crochet_mom314

Let's test that. If an 18 year old saves $26 a day by eating the cheap sandwich instead of the $28 lunch mentioned, that's $9,490 a year. In five years, that's $47,450 if you save NOTHING else. That's a 20% down payment for a $230k home at 23. If you wait until 28, it's $94.9k.

English
296
3.8K
23.3K
714K
Future Ruins
Future Ruins@FutureRuins·
@BrianRoemmele A buddy of mine was his guitar tech for a while, and said Steve was a hyper nice dude.
English
0
0
5
324
Brian Roemmele
Brian Roemmele@BrianRoemmele·
Ever heard of Steve Stevens? He is the guy playing guitar and bass lines with one hand with Billy Idol. A great song is timeless. A great musician is timeless.
English
61
91
1.1K
102K
Andrew Weinstein
Andrew Weinstein@Weinsteinlaw·
When a federal agency tasked with protecting all Americans decides to mandate a specific religious worldview, it ceases to protect democracy and begins to threaten it.
Andrew Weinstein tweet media
English
1.3K
3.8K
10.4K
212.6K
Tumlaren
Tumlaren@Tumlaren160545·
@ArtemisConsort It's wild to me that you people think that "Let's hate and demonize Black citizens even more" will solve things when that is what you have been doing for like 200 years.
English
62
0
16
10.8K