
Bianca A GoldenRuleLover 🇺🇸🇺🇦 #StillNeverTrump
87.9K posts

Bianca A GoldenRuleLover 🇺🇸🇺🇦 #StillNeverTrump
@GoldenRuleLover
Indie Voter- Thinks everything needed to be a useful human being was learned in kindergarten. Still proudly #NeverTrump






As I said on my 77WABC Radio radio show tonight, the shit will hit the fan for Eric Swallwell ( aka Swallowswell) The dopey drugged out pothead and serial sexual predator tomorrow.


WOW. 46% of Italians and 37% of French people see the U.S. as a threat

We cannot simply speak about withdrawing from Donbas as a matter of compromise. Our withdrawal from Donbas would open up opportunities for the Russian Federation to occupy our most fortified territories without losses. Some people say it would take a year to a year and a half to build new fortifications. But everyone forgets: first and foremost, that is a year and a half. And even if it were less, fortifications in an open field are a completely different matter from those in urban areas. They can never provide equally strong protection. A withdrawal would give the Russian Federation room for large-scale maneuver. They could advance either toward Kharkiv or toward Dnipro, destroying our cities. And two major cities would be at risk – cities that, incidentally, generate a significant share of our GDP. So many people have died there… The morale of our army would certainly decline. There would undoubtedly be a rift in society. The army – which would surely not support such steps – on one side, and society on the other. And division within society is precisely what Putin is aiming for. Moreover, there are currently 200,000 people living in the territories of Donbas that we are defending. Withdrawal does not mean preserving anything. You leave, and without any guarantees, you risk losing everything. And that is a major risk. From an interview with Rai Radio 1 (2/3).



Whats most obvious and significant about Trump's statement is that he won the "podcaster election" of 2024 without caring about the importance of "podcasters." To him, power is still in 80s-90s television and the Baby Boomers. True enough for him. Drastically less for the future


If sanctions on Russian oil have been lifted because of the war in the Middle East, will the U.S. sanctions be reimposed now that there is a ceasefire? I think that an answer to this question will expose the reason for lifting sanctions in the first place. We just need to wait and see. In my view, Russia played the Americans again – played the President of the United States. The Russians lied about the role their oil supplies played in keeping oil markets stable. If the U.S. reimposes sanctions, that would be fair. But if it doesn’t… We heard that Russia wanted Americans to buy certain energy assets in Europe belonging to Lukoil. I ask myself, “If I want to sell sanctioned energy assets, what do I do?” I come up with a scheme to lift sanctions. How else could I sell it? From an interview with Rai Radio 1 (3/3).


"One person familiar with their interactions noted that Trump had a habit of confusing tactical advice from Caine with strategic counsel." Almost as if Trump didn't understand that operational wins do not automatically mean strategic success. theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/03/…

Don't worry, America. The outcome of the war against the Iranian regime all depends upon the specifics of what gets agreed to at the negotiating table with the mullahs in the coming weeks, on everything from control of the Strait of Hormuz, to uranium enrichment, to sanctions, to whether U.S. combat forces will remain in the region, to the fate of Hezbollah. The fate of the world rests in the hands of... ...Steve Witkoff.






