H.P.Art

"The neighbor who called police told Eyewitness News off-camera that they they feel guilty for calling 911, but sincerely thought their neighbor was in trouble." that person should feel shame every second for the rest of their lives abc7.com/post/family-do…

"thought their neighbour was in trouble" my ass no the fuck you did not i would not be surprised if they told the cops to bring the cavalry

Is this you in this photo, doctor?

There are two red flag pictures in politics, and Rick Scott has both. 🚩🚩

A woman dressed as a man lecturing men on masculinity. Clown world.

Genuinely though, why do browns love setting off fireworks in the middle of the day when you can't even see them?

There are no Loons in Somalia..

holy ratio 😭

There's a reverse influence op going on right now. They purposely sent JD Palantir on to Megyn Kelly to distance him from Trump & the Iran War. Then they launched a coordinated social media campaign against JD to criticize him, to make him seem even further from Trump & Iran. It's all fake. They're trying to rehabilitate his image so that he's not tainted by the deeply unpopular Iran war—even though he himself called for this war. Never JD. NEVER. Hold the line. Don't fall for the the gayops.

Adding: since OP went private, here's the top post from their Bsky thread, about Peter Thiel's secret society, "Dialog". It's not just a chat group. They host retreats; they've bought property in DC. Peter thinks the world should be run by elites. These are the his choices. 8/

IMHO it's a good general rule that if a club includes Jared Kushner, Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, and Leonard Leo, you should not join it. You do not want to be associated with those people in any way. And for those who did join, they'd better answer for that choice now. 7/

Peter Thiel himself, of course, and Shivon Zilis, Elon Musk's baby mama, along with anti-gay Evangelical pastor Rick Warren. A strange mix, that includes a lot of people who just sacrificed any credibility for calling themselves Dem leaders. 6/

Bret Stephens of the NYT, hanging with Epstein files creepers Steven Pinker and Larry Summers. Jim O'Neill, the Thiel flunky nominated to lead US science. And then Jared Polis, the CO Governor who just pardoned Tina Peters. 5/

Bryan Johnson who wants to live forever and Grover Norquist who the government to die. Leonard Leo and Elon Musk. Ezra Klein, doing secret societies the right way. Thiel henchman Joe Lonsdale. But then.. Wes Moore? Kaja Kallas? Lisa Monaco, who helped lead the J6 prosecutions? 4/

Going to post the membership list in chunks. It's tech-fascists and fake-centrist pundits and Silicon Valley business guys and health wackos like Peter Attia and Trump toadies like Scott Bessent and a few arts folks and then.. Cory Booker? 2/

Dan Driscoll, our SecArmy, is JD Vance's friend from Yale tasked with giving your tax dollars to Peter Thiel's friends with defense startups. Pundit Sam Harris, no surprise. Rob Hur was the Special Counsel who wrote a hit-piece biased report on Joe Biden. 3/

New today: Peter Thiel's secret society of illuminati had a website so insecure it exposed his entire membership list. And it's... interesting. His Palatantir folks, sure. Leonard Leo. The president of Stanford. Ezra Klein. And some D politicians who really shouldn't be there. 1/

I’m actually a child online safety expert and was one of the pioneers in this space with Club Penguin and so I feel uniquely positioned to critique this. The groomer problem is real but it’s also vastly overstated. The far larger issue we saw at Penguin was suicidality or reports of sexual abuse in the home. There is no solution for lazy/bad parenting. You can implement all the ID laws you want but if parents are going to just hand kids their phones unlocked, those kids will have access to all the same things the parents have unfettered. What I found is that these draconian safety laws actually make it harder to be an honest operator of kids apps because on one hand it’s so much legal risk and so much user friction that it simply becomes uninvestible as a business. Parents will just lie to let their kids use the unfettered internet. For example, I have a friend who works in mobile gaming who has two kids, one above and one below the age limit but separated by just 2 yrs, and the two wanted to play and chat together on Roblox - which is reasonable. To do this, he just verified that his younger kid is old enough for the chat feature when he’s not. This happens all the time and will happen with these laws to. How far do we want to go with this? Scan the face of the user in real-time to make sure it’s not a kid using the device? We could do that but it feels like a massive unwanted intrusion of privacy. That’s how you know this law isn’t about kids. COPPA and GDPR-K and so forth already make it illegal to allow chat and other grooming vectors to kids. What’s really being done here is trying to eliminate online anonymity. And this is a far bigger issue that goes to core speech rights because if you cannot criticize the govt anonymously and if wrong speech is a crime then it becomes easy to identify all the detractors of the govt in power, and ban, fine or jail them for speech crimes. Starmer has already been doing this and he wants to do it at a much bigger scale. Starmer won’t even acknowledge the problem of actual grooming gangs in Britain’s neighborhoods but he’s worried about online grooming? No he’s not, and this hypocrisy gives away the game. What he wants is to kill online anonymity so he can enforce censorship of his unpopular policies. No politician should have this power.

Just watch how Jews will collective instantly and all run the same exact lie... They will then run it on national news until it's permanently in the boomer brain. You must be ready to collectivize more than they do. You must understand this is tribal warfare.