Himothee Chalamet

24.2K posts

Himothee Chalamet banner
Himothee Chalamet

Himothee Chalamet

@Himoothee

Building @HiruleHQ

Beigetreten Mayıs 2021
1.5K Folgt8.6K Follower
10Δ
10Δ@_10delta_·
Addendum 2:
10Δ@_10delta_

This all makes sense when you consider that the United States faces a debt dynamic that can no longer be solved through orthodox policy. Federal debt held by the public is approximately 100% of GDP, interest expense is above $1 trillion annually, & the primary deficit is structurally running at around 5% - 6% of GDP. Under these conditions, achieving debt sustainability becomes a function of 3 variables only: the nominal growth rate, the effective interest cost of the debt stock, & the primary fiscal balance. Because the primary balance is politically locked, the remaining levers are nominal growth & the effective interest cost of the debt. Thus, we’re going to see negative real rates for a long period (explicit default is obviously not an option). “We’re going to grow ourselves out of the debt.” How? Using the combination of policy tools detailed in some of my previous posts. But, to rehash, we can consider 4 distinct mechanisms that will run in parallel: 1/ Rate suppression: policy rate at 2% - 2.50% versus structurally elevated inflation (core PCE likely to run 2.5% - 3.5% for the next several years), which delivers negative or near 0 short-end real rates. Thus reducing the value of the debt service. 2/ (forced) Private sector demand for Treasuries.. Stablecoin issuance mandates T-bill holding. Relaxed eSLR encourages bank absorption of longer duration Treasuries. Money funds continue to be a large bill buyer. All of this compresses front end yields below the “free-market” clearing price. 3/ Nominal GDP (hyper) acceleration via fiscal transfer: tariff dividends, targeted transfers, & ongoing defense & industrial policy spending will keep nominal GDP growth elevated (“run it hot!”), which mechanically erodes the real value of the debt stock. 4/ Central Bank Policy Coordination: Warsh will weigh growth & debt sustainability much more heavily relative to the “outdated” 2% inflation target. Study the 1942 - 1951 Treasury-Fed period, when the Fed was committed to supporting the Treasury market with pegged rates. This post war financial policy strategy compressed real yields to around -1.5% to -2.0% on average. This is the core mechanism that took Debt to GDP from 119% in 1946 to 47% by 1974. I’ll be tracking the 10 year real rate, which (in my base case) should move from the current 2.1% to approximately 0.5% by end of 2027 & potentially negative territory by 2029. Time to run it hot!

Türkçe
1
2
24
4.6K
10Δ
10Δ@_10delta_·
Clarity Act is now poised to accelerate the “Bretton Woods 3.0” framework that I’ve talked about. The yield “ban” is cosmetic & simply something for banks to tout as a victory. It bans stablecoins from paying you interest for just holding them: the way a savings account does. But it explicitly allows stablecoins to pay you rewards for using them: buying things, lending, providing liquidity, participating in any program.. Now consider that those rewards can be calculated based on how much you hold & for how long. I think that’s what we just call interest, but it will now be rebranded under a new name. So, the implications: - The fact that there is now a carve-out for stablecoin yield will accelerate the Bretton Woods 3.0 system. If the ban had been real (no yield in any form) there’s no reason for anyone to hold stablecoins over a bank account. Stablecoin adoption would flatline (especially in Developed Markets) & Bessent’s $3.7T target would be hard to achieve. This carve out keeps the incentive to hold stablecoins, which keeps the growth flywheel spinning. - CBDCs can’t compete. No central bank would design its digital currency to pay activity based rewards calculated by balance & duration (too close to monetary policy). However, dollar stablecoins can. So in every market where a CBDC competes against a $ stablecoin, the dollar product is economically superior. The Clarity Act now guarantees that advantage persists. - The dollar now goes global without permission. The new text allows platforms to pay incentives for payments, remittances, & settlement activity using stablecoins. That’s a subsidy for global dollar adoption funded by private companies (not taxpayers). Meanwhile, increasing Treasury demand in the background. For example, a Filipino worker now gets a rebate for sending remittances in USDC. There’s an additional incentive for him to now transact in stablecoins, which, unbeknownst to him, purchases American debt behind the scenes. A win-win for global stablecoin users & the American economy (fiscal situation). The compromise looks like a ban. But it’s actually a growth mandate. As I’ve stated, the US government needs stablecoins to scale because it needs someone to buy its debt. Bretton Woods 3.0
Faryar Shirzad 🛡️@faryarshirzad

The final rewards text in the CLARITY Act is now public. We’ve been clear throughout this process: much of this debate was based on imagined risks, not real evidence, nor was it based on a real understanding of how crypto actually works. Nevertheless, the crypto industry showed up to engage. Through months of meetings, the @WhiteHouse, @USTreasury, @BankingGOP, @SenThomTillis and @Sen_Alsobrooks finally arrived at a compromise. In the end, the banks were able to get more restrictions on rewards, but we protected what matters – the ability for Americans to earn rewards, based on real usage of crypto platforms and networks. We also ensured the US can be at the forefront of the financial system – which in this competitive geopolitical era is paramount. That’s important for innovation, consumers and America's national security. Now that this issue is behind us, it’s time to focus on the broader bill. While this debate has been underway, lots of progress has been made on other areas like token classification, defi, and tokenization. We’re excited to review the full, final text, and for the bill to move forward. It’s time to get CLARITY done.

English
41
121
890
117.2K
Himothee Chalamet retweetet
Kyle
Kyle@0xkyle__·
only in america do people pay for drugs to make you eat less instead of just... eating less
English
6
2
31
1.9K
gainzy
gainzy@gainzy222·
wait no… we’re rich ?
English
4
0
9
2.3K
Daniel
Daniel@danielisdizzy·
@Himoothee It could really happen 😅 $LMND
English
1
0
0
177
Daniel
Daniel@danielisdizzy·
$LMND will become the largest insurance company in the world. Every quarter is another validation of the thesis. Being a true AI company from day one allows $LMND to scale customers without increasing headcount — something no incumbent insurer can replicate. Over the last 3 years, employee count has declined while in-force premium has more than doubled. $LMND now generates >$1M of IFP per employee — already in line with the best in the industry. As the business scales, it’s set to lead the industry in IFP per employee efficiency. Q1 2026: • $1.33B in-force premium (+32% YoY), 10 consecutive quarters of accelerating growth • $100M gross profit (+159% YoY) • $258M revenue (+71% YoY) And the stock is still down 45% from its January highs. 👀
Daniel tweet media
English
1
0
45
2.6K
DVB
DVB@DeepValueBagger·
I'm up $1m this week, now $7.2M. Have a good weekend everyone.
DVB tweet media
English
151
24
1.3K
115.6K
Himothee Chalamet
Himothee Chalamet@Himoothee·
Trump gave everyone a free 5x with unlimited size We can no longer bitch about the insider trading
Himothee Chalamet tweet media
English
31
25
781
94.2K
stonk mane
stonk mane@stonkmane69·
@Himoothee I have both fwiw but MP actually makes money. USAR could go nuts on beta.
English
1
0
0
547
stonk mane
stonk mane@stonkmane69·
@Himoothee MP ships today into a $110/kg DoD floor and Apple's $500M deal. USAR ships in 2027 if Phase 1a commissions on time and the $1.6B DOC funding closes. Both bet on the same thesis. MP is 18-24 months ahead with contracted demand. USAR is the higher-beta lottery on the same trade.
English
2
0
0
644
Kalshi
Kalshi@Kalshi·
JUST IN: Iran reportedly considering using dolphins armed with mines to attack US warships
English
488
185
2.4K
759.8K
Serenity
Serenity@aleabitoreddit·
"To unblock a blockade, one must blockade the blockade" Wait this is actually working?
Serenity tweet media
English
88
25
686
64.1K