Angehefteter Tweet
MθθΣK
5.8K posts
MθθΣK
@ImMoosking
I'm being controlled by a comically small alien in a mech suit.
Beigetreten Aralık 2019
707 Folgt343 Follower
@GraviosLover @IlPredestinAyo @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme Apollo 1 is not mentioned in the graphic.
Also yeah. It cherry picks things. That's the point. The original cherry picks things as well.
English
@ImMoosking @IlPredestinAyo @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme Apollo 1 is actually mentioned in the image as well, it's one of two failures of the Apollo program.
However, the image does heavily cherry pick things - it specifically uses Laika whilst ignoring that she launched with Sputnik 2, which had scientific instruments and transmitted
English
@czljp @IlPredestinAyo @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme It doesn't matter if the station habitation module itself works fine; if you fail to get any crew to and from the station it is not a successful station. Nobody has gone to Salyut-1 and lived to tell the tale.
English
@ImMoosking @IlPredestinAyo @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme Well, Salyut was a success, albeit on the second attempt.
Soyuz was the issue.
English
@IlPredestinAyo @ZaaggyPiep @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme The distinction on whether the mission was successful or not very much changes that fact. You don't see Americans parading around and bragging that they launched the first space tourist on Challenger in 1986.
English
@ZaaggyPiep @ImMoosking @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme Doesn't change the fact that it's the first space station ever
English
@IlPredestinAyo @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme I would call having at least one crew visit the station and live to tell the tale as a success.
English
@ImMoosking @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme Depends on what you call a sucess. Soyuz WAS a Space Station that allowed mankind to stay in Space for more than a few hours. The fact that they died during entry changes nothing about the fact that it was a successful space station.
English
@IlPredestinAyo @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme The result of Apollo 1 did not change the fact that the US was first to the Moon. The result of Soyuz-11, however, does change things. With the exclusion of Salyut-1, the title of "first successful space station" goes to the US.
English
@ImMoosking @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme Both image include first man on the moon for USA. Apollo 1 is from the same program and had a direct impact on the achievement of Apollo 11 so it would only by fair to include it according to your own logic
English
@bunnicage @Cushmanvi @bahakirlidokme The whole space race was both sides extending the finish line until one of them couldn't reach it. Unless, of course, you'd like to argue that the NAZIs won the space race in 1944
English
English
@bunnicage @Cushmanvi @bahakirlidokme Yeah it's called May 1961. US stated they wanted to go to the Moon and the Soviets responded by starting their own Moon program.
English
@Cushmanvi @bahakirlidokme was there some big get together i missed where they established that the moon was the finish line, cause from here it just looked like the USA extending the finish line over and over
English
@IlPredestinAyo @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme The only reason the death of Soyuz 11 is included in this response is because the OP listed Salyut-1 as one of the Soviet achievements.
English
@GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme Pure american propaganda. Why not mention the death of the Apollo 1 crew during TRAINING for example ?
English
@Dusk_Writerr @ZayJspx @DanteNotAlmeida @memeticsisyphus You're not talking to those 'Eurosnobs' you're talking to me
English
@ImMoosking @ZayJspx @DanteNotAlmeida @memeticsisyphus And there were no cries of outrage from Eurosnobs who are afraid of getting their hands dirty until the orange guy blew up infrastructure. Clearly the principle matters way less than hatred of the orange guy.
English
Iran straps children to stop American bombs while its leaders hide under mountains.
Open Source Intel@Osint613
WATCH 🔴 Iranians form human shield at Kazeroun power plant ahead of Trump’s threatened strikes.
English
@DanteNotAlmeida @memeticsisyphus They are not valid military targets. That is the whole point.
English
@memeticsisyphus >notice it's illegal to deliberately kill civilians in war
>stack a bunch of civilians on top of your valid military targets
>enemy is legally not allowed to win the war
English
@banksysfather @hashjenni Trump has not been quiet about Artemis what universe are you from
English
This is so incredibly moving when it’s not to add 19 more starlink satellites to the night sky
English
@Stuffhappenwhen @Griot2325 A feasibility study or vague concept is not actual development. By that metric, SpaceX started developing Starship in 2005.
Even if it was, the fact that the program persisted through 2017 would still dispell the notion set by the original poster.
English
@ImMoosking @Griot2325 In 2004, NASA began feasability analysis for a potentiall crewed rocket using shuttle boosters and a shuttle main tank with RS-25's, as a part of the constellation program.
However, the SLS did not officially receive funding until 2010. However, initial development was 2004.
English
Obama gutted NASA while Trump is sending a crew to the moon for the first time in 50 years.
Alex@alexriesart
Why do conservatives hate space science? They are trying to cut the budget in half, again. Something about it clearly offends them...
English
@Stuffhappenwhen @Griot2325 This is simply incorrect. The SLS program was introduced in the 2010 NASA Authorization Act. It began work after the subsequent appropriations. The program went through KDP A (program definition) and B (requirements definition) in 2012, and KDP C (preliminary design) in 2014.
English
@ImMoosking @Griot2325 SLS first started development in 2004, so that isn't technically true.
English
@esjesjesj I get that you don't like Elon, and neither do most space fans, but you are being incredibly annoying.
SpaceX has a 99.5% success rate on customer missions. You have 0 idea what you're talking about.
Just enjoy Artemis. No need to be miserable.
English
This would never happen with SpaceX (the ship would have exploded)
New York Post@nypost
Artemis II astronauts report burning smell from malfunctioning $23M toilet trib.al/GmAVFe9
English