Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod

1.5K posts

Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod banner
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod

Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod

@IndoPacPodcast

Join Ray Powell and Jim Carouso as they explore issues defining this century's pivotal region, the Indo-Pacific. New podcast every Friday.

Beigetreten Nisan 2024
149 Folgt3.2K Follower
Angehefteter Tweet
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod
"Why Should We Care if China is Building its Biggest Island Yet in the South China Sea?" At the start of 2025, Antelope Reef was little more than a sandbar in the Paracel Islands. Months later, it's on track to become China's largest artificial island in the South China Sea. In this episode, we sit down with @GregPoling, director of the Southeast Asia Program and the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative (@AsiaMTI) at CSIS and author of On Dangerous Ground: America's Century in the South China Sea, to unpack what China is building, why it's building it now, and what it means for the region – and especially Vietnam. Greg walks us through the latest satellite imagery, explains why the scale and speed of construction caught even seasoned analysts off guard, and lays out the military implications of a potential new airstrip in the western Paracels – the first in an area where Vietnamese fishermen have operated for generations. We explore why both China and Vietnam claim the Paracel Islands, how Vietnam’s own massive island-building campaign in the Spratly Islands complicates the narrative, and why Hanoi’s response to Antelope Reef has been surprisingly restrained. The conversation turns to the broader geopolitical landscape: Vietnam’s strategic rebalancing between Washington and Beijing, the Philippines’ recalibration during its ASEAN chairmanship, and whether a South China Sea Code of Conduct can ever be more than symbolic. With the 10th anniversary of the landmark 2016 Hague arbitral ruling approaching in July, we assess whether it has been a net positive or negative for the Philippines and the rules-based order. We also discuss middle-power alignment, the expanding Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership, and what countries like the United States, Japan, and Australia should and shouldn’t do in response. Links to the full episode with @GordianKnotRay and Jim Carouso below.
English
14
29
80
8.8K
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod
What Will The Future of International Law Would Look Like? According to @GregPoling
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod@IndoPacPodcast

@GregPoling @AsiaMTI @CSIS Ep. 141 is available wherever you get your podcasts, including: - YouTube: youtu.be/V-GHHNCynnQ - Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/why… - Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/0Y7RnI… - Amazon: music.amazon.com/podcasts/9e5b7… - RSS: rss.com/podcasts/indo-… + More! 🔥 Sponsored by @BowerGroupAsia

English
0
0
0
81
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod
What does Vietnam think about signing the South China Sea Code of Conduct? @GregPoling, director of the Southeast Asia Program and the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative (@AsiaMTI) at @CSIS and author of On Dangerous Ground: America's Century in the South China Sea, shares his thoughts on Vietnam’s perspective on the Code of Conduct in the South China Sea between ASEAN and China.
English
1
4
9
805
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod retweetet
Ray Powell
Ray Powell@GordianKnotRay·
😲THEY DID IT AGAIN — all while denying they do it. 🤦‍♂️ 🇨🇳@Chinaembmanila again denied controlling Chinese-language media in the 🇵🇭#Philippines — by distributing its denial across the local Chinese-language press, word for word, on command. 🗣️Deputy Spokesperson Guo Wei published his latest & longest salvo — a 3,000-word column that continues a months-long campaign of formal embassy statements targeting @SeaLightFound & me personally. It includes this passage: 📰"Powell's attacks on Chinese-language media in the Philippines are particularly egregious. On January 22, 2026, he smeared the normal interactions between these media outlets and the Chinese Embassy, claiming the Embassy 'controls' them and builds a 'propaganda network.' In early February, he again singled out major Chinese language newspapers such as the World News and the Commercial News. His so-called 'exposés' are in fact attempts to pressure and intimidate these outlets, seeking to silence voices that promote China–Philippines friendship." This exact column — including this exact denial — was placed verbatim on 👉PAGE 1👈 of both United News & Chinese Commercial News. It was also published online by the Philippine Dragon Media Network & World News (which mainland state media aggregator Sohu redistributed for PRC audiences) & run in English in @TheManilaTimes. 🗞️ Same text. Same byline. Delivered as a package & published as received. The column names Chinese Commercial News and World News as outlets I unfairly "attacked." Both papers then printed the embassy's column, on command. 🫡 This is not new. 🔎 In January, I published an investigation documenting how Ambassador Jing Quan summoned executives from 8 Manila Chinese-language outlets & told them to "cooperate closely" with Beijing. The embassy attacked me in response — but didn't dispute a single fact. Then on March 27 he did it again — this time personally visiting the headquarters of World News, Chinese Commercial News & Chinatown TV, and meeting with heads of United News and others. He urged them not to be afraid of "smear campaigns." Two weeks later, every outlet the ambassador visited published Guo Wei's column ... calling my work a smear campaign ... verbatim ... on command. 🫡 But ... nothing to see here ... move along ... 🙈🙉🙊
Ray Powell tweet media
English
2
69
145
4.8K
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod retweetet
Ray Powell
Ray Powell@GordianKnotRay·
👽Conspiratorial & very much on brand.✅ A 2nd columnist at 📰@TheManilaTimes, Ado Paglinawan, has responded to my op-ed on "Beijing's good-cop, bad-cop playbook in Manila". Ado builds on Bobi Tiglao's theories by saying I've 🤪"gone berserk" and 🔥"burned my cover" as a spy. 🕵️ Yeah, I must have missed the day in spy school where they tell you NOT to have a 📱big social media account, do 📺on-camera media interviews & ✍️write op-eds under your own name. Oops?🤷‍♂️ This is all quite on brand for Ado -- who is, of course, a particularly sloppy conspiracy theorist. He's been building my espionage resumé for years, though he can't seem to settle on the details. He's claimed at various times that I'm an agent of US Navy intelligence ... or the Naval Institute ... or CIA ... or DIA ... or (in this column) something called the Office of Naval Concerns, whatever that is. 🙄 The accusation morphs a little every few weeks. The evidence never arrives, but conspiracy theorists don't really traffic in evidence. Again, on brand.✅ Ado also claims I "insulted" DFA Secretary Lazaro — which is of course the opposite of what I actually wrote. My op-ed called her "a solid and principled defender of Philippine sovereign rights," cited DFA's 47 diplomatic protests against China in 2025 & quoted her department's flat rejection of Beijing's sovereignty claims. But notice what Ado is doing: manufacturing a conflict that doesn't exist, framed as 🪖warmongering transparency advocates vs. ☮️sensible Philippine diplomats. It's a variation on the very same 🇨🇳Chinese Embassy playbook I described in my op-ed. So again, on brand.✅ My column argued that Beijing's tactic is to muddle the inconvenient facts by personally attacking anyone who generates transparency about its behavior, in order to silence them & shut down debate on the substance. So far the response of its acolytes has been to ... [checks notes] ... personally attack me in order to silence me & shut down debate on the substance. In other words, on brand.✅
Ray Powell tweet media
Ray Powell@GordianKnotRay

🙀That escalated quickly.👀 Rigoberto Tiglao was so rattled by Part 1 of my op-ed on "Beijing's good-cop, bad-cop playbook in Manila" that he couldn't even wait for Part 2 to be published a day later. Before even seeing the full argument, he had already pounded out 2,000 words of ad hominem hysterics — not rebutting anything I wrote, but proclaiming himself "stunned" that a voice critical of Beijing had dared to grace the pages of @TheManilaTimes. Tiglao treats the Times' opinion page as the exclusive playground of those who toe the 🇨🇳Party line — literally. Former Chinese Ambassador Huang Xilian published 13 opinion columns in the same paper during his tenure, while openly pro-Beijing columnists like Tiglao have run there for years without interruption. Not once did Tiglao object to a sitting foreign government official using the paper as a direct messaging platform. But one two-part series that names the Chinese embassy's interference operation for what it is? That's an "infiltration" by a "professional propagandist" that must be exposed and expelled. Tiglao's rule is clear: voices supporting Beijing are welcome in The Manila Times. Voices questioning Beijing are infiltrators.🕵️ Not only is his column revealingly hysterical, it's unbelievably sloppy: "Concealing his background" — 🤣Child, please. I'm a retired Air Force officer. Is there anyone who doesn't know this? Tiglao found my full biography easily enough on the web to fill four pages with it. If I'm trying to "conceal" any of this I'm not very good at it. "Paid by the US Navy" — 🚫False. The SeaLight Foundation is an IRS-registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit funded by modest private donations. I receive no salary — not from the Navy, not from Stanford or the Gordian Knot Center, not even from SeaLight. Zero. Tiglao could have verified this with a single search. He chose not to. The name "Project Myoushu" proves it targeted China — 🤦‍♂️Dude. "Myōshu (妙手)" is a 🇯🇵Japanese word — a game of Go term meaning "inspired move" (which was, in fact, the reason we chose it). It's not Chinese. On my actual argument — Tiglao's own column concedes: "There is no use to debunk Powell's piece." At least he's honest about that, because ... he doesn't try. 🙄 Not a word about the 🇨🇳ambassador's dual-track messaging. Not a word about the spokesperson's personal attacks on government officials. Not a word about Beijing claiming "indisputable sovereignty" while calling for dialogue to "resolve disputes". Not a word about the embassy weaponizing the DFA Secretary's quotes against her own government. Nope. He attacked the messenger because he couldn't touch the message. I'll let readers decide which column dealt in evidence and which dealt in ad hominem. They can draw their own conclusions about my actual argument using the links below.👇

English
6
30
81
4.9K
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod retweetet
Sino Talk (Joaquin Camarena)
The episode with @GregPoling provides a good understanding of why China is developing Antelope Reef after a ten-year hiatus. The development is significant because of the increased capability it gives to the CCG to harass Vietnamese ships, oil rigs, and violate Vietnam's EEZ.
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod@IndoPacPodcast

"Why Should We Care if China is Building its Biggest Island Yet in the South China Sea?" At the start of 2025, Antelope Reef was little more than a sandbar in the Paracel Islands. Months later, it's on track to become China's largest artificial island in the South China Sea. In this episode, we sit down with @GregPoling, director of the Southeast Asia Program and the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative (@AsiaMTI) at CSIS and author of On Dangerous Ground: America's Century in the South China Sea, to unpack what China is building, why it's building it now, and what it means for the region – and especially Vietnam. Greg walks us through the latest satellite imagery, explains why the scale and speed of construction caught even seasoned analysts off guard, and lays out the military implications of a potential new airstrip in the western Paracels – the first in an area where Vietnamese fishermen have operated for generations. We explore why both China and Vietnam claim the Paracel Islands, how Vietnam’s own massive island-building campaign in the Spratly Islands complicates the narrative, and why Hanoi’s response to Antelope Reef has been surprisingly restrained. The conversation turns to the broader geopolitical landscape: Vietnam’s strategic rebalancing between Washington and Beijing, the Philippines’ recalibration during its ASEAN chairmanship, and whether a South China Sea Code of Conduct can ever be more than symbolic. With the 10th anniversary of the landmark 2016 Hague arbitral ruling approaching in July, we assess whether it has been a net positive or negative for the Philippines and the rules-based order. We also discuss middle-power alignment, the expanding Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership, and what countries like the United States, Japan, and Australia should and shouldn’t do in response. Links to the full episode with @GordianKnotRay and Jim Carouso below.

English
0
8
14
2K
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod
"Why Should We Care if China is Building its Biggest Island Yet in the South China Sea?" At the start of 2025, Antelope Reef was little more than a sandbar in the Paracel Islands. Months later, it's on track to become China's largest artificial island in the South China Sea. In this episode, we sit down with @GregPoling, director of the Southeast Asia Program and the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative (@AsiaMTI) at CSIS and author of On Dangerous Ground: America's Century in the South China Sea, to unpack what China is building, why it's building it now, and what it means for the region – and especially Vietnam. Greg walks us through the latest satellite imagery, explains why the scale and speed of construction caught even seasoned analysts off guard, and lays out the military implications of a potential new airstrip in the western Paracels – the first in an area where Vietnamese fishermen have operated for generations. We explore why both China and Vietnam claim the Paracel Islands, how Vietnam’s own massive island-building campaign in the Spratly Islands complicates the narrative, and why Hanoi’s response to Antelope Reef has been surprisingly restrained. The conversation turns to the broader geopolitical landscape: Vietnam’s strategic rebalancing between Washington and Beijing, the Philippines’ recalibration during its ASEAN chairmanship, and whether a South China Sea Code of Conduct can ever be more than symbolic. With the 10th anniversary of the landmark 2016 Hague arbitral ruling approaching in July, we assess whether it has been a net positive or negative for the Philippines and the rules-based order. We also discuss middle-power alignment, the expanding Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership, and what countries like the United States, Japan, and Australia should and shouldn’t do in response. Links to the full episode with @GordianKnotRay and Jim Carouso below.
English
14
29
80
8.8K
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod retweetet
Ray Powell
Ray Powell@GordianKnotRay·
📢HEY YOU! 🛑STOP what you're doing and 🟢START following @IndoPacPodcast NOW so you can get more gems like this one in your feed👇 If you already are ... 😃great! Now tell all your friends.📣
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod@IndoPacPodcast

Special Ep: "Why Should We Care About America’s Extraordinary Rescue Mission in Iran?" The U.S. military just pulled off one of the most dramatic combat search and rescue missions in history, sending forces deep into Iran to recover the crew of a downed F‑15E Strike Eagle fighter. Aircraft were lost, firefights erupted, and both airmen came home alive. The last time America attempted something this ambitious inside Iran was Operation Eagle Claw in 1980 - and that ended in disaster. In this podcast, hosts @GordianKnotRay and Jim sit down with two retired special operations colonels: Ioannis Koskinas (Air Force Special Operations, CEO of The Hoplite Group, former senior advisor to Generals McChrystal and Schwartz) and Joe Felter (Army Special Forces, Director of Stanford’s Gordian Knot Center for National Security Innovation, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense). As @JoeFelter puts it: no other country could have pulled this off, and no other country would have tried. The conversation starts with the rescue: how it was planned in under 48 hours, how and why aircraft were lost at a forward staging site deep in Iran, and what separates this outcome from the 1980 failure. It then pivots to the broader war: where the conflict with Iran is headed, the risk of Gulf state escalation, and why both guests, drawing on painful experience from Afghanistan’s collapse, warn against assuming tactical brilliance equals strategic victory. The episode closes with the Indo‑Pacific: what allies are thinking as American attention and resources once again pour into the Middle East, and whether the U.S. can fight in the Gulf without undermining its ability to deter China. Links to the full episode below.

English
0
1
8
1.2K
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod retweetet
SeaLight
SeaLight@SeaLightFound·
In celebration of the 🇵🇭#Philippines’ Day of Valor, listen to the July 2025 interview featuring SeaLight Executive Director Ray Powell and Philippine Secretary of National Defense Gibo Teodoro, wherein they discussed the Philippines’ growing support of nations in their fight against 🇨🇳China in the West Philippine Sea Maligayang Araw ng Kagitingan!
English
5
35
105
2.4K
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod retweetet
Ray Powell
Ray Powell@GordianKnotRay·
2/Op-Ed here, "Beijing's good-cop, bad-cop playbook in Manila": manilatimes.net/2026/04/09/opi… Part 2 out tomorrow. [🧵2/2]
English
0
9
17
1.5K
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod retweetet
Ray Powell
Ray Powell@GordianKnotRay·
1/Today 📰@TheManilaTimes released Part 1 of my latest Op-Ed, in which I explain how 🇨🇳#China's embassy in the 🇵🇭#Philippines is running a classic Good-Cop/Bad-Cop playbook. [🧵1/2]
Ray Powell tweet media
English
5
37
72
2.8K
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod
Special Ep: "Why Should We Care About America’s Extraordinary Rescue Mission in Iran?" The U.S. military just pulled off one of the most dramatic combat search and rescue missions in history, sending forces deep into Iran to recover the crew of a downed F‑15E Strike Eagle fighter. Aircraft were lost, firefights erupted, and both airmen came home alive. The last time America attempted something this ambitious inside Iran was Operation Eagle Claw in 1980 - and that ended in disaster. In this podcast, hosts @GordianKnotRay and Jim sit down with two retired special operations colonels: Ioannis Koskinas (Air Force Special Operations, CEO of The Hoplite Group, former senior advisor to Generals McChrystal and Schwartz) and Joe Felter (Army Special Forces, Director of Stanford’s Gordian Knot Center for National Security Innovation, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense). As @JoeFelter puts it: no other country could have pulled this off, and no other country would have tried. The conversation starts with the rescue: how it was planned in under 48 hours, how and why aircraft were lost at a forward staging site deep in Iran, and what separates this outcome from the 1980 failure. It then pivots to the broader war: where the conflict with Iran is headed, the risk of Gulf state escalation, and why both guests, drawing on painful experience from Afghanistan’s collapse, warn against assuming tactical brilliance equals strategic victory. The episode closes with the Indo‑Pacific: what allies are thinking as American attention and resources once again pour into the Middle East, and whether the U.S. can fight in the Gulf without undermining its ability to deter China. Links to the full episode below.
English
1
4
5
2K
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod
Australia's Trade and Investment Opportunities in Southeast Asia In Ep. 139, Ray Powell, James Carouso and guest co-host Nydia Ngiow of BowerGroupAsia sit down with Sir Nicholas Moore, the former Macquarie Group CEO who authored Australia’s Southeast Asia Economic Strategy to 2040 - the landmark report designed to expand Australian trade and investment across ASEAN. In this section, Sir Nicholas discussed the critical need for deeper economic ties between Australia and the ASEAN region. While trade has been strong, investment has lagged—and it’s time for that to change.
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod@IndoPacPodcast

Ep. 139 is available wherever you get your podcasts, including: - YouTube: youtu.be/iWHbwFY7KtA - Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/why… - Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/20WiLm… - Amazon: music.amazon.com/podcasts/9e5b7… - RSS: rss.com/podcasts/indo-… + More! 🔥 Sponsored by @BowerGroupAsia

English
0
1
1
343
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod retweetet
Joyu Wang
Joyu Wang@joyuwang·
🚨: The #Notams alerts are in effect from March 27 through May 6, and haven’t previously been reported. “What makes this especially notable is the combination of SFC-UNL with an extraordinary 40-day duration—and no announced exercise,” says @GordianKnotRay wsj.com/world/china/ch…
Joyu Wang tweet media
Jonathan Cheng@JChengWSJ

China Creates New Aviation Mystery With Offshore Warning Zones—Beijing reserves airspace for 40 days, suggesting possible military activity ahead @joyuwang wsj.com/world/china/ch… wsj.com/world/china/ch…

English
1
34
93
44.3K
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod
ASEAN’s success in regional cooperation In Ep. 139, @GordianKnotRay, James Carouso and guest co-host Nydia Ngiow of BowerGroupAsia sit down with Sir Nicholas Moore, the former Macquarie Group CEO who authored Australia’s Southeast Asia Economic Strategy to 2040 - the landmark report designed to expand Australian trade and investment across ASEAN. In this section, Sir Nicholas explains ASEAN’s regional cooperation in resolving its issues. He recalls his experience in March 2024, hosting ASEAN leaders in Australia, in which he observed the commonality and togetherness of ASEAN leaders reflected in their trade relations. Links ⬇️
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod@IndoPacPodcast

Ep. 139 is available wherever you get your podcasts, including: - YouTube: youtu.be/iWHbwFY7KtA - Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/why… - Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/20WiLm… - Amazon: music.amazon.com/podcasts/9e5b7… - RSS: rss.com/podcasts/indo-… + More! 🔥 Sponsored by @BowerGroupAsia

English
0
3
7
1.4K
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod retweetet
Ray Powell
Ray Powell@GordianKnotRay·
My relationship with @Chinaembmanila seems to have reached a healthier stage of mutual sarcasm.🙃
Ray Powell tweet media
English
5
15
109
4.7K
Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod retweetet
SeaLight
SeaLight@SeaLightFound·
🚨 DARK FLEET TANKER OPERATING OFF 🇲🇾#MALAYSIA: False flag. False name. False dimensions. No insurance. No safety management. 294 days at sea. 78 encounters with other suspect tankers in 2026 alone. Zero port calls. HAI DA's permanent vessel ID — the number assigned by the International Maritime Organization, 9033787 — reveals that she's actually registered as the YU SHUN, an 88-meter chemical tanker. But on her AIS transponder (the tracking system that all vessels are required to broadcast), she identifies herself as "HAI DA," claims to be only 53 meters long, and flies a 🇹🇿Tanzanian flag that the IMO itself has determined is false. She's shrinking her profile by 40% and broadcasting a name that appears in no official registry. Her owner is Collins Holding Inc, a shell company in 🇦🇮Anguilla that owns exactly two ships and discloses no beneficial owner. She carries no known liability insurance. And no company has been formally designated as responsible for her safety management since 2016 — meaning for a decade, nobody on shore has been accountable for whether this vessel is seaworthy, her crew is trained, or an oil spill gets reported. Her flag history tells the story of how a legitimate vessel becomes a ghost: - 🇰🇷 South Korea (2002–2016) — legitimate flag, reputable classification - 🇸🇱 Sierra Leone (2016–2022) — flag of convenience - 🇳🇺 Niue (Dec 2022) — micro-state registry - ❓ Unknown (Jan 2023) - 🇹🇿 Tanzania (2023–2025) - 🚩 Tanzania FALSE (2025–present) — confirmed by the IMO as not genuinely registered The last reputable safety body — Korea's classification society — walked away from the ship in 2016. Her last port state safety inspection was in February 2016. Ten years ago. Since March 10, she's been parked at ~1.84°N, 104.73°E, just east of the #SingaporeStrait in 🇲🇾Malaysian waters, a known hotspot for illicit ship-to-ship oil transfers where enforcement has been undermined by trivial penalties and documented corruption. In 2026 alone, she's had 78 encounters with other tankers. She hasn't visited a single port. Her most frequent encounter partners share the same red flags — flags of convenience, obscure ownership, and rendezvous lasting hours or days: HAI YOU 168 🇸🇹 — 30 encounters WEN SHENG 🇹🇿/🇧🇿 — 25 encounters MT.FUYU 🇹🇿 — 23 encounters HEBE 🇸🇹 — 14 encounters FILENE 🇹🇿 — 9 encounters At least three of these vessels are also broadcasting false identities. Some of these encounters last days — HAI DA sat alongside HANA I for three straight days in early March, and spent over 40 hours with FILENE across back-to-back encounters from April 3–5. These are not passing encounters. They are consistent with illicit ship-to-ship oil or fuel transfers. So why is she still operating? Malaysia's maritime enforcement agency, the MMEA, has detained hundreds of vessels in its waters since 2021. But fines max out at roughly $50,000 per vessel — when a single illicit cargo transfer can be worth $130 million. And some MMEA officers in the unit responsible for this exact stretch of water have been convicted and charged with accepting bribes to look the other way. HAI DA is one vessel. But she represents a system: aging tankers converted through shell companies and false flags into instruments of sanctions evasion, operating where enforcement is underfunded, penalties are trivial, and corruption is documented. ‼️She's been at it for years. She's out there right now. Credit: Ship tracking by @StarboardIntel
SeaLight tweet media
English
9
139
322
77.3K