IntChildProtectionTaskforce

40 posts

IntChildProtectionTaskforce banner
IntChildProtectionTaskforce

IntChildProtectionTaskforce

@IntChildProtect

We are an international taskforce of grassroots parent-led organisations working together to protect our children from state overreach & indoctrination

Beigetreten Ocak 2026
30 Folgt29 Follower
IntChildProtectionTaskforce retweetet
Rachel Sinclair-Scott
Rachel Sinclair-Scott@IOMentalAlchemy·
We’ve long been compromised in the realm of indoctrination, ideological subversion, behavioural nudging and child mutilation around the world. Unfortunately King Charles isn't going to do diddly squat about it. New Zealand seriously needs to become a Constitutional Republic. Parents are SUPREME Law. #HANDSOFFOURCHILDREN
Rachel Sinclair-Scott tweet mediaRachel Sinclair-Scott tweet mediaRachel Sinclair-Scott tweet mediaRachel Sinclair-Scott tweet media
Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC@BishopDewar

As a Bishop, I cannot stay silent. I have today drafted and sent an open letter to His Majesty King Charles III, the text of which reads as follows: To: His Majesty, Charles III, King of the United Kingdom and the Realms, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Bearer of the ancient title Defender of the Faith. Your Majesty, I write to you neither as a politician nor as a commentator, but as one of your loyal subjects who, as a bishop of Christ’s Church, cannot remain silent while the Christian foundations of this kingdom are steadily dismantled. Sir, there are moments in the life of a nation when silence becomes a form of betrayal. If I refused to speak to Your Majesty now, this would be such a moment. For more than a thousand years the Crown of this realm has stood in solemn covenant with the Christian faith. The laws of this land were shaped by it. The liberties of our people were nurtured by it. The conscience of our civilisation was formed by it. From the abbeys of medieval England to the parish churches of our villages, from the preaching of the Reformers to the missionary zeal that carried the Gospel to the ends of the earth, the Christian faith has not merely influenced Britain — it has defined her. Yet today that inheritance is being quietly but deliberately eroded. Across the institutions of this nation there is a growing hostility toward the faith that built them. Christian belief is mocked in the public square. Christian morality is dismissed as intolerance. Christian institutions are pressured to surrender doctrine in order to conform to the ideology of the age. Within the very Church that bears the name of England, voices have arisen that appear more eager to mirror the spirit of the age than to proclaim the eternal truth of the Gospel. Meanwhile, beyond the walls of our churches, powerful political movements openly speak of removing Christianity from its historic place within the life of this nation. What would once have been whispered is now proclaimed openly: that Britain must become a post-Christian state. It is in this context that I write to you, Your Majesty. For the British Crown does not stand apart from this crisis. The Sovereign of this realm bears a title that is not merely historic but sacred in its origin and meaning: Defender of the Faith. Those words are not decorative. They are a charge. They speak of a monarch whose duty is not merely to preside over the ceremonies of the Church, but to stand as a guardian of the Christian inheritance of the nation. Yet many among your subjects now ask, with increasing anxiety: “Who will defend that inheritance today?” They see a nation drifting from its foundations. And they ask whether the Crown will remain silent while that inheritance is dismantled. Your Majesty, may I be so bold as to observe that your coronation oath was not a poetic formality. It was a solemn vow made before Almighty God to maintain and preserve the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law. Those words bind the conscience of the sovereign. They remind the Crown that its authority is not merely constitutional but moral. The monarch is not merely a symbol of national continuity, but a custodian of the spiritual inheritance that shaped this realm. History records moments when kings and emperors were confronted by the Church and reminded that their authority was accountable before God. In the fourth century Ambrose of Milan stood before the Emperor Theodosius I and reminded him that even the ruler of an empire must bow before the moral law of Christ. That tradition of prophetic witness has never disappeared. Nor should it. For when rulers forget the foundations upon which their authority rests, the Church must speak — not with hostility, but with holy clarity. And so, I write to say this, Your Majesty: The Christian character of this nation is under profound and accelerating assault. If the Crown does not stand visibly and courageously in defence of that inheritance, history will record that the guardians of Britain’s institutions watched in silence as the foundations were removed. The issue before us is not nostalgia. It is civilisation. Remove Christianity from the story of Britain and you do not create a neutral society — you create a moral vacuum. And history teaches us that moral vacuums are never left empty for long. Your Majesty now stands at a crossroads that few monarchs in modern history have faced. For the erosion of Britain’s Christian inheritance will not ultimately be judged by speeches made in Parliament or debates in the press. It will be judged by whether those entrusted with the guardianship of our ancient institutions chose to defend them — or merely preside over their quiet surrender. You may preside over the quiet dissolution of Britain’s Christian identity. Or you may rise to the ancient responsibility entrusted to the Crown and speak with clarity about the faith that built this kingdom. The first path requires little courage. The second will require a great deal. But it is the path that history honours. Your Majesty’s subjects are not asking for religious coercion. They are asking for leadership. They are asking that the sovereign who bears the title Defender of the Faith remember what that title means. They are asking that the Crown hear the growing cry of anguish from Christians across this land who feel that the spiritual inheritance of their nation is being surrendered without resistance. And they are asking whether the Crown will stand with them. For the faith that shaped Britain is not merely a cultural ornament. It is the wellspring from which our laws, our liberties, and our moral imagination have flowed. If it is cast aside, the nation will discover — too late — that it has severed itself from the very roots that sustained it. Your Majesty, to many the Crown is a symbol of authority. But before God it is also a symbol of stewardship. And stewardship carries with it the duty to defend what has been entrusted. May Almighty God grant Your Majesty the wisdom to discern this hour, and the courage to fulfil the sacred duty entrusted to the Crown. Yours faithfully, Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC Missionary Bishop Diocese of Providence Confessing Anglican Church @PhilHs10 @RevBrettMurphy @revwickland @BishopRobert1 @GBNews @TalkTV @danwootton @Jacob_Rees_Mogg @LozzaFox @BackBrexitBen @RupertLowe10 @KemiBadenoch @JohnCleese

English
2
1
5
167
IntChildProtectionTaskforce retweetet
Natural Womens Council
Natural Womens Council@NaturalWomensIE·
1/8 🚨NATIONAL SCANDAL - DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION - Parents have clearly been sidelined from a national conversation on education. We have done all we can to inform parents of this and escalate this to the Department and media. ☎️We urge all of you to contact the Department on 018892335 if you did not receive this survey 📩Please find below the thread of numerous communications that we sent to the Department of Education, TDs, Senators and media in relation to this serious issue. Their silence is deafening. The Survey and Convention invitation must include parents. As the primary educators of our children, we have a fundamental right to be consulted - excluding us is indefensible. Our Constitutional rights as parents have clearly been breached.
English
4
27
52
5.9K
IntChildProtectionTaskforce retweetet
J.K. Lunden
J.K. Lunden@Jklunden·
I often wonder how this young woman will feel towards her own mother who affirmed that she was born in the wrong body. A young woman that may have taken irreversible drugs and had surgeries -- and no chance of having her own child. It's tragic.
Covid Vaccines were NEVER SAFE@duzBme

@Jklunden Mary Butler TD - “Proud of my two daughters” - that hasn’t aged well? Mary Butler Minister of State for Mental Health …… let that sink in!

English
3
15
56
1.5K
IntChildProtectionTaskforce retweetet
IntChildProtectionTaskforce retweetet
Natural Womens Council
Natural Womens Council@NaturalWomensIE·
WILL THE SCHOOL'S INSURANCE COMPANY COVER DAMAGES? We sent a letter to Allianz insurance today. Many parents are upset with the age inappropriate harmful content being taught in schools and are considering taking a legal case. __________________________________________ To: Allianz Insurance Re: Request for written clarification of policy coverage and liability Dear Sir/Madam, We are writing to request written clarification regarding the scope of coverage and liability under the insurance policy held by schools. These questions concern both compliance-related matters and the school’s duty of care in relation to student welfare and safeguarding. 1. Compliance with Department of Education requirements Could you please confirm whether a school’s insurance cover would remain valid in the event of an incident where a child is harmed and the school is found not to have: -an approved Risk Assessment, -a current Child Safeguarding Statement, or -other required documentation or sign-offs from the Department of Education? If such documents were incomplete, missing, or not implemented in practice, would this affect indemnity, and to what extent might the school, its Board of Management, the principal, or staff be exposed to personal liability? 2. Coverage relating to educational and wellbeing practices We would also appreciate clarity regarding situations where a school adopts practices or educational content that may be considered inconsistent with current medical best-practice guidance, including but not limited to the Cass Report[1] or the HHS Report [2].  For example, teaching children that they can be “a boy, a girl, neither or both” or bringing in third parties to teach them about ‘top surgery’, ‘bottom surgery’, or being ‘transgender’ or ‘non-binary’. Furthermore,  if a school socially affirms a student who expresses gender-related distress (including use of new pronouns or a different name), and this is later alleged to have contributed to harm, psychological injury, or future medical interventions, would: -the school, -the Board of Management, -the principal, or -individual teachers be indemnified under the existing policy? There is also content that is not age appropriate, including but not limited to chapters on detailed masturbation and group activities talking about ‘forced, painful and violent sex’, and anal sex that that violates Ireland’s own Children First Act 2015. More specifically, would the insurer consider such actions within or outside the scope of the school’s duty of care, and are allegations of negligence, failure to follow safeguarding protocols, or reckless decision-making covered? 3. Clarification of exclusions If there are any policy exclusions, limitations, or additional requirements that apply to the above scenarios, please outline them in writing. We would be grateful for a detailed response so that we can understand the extent of protection offered by the policy and any obligations on the school to maintain coverage. You may be aware of the recent lawsuits in the USA and UK whereby minors have been harmed and some have been awarded significant legal costs. [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]  As this content is being taught in schools in Ireland, if there is any circumstance in which Allianz would not cover damages, we respectfully urge you to communicate this clearly to schools so that they can take appropriate steps to mitigate risk. We represent 100,000 parents across our network - several parents have approached us to advise their children are being harmed in school, coming home severely anxious and traumatised and they are considering taking a case. If you should need to see copies of some of the material we have referenced, we have numerous school textbooks we can recommend for you to see. Our shared objective is to safeguard children, ensure that schools act within a clear and legally sound framework, and minimise the potential for harm, financial damages, and costly litigation. Clear guidance from your office will assist schools in understanding their obligations and taking proactive steps to reduce exposure while prioritising student welfare. Thank you for your assistance.  We look forward to your reply. Yours faithfully, Natural Women’s Council [1] webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20250310… [2]  hhs.gov/press-room/gen… [3] adflegal.org/article/detran… [4] cbn.com/news/us/maine-… [5] persuasion.community/p/keira-bell-m… [6] nbcbayarea.com/news/local/kai… [7] dhillonlaw.com/lawsuits/layla…
English
23
76
266
15.1K
IntChildProtectionTaskforce
IntChildProtectionTaskforce@IntChildProtect·
All of the members of @IntChildProtect are grassroots. We rely on supporters for $. We’re hands to the pump every single day to help YOUR families. Please generously support us. @NaturalWomensIE in 🇮🇪 is requesting donations to keep their online tools alive…
J.K. Lunden@Jklunden

🛜CALLING FOR HELP! OUR WEBSITE AND EMAIL HOSTING PAYMENTS ARE NOW DUE. We have spent our remaining donations on the 40,000 leaflets that just went out to the streets. We have two invoices coming up: €115 for our NWC email - whereby parents contact us for support or offers to help. The other is for our website hosting which is €664 for two years. This hosts our campaigns and information to support the public. NaturalWomensCouncil.com to power the movement! We are grateful for anything you can help with! We do NOT rake in any taxpayer money like the NGOs do.

English
0
0
0
4
IntChildProtectionTaskforce retweetet
J.K. Lunden
J.K. Lunden@Jklunden·
Parents in Ireland are rising up against the sexualisation and indoctrination of children! Thanks to the Natural Women's Council volunteers for your relentless determination getting the awareness out! 40,000 leaflets out this month and the printer is working around the clock.
J.K. Lunden tweet mediaJ.K. Lunden tweet media
English
21
172
521
7.3K
IntChildProtectionTaskforce
IntChildProtectionTaskforce@IntChildProtect·
Government sponsored trans activists are pushing radical policy upon unsuspecting populations. With every ‘trans’ shooting… comes more questions. How many more crimes need to be committed before it is acknowledged that this ideology is wrong??
Penny Marie NZ@pennymarienz

The ANTI TRANSGENDER EXTREMISM booklet paid for by the taxpayer, promoted by a group of trans activists, and published on the @nzpolice website, is an abomination. My hope is that you pick up what I am putting down, here… youtu.be/QOdg5zQmot8?si…

English
1
0
1
19
IntChildProtectionTaskforce retweetet
Purple for Parents United
Purple for Parents United@P4PUnited·
One of the first places that Indiana University’s Alfred Kinsey spread his sexual perversion was the CHURCH!! It’s no wonder we’ve had pedophiles hiding in the church and behind the pulpit. It’s also no wonder why most pastors will NOT even address Kinsey. Why would they when they’ve embraced his ideology in their own sex ed programs for their youth. Heck, we even have pastors asking the same sort of sexual questions of young engaged couples that Kinsey would be salivating over. Lest we forget, today, pastors are now creating their own homemade porn videos just like Kinsey. But hey, we’re accused of “eating our own” as a way for them to deflect from their own sinful behavior. Perhaps these perverted pastors have betrayed their own.🤷‍♀️. Just be sure to drop your payment in the plate on the way out the door.
English
0
2
2
55