Malicious Prosecution

2.7K posts

Malicious Prosecution banner
Malicious Prosecution

Malicious Prosecution

@JennLogan

Karen Read is innocent and was declared NOT GUILTY June 18th, 2025. #FKR #FTB #2:27am

Beigetreten Mayıs 2009
1.1K Folgt1.4K Follower
Emily See
Emily See@TheEmilySee·
Proof that this is the Bad Place:
Emily See tweet media
English
9
0
34
2.7K
Justice Served
Justice Served@JusticeServedTV·
Posted an exciting Domino walk in the park...that's it. A walk. The House Pu$$ies Complaint coming soon. Practice this with me cuz you'll hear it a lot. "So What?" Meanwhile...after the walk.
Justice Served tweet media
English
8
3
125
2K
Ben Burnett
Ben Burnett@SlamminBjB·
Dear X, Remember when Hank Brennan melted down about ARCCA and Jud Welcher was going to be allowed to return after ARCCA as a rebuttal witness? DOES any AFKR person remember why Welcher didn't return? Does any AFKR know why Hank dropped it? confused, Ben
English
21
14
425
22.8K
Malicious Prosecution
Malicious Prosecution@JennLogan·
I’m sorry, WTF did your racist ass just type out regarding the juror in Karen’s retrial😳 Krusty? .. Proctor, is that you? McCabe?
Cowboyfan105d@CowboyFan105d

@kelly_steffee You probably shouldn’t quote this dumb N who made up his mind on the first day.

English
0
0
2
80
Malicious Prosecution
Malicious Prosecution@JennLogan·
@AnEagleEyedGirl So, I’m going to be straight up real with you because you seem like a dumbass. There was evidence presented in the trial specifically around the law of physics (the same law of physics that applies to the entirety of all matters on planet earth, that will not change) and John’s actual body- which is literally the biological record of events and the most objective form of forensic evidence; a body that simply reacts to the laws of physics and human biology, physically presenting facts independent of witness testimony. Zero signs of bone damage. Zero bruises below the neck. Zero ways to ‘update’ physics to a ‘newer more reliable’ version. Cheers from reality…where this all began.
English
1
0
2
64
girlwithaneagleeye
girlwithaneagleeye@AnEagleEyedGirl·
So, I am going to be straight up real with you because you seem like a nice woman and because I myself was subjected to some of the same propaganda early on (not online...but in Canton). I recommend you broaden your resources to those that may have opposing views to challenge your beliefs. There was evidence presented in the trial specifically around the timeline surrounding the taillight pieces (math that will not change) and data surrounding John's phone / her vehicle (that will not change)....and remains largely undiscussed on social media. Many got caught up in red herrings put out by the defense. If you are still questioning the 2:27 google search...I recommend you rewatch the segment in the 2nd trial where Ian Whiffin does a live demonstration explaining visually demonstrating that the search did not happen at 2:27. I wish you all the best. Many well-meaning people have been scammed out of money/time/believing in something that is not real...it does not mean you are stupid. You don't have to believe me...time will reveal all....and when it does, I hope the social media community will give back positively to a community that has suffered from misinformation. Cheers from Canton....ground zero where this all began.
English
5
3
45
1.4K
Oksana Luk
Oksana Luk@oksanka_luky·
Hey, Jen! Public Service Announcement.
English
63
28
354
16K
Dixie Normus
Dixie Normus@DixieNormu95224·
According to sworn testimony from Lank and Goode No one entered or exited the house while they were inside. Matt McCabe wasn’t even there yet. According to… you know… video footage Matt McCabe enters. Leaves. Comes back. Leaves again. Kerry Roberts is in and out. At one point, Matt, Lank, and Goode literally walk out together like it’s a group field trip. But sure… “No one came in or out.” Solid. Lock it in. And the Forensic Four? Oh they’ve got this covered, don’t worry. They will either say “You’re misinterpreting the video.” Or “It’s not relevant.” Or “Memory isn’t perfect.” Do you think lank or Goode would love to have a redo on this question????? @MamaLama43 @JulieCar94 @TuesdayGazette
English
17
49
539
28.1K
Emily See
Emily See@TheEmilySee·
The many faces of Judge Treseler
Emily See tweet media
English
148
153
1.7K
25.6K
Lindsey Gaetani
Lindsey Gaetani@lindseygaetani·
Judge's eyes dart to the right scanning the room as soon as Aidan mentions that Jason Broyles likes to pretend to be a woman. Not a doubt in my mind that Judge was looking to see if Broyles was sitting in that front row wearing shapewear and a wig. I think we could all collectively feel Judge's inner "phew" when all he saw was a creepy bald guy with a man purse.
English
6
1
114
1.5K
AJ Arciniegas
AJ Arciniegas@aj_arciniegas·
CPA 5150 vs. Turtle boy Characters: -A man who likes to pretend to be a woman online - Purplehead man - Ray from Dallas (confirmed not to be the purple guy) - A Bunny - A Koala rumored to be an elite hacker Predicted outcome? The judge will decide to burn the courthouse down before getting through the evidence submitted today. It’s the eyes for me 💀
English
11
3
133
4.8K
Aidan Kearney
Aidan Kearney@DoctorTurtleboy·
It was testified in court today that I said “I’m gonna punch you in the fucking nose” in this clip. I am clearly saying “watch how that fucking goes” in a response to being told that she was going to post this video on Twitter.
English
96
53
768
43.1K
PurpleKoolAidDrinker
PurpleKoolAidDrinker@LamarVsAllen·
This is INSANITY. My head is pounding. Never seen anything like it.
English
54
9
535
12.4K