Josh Christensen

562 posts

Josh Christensen

Josh Christensen

@JoshIsBoredNow

Indiana University '23

Beigetreten Eylül 2017
2.3K Folgt187 Follower
Josh Christensen
Josh Christensen@JoshIsBoredNow·
@nikicaga Retiring early might also be worse for people versus reducing hours if it leads to a more lonely/sedentary life
English
0
0
15
401
Josh Christensen
Josh Christensen@JoshIsBoredNow·
@krishnanrohit All good, people are misconstruing an estimate by a TD cowen which thought they could cut 30k
English
0
0
2
1.7K
Josh Christensen retweetet
Joey Politano 🏳️‍🌈
Joey Politano 🏳️‍🌈@JosephPolitano·
I am tired of Earth. These people. I am tired of being caught in the tangle of their lives.
Joey Politano 🏳️‍🌈 tweet media
Matt Darling 🌐🏗️@besttrousers

@axelinabox The 49.99th percentile household in the United States has $7,999.99 in their checking account, owns their home, and has a net worth of $192,999.99.

English
19
75
1.7K
68.9K
Josh Christensen
Josh Christensen@JoshIsBoredNow·
@musharbash_b @Noahpinion How does differentiate between landlords causing prices to go up and investors choosing to prioritize buying in places with faster increasing rents?
English
0
0
0
121
Basel Musharbash
Basel Musharbash@musharbash_b·
Excellent question. @Noahpinion any idea why you seem to selectively forget that housing markets are local when that’s useful for obscuring the role of private equity in raising home prices and the role of corporate landlords in raising rents?
ᕼOᑌᔕEᔕᖴOᖇᗩᒪᒪgirl80@SoCalLakerGirl

@musharbash_b @Noahpinion Why do they understand "real estate is local" to argue for more development when ppl say "there's enough existing vacant housing to house the homeless!" but when it comes to concentration of corporate ownership it's all about national numbers?

English
6
8
74
14.1K
Josh Christensen retweetet
Jeremiah Johnson 🌐
Jeremiah Johnson 🌐@JeremiahDJohns·
It's worth remembering that DOGE is a failure at Every. Single. Possible. Level. At the micro level, they misread, misled and straight up lied about many of the 'savings'. They'd announce '500m saved!' and it would be some contract where the money was 98% already spent and already wasn't being renewed. At the macro level, they didn't impact spending at all. The government is spending more in 2025 than 2024, on basically the same trajectory but a little more. At the institutional level, they didn't even convince the GOP that deficits are a problem worth caring about. The GOP just passed a bill that explodes the deficit by trillions of dollars. At a personal level, Elon got run out of town with his tail between his legs and the most notable public facts about the Cracked Coders are that one of them was a mini Hitler, one was called 'big balls' and none of them bothered to learn how the government actually works before they lit it on fire. They gutted a bunch of important institutions, fired whole departments at random, decimated medical research funding, killed a bunch of people dependent on USAID, and still failed at every possible level.
English
280
3.2K
24.8K
1M
Josh Christensen
Josh Christensen@JoshIsBoredNow·
@JeremiahDJohns I think the biggest thing they efficiently shift value from employees and customers to investors. So there were more employees making more money than they efficiently would or excess consumer value. That shift is efficient economically but people are losing “value”
English
0
0
0
61
Jeremiah Johnson 🌐
Jeremiah Johnson 🌐@JeremiahDJohns·
So there's a persistent idea floating around that goes like "Private equity firms buy up good companies and then run them into the ground, and this is a huge and persistent problem". This confuses me: why would they buy companies just to ruin them? Wouldn't they lose money? PE firms are also supposedly laser-focused on profits, so the whole thing doesn't make sense. I can see a few possible explanations here, but I've never gotten a comprehensive answer which story people think is true: 1) This doesn't actually happen, PE-owned companies fail at the same rate as non-PE-owned companies. It's just a media panic. 2a) PE firms are buying stable businesses and making high-risk-high-reward bets on scaling them. Sometimes they don't work, but when they do the payoff is large. 2b) PE firms are buying distressed companies with a high chance of failure. They buy at low prices knowing failure is likely but if they turn the business around profits could be huge. In both 2a and 2b you'd see a higher rate of PE-owned businesses failing, but it could be economically rational and +EV to make high risk bets 3) PE companies are buying companies whose parts are worth more than the sum - they have more value just selling off the assets than keeping the business running. 4) PE companies are involved in some sort of contractual slipperiness, dirty tricks, or outright malfeasance where they make money even if the business fails. Scenario (4) raises another question - who's the counterparty? If the PE firms are making money despite the purchased business failing, where's that money coming from? Sometimes I hear about them 'loading up the business with loans' which then presumably don't get paid back... but big banks are sophisticated players too. They typically don't give loans to parties unlikely to pay them back. So which big banks are habitually getting fleeced over and over here? Wouldn't they learn not to loan to these companies? And if it's not the banks, who is getting fleeced? This has long confused me, and I'd be interested to see what people think. It's typically presented as "PE firms are evil vampires intentionally ruining things because they enjoy human misery" but the actual answer has to be something more than that.
English
502
97
2.5K
409.1K
Josh Christensen retweetet
Neil Renic
Neil Renic@NC_Renic·
Too many em dashes? What’s next? too much love? too much joy?
English
32
4K
17.9K
614.7K
Josh Christensen retweetet
Socialists For Pritzker
Socialists For Pritzker@PritzkerForPrez·
Reports are leaking to me that the Democratic establishment has begged JB Pritzker to "be less large" and "have less drip" in his 3rd campaign for Governor. He flatly refused. RT if you support Illinois' Big Boy! 🇺🇸
Socialists For Pritzker tweet media
English
6
48
453
18.1K
Josh Christensen retweetet
BuccoCapital Bloke
BuccoCapital Bloke@buccocapital·
Fuck it. Josh Brown reading the J.P Morgan research note on the US Stock Market set to the Battle Hymn of the Republic
English
119
327
3.9K
690.6K
Josh Christensen retweetet
Jeremy Glover
Jeremy Glover@JGrantGlover·
Illinois absolutely dominates pumpkin production and processing. The vast majority of pumpkins grown in the other top states are ornamental (lame, wasteful) whereas 70% of Illinois’s crop ends up in food products (based, bountiful).
Jeremy Glover tweet media
Esri@Esri

Enjoying pumpkin pie this Thanksgiving? 🥧 Chances are that its filling originated in Illinois. Discover the origins of the vegetables, turkey, and sweets we pass around the dinner table. esri.social/gcA650Ufg0Y 🔸Data: @USDA Census of Agriculture

English
2
92
1K
70.8K
Josh Christensen retweetet
Rep. Nadler
Rep. Nadler@RepJerryNadler·
Simply put, attempts by New Jersey to stop New York’s congestion pricing plan are an attack on New York’s sovereignty. New Yorkers don’t dictate the tolls on the NJ Turnpike, or their (lack of) investment in NJ Transit.
English
88
92
1.1K
54.8K
Josh Christensen retweetet
New Liberals 🇺🇦🇹🇼🇬🇱🌐
"For years, we have heard excuses about why America can't build enough housing. Enough with the excuses, I'm going to cut the red tape, and work with the private sector and local governments to speed up building, and get it done!" THATS OUR FUTURE YIMBY PRESIDENT
English
12
110
976
78.5K
Josh Christensen retweetet
Michael Linden
Michael Linden@MichaelSLinden·
American Rescue Plan Inflation Reduction Act Bipartisan Infrastructure Law PACT Act (Veterans' health care) Postal Service Reform Act CHIPs and Science Act Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health Bipartisan Safer Communities Act Respect for Marriage Act
scary lawyerguy@scarylawyerguy

Among the most disappointing aspects of press coverage this year, beyond the normalizing of Trump, beyond the sane washing of his incoherence, is the dismissal of all the legislation Biden/Harris implemented. Like, government actually at work, and it's just completely ignored.

English
28
378
1.2K
134.6K
Josh Christensen
Josh Christensen@JoshIsBoredNow·
@DzambhalaHODL The argument is if towns can change the rules to delay the certification then republican legislatures will attempt to throw out the results because the results weren't certified fast enough
English
1
0
0
43
the ghost of groditi’s future 👹
@dieworkwear sorry to nitpick but Gross Margins are based on revenue minus cost of goods sold, which does not include labor. so your base would be $135 and at 40% GM your gross profit would be $54 for a selling price of $189.
English
1
0
3
433
derek guy
derek guy@dieworkwear·
Some misinformation in today's US presidential debate about who bears the cost of tariffs. So let's talk about how tariffs affect what you pay for a suit. 🧵
derek guy tweet media
English
611
7.2K
41.4K
6.1M