LonelyBot

4.7K posts

LonelyBot banner
LonelyBot

LonelyBot

@LonelyBot7

I like dark and edgy manga and Mob Psycho.

England Beigetreten Ocak 2022
344 Folgt88 Follower
Angehefteter Tweet
LonelyBot
LonelyBot@LonelyBot7·
2026 media thread whos excited to keep up w this one guys
LonelyBot tweet media
English
1
0
3
160
Derrick Lewis Miles
Derrick Lewis Miles@MilesDerri16148·
@AzPetrich I have no obligation to them. They aren't my people. They can shove off. Bringing this trash into our country has only made it a worse place to live. We need to bring the hammer down on inferior races before they overrun us and turn our civilization into the 3rd world.
English
1
0
1
193
LonelyBot
LonelyBot@LonelyBot7·
legitimately unrankable, will always be one of my favourite stories ever even though it has undeniable flaws (i rewatched the anime this time)
LonelyBot tweet media
English
0
0
0
1
LonelyBot
LonelyBot@LonelyBot7·
another banger vru who watches the watchmen fr
LonelyBot tweet media
English
1
0
0
8
LonelyBot
LonelyBot@LonelyBot7·
2026 media thread whos excited to keep up w this one guys
LonelyBot tweet media
English
1
0
3
160
LonelyBot
LonelyBot@LonelyBot7·
@kamosahhh @Theworldwuw @blurr_727 you are just bringing up the plot reasons that these things couldn't happen, completely disregarding how readers feel about it from a more zoomed out perspective.
English
1
0
1
20
Ka Mo Sahhh
Ka Mo Sahhh@kamosahhh·
@Theworldwuw @blurr_727 you're just not accounting for time, priorities, and who was even available to teach. literally how does Yuji learn simple domain with UiUi in Malaysia & Kusakabe under a Binding Vow? How does he learn RCT with Yuta in a whole ass other colony and no good teachers to teach it??
English
3
0
0
272
Kai
Kai@Theworldwuw·
I hate his power progression so much it’s was done god awful. He was progressing in the early half then stopped then got literally everything in his arsenal during the last arc. I feel like rct and sd should of been gained during that shibuya to culling game period.
English
32
15
503
30.2K
LonelyBot
LonelyBot@LonelyBot7·
@arfa2706 radagon definitely has a lot more mix-ups than rellana i will just chalk this up to you always killing his 2nd/3rd phase too quick which is encouraged tbf. i dont think anyone from the low damage community would disagree with me 😭 e.g. youtu.be/h7JcABZgfjk rellana could never
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
0
0
80
Arfadoz
Arfadoz@arfa2706·
@LonelyBot7 She's way faster with her positional follow-ups and mix-ups than any boss in the game. Malenia and Radagon are one step below her in terms of complexity, while Godfrey and Morgott are many steps below her in terms of speed.
English
2
0
15
1.2K
LonelyBot
LonelyBot@LonelyBot7·
@treasonoustris @n0tfourlong they obviously mean misandry isn't prevalent institutionally because it does not serve the people in power bro come on
English
0
0
3
176
𝖙𝖗𝖎𝖘
𝖙𝖗𝖎𝖘@treasonoustris·
@n0tfourlong i highly doubt there aren't any misandrists with positions of power
English
2
0
36
1.7K
LonelyBot
LonelyBot@LonelyBot7·
@averagesoultm @dangerswlf @Emperor_Sheev66 ig you have a point there but i think the point goes to stamina bar mechanics rather than level design because elden ring has some genuinely very good enemy placement that makes use of the faster paced combat too
English
0
0
0
27
AverageSoul
AverageSoul@averagesoultm·
@dangerswlf @Emperor_Sheev66 Skeletons jumpimg you while one shppts an arrow after the drakez followed by a small tiny bridge where fire bombs are thrown as u run for safety in the room where hollows ambush you. Then up the stairs to more hollows that also act as melee prptecting a range guy. From there you
English
2
0
0
100
dinosaur
dinosaur@dinosaurs1969·
dinosaur tweet media
ZXX
78
5K
155.4K
1.4M
LonelyBot
LonelyBot@LonelyBot7·
@ginaSMILER @Ebrietas_C @SquintFeastwood i dont understand. paul is meant to be a charismatic and magnetic leader cus of the prophecy and his general ambiance, and i think chalamet portrays that well. so its not within character to say he's bad at those things?
English
1
0
0
59
LonelyBot
LonelyBot@LonelyBot7·
@Aizenu_00 @seriouslyjokinn what is this retort lol this might be the least ai-written tweet of all time just say you don't agree
English
0
0
1
80
C3Ls1uS
C3Ls1uS@seriouslyjokinn·
thoughts on jjk 3X12: good parts: souyama corrections. pre-ad break part (gosso sbs). sunakohara's part. three way domain adaptation. photography. bad parts: everything else regarding the episode, except the good parts.
C3Ls1uS tweet mediaC3Ls1uS tweet mediaC3Ls1uS tweet mediaC3Ls1uS tweet media
English
20
5
129
13.1K
LonelyBot
LonelyBot@LonelyBot7·
@_bt33_ @mcsquared34 im so baffled at how close u are to getting it 🤣 OP is arguing people who dream of being artists or writers cannot really chase their dreams, because capitalism places less importance on literature and art than it does on financebros and bankers
English
4
0
3
105
🌞
🌞@_bt33_·
@mcsquared34 Are you guys actually stupid? Capitalism is not an entity who arbitrarily decides your art or literature degree won’t make you money. You don’t make money because nobody demands what you do.
English
2
0
16
400
MC Squared
MC Squared@mcsquared34·
MC Squared tweet media
ZXX
79
1.8K
12.7K
100.4K
LonelyBot
LonelyBot@LonelyBot7·
@cinepatica @COH_CHELS OP said most "critically acclaimed" and "accomplished" which implies awards, OP did not argue that Timothee is the best young actor since Brando.
English
0
0
32
245
Becky
Becky@cinepatica·
@COH_CHELS + Leonardo DiCaprio... It's ridiculous xD And having awards or records doesn't make you the best at anything; there are many actors and actresses who are much better than him and don't have awards or records.
English
2
0
23
2.1K
LonelyBot
LonelyBot@LonelyBot7·
who put this dumbass on my TL
English
1
0
15
407
LonelyBot
LonelyBot@LonelyBot7·
@niederhaus17566 @Leophilius @ProjPM he doesn't if you've taken physics courses 😆 his entire ramble is him being pissed about why physicists wouldn't listen to his theories
English
0
0
0
17
Dr. Tran
Dr. Tran@Leophilius·
Eric Weinstein out here bullshitmaxxing and getting absolutely mogged by actual physicists, and I'm here for all of it.
English
28
15
594
53.9K
RedHackBlue
RedHackBlue@redhackblue_·
Everything after Newtonian physics is bull shit. Why you ask? Cause the math suddenly switches from deterministic to statistical. And everything is still theory we have best guesses as to why things are and what and how they do what they do. -We don't know gravity is. -Einstein's relativity works for different predictions because of statistics not because we have a deterministic equation. You could do the same for different Newtonian (deterministic) equations we have and use statistics and get the same results. -We don't know what particles are. -We don't know what light is made of. -We don't know what black holes are. -We don't know what energy is. That is everything after your physics you are required to take at the undergrad level for most engineering degrees. For me I also was required to take relativity. Upper level and undergrad is all statistical after that. Statistical mechanics, upper level optics still have some deterministic equations. But it's all theory and statistics for the most part. This is why we have gone nowhere since the early 1900s. Yet, there's tons of books from tons of pop physicists spouting their theories as dogma as if it were true for decades. Here's my dogma lol I think we went wrong in dismissing the Ether and switching to relativity. The Michelson Morley experiment was flawed yet that was what caused the big switch. Even now there's a re-emergence of "consciousness" as a field. Instead of calling it Ether we call it consciousness. Okay. Semantics. I think we also have gotten lost in differential equations and lost sight of the geometry. This is where I'm a geometer like you. I think physics as a discipline needs to back up and go back to before relativity and start fresh using no statistics. It would be a good long hard look in the mirror to admit what we don't actually know. And start figuring it out cause I agree with you that the only way we navigate the stars is breakthroughs in physics not with chemical rockets. And if these UFOs are real which I think they are simply cause people in the late 1800s right before the airplane repeatedly reported big disc, cigar, oval, triangular, and spherical objects in the sky. There are tons of newspaper clippings. This is at a time where we are industrialized. We have mechanics and steam power so we have technology and the vocabulary to modernly describe what we see. And lots of people saw these objects. So, if they are here and aren't from here, then they aren't using chemical rockets which means they know physics and engineering that we don't. That is a forced admission of what we don't actually know in physics in my opinion. Even if it's classified craft from our military. Either way, it should be a serious mirror held up to serious academics that these objects are using a means of propulsion that we don't possess or understand. Which means we don't really understand "upper" level physics.
English
6
0
1
1.7K
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
Over the years I have learned that physicists misportray their level of certainty. Like here. Let’s take this out of particle physics so that all of us are on a level playing field. Suppose Martin is staring obsessively at the asymmety of his right hand rather than at that of the universe, to the exclusion of everything else. He notices that his thumb (matter), or digit 1, is bigger and stronger than his pinky (antimatter), or digit 5. He then says: There are only two possible explanations for why my hand is asymmetric about digit 3: A) The laws of human limb development are perfectly symmetric (laws of physics), but the fertilized egg (initial condition of the universe) was not. B) The initial conditions of the egg was symmetrical, but the laws of limb development are not. To which you would say: “But Martin, is it not impossible that you have a left arm (dark matter) that you are not looking at as you obsess? Is there not at least a third scenario: C) The initial conditions are symmetric. The laws of limb development are symmetric. And your right thumb’s (luminous matter’s) symmetric partner is your left thumb (dark anti-matter) not your right pinky (luminous anti-matter). And the assymetry was introduced spontaneously (spontaneous symmetry breaking) by you decoupling your attention (Anthropic error) by focusing on one limb and ignoring the other? “ And there may be more ideas than that too! Obviously. That is what science is supposed to be. Not this “The only game in town” or TOGIT bullshit. This is why we are stuck. We have one part of the community making these grand absolutest statements called “physics theorems” or “no-go results” that aren’t true. And that group only listens to itself and nitpicks, ridicules and denigrates all valid critics into submission unless they come from inside the group. It’s madness. Martin: you’re wrong. That’s not egoic. It’s just a statement of fact. But it’s not a small error either. We are stuck because of this way of thinking. Let’s open fundamental physics up. Your official community is dying.
Martin Bauer@martinmbauer

There are two possible explanations for why there is more matter than antimatter in the Universe: 1) The laws of physics are symmetric, but the initial condition aren't: At the beginning there simply was slightly more matter than antimatter 2) Asymmetric dynamics: the laws of physics aren't symmetric even if the initial conditions were Option 1 might look like a simple solution, but if it is asymmetric boundary conditions that only shifts the question to 'what set these boundary conditions?" And we already know that 2 is the case, because the SM doesn't respect that symmetry, but doesn't break it enough. So any extension of the SM that breaks matter-antimatter symmetry more than the SM could explain it. Depending on where the asymmetry is first generated, people call such a mechanism baryogenesis (generated in baryons directly), leptogenesis (a lepton asymmetry later converted to a baryon asymmetry via sphalerons), it could even be that the SM symmetry breaking is enough if mesons can decay in dark matter (mesogensis). All these mechanisms are actively probed at colliders and grav wave observatories. Personal preferences don't really play a role here, we should test any viable solution (Occam's razor does though)

English
77
42
447
106.5K
LonelyBot
LonelyBot@LonelyBot7·
@buoylover2025 @smackedboyjayo @tibicenAbacist @johndrewmarkley appreciate it but there is heavy consensus on dark matter and dark energy actually being manifest phenomena in our universe. we don't agree on their nature yet cus theres been no experiment to prove any theory whatsoever, but we know with near certainty that they do exist
English
0
0
0
29
buoylover
buoylover@buoylover2025·
@smackedboyjayo @tibicenAbacist @johndrewmarkley We don’t “know dark matter exists”, it is a leading theory that provides potential explanations for several cosmological phenomena, but the scientific community is far from consensus on dark matter, dark energy, or its properties, so I don’t think this is an apt comparison
English
1
0
1
46
John Markley
John Markley@johndrewmarkley·
I hate to tell some people this, but a guy saying "heavier than air flight is impossible" 150 years ago is not, in fact, a very good reason to think relativity must have some loophole that will yield to us if we wax poetic about the Human Spirit insistently enough.
Chris 🇺🇲💦🍑@Alicoh1

the speed of light is a hard limit and any sci-fi future that involves FTL travel or even communication is simply off the table for our species.

English
173
123
3.4K
171.7K