🌞

42.2K posts

🌞 banner
🌞

🌞

@_bt33_

Katılım Eylül 2019
68 Takip Edilen167 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
🌞
🌞@_bt33_·
Hay que terminar con la idea de que toda la gente que apoya al partido contrario al propio es una mala persona. Todos somos culpables de eso.
Español
4
0
14
3.7K
🌞
🌞@_bt33_·
@elayasfc Those are fouls that were called, what’s the issue? The 2nd one is even a very clear dive
English
0
0
0
1
elayas FC
elayas FC@elayasfc·
How do I defend this as an Argentina and Messi fan
English
291
293
2.4K
393.2K
🌞
🌞@_bt33_·
@ProudSocialist No, we hate communism because we have knowledge of economics and history. You don’t, and/or are willingly ignorant, so you support it despite having all evidence against it.
English
0
0
0
9
🌞
🌞@_bt33_·
@YourAnonNews Norway isn’t socialist at all, it’s even more capitalist than the US. Their corporate tax rate is lower, and they don’t even have minimum wage.
English
0
0
0
4
Anonymous
Anonymous@YourAnonNews·
Teach your kids about socialism...
Anonymous tweet media
English
1.1K
4.3K
67.3K
1.8M
🌞
🌞@_bt33_·
@namonaai @tetrarosie Which would make sense if labor on its own produced value, but it that’s not the case. A lot more things go into producing a commodity than labor, and most is not carried by the worker. And the end price depends on how much people want to pay for it, not labor or anything else.
English
0
0
0
6
🌞
🌞@_bt33_·
@namonaai @tetrarosie valuable than something less useful that needed more labor to produce. Price is an expression of value, denying that is a fallacy and an excuse. By that incorrect principle, he argues that if labor is the sole producer of value, then any profit generated is stolen from the worker
English
1
0
0
8
rosie 💜🎀🇺🇳
rosie 💜🎀🇺🇳@tetrarosie·
being a left winger who actually understands economics is so alienating
English
282
244
8.7K
954.8K
🌞
🌞@_bt33_·
@Nathan4897 @LVTYIMBY Okay, so the idea is land tax is the only tax that actually works as an incentive to invest? Makes sense. But what if the land owners don’t have the resources to invest and develop it into something productive? They’d be paying the tax out of pocket or forced to sell, right?
English
0
0
0
13
Nathan
Nathan@Nathan4897·
@_bt33_ @LVTYIMBY Taxing most things can disincentivize investing in them; eg corporate taxes reduce the returns on expanding a business. Taxing unimproved value of land does the opposite, encouraging developing it into productive things eg housing. + land is stationary so no tax avoidance/flight
English
1
0
1
18
🌞
🌞@_bt33_·
@mitrajoy_ It’s not the intention that is evil, it’s the system they propose to get there. Socialism has always, without exception, ended in absolute misery for every human that lived under it.
English
0
0
0
11
mitra
mitra@mitrajoy_·
Socialists genuinely just want a better world for everyone and believe everyone deserves to have their basic needs met to survive.. considering no body asks to be here and we have the resources to do it.. I think this is fair. Meanwhile the US has brainwashed people into thinking this is a bad thing
English
21
39
301
4.7K
🌞
🌞@_bt33_·
@Asensii20 Genuinely, what part was a “robbery”? Can you point out the exact rule that was broken? Also, most of these were fouls that were called, so the compilation doesn’t even make sense.
English
0
0
1
90
Roy Jenkinsite 🇬🇧
This is an extremely difficult and highly subjective task, but here's my attempt to map countries based on whether they punch above or below their weight when it comes to global culture
Roy Jenkinsite 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
504
54
3.4K
1M
🌞
🌞@_bt33_·
@namonaai @tetrarosie You don’t care about anything I said or anything I can say, you just told me that no matter what argument I tell you, you’ll say it’s already addressed and any attempt at debunking it is propaganda. Also, even at that silly format, you’re unable to argue against it.
English
0
0
0
6
🌞
🌞@_bt33_·
@namonaai @tetrarosie Ah yes, the ultimate tactic, calling everything you don’t like propaganda. That is the absolute lowest form of political discourse. Respectfully, you seem like the type who is obsessed with Marxism but can’t critically think, only repeat, and never read anything outside of it.
English
1
0
0
12
☭lunazz☭
☭lunazz☭@namonaai·
@_bt33_ @tetrarosie you are wrong in whole and without exception because you are never precise enough to be correct. 100 pages would fail to graze the surface of marxism and all the debunkings of marxism I've ever seen were thinly veiled bourgeois propaganda pieces.
English
1
0
0
13
🌞
🌞@_bt33_·
@namonaai @tetrarosie They arent. You just tell yourself that to avoid thinking. All of the addressing, including what you do here, is literally this meme.
🌞 tweet media
English
1
0
0
11
☭lunazz☭
☭lunazz☭@namonaai·
@_bt33_ @tetrarosie your arguments against the labour theory of value are adressed in the first ten pages of the first volume of capital, you have done nothing special. this is why I'm not getting into these pet peeves.
English
1
0
0
15
Satan
Satan@s8n·
Satan tweet media
ZXX
37
1.8K
33.7K
274.7K
🌞
🌞@_bt33_·
@namonaai @tetrarosie I said LTV is wrong and why, I mentioned the absolute impossibility for Marxist ideas to work on the real world and its evidence, and pointed out what topics Marx never addressed correctly.
English
1
0
0
11
🌞
🌞@_bt33_·
@namonaai @tetrarosie You want me to write a 100 page paper debunking Marxism? That has been done before, but I don’t have the space here to do it. Point out where I’m wrong, and we’ll go from there. I mentioned more specific things that you can argue against. Marx never addressed those correctly.
English
2
0
1
16
🌞
🌞@_bt33_·
@namonaai @tetrarosie Marx never understood profit, incentive, supply and demand, and insisted that value comes solely from labor, which is honestly stupid. That’s why he’s been debunked so many times and every country that adopted his ideas ended in extreme disaster.
English
1
0
0
13
🌞
🌞@_bt33_·
@namonaai @tetrarosie For starters, Marx wasn’t an economist. I have read his work, and it is fundamentally incorrect and consistently contradicts himself. LTV, the core of Marxism, is straight up nonsense. You can’t be an “excellent economist” if you reject the basics of economics.
English
1
0
0
16