The Mitchell Group

@KillaXBT @KillaXBT Just curious if you actually executed the trade that you set us up for? I personally got out at a loss. Could take the pressure. Did you fill the last short at 75k and hold out as we ran up to 76? or did you fold?

$BTC Still holding the same short as planned. Ranges are messy and deviations are messy, but that doesn’t invalidate my plan. If we sweep the current highs (74K), I have a final limit order placed above. My invalidation is a weekly close above 80K, which would invalidate the bearish structure, essentially my soft stop loss. I’ve also spotted a potential fractal that I’ll be posting shortly. It could play out since we’re currently in a similar time period to that previous structure. Stay tuned. For now, the plan remains unchanged.

All the videos are cool and all, but what would have been really Gangster, is you posting each time you added to your short at the levels you drew out. Especially the top level near 75+. Making this tweet and not confidently circling back to it, showing your conviction. Hints that your plan was canceled. Was 80k really your invalidation or did you close that plan? If you actually took the shorts in the 3 levels you called out in your chart, You deserve made props! That alone would be much more respectable than the recent videos. However I did find them enjoyable and your charts on point. @KillaXBT Just curious if you actually executed the trade that you set us up for? I personally got out at a loss. Could take the pressure. x.com/KillaXBT/statu…

Lets observe $BTC objectively. People have been aiming for 80K for a few reasons. As always, everything is possible, despite being extremely confident in my positioning. Running through the technicals, people are watching 80K because of the CME gap, the prior weekly FVG (which we’ve consistently filled so far), the previous range wick low around 80K before the breakdown, and the fib confluence with the 0.618 around 83K and the 0.5 around 79K. However, in order to validate these targets, you need structural confirmation. Do we have that? No, we don’t. So I’m focusing on what’s actually confirmed rather than speculative targets. Right now, 72.8K is a key S/R since it’s the current weekly open. If we can’t reclaim that level, I expect continuation lower toward 68K and then 65K, which is the middle of the range. If we do flip the weekly open, that objectively shifts structure and opens the door for another move toward the highs at 76K. Based on the fractal I mentioned with the three highs, if BTC reclaims 72.8K, we could see one final push above 76K before further downside. For continuation toward the 80K targets people are calling for, price would need to reclaim and hold above 72.8K,otherwise, it’s just a lower high and a bearish retest before continuation down. At the moment, all we’ve really seen is BTC deviate to 76K, fully retrace below 69K, and now hover around 70.5K. Psychologically, holding 70K was key for bullish structure, and given that price has retraced almost the entire move, I’d be cautious here. Until bullish structure is clearly present, there are no longs for me. Just my current views if we are speaking purely technical.

⛏️ TOKENIZING THE FINANCING BEHIND CRITICAL MINERALS & METALS MINING ON $XDC One of the more eye-opening interviews I've done. We talk about bringing RWAs onchain, but what about the financing processes behind the RWAs themselves?

You can't measure the value $XDC brings to trade finance just by TVL Is tokenizing trade instruments on-chain important? Absolutely, and XDC is already doing that with real-world trade finance leaders. But that's only one part of the equation. Global Trade moving on-chain has 2 key factors. First is the value add through things like tokenization and globally coordinated liquidity. The other is cutting costs and boosting efficiencies. And that's where XDC Network has really shined more than most. This has been visible through things like Lloyds Bank, JP Morgan and the ITFA. And the way they're doing it? By digitalizing every procedure that happens across the supply chain. This is directly inline with the UNCITRAL's Model Law on Electronic Transferrable Records (MLETR) framework. Which XDC has already been verified as a compliant foundation for MLETR. The consensus is that trade finance is moving digital. Not just the assets, but the entire procedure and process being logged on-chain for a digital twin. In doing so, not only does it cut costs and time down thanks to automated logging of transactions without reliance on paper and manual labour. But because of these inefficiencies being cut out, it also results in reduced unneeded costs and mistakes across the supply chain. Think manual human errors, fragmented data in legacy systems, etc. These are all inefficiencies in modern supply chains. Ones that can entirely be solved by moving the data of the supply chain procedure on-chain. And that's exactly what XDC Network is doing with industry leaders. JP Morgan and Lloyds Bank are already leveraging Enigio in the XDC ecosystem to enable digital trade documents Singapore's government system TradeTrust has integrated XDC as 1 of 2 supported public DLTs. We have to remember that asset tokenization had only really began taking off institutionally the past few years. And XDC has already begun making progress here. But with regards to digitalizing trade finance data... It may not sound as exciting, but it's critical and ironically needed for tokenized trade finance to work. Fortunately XDC has been building around this initiative since 2017... Long before many cryptos were even conceptualized.

@Gabe_Torrez7 @BibleInContext1 Amen

@BibleInContext1 Israel in the OT is the ekklesia = the assembly; the chosen ones. The body of Christ (the church) is the ekklesia = the assembly; the chosen ones. The ekklesia has always been the people of God. Those faithful to yhwh in the OT & in the NT. All who are in Christ are true Israel.

The Church is not Israel & praise God that it’s not!

@sanderson1611 How about we force a conversation. If the women has a lack of desire, what are you missing (bc we are a men and don't notice) that maybe we could change or help with and her desire miraculously increases.

How Bad Ex-NIFB Doctrine Leads to "Moral Sin"

This project is unbelievable, the different facets being created. Its a one stop shop for crypto. Primefi - app.primefi.xyz Primeport- Primeport.xyz Primestaking- Primestaking.xyz XDC node- nodes.primexdc.com Prime AI Agent- x.com/primexdc?s=21 Prime wallet- wallet.primexdc.com

@KillaXBT Curious, did your 3rd short trigger or did you close your shorts? rejection off 76 was strong

@X_David_PRFI @Arturo_Cantera @PrimeNumbersFi @XDCNetwork

@MitchellGroupPR @Arturo_Cantera @PrimeNumbersFi @XDCNetwork You dang right! Love to see it 🛠️ #Build $XDC $PRFI

@VigilantFox imagine thinking the war does not affect the Economy 🤣

Harry Enten devastates CNN viewers when he reveals Democrats have gained NO GROUND on Trump following the war with Iran. “What we are seeing right now is a president whose approval rating is steady.” “This has NOT been a big deal politically.” “Americans who say they care a lot about the Iranian situation — look at this — it’s just 45%. Just 45% of Americans say they care a lot about the situation going on in Iran.” “So despite all the hubbub, right now we’re talking about less than a majority of Americans who say they care a lot about what’s going on in Iran right now.” “But take a look at Google searches right now because it just sort of reinforces that point. Americans’ Google searches for Iran. Look at this down 84% versus February 28th when of course the current war started in Iran.” “And if you look back on Sunday, you look back yesterday searches for the Academy Awards significantly higher are talking about three, four times as high as searches for Iran in the United States of America.” “I’m just not thinking that this is necessarily going to be the big political mover and shaker that you might expect.” “The president’s overall approval rating is the same. It’s the same. It was 41% before the current war in Iran started, and it is 41% now.” “So despite again, all the hubbub, despite all the critics of the president of the United States, what we are seeing right now is a president whose approval rating is steady. And this has not been a big deal politically.” Headline: The news media are yet again out of touch with the American public.

@astronomer_zero Excellent write up! It answers all my questions indirectly. I've been struggling with regret. ex- closing 100% and it keeps going. Or not taking a partial and experience full retrace. Thanks for sharing the bigger picture

$BTC Account doubled in 1.5 months (5% risk per trade on average) ✅ Here's how I did it (secrets to trading philosophy revealed) Alright, just doubled my account from trading the range so far since start of Feb. And, to many of you, that should be to no surprise, because these trades are all built on the backbone of our macro range masterplan since the very day it started, of calling the bottom in live time (Feb 6), range high, and range low. That range is still holding more than 1 month later. And in alignment, we have simply continued to trade it so far without failure. Many of you have been able to replicate a large part of that success since I share (almost) all of my entries and exits live, telling you exactly when to get in, and when to get out. But regardless, even if you copied all my moves, doesn't necessarily mean you doubled your account. That's exactly why I often get asked how much I exactly make, because there is one parameter I don't often talk about, which is how much I risk per trade in exact sense. And while I don't like to reveal PnL numbers too often to not draw unwanted attention, I can share relative numbers since risk is related to just that, regardless of your size. After all, risk is personal, and should be treated that way. Besides, it's treated as too holy. There is way too much emphasis on having an exact defined risk, and misinterpreted as needing a stoploss in an exact location (market makers love to hunt you), so that you can plan your exact risk and know exactly how fast your account will grow and exactly when you can retire. In reality, trading is quite different, but it's a good kind of different. Because planning retirmenent like that, to any critical mind, is nothing but a pipe dream. So this all leads to revealing a part of my trading philosophy, to help you avoid such traps and continue your journey in the right direction and especially not the wrong direction. Keep in mind, my philosophy is personal, and is often considered an unpopular opinion. It certainly is not for everyone. But if you have been liking my trades, enjoy how they feel and the stress free aspect of it as well as the real (as real as it gets) results they bring, then you're welcome in advance for the sneak peek in my trading philosophy I'm sharing here. #1 Win rate is more important than RR Unpopular opinion number 1 indeed. Because only high RR's look flashy and clean on social media. Only 10 RR+'s seem as if the trader exactly knows what he's doing. And it's very effective for selectively sharing posts too. In reality though, going for 10RR+ trades means no partials at all before hitting 5RR say, which means your trade could run to 6RR, hit all your targets except your most ambitious ones, and still result in a loss. So, even while your edge is working well, you still probably eat many losses before seeing the winning effect of your edge. That gap is frustrating because it means you have to sometimes wait days/weeks (multiple losing trades) before seeing results, which is also detrimental if you want to test a new edge (which may not be an edge in the first place). Instead, partials earlier, reduces your RR, and increases win rate because you already eliminate. If your 6RR or 7RR still hits, then you still take home 3RR or so net, instead of -1RR. This allows for steadier growth, allows you to see pretty quickly if you are doing a good job, the very next 1 or two trades, allows you to steer and adjust quickly, and by principle of risk optimisation, also allows you to risk more, and so your account ends up growing faster. It also allows you to redeploy partials if price retraces locally, and it still keeps you winning even if your final target isn't hit. You have all seen how I pinpoint entries quite exact, but then sometimes we don't get final target, or get front run, but still walk home with the win. Finally, it also allows you to keep runners which increase drastically on big trending moves. Since, if you go for a 10RR+ trade, I assure you once you hit 10RR without having taken much partial, you are very tempted to close all (I mean congrats, you just hit a homerun). But if price runs further, you feel unexposed and so you feel the strongest emotion in trading: FOMO whereas if you keep runners, you still end up with a 50RR plus runner sometimes, getting an average return of 10RR anyways, whilst keeping your high win rate, the irony. Instead leaving runners always keeps you exposed, especially when executed well in alignment with your high timeframe idea. There are some more reasons, but let's keep this post not too lengthy and move on to the second unpopular opinion: #2 Fixed position sizing - variable risk, is better than fixed risk - variable position sizing. Another very unpopular opinion. "No defined risk, no trade", "no SL, no trade", "no invalidation, no trade". The single biggest misunderstanding by far, is that a stop loss is the same as an invalidation. It's not. So instead of telling your broker (crypto exchange) exactly where you force yourself to sell, either directly (with a stoploss order), or, indirectly. Indirectly as in: with a higher position size i.e. telling your broker your stoploss/liquidation is closer, or vice versa, lower position size, telling your broker your stoploss is further away, and yes, the AI is very good at finding your forced selling point nowadays. Instead, using a fixed position size (say always 2x of your account), leaves the broker completely in the unknown. On top, it also allows you to locally monitor on set intervals whether to get in or to get out. Sometimes, you get out beyond analytical invalidation, sometimes, before your analytical invalidation, on average usually around it. And because you use fixed position size, your invalidation width determines risk. Keep that consistent, and so will your risk be approximately. My results So I just laid out my philosophy. You know me, I don't leave it at that, we actually have been calling all these moves step by step, and they have led to these results. Closing 6 wins in a row, but in the graph, a steady increase due to partials and all other elements of my exact philosophy, mostly reaching my final target (about 6-8 RR away from entry/inval), with partials, ending mostly around 2-3RR on average after fees per trade. And with an SL width mostly 1-3.5% wide, and a fixed position size of 2x or 3x leverage (you already know), that results in a variable risk per trade ranging 3 - 8% approx. On average around 5% risk per trade give or take, and with 6 trades closed, 0 losses, 6 wins, that ends up in 1.12^6 = 1.97 x or about a double on the account. Say you have not been risking my amount and say go for 1x on account, then average risk using my method is less, say 2.5%, then you might have ended up with: 1.06^6 = 40% gain in 1.5 months, very good indeed. Even if you missed a trade entirely: 1.05^6 = 34%, still amongst the top 100 traders in the robins cup. Summary So my philosophy, assuming accurate analysis allows you to: ➡️Have way more winners ➡️Have way less losers ➡️Risk more ➡️Allow runners ➡️Stress out less for being front run on your target and still losing ➡️Stress out less about getting close to target 5 times before hitting it on the 6th ➡️Stress out less about micromanaging your trade because the market is volatile ➡️Etc, etc etc. There of course is more to it, but without a doubt, here is a big (the biggest) step on the path towards... the dream of profitable and stress free trading. Enjoy.

@battleofever "this is 37 children, more than 50 have been identified" So 50 were identified out of 37? Math that... Accident ? Or i'm missing something ?

37 #MissingChildren rescued at CA house in #childtrafficking bust. #ChildSexTrafficking #SaveTheChildrenWorldwide Credit: officiallysotired IG

Introducing Plugin Dashboards: At Plugin, we continue to enhance transparency and visibility for both our partners and the broader developer ecosystem. We’re excited to introduce a Real-Time Enterprise Dashboard created for our partners. This dashboard provides deep visibility into their price feeds, including: • Real-time status of customized feeds • Insights into the decentralization behind the feeds • Data sources powering the feeds • Exclusive access to feed-level details We have also launched a real-time Plugin Network Dashboard, allowing anyone to witness the strength of the Plugin ecosystem, including: • Active nodes across the network • Validator nodes • Infrastructure servers • Data sources and network activity With AI-driven analytics coming soon, these dashboards will evolve into a powerful data intelligence layer for Plugin. 🔗 Explore the dashboard: dashboard.plugin.global #Plugin #XDCNetwork #WeAreXDC #Web3Infrastructure #Oracles #DeFi #BlockchainTransparency #Web3 #PriceFeeds #VRF

" If something has consistently worked, there’s no reason to abandon it." History repeats until it doesn't... I'd like to bet on the side of history. This is why I follow several different Chart Autists... I like to hear both sides of the story and then watch how it unfolds. Taking thoughts of both sides and using them to my advantage as worked great, after the crash. Wish I had found @KillaXBT before the bottom fell out.

The same people who believed $BTC wouldn’t top in Q4 are now the ones calling bottom. So far, this cycle has shown the same characteristics as previous ones. Historically, bear market bottoms take around 350 days on average to form. That’s based on data, not just a "feeling". Right now we’re only 151 days into the bear cycle. Calling a bottom this early is extremely bold and essentially means betting against historical patterns. Personally, I’ve said I expect the bottom somewhere around the 250–300 day mark, which aligns more closely with past cycles, but still relatively shorter. I don’t think the market will bottom just 150 days into a bear phase. Of course, I could be wrong, and that’s completely fine. But I’d rather trade with history than against it. If something has consistently worked, there’s no reason to abandon it.

@astronomer_zero are you calling the current LOW, the Bear Low for this cycle? Or do you see us running up and then correcting hard again and going below 60? Last cycle for example, retraced a solid 50% ish, then double topped before committing to the Bear Bottom. I understand you are bullish but I cant fade a short from the push over 73.5 we just had. Might not be something to call live and give target to 63-65, but it def seemed to be a great target to get some sort of pullback to capitalize on profits. Will it bounce off the previous range high (70.5 ish) and continue up is what I'm waiting to see. Thanks

$BTC To make the gameplan even simpler and remind you: the chart saids all. ➡️Mostly long, only little short (I'm overall bullish). What about 63k, Astro? ➡️Already long from there. With most levels of the range exposed, I only look to long levels where fear likely is most exteme (63/65k), they are the best entries. What about shorting here, Astro? ➡️Already short from range top as announced week ago (73.4k), most is TP'd. Only interested in short above current range top, but for a weak case - strong requirements (I'm overall bullish, would rather focus long). What about a breakout long? ➡️Need close above our 73k to send Wasn't 70k also a key level? ➡️ Yup, we closed above and ran good already. Close below is sub 65k very likely, good for further trade development. Any further questions, then I answer happily in the comments down below.

This week’s highest deposit APYs across supported networks are here. Compare the options and choose your network wisely. View them all at app.primefi.xyz.

@SlimVltxi @KillaXBT I think I read this as we were 6 months "after the low" but it is written 6 months until the low. My mistake.

@MitchellGroupPR @KillaXBT Cycle lows aren’t single candles. The turn started months ago. 🐦‍⬛

Just for your interest, we are approximately 168 days from the $BTC bottom. That means 6 months of what exactly, upside? 😂 Let’s be realistic. We’re close to the bottom, so any pumps will likely be quickly retraced. Range bound/bleed PA is the most likely outcome.