Monotheist Way

Exactly. It's not even close.

@Muadhibnaljabal @DavidTheJatt @WDLD0712 I get your point, but we have to be optimistic & return to the basics of our faith. Worship Allah SWT and treat people kindly. Ibn Al-Qayyim famously said that the entirety of the religion is 1) Worship Allah. 2) Be kind & merciful to His creation.

@Monoway10 @DavidTheJatt @WDLD0712 Maybe I'm overexaggerating, however I don't think the future is heading to a good place for Muslims and immigrants in the West.

Tommy Robinson comes from a traditional working class Irish catholic family in Luton. The sort whose cultural family values align with our own, as Muslims. Irish catholics were even discriminated against in England, and shared that experience of other-ised victimhood with British Muslims. Until Luton Pakis groomed and abused his female cousins, and turned him into a hateful monster. If you talk to older Asians in Luton, they’ll tell you this.

@DavidTheJatt @Muadhibnaljabal @WDLD0712 We raised funds for a poor (Muslim!) woman who literally prostituted herself to feed her 5 kids in Yemen. Otherwise they faced literally dying of starvation. And we have people online basically acting like it's nothing. Or compare it to a few islamophobic incidents in the UK.

@DavidTheJatt @Muadhibnaljabal @WDLD0712 But people are making light of what they're facing over there. The Syrians, Yemenis, Sudanese, Palestinians etc. have been genocided & thoroughly ravaged. It's not really acceptable to compare it to New York even sarcastically.

@DavidTheJatt @Muadhibnaljabal @WDLD0712 Of course, but it has a long way to go for even Syrians. Most of them have not returned to their homes yet. And as you already know, Israel has already annexed a portion of Syria & basically fully controls the entire southern Syrian airspace & bombs them at will.

@Monoway10 @Muadhibnaljabal @WDLD0712 Syria is stabilizing ngl from what I heard

@Muadhibnaljabal @WDLD0712 @DavidTheJatt You're literally labelling the most violent places on earth as safe just to argue. I don't get it. You already know what the situation is, so why are you arguing? The states you mentioned aren't even fully independent states. That's how bad it is.

@Monoway10 @WDLD0712 @DavidTheJatt Syria is getting better and a lot of those countries you mentioned are relatively stable like Iraq Yemen parts of Somalia normal Muslim countries are war zones. Also most British Muslims are desi and they can go back to their homelands

@Muadhibnaljabal @WDLD0712 @DavidTheJatt @Muadhibnaljabal You're joking right? 500 K Muslims dead in Syria & 5 million Syrians made homeless but you think it's worse in the UK because a house got attacked? 150 K dead in Yemen but you think a house in the UK being attacked is worse? What planet do you live on?

@Monoway10 @WDLD0712 @DavidTheJatt Worse Muslim women attacked on the streets Muslim houses fire bombed and also sorts of clashes it won't be nice

@Muadhibnaljabal @WDLD0712 @DavidTheJatt @Muadhibnaljabal The Muslim world is already struggling as it is to deal with refugees from other Muslim states. E.g. The Royingha - who have been literally genocided - are now unwanted & facing open discrimination in Muslim countries. Same with Syrian refugees. Etc.

@Muadhibnaljabal @WDLD0712 @DavidTheJatt @Muadhibnaljabal Realistically, if you think it's a good idea for Western Muslims to go those Muslim states then the situation in the West would at least have to match the devastation in those Muslim states.

Safety is an important aspect but it's only one aspect. The whole point of the Niqab is to act as a wall between you & society. That's literally the whole point. It's beautiful that you wish to emulate the Prophet's (SAW) wives, but their behavior was not limited to wearing the Niqab. They basically stayed at home for 99% of the time because that's literally what Allah SWT told them to do, which is conveniently ignored by many people: وَقَرْنَ فِى بُيُوتِكُنَّ "Remain in your homes" (Qur'an 33:33) The problem in modern times is that many Niqabis are trying to have it both ways. They don't want to be seen, but they also want to take part in society (get jobs, go to the shops etc.) But it doesn't work like that. It never worked that way in early Islam. The Niqab is a lifestyle. It's not simply a cloth. And it means staying at home for the vast majority of the time and not leaving at all unless absolutely essential.

@kmt_ofb i live in a liberal american city, hostility here is fairly limited compared to other cities

my parents genuinely think I cannot have a life wearing niqab and that it is unsustainable

@WDLD0712 @DavidTheJatt Option 1 is impossible even if the unlikely desire was there. People are actively fleeing from Muslim states for a good reason. We can't seriously expect the diaspora - who send billions in aid to help out those same states - to move the other way. That's nuts.

@DavidTheJatt Option 1: Leave (best option) Option 2: Publicly make amends, pursue full civic integration, build socio-political capital with national service. Heal these deep wounds. Embarrass and expose the self-serving Hebrew with the Musalman’s commitment to King and Country.

"What have the Muslims ever given us?" Well, apart from algebra, hospitals, universities, paper manufacturing, modern optics, surgical instruments, astronomical tables, navigational advances, Arabic numerals, public libraries, pharmacology, coffee, family morality, prophetic theology, and of course the preservation and development of Greek philosophy that sparked the Renaissance... ...what have the Muslims ever given us?

John Cleese was undoubtedly one of the most brilliant and original comedians of his generation, and would have been remembered as a legend of intelligent wit and original script had he simply not devolved to be so full of hate recently. Sadly, as he reaches his ninth decade and hence in what is most likely the last years of his life (and perhaps his age is an excuse...), he has become a bitter xenophobe spouting the most crass anti-Muslim stereotypes and regurgitating the worst caricatures of our faith that the Far Right can come up with. For the last few months, he has been on a literal crusade against Islam, and seems to refuse any sensible engagement with Muslims online or in person. But Cleese is (or was) too intelligent to believe such lies; a simple dialogue or search would clear up these misconceptions. It's obvious his emotions have gotten the better of his intelligence. To answer this simple garbling of facts: No one is saying that the early Islamic empires expanded through friendly persuasion alone; they politically expanded through military conquest, just as virtually every major empire in history did. The more relevant question is whether people were converted by force. On that point, the historical evidence is quite clear. Egypt, Persia, and other regions remained largely non-Muslim for centuries after conquest, while the world's largest Muslim populations today—such as Indonesia—became Muslim without invading armies. So the historical record points to a distinction between the spread of Muslim political rule and the spread of the Islamic faith itself. Any fair assessment should recognize both. More importantly, are you willing to apply your critique to your own civilization? Have you forgotten Britain's colonial history, and its boast of having an empire on which the sun never set, controlling over a quarter of the earth's population, subjugating hundreds of millions of peoples and fleecing the economies of many civilizations by force? Not to mention the entire mess of the modern Middle East...of which the lion's share is the direct fault of Britain with its Sykes-Picot agreement and Balfour Declaration? All civilizations acted with a level of political force to protect their interests, but some left greater and more noble legacies than others.

There's actually an interesting authentic report I read a long time ago. A group of Muslims went to Al Hassan Al Basri because they were concerned about non-Muslim women who were selling things in the marketplace. They wanted to buy the items but the women were uncovered, with their hair showing. So they asked him, is it permissible to buy from them? And if so, is it permissible to look at them? Al Hassan Al Basri responded: "Yes and yes. Provided it's without lust." I'll need to find this report.

This is why I can’t take ikhtilaat and segregation discourse seriously by otherwise “pious” people who insist on remaining in sodom and gomorrah People will look Shazia from accounts in the eye when talking to her in the office, and then performatively pretend she doesn’t exist when passing her outside the masjid

@WDLD0712 And it has also never been true that it was sinful for women to work, even in areas where men would appear. Women (and men) used to buy & sell to each other all the time in the marketplaces, from the very beginning of Islam. That's an objective fact.

@WDLD0712 I don't get your point here though. It's literally never been true in Islam that you can't look at the opposite sex when talking to them. That has literally never been true. Merely looking has never been a sin. The sin was always looking with lust. Not merely looking.

@ARAH_Ashari @abuatiyyah_ Don't worry, your efforts at spreading knowledge will get Allah's reward 👍 But also try to find an easier way to do it! We don't want you to get tired 😩

@Monoway10 @abuatiyyah_ Wallah making those slides is so tiring 😭

It is disliked for the man outside of fee special occasion to play the daff, and this is the madhab of imam Ahmad. vm.tiktok.com/ZNRcP63BG/

@M2Easy420 @TypedInAnger Can you imagine if someone said "if you can avoid missing the Fajr salah and Asr salah then do so". This guy (@TypedInAnger ) would freak out. And yet that's literally what the Prophet (SAW) said 👇

@TypedInAnger I know the Hadith akhi, and your way of giving naseeha absolutely have no issue with it. But someone who is deep in Jahiliya and who is already calling themselves munafiq, I don’t see the hikma of telling them abandoning the salah = kufr.

Either say the truth or just shut it and don't mislead ppl into kufr