
Morgan Wyatt Khan
15.5K posts




Benjamin Netanyahu says Jesus Christ has no advantage over Genghis Khan. Netanyahu says that if you are strong enough, ruthless enough, and powerful enough, “evil will overcome good.” What's your message to Benjamin Netanyahu?


NEWS: NASA is planning a bigger @SpaceX Moon mission role using Starship, in a massive blow to Boeing. With the new proposal, Boeing's SLS would no longer be used to boost Orion close to the moon. Instead, Starship and Orion would dock in Earth orbit, giving Starship the pivotal role of propelling the capsule to the moon’s orbit, before taking astronauts down to the surface. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…


NEWS: NASA is planning a bigger @SpaceX Moon mission role using Starship, in a massive blow to Boeing. With the new proposal, Boeing's SLS would no longer be used to boost Orion close to the moon. Instead, Starship and Orion would dock in Earth orbit, giving Starship the pivotal role of propelling the capsule to the moon’s orbit, before taking astronauts down to the surface. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…





🇸🇦🇮🇷 Saudi FM just torched Iran on the floor: "I do not understand how they claim to defend Islamic causes while attacking Islamic countries! Even before this war, what was Iran’s contribution to the Islamic world?" x.com/i/status/20347…




For 25+ years, we’ve sustained human presence on the ISS. It’s our testbed for life support, spacesuits, and long-duration flight. Now we’re taking those lessons to the Moon. Starting in 2027, robotic landers and rovers will build toward a steady cadence as we construct a lunar base and extend American leadership to Mars and beyond.

This might actually be Trump's funniest moment 😂 Japanese Reporter: Why didn't you tell us before you struck Iran? Trump: "Why didn't you tell me about Pearl Harbor?" 💀🔥😂

Our American HERITAGE is FORGED with innovators, dreamers, and winners. AMERICAN INGENUITY 🇺🇸

Legacy Space Primes VS Neo Space Primes: An unhinged thread 🧵🚨⚠️ The old playbook for winning in space was simple: Win a cost-plus contract. Build a team of 4000 people. Spend 8 years and $3B. Deliver something that works. Repeat. That model built the GPS and IRS nav systems!(I've flown and navigated with BOTH of these myself). It built the Space Shuttle. It put rovers on Mars. It also created organizations so encrusted with process, overhead, and self-protective bureaucratic bullshit that they can no longer execute fast enough to matter. 1/ How Legacy Primes Actually Operate Legacy space primes - your Boeings, your Northrop Grummans, your Lockheed Martins are not bad companies. They are optimized for the wrong environment. Their execution model is built around compliance as the product. The deliverable isn’t the satellite or the launch vehicle. The deliverable is the documentation proving every step was done correctly. CDRs. PDRs. Test Readiness Reviews. Boards. More boards. A board to approve the agenda of the next board. Ask me how I know. We recently had a meeting with a legacy space prime, I kid you not: 17 VPs of God knows what on the call!. Every technical decision runs through a committee. Every schedule has a 40% margin baked in because the program manager who doesn’t pad the schedule gets burned, and the one who does gets promoted. Risk is not managed, it is diffused across so many layers of org charts that no single person is ever responsible for a failure. Speed is structurally impossible. Not because the engineers aren’t talented - they are exceptional - but because the incentive architecture punishes velocity and rewards coverage. When your contract is cost-plus, time spent is revenue earned. There is no forcing function. The result: programs that take a decade to reach orbit for billions of dollars, built by organizations that have institutionalized the assumption that this is simply how space works. I looked at those processes, got exposed to them, scratched my head and said SCREW THIS!!!. 2/ How Neo-Space Primes Operate: SpaceX didn’t beat legacy primes by hiring better engineers. They beat them by building a company where speed is the primary design constraint, and everything else, including elegance and process, is subordinate to that. One of my guys now on the team confirmed this. Starship has exploded on the pad multiple times. Each explosion is treated as a data point, not a failure. The program moves. Iterative hardware development cycles that legacy primes would gate behind 18 months of analysis are compressed into weeks. Manufacturing is vertically integrated so the supply chain can’t hold the schedule hostage. The org structure is flat enough that an engineer can escalate a critical finding to a decision-maker in hours, not quarters. Rocket Lab. Relativity. Ursa Major. ABL Space. The new generation of space companies shares this operating DNA: small teams, short cycles, hardware-forward, failure-tolerant execution. The contrast in output is staggering. SpaceX has conducted more orbital launches in a single year than some legacy primes have conducted in a decade. At a fraction of the cost per kilogram to orbit. The neo-space model doesn’t just move faster. It generates more learning per dollar. And in a technology development environment, learning velocity is the only moat that matters. 3/ The Government Is Watching - and Shifting For decades, the U.S. government tolerated legacy prime inefficiency because there was no alternative. You needed Boeing to build the rocket because no one else could. That calculus has fundamentally changed, and the government knows it. The DOW’s Commercial Space Integration Strategy, the NRO’s aggressive pivot toward commercial remote sensing, the Space Force’s commercial augmentation frameworks, the CIA’s In-Q-Tel portfolio expansion into space infrastructure - these are not isolated initiatives. Cont….👇🏼🧵






Just saw that new Spider-man trailer, And it made me wonder... What happened to romantic interests in movies?

Tech companies are now using robot dogs costing up to $300,000 a piece to guard AI data centers. Via @FortuneMagazine








