
The data I sent you does illustrate my point, but I guess you don't really care about any research that doesn't align with your internet debates.
Separately, I'm starting to feel like you're bad faith and refuse to engage with any points that you don't like to hear.
So again, when *I* talk about the kind of "societal trust" I value, I'm talking about things like crime, safety, cleanliness, and general experience when out in public, e.g., are people going to rob me, are sales people going to run up to me in a grocery store and ask me invasive questions about which phone carrier I'm using, is it safe to walk around almost everywhere at all times, etc. etc.
If you can acknowledge that there are these categories of things that you can experience, and that THEY ARE DIFFERENT IN DIFFERENT PLACES.
Playing dumb semantic games about arbitrary definitions of "trust" are stupid, I don't trust you with my banking details and social security number, but I trust you not to rob me on public transportation.
English












