OmegaGaming119

@xepale0 @1Saltyspider @StellarArtoisGB Bc there isn't a single camera in existence that can zoom those distances😑

@1Saltyspider @StellarArtoisGB not an answer of my question why dont they

Now I know some people won't want to hear this but why doesn't NASA zoom in on the earth?. Are we being duped?

@fieryangel1 @MJTruthUltra We see light via reflections there is nothing for the light to reflect off of in space

@MJTruthUltra I remember a child asking years ago....'if the Sun is VERY bright & can travel millions of miles to heat up Earth...then why is Space so dark....' ??

Artemis crew members appear to struggle answering a child’s question why he can’t see any stars on their mission. Crew member Reid says don’t worry… they will turn the craft around later pointing at deep space and will turn off all the lights and will get good photos then. I’m sure NASA will make an official statement explaining why later. 🤣 rumble.com/v78722i-artemi…

@MacFromAZ @AlvinCDork @RFeynwoman @benwehrman Right? I wish more people would be like great pics instead of just screaming fake bc it goes against their beliefs

@OmegaGaming119 @AlvinCDork @RFeynwoman @benwehrman Wow, those are amazing pictures!

NASA is constantly sharing pictures on their Instagram of galaxies, planets, and other spacey stuff that's tens of millions of light years away... But they can't zoom in on the 🇺🇸 flag they supposedly planted on the moon only 238,000 miles away? Wouldn't that be a really easy way to shut up all of the moon landing-denying cOnSpiRaCy tHeOriSts immediately? 🤔 [🎥: @holisticnut33]

@OG_Jhn @Tikka_BRNO @Burcklers @sciencegirl Also he did squeeze the container it was originally in or the straw either way didn't just magically pour it's zero g after all

@Tikka_BRNO @Burcklers @sciencegirl Blood if you watch that video very well you will notice that isn’t from a squeeze tube, it’s from a container that has an opening nd his hands has no pressure on that tube… he just opened it up nd the coffee pours out easily, even when the coffee spilled it was pure liquid

NASA’s coffee cup, designed to not spill in zero gravity

@AlvinCDork @RFeynwoman @MacFromAZ @benwehrman Yeah you really are go buy a god damn telescope yourself if you're so damn confident in ur stupidity

@OmegaGaming119 @RFeynwoman @MacFromAZ @benwehrman I see some bullshit that looks cgi and a couple shadows ya I am the dumb one you pegged me

@AlvinCDork @RFeynwoman @MacFromAZ @benwehrman It's from a telescope you are absolutely not going to get a better Pic on a fucking iPhone, do you enjoy being this retarded and uniformed?

@OmegaGaming119 @RFeynwoman @MacFromAZ @benwehrman 😂 how many ppl are going to show me that bullshit image over and over….my iPhone could take a better pic

@AlvinCDork @RFeynwoman @MacFromAZ @benwehrman Vague?? Wtf drugs you on you can literally see the fucking lander 😑

@OmegaGaming119 @RFeynwoman @MacFromAZ @benwehrman They show you a bunch of arrows pointing to some vague bullshit and you guys believe it wild to me

@AlvinCDork @RFeynwoman @MacFromAZ @benwehrman I'll never understand how you people can be so confident about being so fucking wrong

@OmegaGaming119 @RFeynwoman @MacFromAZ @benwehrman You literally can’t

@AlvinCDork @RFeynwoman @MacFromAZ @benwehrman You can literally see the flag with a fucking telescope 😑

@RFeynwoman @OmegaGaming119 @MacFromAZ @benwehrman Since when has Gov cared what something costs? And it isn’t because I want pictures…you are telling me we have no reason to have a rover in the moon?

@realNoox @GrayfoxArt @Shamira1925 @wisbik @elonmusk There is a difference between asking a question out of curiosity and just asking a question and when given the answer being like no my beliefs and retarded opinions are what's true not the facts and evidence 😑

@GrayfoxArt @Shamira1925 @wisbik @elonmusk They asked a question a-hole. That’s what science was for most of time, apparently we know it all now and people can’t ask questions anymore. Great facts with zero answers to the question above. Talk about being ignorant.

NASA Artemis passing close to the Moon

@Joffa_AU @Jikkyleaks @BGatesIsaPyscho Dude insta blocked me 😂 I really hope people are just engagement farming and aren't this retarded

@OmegaGaming119 @Jikkyleaks @BGatesIsaPyscho I cant take this performative stupidity seriously. I think hes just trolling for engagement or doing some weird psych experiment on us.

🚨🚀 New Official NASA footage shows Artemis II Orion Craft separating from the last part of the Space Launch System. Do people seriously believe this?

@AlvinCDork @MacFromAZ @benwehrman How is that suspicious??? We had no reason to we literally went there in person

@OmegaGaming119 @MacFromAZ @benwehrman Just the fact one isn’t on the moon is suspicious

@AlvinCDork @MacFromAZ @benwehrman Bc we don't have one on the moon???? How can something that doesn't exist take pictures??

@OmegaGaming119 @MacFromAZ @benwehrman Look I’m not a nut these are legit questions you don’t find it suspicious there are no pics from a ground rover ever when you see those mars images?

@AlvinCDork @MacFromAZ @benwehrman We were the only country to go there in person to physically collect samples ourselves unlike with Mars where we don't have the technology to land people on the planet so we use autonomous rovers to collect samples and pictures

@OmegaGaming119 @MacFromAZ @benwehrman Why is that

@AlvinCDork @MacFromAZ @benwehrman Also BTW the rover used in 15,16,17 was a manned rover meaning driven by people, nasa hasn't deployed any autonomous rovers on the moon not yet at least 😂

@OmegaGaming119 @MacFromAZ @benwehrman Google might help you…..Three NASA Apollo Lunar Roving Vehicles (missions 15, 16, and 17) remain on the surface with TV cameras

@AlvinCDork @MacFromAZ @benwehrman Nice try tho they are planning to deploy some but that doesn't really count now does it? But the Chinese do have one currently active just not nasa

@Jikkyleaks @Joffa_AU @BGatesIsaPyscho Bruh they use explosives to separate sections of the craft which generates vibrations that travel through the craft tf do you think the camera is attached to?? Just floating there??

@Joffa_AU @BGatesIsaPyscho Show the boom. Where is it?

@AlvinCDork @MacFromAZ @benwehrman You do realize we have rovers on Mars.... But none on the moon right? Where tf do you think the pictures came from 😑

@MacFromAZ @benwehrman This is a photo taken by one of our rovers of Mars surface….now show me a modern photo from the Moons surface showing the flag…I’ll be generous let’s say show me one from the moons surface from the last 30 years….

@KL71ind @esf69 @orbvase @WiseOneAwakens They live streamed the entire thing on YouTube, you people are so fucking stupid

Plus, the budget NASA has, why did we only get to see the "spacecraft" leave the atmosphere. I haven't see any third-party video footage taken from earth showing that the "spacecraft" is even moving through space toward the moon. But we can somehow see a planet a few trillion miles away? What?

For all you highly moronic moon conspiracy theorists... The moon landings happened. Here are four bulletproof reasons why the hoax theory collapses under its own weight. 1. We brought back 842 pounds of moon rocks and geologists worldwide have been slicing them open for 55 years Apollo 11–17 crews hauled back samples that scream "lunar origin" in every isotope, crystal structure, and chemical signature. These rocks have zero water content (Earth rocks almost always have some), solar wind particles embedded from billions of years of unfiltered space exposure, and microscopic glass beads formed by ancient meteorite impacts— stuff impossible to replicate with 1960s tech. Independent labs in the Soviet Union, Europe, Japan, and China analyzed them and confirmed: same age (3.7–4.5 billion years), same exotic minerals like armalcolite, same lack of oxidation. If NASA faked it, they'd have needed a secret lunar rock factory decades ahead of its time. Conspiracy theorists never explain how we pulled that off while simultaneously "faking" the tech to get there. These samples are still studied today in museums and universities— you can touch (protected) pieces yourself. 2. Laser reflectors are still on the Moon, and anyone with the right equipment can ping them right now Apollo 11, 14, and 15 crews placed corner-cube retroreflectors on the lunar surface. These are passive mirrors (no batteries, no moving parts) that bounce laser beams straight back to Earth. Observatories like McDonald in Texas, Apache Point in New Mexico, and facilities in France, Italy, and Australia have been firing lasers at them daily since 1969 and measuring the round-trip time to millimeter precision. The data proves the distance to the Moon (about 384,400 km) and how it's slowly receding (3.8 cm/year). China’s Chang’e missions and India’s Chandrayaan have imaged the exact landing sites, including the hardware and tracks. If it was faked, the hoaxers would have needed to secretly land mirrors on the Moon— or convince every laser-ranging scientist on Earth to lie for half a century. Spoiler: they didn’t. 3. Modern orbiters from multiple countries have photographed the landing sites in high resolution—footprints and all NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has snapped razor-sharp images of every Apollo site since 2009. You can see the descent stages, rover tracks, astronaut footprints, and even the exact paths they walked. Japan’s SELENE, India’s Chandrayaan-2, and China’s Chang’e-2 and Chang’e-3 orbiters independently confirmed the same shadows, hardware, and disturbance patterns. These aren’t blurry NASA photos from 1969, they’re crisp, multi-spectral images taken decades later by rival space agencies. The geometry matches perfectly: the flag is still there (Apollo 11’s fell over during liftoff), the rover is parked where they left it, and the blast craters under the landers are exactly as predicted. A studio set on Earth couldn’t survive that level of global scrutiny from space. 4. The conspiracy would have been bigger, dumber, and leakier than the actual mission Over 400,000 people worked on Apollo. That’s engineers, technicians, contractors, secretaries, and janitors across dozens of companies and universities. Not one deathbed confession, not one leaked memo, not one whistleblower with hard proof in 55+ years? That’s statistically insane. The Soviets were tracking every second of the missions in real time with their own radar and radio telescopes— they hated America’s guts and would have screamed "fake" at the first glitch if they could. Instead, they congratulated the U.S. and kept quiet. Faking it would have required inventing better special effects, vacuum chambers, and propulsion tech than what actually existed while hiding it from the very people who built the real rockets. Occam’s razor doesn’t just cut here; it eviscerates the hoax. The footage, the rocks, the reflectors, the photos, the tracking data— they all line up perfectly because the landings were real. The moon is still up there, waiting for the next crew. The evidence isn’t "believable", it’s undeniable. If you’re still on the fence, go look at an LRO image of Tranquility Base or bounce a laser off those reflectors yourself. Remember: conspiracy theory is the sophistication of the ignorant.

@KL71ind @esf69 @orbvase @WiseOneAwakens You mean like this? And the pussy who blocked me above has the gall to call me a religious fenatic bc I believe in hard proven facts and don't doubt space and scientists like what?? Literally anyone can track the capsule with a telescope and intelligence