Ben 🔧

7.3K posts

Ben 🔧 banner
Ben 🔧

Ben 🔧

@OrmosBen

Beigetreten Aralık 2013
2.1K Folgt708 Follower
Ben 🔧 retweetet
Lukas Ziegler
Lukas Ziegler@lukas_m_ziegler·
JUST IN: @GoogleDeepMind launches Gemini Robotics ER 1.6! 🧠 GDM introduced Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6, a reasoning-first model that enables robots to understand environments through spatial reasoning and multi-view understanding. The model specializes in visual and spatial understanding, task planning, and success detection. It acts as the high-level reasoning model for robots, capable of calling tools like Google Search, vision-language-action models, or any third-party user-defined functions. New capabilities like instrument reading, enabling robots to read complex gauges and sight glasses, discovered through collaboration with Boston Dynamics. Precision object detection and counting, relational logic, motion reasoning, and constraint compliance. The model uses points as intermediate steps to reason about complex tasks. It enables agents to intelligently choose between retrying failed attempts or progressing to the next stage. The model advances multi-view reasoning, understanding multiple camera streams and relationships between them even in dynamic or occluded environments. Super important are the safety improvements. They have included superior compliance with safety policies, better adherence to physical safety constraints (safer decisions about which objects can be manipulated), and improved hazard identification. 🚧 So the high-level planning that calls lower-level execution models, versus the end-to-end visuomotor control approach of models like π0 and GEN-1. It's getting interesting! 🔥 More details here: deepmind.google/blog/gemini-ro… ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news → ziegler.substack.com
Lukas Ziegler tweet media
English
5
55
398
24K
Ben 🔧
Ben 🔧@OrmosBen·
@tunguz It’s so good honestly, easy to spin it up in under 10-15 minutes, especially if you know what would add value to the team and what would accelerate it. I’ve been using it to test onboarding flows, simulate different scenarios.
English
0
0
1
256
Ben 🔧 retweetet
Pubity
Pubity@pubity·
Scientists have figured out how to extract oxygen from Moon dust, making it possible to build long-term bases on the Moon. Blue Origin, a company founded by Jeff Bezos, has created a reactor that turns the Moon's surface into breathable air.
Pubity tweet mediaPubity tweet media
English
118
249
3.1K
128K
Ben 🔧
Ben 🔧@OrmosBen·
@CharC_SEO Cheers to that! While on a museum crawl. You just can’t stop.
Ben 🔧 tweet media
English
0
0
2
102
Charlie Clark
Charlie Clark@CharC_SEO·
Real Londonmaxxing isn't pub crawls. It's Claude Crawls. Coffee shop to coffee shop around London building automations and workflows all day.
Charlie Clark tweet media
English
47
4
222
16.9K
Ben 🔧
Ben 🔧@OrmosBen·
The Friend pin was advertised badly. The future is similar to that. Only thing that was missing is the privacy aspect. The future belongs to those who live in the real world, build in the real world and just tap into AI for assistance. AI isn’t there to drive culture.
English
0
0
0
15
Ben 🔧
Ben 🔧@OrmosBen·
Unfair advantage in 2026: Be a craftsman with products. That includes apps. Combine it with physical AI and you’re golden.
English
0
0
0
10
Ben 🔧
Ben 🔧@OrmosBen·
@CarSighting Especially big respect for making the cars accurate on screen even with the kit cars, missing a good car movie lately
English
0
0
14
438
VINTAGE
VINTAGE@CarSighting·
VINTAGE tweet mediaVINTAGE tweet media
ZXX
9
101
1.6K
32.9K
Ben 🔧
Ben 🔧@OrmosBen·
@robindchnt Very true, voting for more robots with designs inspired by biomimicry
English
0
0
0
15
Robin Dechant
Robin Dechant@robindchnt·
we need to bring more taste to robotics!
English
42
5
185
7.9K
Ben 🔧
Ben 🔧@OrmosBen·
AI opens up doors for interfaces to be more dynamic. No one has cracked this yet. Anthropic is trying, respect this a lot. A product needs care. We see products launch left and right but not with the right amount of care. That’s why they don’t stick.
English
0
0
0
15
Ben 🔧 retweetet
Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai·
Demis Hassabis: "Kids these days could start a multi-bn dollar business using these AI tools in some new way that no one had thought about." Labs are focused on shipping better models, not exhausting their applications, so there's room for new products
English
40
159
1.6K
164.7K
Ben 🔧
Ben 🔧@OrmosBen·
When in MVP mode: - Make sure you butcher the design and interface fast, every hour if needed - Roll it out - Get feedback - Dutcher it again Do it until you don’t see meaningful user retention.
English
0
0
0
10
Ben 🔧
Ben 🔧@OrmosBen·
@ListerLawrence Used AI to bring life to the Sultan of Brunei cars too, so they see some daylight at least virtually
English
0
0
0
38
Lawrence Whittaker
Lawrence Whittaker@ListerLawrence·
This is the kind of AI I can get into.
Lawrence Whittaker tweet media
English
10
10
149
6K
Ben 🔧
Ben 🔧@OrmosBen·
Produce great work and others will want to share that great work with others.
English
0
0
0
16
Ben 🔧
Ben 🔧@OrmosBen·
There is still hope. Let’s build the science SaaS.
Ricardo@Ric_RTP

The CEO of Google DeepMind just admitted that if the decision had been his, we would've cured cancer before anyone ever used ChatGPT. And that's not even the scariest thing he said on a recent interview. Demis Hassabis is one of the most important people alive in AI. He won the Nobel Prize last year for AlphaFold, the system that cracked the 50 year protein folding problem. 3 million scientists now use his tool. Almost every new drug being developed will touch it at some stage. In a new interview, he was asked about the moment ChatGPT launched and Google went into "code red." His answer was one of the most revealing things any AI leader has ever said on the record: "If I'd had my way, I would have left AI in the lab for longer. Done more things like AlphaFold. Maybe cured cancer or something like that." Read that again. The man running Google's entire AI division is publicly saying the commercial AI race we're all living through was a MISTAKE. That the industry got hijacked by a chatbot when it could have been solving the biggest problems in science and medicine. His vision was simple: Build AI slowly, carefully, like CERN. Use it to crack root node problems one at a time. Cancer. Energy. New materials. Let humanity benefit from real breakthroughs while the foundational science was figured out over a decade or two. Then ChatGPT dropped in November 2022 and everything changed. Demis described what happened next as getting locked into a "ferocious commercial pressure race" that none of the labs can escape from. On top of that, the US vs China dynamic added geopolitical pressure. The result is everyone sprinting toward products instead of breakthroughs, shipping chatbots while the scientific opportunity gets buried under marketing cycles and quarterly earnings. But he's not saying progress isn't happening... He's saying the progress got redirected away from the things that actually matter most. And then it got even scarier: Because when Demis was asked what he worries about with AI, he laid out two threats. The first is what everyone talks about: Bad actors using AI for harm. Terrorist groups. Hostile nation states. Cyberattacks at scale. But that's not the threat he's most worried about. His second worry is AI itself going rogue. Not today's models. The models coming in the next two to four years as the industry enters what he calls "the agentic era." Systems that can complete entire tasks autonomously. Systems that are increasingly capable and increasingly hard to control. His exact words: "How do we make sure the guardrails are put in place so they do exactly what they've been told to do, and there's no way of them circumventing that or accidentally breaching those guardrails? That's going to be an incredibly hard technical challenge if you think about how powerful and smart and capable these systems eventually get." A Nobel Prize winner who runs one of the 3 most advanced AI labs on Earth just said publicly that within two to four years, we're entering a phase where AI alignment becomes a real problem, and the technical challenge of solving it is enormous. And almost nobody is paying enough attention. He called for international cooperation between labs, AI safety institutes, and academia to tackle the problem. He said this is the thing even the experts aren't thinking about enough. He said the only way to get through the AGI moment safely is if everyone starts treating this with the seriousness it deserves. Most AI CEOs give you careful PR answers about "responsible development" and move on. Demis said something different... He said the commercial race FORCED us into a premature deployment of a technology we barely understand, and the window to get alignment right before the next generation of agents shows up is two to four years. If the man who built the system that might cure cancer is telling you he wishes it had happened first, maybe we should listen to what he says is coming next.

English
0
0
0
16
Ben 🔧 retweetet
CyberRobo
CyberRobo@CyberRobooo·
There are many ways to collect high-quality data. GenRobot seems to be closer to human-like methods. It uses a wearable exoskeleton robotic hand: a person simply wears the Gen DAS Dex and can flexibly complete various tasks, while simultaneously capturing the entire human motion trajectory and converting it into high-quality data for use by the humanoid robot. >23 degrees of freedom omnidirectional hand capture with millimeter-level precision >Tactile and visual fusion >Sub-millisecond head-hand synchronization
English
8
73
348
18.3K
Ben 🔧 retweetet
Sajeel Purewal 🇨🇦 🇵🇰
Sajeel Purewal 🇨🇦 🇵🇰@Sajeel_Purewal·
Build Robots Build Drones Build Hexapods Build Glasses Build Radios Build Clocks Build Rovers Build Wearables Build Rockets Build Exoskeletons Build Sensors Build it all blueprint.am
English
43
419
3.4K
205.7K
Ben 🔧 retweetet
Tony Fadell
Tony Fadell@tfadell·
50 years of @Apple From the early days of the #iPod to bringing the #iPhone into the world, some of the most formative years of my career were spent there. The products and teams stay with you. But more importantly so does how Apple thinks. A few lessons that have held true for decades: 1) Start with the user, not the tech. The question isn’t “what can we build?” but “what problem actually matters?” 2) Focus is everything. Apple is defined as much by what it says no to as what it builds. 3) End-to-end matters. Hardware, software, services. It all has to work together. 4) Details are the product. What feels small is what users remember. 5) Debate hard. Commit fully. 6) Build for the long term. We’re in another moment of massive technological change. The fundamentals haven’t changed. The companies that win build things people actually use and can’t imagine living without. Congrats to everyone who has been part of Apple’s first 50 years! 🙌
Tony Fadell tweet media
English
80
577
4.5K
241.3K