peter hotrum

I miss the days when men formed opinions with facts logic and reason instead of emotional outbursts. The ignorance drips from anti-EVers like a festering wound.

People were banned off social media for saying Ivermectin helped treat Covid. Now the FDA actually admits it years later. The “conspiracy theorists” remain undefeated.

@Joom01234567 @Rockternal Priceless

@Rockternal How much did that freedom costed you?

A Cybertruck and a solar array. No middle man. no oil company. no power company. No geopolitics. Simple = freedom.

@Rockternal Does this fully charge the CT in one day?

Does Israel have "a right to exist?" The answer is an emphatic NO, and I'll explain why. For starters, the question itself is manipulative and means one of two things: (A) The first is that the question means they want something from you. This is the most common. If you concede that yes, Israel has a right to exist, it will be followed by a list of things they need to actualize that right. If Israel has a right to exist, they need our bombs. They need our tax dollars. They need our national resources. They need our veto power at the U.N. Their so-called "right to exist" will require something from us for the right to be conferred. Notice that Americans never go around asking other nations if we have a right to exist. That's because we're not trying to bilk them out of anything. (B) The second is that the question is asked so that, if we answer in the affirmative, it means we must overlook or excuse whatever horrendous human rights abuse, illegal activity, or immoral action they want to undertake (or already have) - even if it is to the detriment of the United States. This strategy requires Israel to label everything an existential crisis, with Israel's future existence hanging in the balance. Once something becomes existential, then ethics don't matter. If this is an extinction-level event, then it's not the time to worry about the morality of a matter. Kill women and children? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Murder nine civilian non-combatants for every one terrorist? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Double-tap missile targets, killing aid workers? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Ethnic cleansing in Gaza? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Bomb churches? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Target journalists? Yes, because Israel has the right to exist. Blow up oil fields? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Violate international law? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Because nothing is as important as existing, it's the perfect Get-Out-Of-Having-a-Conscience Free Card for a Desert War Cult that wants to act however it wants with impunity. But there's another reason the question is illegitimate. It's wrongfully open-ended. It's not a complete question. No nation on Earth has a unilateral "right to exist" without qualification; not even the United States. There's got to be an IF on the end of it. Does Israel have a right to exist...if it requires the rest of the world to live on the brink of WWIII? No. Does Israel have a right to exist if it means bankrupting the United States to guarantee its security? No. Does Israel have the right to exist if it means genocide of its neighbors? No. Does Israel have a right to exist if it's acting in constant violation of international law? No. The moment a nation has an unqualified "right to exist" is the moment it can get away with whatever it wants, behave in a way that's detrimental to every other nation on Earth, and can even demand you help facilitating its existence because, after all, it has a "right" to it. Next, logically, we cannot affirm Israel's unilateral "right to exist" over and against the rights of other nations to exist. God Almighty forbids favoritism. He's not a respecter of persons (the Bible says this three times, each time in reference to Jews), and we're forbidden from showing partiality on account of their alleged genetic ancestry. God hates this. It's a sin. If we affirm Israel's "right to exist, " we must by the same measure affirm the right of Iran to exist. And Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Libya, Lebanon, Jordan, the UAE, Iraq, Syria, et al. And I don't feel like it, do you? Sorry. Step out of line, and you get smoked. That goes for Israel, just like it goes for Iran. Further, Israel most emphatically does NOT have a divine right to exist. The Abrahamic Promise of Genesis 12:3 is about Christ, and the recipients, or heirs of that promise, are Christians exclusively. Those who have faith in Jesus are the “heirs of the promise” (Galatians 3:29). The Seed referenced in the promise is Christ, according to Paul, and he very explicitly says that it’s NOT Jews (Galatians 3:16). There is no Covenant blessing or promise obtainable or retainable outside of Christ (2 Corinthians 2:10). Romans 9 says that Jews who reject Christ do not belong to Israel (Romans 9:6-8). Romans 11 says that Jews who reject Christ have been rejected by God and they’ve been broken off from Abraham (Romans 11:17–20). Whatever the Dispensationalists claim in the novel eschatology about the future, doesn't change the fact that they are - as it stands now - cut off from the promises of God until at such time they stop persisting in unbelief. Israel does not have the right to exist on account of an ancient ancestral land deed. Let's presume for a moment that most Israelis aren't more European than they are Middle Eastern. Let's pretend they're more Semitic than the Palestinians who've lived there continually for thousands of years (they aren't). It wouldn't matter if it were true. That's not how the world works. Americans don't have to give back Florida to the Seminole. My ancestors came from the British Isles, but I don't have the right to Buckingham Palace. The land known as Palestine has been inhabited by dozens and DOZENS of people groups over the millennia. Every nation on Earth has previously been inhabited by different people groups than those who live there now. And that means exactly nothing. And if you want to quote the Bible at this point, refer back to the last one. If we're playing by Biblical rules, Palestine belongs to Christ, which means it should be transferred to those who are in Christ, at which point, the Church would happily take it. And finally, it would be foolish and irresponsible for any serious person to answer "Does Israel have a right to exist" in the affirmative, knowing what the Zionists mean when they say "Israel." In their head, they don't mean the strip of land we call Israel. They mean Greater Israel (which is why they refer to the land held by other nations as Judea, or Samaria, or Greater Israel). Their entire national history has been one ambitious land grab after another. Their goal is to occupy practically the entire Middle East, a region currently home to 310 million Muslims. No, we don't want WWIII, thank you very much. And we're not going to affirm your right to exist there. As Christians, there's a bonus reason we should answer that question in the negative. We should be reminded that the current global consensus is that no Christian ethnostate should exist on this planet. That's out of the question for every major international ruling body on Earth. So in a world in which Christians are not allowed to have a Christian ethnostate, there's no good reason we should support a Jewish one. Jesus Christ is the King of Kings. We should not support the "right to exist" of a nation that rejects Jesus in their national charter, which Israel matter-of-factly does. Their entire identity is founded upon their rejection of Jesus as Lord. They ban Jews who believe in Christ from migrating to Israel. They ban public Christian evangelism. They pull the broadcast licenses of Christian TV and radio if they provide programming directed at evangelizing Jews. They're hostile to the indigenous church. They discriminate against Christian in a thousand different ways, none of them secretly. Any Christian who would support the right of a nation to exist that is THAT hostile to our God needs to get their head on straight. Not only should we not support their right to exist, but newsflash: God Almighty also doesn't, either. He does not embrace a nation that rejects His Son. Reject Christ, reject God (Luke 10:16). Reject God, be rejected by God (2 Chronicles 5:2). Does Israel have a right to exist? The short answer is no. The long answer is noooooooo. It doesn't. That does not mean - for the record - that Jews don't have a right to exist, any more or less than any other human has such a right. But their nation-state? Their body-politic? Their collective civic identity? No, it doesn't. And that's the only answer this side of common sense.

Your question is where in Catholic doctrine it says you can’t support a Jewish ethnostate. Great question. I’m a Protestant, but I’ll happily explain Romanist doctrine on the issue of Zionism, because it’s the same as mine. In fact, it’s the one thing that Catholics and Protestants and Orthodox have all agreed on since the beginning, Chiefly, it’s this: There are no Covenant blessings or promises received outside of Christ. In other words, it’s that Jews don’t receive gold stars or special brownie points on account of their ethnic ancestry. It’s that God is not a respecter of persons. And it’s the time-treasured doctrine of the Exclusivity of Christ. To put it simply: No Jesus, no blessings. The reason is clear. Galatians 3 says that the promise made to Abraham is not about the Jews, but about Jesus. Further, it teaches that God no longer hands out blessings by the categories of “Jew and Gentile,” and says that only those with faith in Jesus are “heirs of the promise.” Christian Zionism holds that Jews are heirs of the “Abrahamic Promise” in Genesis 12:3 (which includes the “bless those that bless thee” and an ancient land deed). In order for that to be so, Galatians 3 must be ripped out of the Bible and used as toilet paper. For literal millennial, Roman Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, and Reformed Protestants have refused to do so, So while Jews have the same rights as anyone else, they don’t have more. Christians don’t get a religious ethnostate; the entire world would oppose it. So, why do Jews? The Bible couldn’t be clearer that God isn’t a respecter of persons. In other words, Jews aren’t special. Full stop. If they can pull it off, good for them. Congrats. But that does not mean that Christians have a responsibility to underwrite, protect, or defend a nation whose entire identity is wrapped up in their wholesale rejection of our God. Jesus said that if we reject him, He will reject us to the Father. That being true, there is no religious obligation on the part of Christians to serve as a protectorate for the people whose religion was founded by the Pharisees, and who to this day, continue to reject our God. This is why when Theodore Herzl, the Father of Zionism, asked Pope Pius X to support a Jewish ethnostate, the pope told him to pound sand. Technically he said: “We cannot prevent the Jews from going to Jerusalem, but we could never sanction it… The Jews have not recognized our Lord, therefore we cannot recognize them.” That’s why the Vatican was the last religious body on earth to acknowledge the existence of Israel (1993), and didn’t confirm their so-called “right to exist” undergo the goyim humiliation ritual at the Western Wall until 2000. But none of that suggests a religious claim, or an embrace of the idea that Jews retain a covenant with God apart from Christ, or that a Christian is obligated to provide them material support for their national agenda, which is often at direct odds with Christian teaching. Great question. Glad you asked it.

@Lukewearechange To force morale to improve obviously

why are we bombing power plants?

Did You Know: The 28 Pages show that two 9/11 hijackers tied to Saudi intelligence rented a room from an FBI informant in California before the 2001 attacks The Director of the FBI kept this covered up for years His name? Robert Mueller

@YearUsual @Rainmaker1973 Good guess but actual mathematical calculations and real-world experiments prove otherwise.

@Photrum @Rainmaker1973 Incorrect. "Rapid, immediate acceleration generally reaches a destination faster than constant, gradual acceleration over the same distance. This is because a higher initial acceleration increases the average velocity of the journey more quickly..."

Best example for why ups and downs are important in life

@JoshuaLisec @ItIsHoeMath @ThruTheHayes @Ofer_binshtok Judeo/Christian is an unequal yoke of heretical mixture. What alliance does light have with dark or christ with antichrist?

@ItIsHoeMath @ThruTheHayes @Ofer_binshtok Jews and Whites find ourselves on the same side set against the red-green-brown alliance. Sooner we all realize that, the better.

If and when a war breaks out in the future between Muslims and non-Muslims on British soil, who will the internal security forces, the police, MI5, MI6, and the army stand with? Who will the King and the British government stand with?

@Jordan163535 @BasedTorba Actually this makes them unhappy because it robs them of hundreds of thousands in interest payments. Just try it, the resistance and feigned confusion on their part is extreme. They do not want you to pay off your house.

@BasedTorba Oh, and make sure to pay down your mortgage first to make the bankers happy!

“Just ignore the fact that your nation, culture, and people are being destroyed and certainly don’t name the people responsible. Instead focus on being the best version of you that you can be—and clean your room!”

@_Petruchio @BasedTorba I dont get it

@Photrum @BasedTorba The current state of that family

@_Petruchio @BasedTorba What in the heck is this?

BREAKING NEWS: First-in-the-World IVERMECTIN, Mebendazole and Fenbendazole Protocol for CANCER has been peer-reviewed and published! I am seeing our paper everywhere recently, the NEWS is spreading! 😃 BIG PHARMA attacked our Fenbendazole paper on three Stage 4 Cancer patients who are now Cancer Free, but it will be resubmitted and published soon! I have been attacked recently by Canadian authorities for my revolutionary Cancer research and work, but... a NEW FLORIDA CANCER CLINIC is coming soon!🙏 Thank you all for your ongoing support!! 😃 God Bless you all and God bless those who are fighting Cancer...

Mr President, Do not! Please! Do not put a detachment ashore in Iran. Every wargame ends badly for the invasion force, Iran’s civilians, and the world's economy. It is a quagmire without end. Call victory and leave.

This is insane. Regime change will result in a bloody civil war, killing hundreds of thousands and creating another massive Muslim refugee crisis. Topping a leader is NEVER as easy you think. It almost always results in further involvement, a civil war, and chaos. Resist this!

Its sad this BS works on the weak minded. I guess it's sad there are so many weak minded that this BS works on. The lies they tell young soldiers to get buy-in definitely makes them feel special. Special enough to die for the lie. The simple-minded cant grasp the grift that costs lives. Its not honorable to die for a lie, its embarrassing.

They bury the Dad’s full quote at the end of the article. And they REALLY buried the lede. “Simmons recalled something his son had told him before volunteering for the mission that ended his life. “He said, ‘Dad, I can’t give you any details, but if civilians knew what we knew, a lot of the criticism [of the war] would cease,” he said. Simmons came away from Dover with a better impression of the war’s architects than he had when he arrived. Trump teared up and hugged him, evincing warmth and compassion at odds with the president’s public persona, Simmons said. He also credited Trump for looking him “straight in the eye.” “He extended his condolences father to father and conveyed how difficult it is to make decisions to put the children of other parents in peril,” Simmons said. As for Hegseth, “When I talked to him, I got the impression that he was torn because he seemed to be a very compassionate man, faced with difficult decisions as it pertains to war,” Simmons said. “I also let him know that Tyler was my only son. And you could see the emotion on his face. And I think those kinds of things you can’t fake,” he continued. “I was pleasantly surprised because the perception is they [Trump and Hegseth] don’t care, they’re going to do what they want to do,” he said. “I got to see a different side of them up close and personal.”

@AmericaWarNews @sungleeiq Jump in a boat and sell drinking water to the ships for huge profits

@sungleeiq Jump into a life boat and go to shore. Before you die for the lack of fresh drinking water.

@JimWalshLD19 @sethyyt @votejohnbraun What are you saying, Jim?

@sethyyt @votejohnbraun Sometimes high-quality candidates listen to low-quality advice. Tragedy, that.

JHB always was more conservative than Joe. This should serve as a lesson to WA GOP, candidate quality matters. Good thing we have @votejohnbraun to win it back for us.

@HeatherKaiserWA Heather im connected to quite a network of Patriots around Vancouver and we all have a huge amount of respect for Joe for this rare display of integrity in top leadership.

.