๐™ป๐š’๐š•๐š’ โ˜ญ

533 posts

๐™ป๐š’๐š•๐š’ โ˜ญ banner
๐™ป๐š’๐š•๐š’ โ˜ญ

๐™ป๐š’๐š•๐š’ โ˜ญ

@Plus_Lilith

she/her, Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist, still educating myself. Marxists' rhetoric should serve the education of the proletariat not ones reactionary tendencies

Beigetreten Nisan 2026
87 Folgt106 Follower
Angehefteter Tweet
๐™ป๐š’๐š•๐š’ โ˜ญ
"The attitude of a political party towards its own mistakes is one of the most important and surest ways of judging how earnest the party is and how it in practice fulfils its obligation towards its class and the toiling masses." V.I. Lenin Left Wing Communism
English
0
6
28
1.2K
๐™ป๐š’๐š•๐š’ โ˜ญ retweetet
mira king ๐Ÿ”ปโ›๏ธ
@AprilsBooks theres a ton of us that do not have an option for mental labor and marxists should have some base level of respect (many carpet walker chauvinists do not) for manual labor. the contradiction between manual and mental labor is presently non antagonistic, but it doesnt mean that 1/
English
2
1
17
581
๐™ป๐š’๐š•๐š’ โ˜ญ
@GokuComrade the intelligentsia are wage labourers and proletariat. This only changes if they own capital. Which some do but not all. Of course there's a difference between mental and physical laborer's this does not make the mental worker petit-bourgeoise.
English
1
0
0
8
๐™ป๐š’๐š•๐š’ โ˜ญ
I also agree with their point that there needs to be more organization within blue-collar labour instead of the intelligentsia. The USA is in dire need of organized labour outside of the very few yellow unions
English
1
0
0
37
๐™ป๐š’๐š•๐š’ โ˜ญ
professors are not inherently petit-bourgeois this is a failure to give actual nuance and correct analysis for the sake of quips. Some* professors are but this is only if they leverage their expertise to create books but this is not exclusive to them nor other skilled labourers
English
2
1
141
2.9K
๐™ป๐š’๐š•๐š’ โ˜ญ
@jizzeringjezza there is a difference in these. I never once disagreed that the intelligentsia under capitalism upholds capitalism. I would consider all labour aristocrats and only some are actually petit-bourgeoisie.
English
2
0
1
91
๐™ป๐š’๐š•๐š’ โ˜ญ retweetet
Punch Cat
Punch Cat@PunchingCatยท
ZXX
52
3.1K
23.5K
295K
๐™ป๐š’๐š•๐š’ โ˜ญ retweetet
Abhinav
Abhinav@abhinav999911ยท
@Fan8824 Thank you for the words of wisdom mr Khrushchev
English
0
1
6
466
๐™ป๐š’๐š•๐š’ โ˜ญ
@SunGodNika1914 they can been seen similarly to police unions which are used to keep the proletariats within these jobs from resisting capitalism by appeasing them. In this they are labour aristocrats but this does not make them bourgeoise
English
0
0
12
486
๐™ป๐š’๐š•๐š’ โ˜ญ
@SunGodNika1914 i didnt mean to keep that last sentence. To expand to stop confusion, many of the things which confuses OP are caused by Union effort and the betterment in treatment for the proletariat. Although atleast in the USA teacher unions have become yellow unions and tools of capitalism.
English
1
0
23
562