Angehefteter Tweet
๐ป๐๐๐ โญ
533 posts

๐ป๐๐๐ โญ
@Plus_Lilith
she/her, Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist, still educating myself. Marxists' rhetoric should serve the education of the proletariat not ones reactionary tendencies
Beigetreten Nisan 2026
87 Folgt106 Follower
๐ป๐๐๐ โญ retweetet

@AprilsBooks theres a ton of us that do not have an option for mental labor and marxists should have some base level of respect (many carpet walker chauvinists do not) for manual labor. the contradiction between manual and mental labor is presently non antagonistic, but it doesnt mean that 1/
English

@vvorm__ @ReverendRunt bourgeois in ideology not in class character. OP was deliberately speaking on class character
English

โProfessors are petit bourgeoisโ

๐@SwampCommunist
Hes a professor, he was already petit-bourgeois without the tenants
Franรงais
๐ป๐๐๐ โญ retweetet

The Hunger Games Trilogy so he knows what real revolutionary literature looks like.
ape attack survivor@pissvortex
If you could revive Karl Marx with Juche necromancy but could only give him 3 books to catch him up to speed what are you choosing
English

@GokuComrade The intelligentsia are petit-bourgeois in ideology and they serve as a tool to serve capitalism while under capitalism, but this does not equate to class relations.
English

@GokuComrade the intelligentsia are wage labourers and proletariat. This only changes if they own capital. Which some do but not all. Of course there's a difference between mental and physical laborer's this does not make the mental worker petit-bourgeoise.
English

@GokuComrade Literal second section of the principles of communism.
English

People are being dumb in my comments. Teachers are not inherently good in 97% of cases they uphold capitalism. The issue is the incorrect analysis and generalization. Being negative towards the intelligentsia isn't entirely wrong.
๐ป๐๐๐ โญ@Plus_Lilith
English

@jizzeringjezza They bring up their disagreeing with the concept of a labour aristocracy in a comment under their post, so I inferred they meant class character. Sorry if I came off argumentative
English

@Plus_Lilith That reads as a pretty standard attack against academia, is the thing. I don't want to get into a back and forth, really.
x.com/SwampCommunistโฆ
๐@SwampCommunist
Hes a professor, he was already petit-bourgeois without the tenants
English


@jizzeringjezza the majority of the intelligentsia* some may differ but this is not nearly as likely
English

@jizzeringjezza there is a difference in these. I never once disagreed that the intelligentsia under capitalism upholds capitalism. I would consider all labour aristocrats and only some are actually petit-bourgeoisie.
English
๐ป๐๐๐ โญ retweetet
๐ป๐๐๐ โญ retweetet

@SunGodNika1914 they can been seen similarly to police unions which are used to keep the proletariats within these jobs from resisting capitalism by appeasing them. In this they are labour aristocrats but this does not make them bourgeoise
English

@SunGodNika1914 i didnt mean to keep that last sentence. To expand to stop confusion, many of the things which confuses OP are caused by Union effort and the betterment in treatment for the proletariat. Although atleast in the USA teacher unions have become yellow unions and tools of capitalism.
English







